Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand

A good water users’ organization (WUO) is a significant factor in the practical success of an irrigation project. The major duties of WUOs are to operate and maintain their irrigation facilities and to perform the financial and organizational management. This paper analyzes the history and present s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paddy and water environment 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.227-237
Hauptverfasser: Teamsuwan, Vipob, Satoh, Masayoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 3
container_start_page 227
container_title Paddy and water environment
container_volume 7
creator Teamsuwan, Vipob
Satoh, Masayoshi
description A good water users’ organization (WUO) is a significant factor in the practical success of an irrigation project. The major duties of WUOs are to operate and maintain their irrigation facilities and to perform the financial and organizational management. This paper analyzes the history and present situation of three WUOs in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand which have been awarded for their successful activities: namely, two pilot integrated water user groups (IWUGs) and one pilot water users’ association. The results of a field survey and questionnaire revealed the users’ past experience, methods of irrigation management, and social mobilization efforts. The main results of our analysis are as follows: (1) among the three WUOs, only the IWUG Sao Hi Unity Agriculture Irrigation (IWUG SHUAI) can be regarded as a successful case in terms of long-term management, (2) as a pumping irrigation project, the IWUG SHUAI entails an upfront electricity cost, which gives farmers added impetus to organize a management system and budget, and to learn from past failures, and (3) in contrast, the member farmers in the gravity irrigation projects lack the impetus to realize the necessity of a common management budget, a situation which can be improved only by the education of the leaders and clear explanation to the member farmers.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21254203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891980511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-2e935f20c824524fdebdbb5115821536ff82f03e988115d33f6905fca5b3cde43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9qGzEQh0VIII6TB8hN9NBTt9Hftba34rRpwJAckrOQtSN7w-7K1ewmuFDIa-T1-iSRcUshkNPMiO8bxPwIOefsM2dsdoGcSSkLxqqC8dIU5oBMeMl5ITRTh_96VbFjcoL4wJiYKckn5Pc8dhuX3NA8AnW9a7fYII2BdnlYQQf9sJuGdQKgT26AREeEhH-eX2hMK9c3v7Ibe_xCcfQeEMPYUu8QkDZ99oDO1y7S23VyW0cvoR3cJ3q3dk3r-vqUHAXXIpz9rVNy__3b3fxHsbi5up5_XRRecTEUAiqpg2DeCKWFCjUs6-VSc66N4FqWIRgRmITKmPxWSxnKiungnV5KX4OSU_Jxv3eT4s8RcLBdgx7a_AeII1rBhVYiX3BKPrwBH-KY8ll2zEyaiqsyQ3wP-RQREwS7SU3n0tZyZndp2H0aNqdhd2lYkx2xdzCz_QrS_8XvS6-y0Y6Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217389146</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Teamsuwan, Vipob ; Satoh, Masayoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Teamsuwan, Vipob ; Satoh, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><description>A good water users’ organization (WUO) is a significant factor in the practical success of an irrigation project. The major duties of WUOs are to operate and maintain their irrigation facilities and to perform the financial and organizational management. This paper analyzes the history and present situation of three WUOs in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand which have been awarded for their successful activities: namely, two pilot integrated water user groups (IWUGs) and one pilot water users’ association. The results of a field survey and questionnaire revealed the users’ past experience, methods of irrigation management, and social mobilization efforts. The main results of our analysis are as follows: (1) among the three WUOs, only the IWUG Sao Hi Unity Agriculture Irrigation (IWUG SHUAI) can be regarded as a successful case in terms of long-term management, (2) as a pumping irrigation project, the IWUG SHUAI entails an upfront electricity cost, which gives farmers added impetus to organize a management system and budget, and to learn from past failures, and (3) in contrast, the member farmers in the gravity irrigation projects lack the impetus to realize the necessity of a common management budget, a situation which can be improved only by the education of the leaders and clear explanation to the member farmers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1611-2490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-2504</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Associations ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Ecotoxicology ; Farmers ; Freshwater ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Irrigation ; Life Sciences ; Rice ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Water management ; Water resources management ; Water users</subject><ispartof>Paddy and water environment, 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.227-237</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-2e935f20c824524fdebdbb5115821536ff82f03e988115d33f6905fca5b3cde43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-2e935f20c824524fdebdbb5115821536ff82f03e988115d33f6905fca5b3cde43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teamsuwan, Vipob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand</title><title>Paddy and water environment</title><addtitle>Paddy Water Environ</addtitle><description>A good water users’ organization (WUO) is a significant factor in the practical success of an irrigation project. The major duties of WUOs are to operate and maintain their irrigation facilities and to perform the financial and organizational management. This paper analyzes the history and present situation of three WUOs in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand which have been awarded for their successful activities: namely, two pilot integrated water user groups (IWUGs) and one pilot water users’ association. The results of a field survey and questionnaire revealed the users’ past experience, methods of irrigation management, and social mobilization efforts. The main results of our analysis are as follows: (1) among the three WUOs, only the IWUG Sao Hi Unity Agriculture Irrigation (IWUG SHUAI) can be regarded as a successful case in terms of long-term management, (2) as a pumping irrigation project, the IWUG SHUAI entails an upfront electricity cost, which gives farmers added impetus to organize a management system and budget, and to learn from past failures, and (3) in contrast, the member farmers in the gravity irrigation projects lack the impetus to realize the necessity of a common management budget, a situation which can be improved only by the education of the leaders and clear explanation to the member farmers.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water users</subject><issn>1611-2490</issn><issn>1611-2504</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9qGzEQh0VIII6TB8hN9NBTt9Hftba34rRpwJAckrOQtSN7w-7K1ewmuFDIa-T1-iSRcUshkNPMiO8bxPwIOefsM2dsdoGcSSkLxqqC8dIU5oBMeMl5ITRTh_96VbFjcoL4wJiYKckn5Pc8dhuX3NA8AnW9a7fYII2BdnlYQQf9sJuGdQKgT26AREeEhH-eX2hMK9c3v7Ibe_xCcfQeEMPYUu8QkDZ99oDO1y7S23VyW0cvoR3cJ3q3dk3r-vqUHAXXIpz9rVNy__3b3fxHsbi5up5_XRRecTEUAiqpg2DeCKWFCjUs6-VSc66N4FqWIRgRmITKmPxWSxnKiungnV5KX4OSU_Jxv3eT4s8RcLBdgx7a_AeII1rBhVYiX3BKPrwBH-KY8ll2zEyaiqsyQ3wP-RQREwS7SU3n0tZyZndp2H0aNqdhd2lYkx2xdzCz_QrS_8XvS6-y0Y6Z</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Teamsuwan, Vipob</creator><creator>Satoh, Masayoshi</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand</title><author>Teamsuwan, Vipob ; Satoh, Masayoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-2e935f20c824524fdebdbb5115821536ff82f03e988115d33f6905fca5b3cde43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water users</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teamsuwan, Vipob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satoh, Masayoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teamsuwan, Vipob</au><au>Satoh, Masayoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand</atitle><jtitle>Paddy and water environment</jtitle><stitle>Paddy Water Environ</stitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>227-237</pages><issn>1611-2490</issn><eissn>1611-2504</eissn><abstract>A good water users’ organization (WUO) is a significant factor in the practical success of an irrigation project. The major duties of WUOs are to operate and maintain their irrigation facilities and to perform the financial and organizational management. This paper analyzes the history and present situation of three WUOs in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand which have been awarded for their successful activities: namely, two pilot integrated water user groups (IWUGs) and one pilot water users’ association. The results of a field survey and questionnaire revealed the users’ past experience, methods of irrigation management, and social mobilization efforts. The main results of our analysis are as follows: (1) among the three WUOs, only the IWUG Sao Hi Unity Agriculture Irrigation (IWUG SHUAI) can be regarded as a successful case in terms of long-term management, (2) as a pumping irrigation project, the IWUG SHUAI entails an upfront electricity cost, which gives farmers added impetus to organize a management system and budget, and to learn from past failures, and (3) in contrast, the member farmers in the gravity irrigation projects lack the impetus to realize the necessity of a common management budget, a situation which can be improved only by the education of the leaders and clear explanation to the member farmers.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1611-2490
ispartof Paddy and water environment, 2009-09, Vol.7 (3), p.227-237
issn 1611-2490
1611-2504
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21254203
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agricultural production
Agriculture
Associations
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Ecotoxicology
Farmers
Freshwater
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hydrogeology
Hydrology/Water Resources
Irrigation
Life Sciences
Rice
Soil Science & Conservation
Water management
Water resources management
Water users
title Comparative analysis of management of three water users’ organizations: successful cases in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A21%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20management%20of%20three%20water%20users%E2%80%99%20organizations:%20successful%20cases%20in%20the%20Chao%20Phraya%20Delta,%20Thailand&rft.jtitle=Paddy%20and%20water%20environment&rft.au=Teamsuwan,%20Vipob&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=227-237&rft.issn=1611-2490&rft.eissn=1611-2504&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10333-009-0168-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1891980511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217389146&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true