An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections
•Half the annual health and economic burden of GAS disease is due to cellulitis.•Preventing cellulitis and other skin infections maximises a vaccine’s value.•Half the value for Indigenous children was from preventing rheumatic heart disease. Group A streptococcus (GAS) causes an exceptionally divers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2018-11, Vol.36 (46), p.6968-6978 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6978 |
---|---|
container_issue | 46 |
container_start_page | 6968 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Cannon, Jeffrey W. Jack, Susan Wu, Yue Zhang, Jane Baker, Michael G. Geelhoed, Elizabeth Fraser, John Carapetis, Jonathan R. |
description | •Half the annual health and economic burden of GAS disease is due to cellulitis.•Preventing cellulitis and other skin infections maximises a vaccine’s value.•Half the value for Indigenous children was from preventing rheumatic heart disease.
Group A streptococcus (GAS) causes an exceptionally diverse range of diseases, raising questions about the optimal product characteristics of a commercially viable vaccine. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the current health and economic burdens caused by 24 diseases attributable to GAS each year in Australia and (2) use these estimates to explore the value of a GAS vaccine for different clinical indications, age schedules, and population groups.
For objective 1, we estimated the population heath and economic burdens by synthesising data from administrative databases, nationally representative surveys, literature reviews, public reimbursement schedules, and expert opinion. For objective 2, we modelled the prospective lifetime burden of GAS for all infants from birth, for children from 5 years of age, and for adults from 65 years of age. A vaccine was assumed to reduce each GAS disease by 70% for a period of 10 years, and the difference in outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated cohorts were used to calculate the cost-effective value of vaccination.
The annual health and economic burdens of GAS diseases totalled 23,528 disability-adjusted life years and AU$185.1 million in healthcare costs respectively; approximately half of each measure was due to cellulitis, followed by other skin infections and throat infections. Reducing the incidence of throat infections, skin infections, and cellulitis in non-Indigenous cohorts resulted in 30%, 33%, and 28% of the total vaccine value for an infant schedule (cost-effective vaccine price AU$260 per course); 47%, 26%, and 22% of the value for a child schedule (AU$289); and 2%, 15% and 74% for an adult schedule (AU$489).
A vaccine that prevents GAS cellulitis and other skin infections, in addition to throat infections, would maximise its value and commercial viability, with a cost-effective price in line with other recently-licensed and funded vaccines in Australia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2123716007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X18313525</els_id><sourcerecordid>2125626738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-64a3c3dfafa91ba8bfd006b7a6a428746cc5b46804c3f41cd42b5b83a1bc0d153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFqGzEQhkVoSNy0j9Ai6CWXdUYrrVY-BROathDIpYHchHZ2tsi1pY20a-jbV8ZuDrn0NDB8_z_Dx9gnAUsBQt9slnuH6AMtaxCm7JYA4owthGllVTfCvGMLqLWqlIDnS_Y-5w0ANFKsLtilBKnAtKsFe1wHThhD3Hnk6DLxISbu-KmcT5GPifYUJv4rxXnka56nROMUMSLOmeffPnAfBsLJx5A_sPPBbTN9PM0r9nT_9efd9-rh8duPu_VDhXIlp0orJ1H2gxvcSnTOdEMPoLvWaadq0yqN2HRKG1AoByWwV3XXdEY60SH0opFX7PrYO6b4MlOe7M5npO3WBYpztrWoZSs0QFvQL2_QTZxTKN8dqEbXupWmUM2RwhRzTjTYMfmdS3-sAHswbjf2JMUejB_WxXjJfT61z92O-tfUP8UFuD0CVHTsPSWb0VNA6n0q0mwf_X9O_AWYVZP8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2125626738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Cannon, Jeffrey W. ; Jack, Susan ; Wu, Yue ; Zhang, Jane ; Baker, Michael G. ; Geelhoed, Elizabeth ; Fraser, John ; Carapetis, Jonathan R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Jeffrey W. ; Jack, Susan ; Wu, Yue ; Zhang, Jane ; Baker, Michael G. ; Geelhoed, Elizabeth ; Fraser, John ; Carapetis, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><description>•Half the annual health and economic burden of GAS disease is due to cellulitis.•Preventing cellulitis and other skin infections maximises a vaccine’s value.•Half the value for Indigenous children was from preventing rheumatic heart disease.
Group A streptococcus (GAS) causes an exceptionally diverse range of diseases, raising questions about the optimal product characteristics of a commercially viable vaccine. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the current health and economic burdens caused by 24 diseases attributable to GAS each year in Australia and (2) use these estimates to explore the value of a GAS vaccine for different clinical indications, age schedules, and population groups.
For objective 1, we estimated the population heath and economic burdens by synthesising data from administrative databases, nationally representative surveys, literature reviews, public reimbursement schedules, and expert opinion. For objective 2, we modelled the prospective lifetime burden of GAS for all infants from birth, for children from 5 years of age, and for adults from 65 years of age. A vaccine was assumed to reduce each GAS disease by 70% for a period of 10 years, and the difference in outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated cohorts were used to calculate the cost-effective value of vaccination.
