Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis
Accurate grading for prostatic carcinoma in pathological images is important to prognosis and treatment planning. Since human grading is always time-consuming and subjective, this paper presents a computer-aided system to automatically grade pathological images according to Gleason grading system wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2009-07, Vol.28 (7), p.1037-1050 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1050 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1037 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on medical imaging |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Huang, Po-Whei Lee, Cheng-Hsiung |
description | Accurate grading for prostatic carcinoma in pathological images is important to prognosis and treatment planning. Since human grading is always time-consuming and subjective, this paper presents a computer-aided system to automatically grade pathological images according to Gleason grading system which is the most widespread method for histological grading of prostate tissues. We proposed two feature extraction methods based on fractal dimension to analyze variations of intensity and texture complexity in regions of interest. Each image can be classified into an appropriate grade by using Bayesian, k -NN, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, respectively. Leave-one-out and k -fold cross-validation procedures were used to estimate the correct classification rates (CCR). Experimental results show that 91.2%, 93.7%, and 93.7% CCR can be achieved by Bayesian, k -NN, and SVM classifiers, respectively, for a set of 205 pathological prostate images. If our fractal-based feature set is optimized by the sequential floating forward selection method, the CCR can be promoted up to 94.6%, 94.2%, and 94.6%, respectively, using each of the above three classifiers. Experimental results also show that our feature set is better than the feature sets extracted from multiwavelets, Gabor filters, and gray-level co-occurrence matrix methods because it has a much smaller size and still keeps the most powerful discriminating capability in grading prostate images. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TMI.2009.2012704 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21243705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4752738</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>21243705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-9edbcd267e27b3b1ee2dd7b84efc3a5cb9d9740f60ca5f9f791777df97ceb0e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmBRGppt0nugUEwPTS5OR59jHbdLky6kJNAUcjOyPEod7FVi2Yf8-2rZpYUe0ouEpGcGMS9jJxzOOQf7-fb7-lwA2LxwgaBesQXXuiqFVnev2QIEViWAEYfsbUoPAFxpsG_YIbfcKKjEgv1YzlMc3NT5YtW7lLrQ-XyKmyLEsbhx06_Yx_t81xc3Y0yTm6hYD-6eUvHFJWqLLC9G56cMlhvXP6cuHbOD4PpE7_b7Eft58fV29a28ur5cr5ZXpddgptJS2_hWGCSBjWw4kWhbbCpFwUunfWNbiwqCAe90sAEtR8Q2WPTUABl5xE53fR_H-DRTmuqhS5763m0ozqmuDKKUKEWWn16UBpUQlar-CwUXSiLoDM9ehNwg37Y0NtOP_9CHOI95VvmHGpUWhkNGsEM-TzmNFOrHsRvc-FxzqLdZ1znrept1vc86l3zY952bgdq_BftwM3i_Ax0R_XlWqAXKSv4Gavusrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857452610</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Huang, Po-Whei ; Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Po-Whei ; Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate grading for prostatic carcinoma in pathological images is important to prognosis and treatment planning. Since human grading is always time-consuming and subjective, this paper presents a computer-aided system to automatically grade pathological images according to Gleason grading system which is the most widespread method for histological grading of prostate tissues. We proposed two feature extraction methods based on fractal dimension to analyze variations of intensity and texture complexity in regions of interest. Each image can be classified into an appropriate grade by using Bayesian, k -NN, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, respectively. Leave-one-out and k -fold cross-validation procedures were used to estimate the correct classification rates (CCR). Experimental results show that 91.2%, 93.7%, and 93.7% CCR can be achieved by Bayesian, k -NN, and SVM classifiers, respectively, for a set of 205 pathological prostate images. If our fractal-based feature set is optimized by the sequential floating forward selection method, the CCR can be promoted up to 94.6%, 94.2%, and 94.6%, respectively, using each of the above three classifiers. Experimental results also show that our feature set is better than the feature sets extracted from multiwavelets, Gabor filters, and gray-level co-occurrence matrix methods because it has a much smaller size and still keeps the most powerful discriminating capability in grading prostate images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-254X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2012704</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19164082</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITMID4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial Intelligence ; Bayes Theorem ; Bayesian methods ; Classification ; Classifiers ; Evaluation ; Feature extraction ; Fractal analysis ; fractal dimension ; Fractals ; Gleason grading ; Histocytochemistry - methods ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Image texture analysis ; Male ; Microscopy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Path planning ; Pathology ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Prostate ; prostate image ; prostatic carcinoma ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Quality ; Reproducibility of Results ; Studies ; Support vector machine classification ; Support vector machines ; Texture</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2009-07, Vol.28 (7), p.1037-1050</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2009</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-9edbcd267e27b3b1ee2dd7b84efc3a5cb9d9740f60ca5f9f791777df97ceb0e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-9edbcd267e27b3b1ee2dd7b84efc3a5cb9d9740f60ca5f9f791777df97ceb0e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4752738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27922,27923,54756</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4752738$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19164082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Po-Whei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis</title><title>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</title><addtitle>TMI</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><description>Accurate grading for prostatic carcinoma in pathological images is important to prognosis and treatment planning. Since human grading is always time-consuming and subjective, this paper presents a computer-aided system to automatically grade pathological images according to Gleason grading system which is the most widespread method for histological grading of prostate tissues. We proposed two feature extraction methods based on fractal dimension to analyze variations of intensity and texture complexity in regions of interest. Each image can be classified into an appropriate grade by using Bayesian, k -NN, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, respectively. Leave-one-out and k -fold cross-validation procedures were used to estimate the correct classification rates (CCR). Experimental results show that 91.2%, 93.7%, and 93.7% CCR can be achieved by Bayesian, k -NN, and SVM classifiers, respectively, for a set of 205 pathological prostate images. If our fractal-based feature set is optimized by the sequential floating forward selection method, the CCR can be promoted up to 94.6%, 94.2%, and 94.6%, respectively, using each of the above three classifiers. Experimental results also show that our feature set is better than the feature sets extracted from multiwavelets, Gabor filters, and gray-level co-occurrence matrix methods because it has a much smaller size and still keeps the most powerful discriminating capability in grading prostate images.