Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results

In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine 2018-10, Vol.165 (6), p.734-740
Hauptverfasser: Bezmaternykh, D. D., Mel’nikov, M. E., Kozlova, L. I., Shtark, M. B., Savelov, A. A., Petrovskii, E. D., Shubina, O. S., Natarova, K. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 740
container_issue 6
container_start_page 734
container_title Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine
container_volume 165
creator Bezmaternykh, D. D.
Mel’nikov, M. E.
Kozlova, L. I.
Shtark, M. B.
Savelov, A. A.
Petrovskii, E. D.
Shubina, O. S.
Natarova, K. A.
description In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2125308186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124336161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d7bb8699ce3f9d9871317166c55d851d60c656b23cb44d07735a1f52bedd66cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrj0ktZjx46XW9lSWqkIqQWukWNPtlllncV2irav0pfF6S4gIXGyZ-ab_5f9E_IG2AkwVp1GYBKqgoEuSi7L4uEZmYGsRKE5h-dkxjJUlFrrA3IY42oqmYKX5EAwIYUoxYw8Xozepm7wpqeLwXvMxX2XtnRo6YdgOk9vcJnHkZ5ZOwTX-SVNQ27GNF1vk0lI2883V-_pede2GNBbjLTB9BPR00s0fbrbUuMdPcdNwBjR0duxWWWj-NT-bkJnmq7fm6Y7nNTHPsVX5EVr-oiv9-cR-Xbx8evisrj-8ulqcXZdWMHLVLiqabSazy2Kdu7mugIBFShlpXRaglPMKqkaLmxTlo5VlZAGWskbdC5TrTgixzvdTRh-jPll9bqLFvveeBzGWHPgUjANWmX03T_oahhD_rwnqhRCgYJMwY6yYYgxYFtvQrc2YVsDq6fk6l1ydU6unpKrH_LO273y2KzR_dn4HVUG-A6IeeSXGP5a_1_1Fw5OpUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124336161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Bezmaternykh, D. D. ; Mel’nikov, M. E. ; Kozlova, L. I. ; Shtark, M. B. ; Savelov, A. A. ; Petrovskii, E. D. ; Shubina, O. S. ; Natarova, K. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bezmaternykh, D. D. ; Mel’nikov, M. E. ; Kozlova, L. I. ; Shtark, M. B. ; Savelov, A. A. ; Petrovskii, E. D. ; Shubina, O. S. ; Natarova, K. A.</creatorcontrib><description>In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8221</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30353343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics and Biochemistry ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - physiology ; Brain - physiopathology ; Brain mapping ; Brain Mapping - methods ; Brain stem ; Cell Biology ; Cerebellum ; Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging ; Depression - physiopathology ; Frontal Lobe - diagnostic imaging ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Internal Medicine ; Intraparietal sulcus ; Laboratory Medicine ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mental depression ; Neural networks ; Operculum ; Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging ; Pathology ; Receptive field ; Reproducibility of Results ; Temporal cortex</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2018-10, Vol.165 (6), p.734-740</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d7bb8699ce3f9d9871317166c55d851d60c656b23cb44d07735a1f52bedd66cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bezmaternykh, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mel’nikov, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlova, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtark, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovskii, E. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shubina, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarova, K. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results</title><title>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><description>In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics and Biochemistry</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain mapping</subject><subject>Brain Mapping - methods</subject><subject>Brain stem</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cerebellum</subject><subject>Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Depression - physiopathology</subject><subject>Frontal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intraparietal sulcus</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Operculum</subject><subject>Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Receptive field</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Temporal cortex</subject><issn>0007-4888</issn><issn>1573-8221</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EotvCA3BBlrj0ktZjx46XW9lSWqkIqQWukWNPtlllncV2irav0pfF6S4gIXGyZ-ab_5f9E_IG2AkwVp1GYBKqgoEuSi7L4uEZmYGsRKE5h-dkxjJUlFrrA3IY42oqmYKX5EAwIYUoxYw8Xozepm7wpqeLwXvMxX2XtnRo6YdgOk9vcJnHkZ5ZOwTX-SVNQ27GNF1vk0lI2883V-_pede2GNBbjLTB9BPR00s0fbrbUuMdPcdNwBjR0duxWWWj-NT-bkJnmq7fm6Y7nNTHPsVX5EVr-oiv9-cR-Xbx8evisrj-8ulqcXZdWMHLVLiqabSazy2Kdu7mugIBFShlpXRaglPMKqkaLmxTlo5VlZAGWskbdC5TrTgixzvdTRh-jPll9bqLFvveeBzGWHPgUjANWmX03T_oahhD_rwnqhRCgYJMwY6yYYgxYFtvQrc2YVsDq6fk6l1ydU6unpKrH_LO273y2KzR_dn4HVUG-A6IeeSXGP5a_1_1Fw5OpUw</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Bezmaternykh, D. D.</creator><creator>Mel’nikov, M. E.</creator><creator>Kozlova, L. I.</creator><creator>Shtark, M. B.</creator><creator>Savelov, A. A.</creator><creator>Petrovskii, E. D.</creator><creator>Shubina, O. S.</creator><creator>Natarova, K. A.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results</title><author>Bezmaternykh, D. D. ; Mel’nikov, M. E. ; Kozlova, L. I. ; Shtark, M. B. ; Savelov, A. A. ; Petrovskii, E. D. ; Shubina, O. S. ; Natarova, K. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-d7bb8699ce3f9d9871317166c55d851d60c656b23cb44d07735a1f52bedd66cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics and Biochemistry</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain mapping</topic><topic>Brain Mapping - methods</topic><topic>Brain stem</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cerebellum</topic><topic>Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Depression - physiopathology</topic><topic>Frontal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intraparietal sulcus</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Operculum</topic><topic>Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Receptive field</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Temporal cortex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bezmaternykh, D. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mel’nikov, M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlova, L. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtark, M. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelov, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrovskii, E. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shubina, O. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarova, K. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bezmaternykh, D. D.</au><au>Mel’nikov, M. E.</au><au>Kozlova, L. I.</au><au>Shtark, M. B.</au><au>Savelov, A. A.</au><au>Petrovskii, E. D.</au><au>Shubina, O. S.</au><au>Natarova, K. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine</jtitle><stitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</stitle><addtitle>Bull Exp Biol Med</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>734</spage><epage>740</epage><pages>734-740</pages><issn>0007-4888</issn><eissn>1573-8221</eissn><abstract>In depressed patients, changes in spontaneous brain activity, in particular, the strength of functional connectivity between different regions are observed. The data on changes in the synchrony of different regions of interest in the brain can serve as markers of depressive symptoms and as the targets for the corresponding therapy. The study involved 21 patients with mild depression and 21 healthy volunteers; by the time of second fMRI scanning, 15 and 19 subjects, respectively). The subjects underwent two 4-min sessions of resting state fMRI with 2-4 months interval between the recordings; on the basis of these data, functional connectivity between regions of interest was assessed. During the first session, depressed patients demonstrated more pronounced connection between the right frontal eye field and cerebellar area III. When the sample was restricted to subjects who underwent both fMRI sessions, depressed patients demonstrated closer relations of the right parietal operculum and cerebellar vermis area VIII. During the second recording, healthy subjects showed stronger connectivity between more than 20 frontal, temporal, and subcortical regions of interest and cerebellum area II. In healthy participants, brainstem functional interactions increased from the first to the second fMRI-recording. In depressed subjects a number of cortical areas split from left intraparietal sulcus, but the left temporal cortex became more intra-connected. The results confirm the differences in functional connectivity between depressed and healthy subjects. At the same time, attention should be paid to the variability of the data obtained.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30353343</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-4888
ispartof Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2018-10, Vol.165 (6), p.734-740
issn 0007-4888
1573-8221
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2125308186
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biophysics and Biochemistry
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - physiology
Brain - physiopathology
Brain mapping
Brain Mapping - methods
Brain stem
Cell Biology
Cerebellum
Cerebellum - diagnostic imaging
Depression - physiopathology
Frontal Lobe - diagnostic imaging
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Internal Medicine
Intraparietal sulcus
Laboratory Medicine
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mental depression
Neural networks
Operculum
Parietal Lobe - diagnostic imaging
Pathology
Receptive field
Reproducibility of Results
Temporal cortex
title Functional Connectivity of Brain Regions According to Resting State fMRI: Differences between Healthy and Depressed Subjects and Variability of the Results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Connectivity%20of%20Brain%20Regions%20According%20to%20Resting%20State%20fMRI:%20Differences%20between%20Healthy%20and%20Depressed%20Subjects%20and%20Variability%20of%20the%20Results&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20experimental%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Bezmaternykh,%20D.%20D.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=734&rft.epage=740&rft.pages=734-740&rft.issn=0007-4888&rft.eissn=1573-8221&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10517-018-4254-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2124336161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124336161&rft_id=info:pmid/30353343&rfr_iscdi=true