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bayesian methods</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classifiers</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Fractal analysis</subject><subject>fractal dimension</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Gleason grading</subject><subject>Histocytochemistry - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image texture analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Path planning</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>prostate image</subject><subject>prostatic carcinoma</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Support vector machine classification</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Texture</subject><issn>0278-0062</issn><issn>1558-254X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1r3DAQBmBRGppt0nugUEwPTS5OR59jHbdLky6kJNAUcjOyPEod7FVi2Yf8-2rZpYUe0ouEpGcGMS9jJxzOOQf7-fb7-lwA2LxwgaBesQXXuiqFVnev2QIEViWAEYfsbUoPAFxpsG_YIbfcKKjEgv1YzlMc3NT5YtW7lLrQ-XyKmyLEsbhx06_Yx_t81xc3Y0yTm6hYD-6eUvHFJWqLLC9G56cMlhvXP6cuHbOD4PpE7_b7Eft58fV29a28ur5cr5ZXpddgptJS2_hWGCSBjWw4kWhbbCpFwUunfWNbiwqCAe90sAEtR8Q2WPTUABl5xE53fR_H-DRTmuqhS5763m0ozqmuDKKUKEWWn16UBpUQlar-CwUXSiLoDM9ehNwg37Y0NtOP_9CHOI95VvmHGpUWhkNGsEM-TzmNFOrHsRvc-FxzqLdZ1znrept1vc86l3zY952bgdq_BftwM3i_Ax0R_XlWqAXKSv4Gavusrg</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Huang, Po-Whei</creator><creator>Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis</title><author>Huang, Po-Whei ; Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-9edbcd267e27b3b1ee2dd7b84efc3a5cb9d9740f60ca5f9f791777df97ceb0e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bayesian methods</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classifiers</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Fractal analysis</topic><topic>fractal dimension</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Gleason grading</topic><topic>Histocytochemistry - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image texture analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Path planning</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>prostate image</topic><topic>prostatic carcinoma</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Support vector machine classification</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Texture</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Po-Whei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Po-Whei</au><au>Lee, Cheng-Hsiung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on medical imaging</jtitle><stitle>TMI</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Med Imaging</addtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1037</spage><epage>1050</epage><pages>1037-1050</pages><issn>0278-0062</issn><eissn>1558-254X</eissn><coden>ITMID4</coden><abstract>Accurate grading for prostatic carcinoma in pathological images is important to prognosis and treatment planning. Since human grading is always time-consuming and subjective, this paper presents a computer-aided system to automatically grade pathological images according to Gleason grading system which is the most widespread method for histological grading of prostate tissues. We proposed two feature extraction methods based on fractal dimension to analyze variations of intensity and texture complexity in regions of interest. Each image can be classified into an appropriate grade by using Bayesian, k -NN, and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, respectively. Leave-one-out and k -fold cross-validation procedures were used to estimate the correct classification rates (CCR). Experimental results show that 91.2%, 93.7%, and 93.7% CCR can be achieved by Bayesian, k -NN, and SVM classifiers, respectively, for a set of 205 pathological prostate images. If our fractal-based feature set is optimized by the sequential floating forward selection method, the CCR can be promoted up to 94.6%, 94.2%, and 94.6%, respectively, using each of the above three classifiers. Experimental results also show that our feature set is better than the feature sets extracted from multiwavelets, Gabor filters, and gray-level co-occurrence matrix methods because it has a much smaller size and still keeps the most powerful discriminating capability in grading prostate images.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>19164082</pmid><doi>10.1109/TMI.2009.2012704</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-0062 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2009-07, Vol.28 (7), p.1037-1050 |
issn | 0278-0062 1558-254X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21243705 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial Intelligence Bayes Theorem Bayesian methods Classification Classifiers Evaluation Feature extraction Fractal analysis fractal dimension Fractals Gleason grading Histocytochemistry - methods Humans Image analysis Image texture analysis Male Microscopy Neoplasm Staging Path planning Pathology Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Prostate prostate image prostatic carcinoma Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Quality Reproducibility of Results Studies Support vector machine classification Support vector machines Texture |
title | Automatic Classification for Pathological Prostate Images Based on Fractal Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A16%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20Classification%20for%20Pathological%20Prostate%20Images%20Based%20on%20Fractal%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20medical%20imaging&rft.au=Huang,%20Po-Whei&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1037&rft.epage=1050&rft.pages=1037-1050&rft.issn=0278-0062&rft.eissn=1558-254X&rft.coden=ITMID4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TMI.2009.2012704&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E21243705%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857452610&rft_id=info:pmid/19164082&rft_ieee_id=4752738&rfr_iscdi=true |