The annual health and economic burdens of GAS diseases totalled 23,528 disability-adjusted life years and AU$185.1 million in healthcare costs respectively; approximately half of each measure was due to cellulitis, followed by other skin infections and throat infections. Reducing the incidence of throat infections, skin infections, and cellulitis in non-Indigenous cohorts resulted in 30%, 33%, and 28% of the total vaccine value for an infant schedule (cost-effective vaccine price AU$260 per course); 47%, 26%, and 22% of the value for a child schedule (AU$289); and 2%, 15% and 74% for an adult schedule (AU$489).
A vaccine that prevents GAS cellulitis and other skin infections, in addition to throat infections, would maximise its value and commercial viability, with a cost-effective price in line with other recently-licensed and funded vaccines in Australia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30340879</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Antigens ; Burden ; Cellulitis ; Children ; Children & youth ; Cost-effective ; Disease ; Diseases ; Economic ; Economics ; Epidemiology ; Fatalities ; Group A streptococcus ; Immunization ; Infants ; Infections ; Literature reviews ; Pharynx ; Population ; Proteins ; Schedules ; Skin ; Streptococcus ; Streptococcus infections ; Streptococcus pyogenes ; Vaccine ; Vaccines ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2018-11, Vol.36 (46), p.6968-6978</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2018. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-64a3c3dfafa91ba8bfd006b7a6a428746cc5b46804c3f41cd42b5b83a1bc0d153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-64a3c3dfafa91ba8bfd006b7a6a428746cc5b46804c3f41cd42b5b83a1bc0d153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9421-1631 ; 0000-0002-3121-5405 ; 0000-0002-1321-9605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2125626738?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974,64362,64364,64366,72216</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30340879$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geelhoed, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carapetis, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><title>An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>•Half the annual health and economic burden of GAS disease is due to cellulitis.•Preventing cellulitis and other skin infections maximises a vaccine’s value.•Half the value for Indigenous children was from preventing rheumatic heart disease.
Group A streptococcus (GAS) causes an exceptionally diverse range of diseases, raising questions about the optimal product characteristics of a commercially viable vaccine. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the current health and economic burdens caused by 24 diseases attributable to GAS each year in Australia and (2) use these estimates to explore the value of a GAS vaccine for different clinical indications, age schedules, and population groups.
For objective 1, we estimated the population heath and economic burdens by synthesising data from administrative databases, nationally representative surveys, literature reviews, public reimbursement schedules, and expert opinion. For objective 2, we modelled the prospective lifetime burden of GAS for all infants from birth, for children from 5 years of age, and for adults from 65 years of age. A vaccine was assumed to reduce each GAS disease by 70% for a period of 10 years, and the difference in outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated cohorts were used to calculate the cost-effective value of vaccination.
The annual health and economic burdens of GAS diseases totalled 23,528 disability-adjusted life years and AU$185.1 million in healthcare costs respectively; approximately half of each measure was due to cellulitis, followed by other skin infections and throat infections. Reducing the incidence of throat infections, skin infections, and cellulitis in non-Indigenous cohorts resulted in 30%, 33%, and 28% of the total vaccine value for an infant schedule (cost-effective vaccine price AU$260 per course); 47%, 26%, and 22% of the value for a child schedule (AU$289); and 2%, 15% and 74% for an adult schedule (AU$489).
A vaccine that prevents GAS cellulitis and other skin infections, in addition to throat infections, would maximise its value and commercial viability, with a cost-effective price in line with other recently-licensed and funded vaccines in Australia.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Burden</subject><subject>Cellulitis</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cost-effective</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Economic</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Group A streptococcus</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Pharynx</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pyogenes</subject><subject>Vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFqGzEQhkVoSNy0j9Ai6CWXdUYrrVY-BROathDIpYHchHZ2tsi1pY20a-jbV8ZuDrn0NDB8_z_Dx9gnAUsBQt9slnuH6AMtaxCm7JYA4owthGllVTfCvGMLqLWqlIDnS_Y-5w0ANFKsLtilBKnAtKsFe1wHThhD3Hnk6DLxISbu-KmcT5GPifYUJv4rxXnka56nROMUMSLOmeffPnAfBsLJx5A_sPPBbTN9PM0r9nT_9efd9-rh8duPu_VDhXIlp0orJ1H2gxvcSnTOdEMPoLvWaadq0yqN2HRKG1AoByWwV3XXdEY60SH0opFX7PrYO6b4MlOe7M5npO3WBYpztrWoZSs0QFvQL2_QTZxTKN8dqEbXupWmUM2RwhRzTjTYMfmdS3-sAHswbjf2JMUejB_WxXjJfT61z92O-tfUP8UFuD0CVHTsPSWb0VNA6n0q0mwf_X9O_AWYVZP8</recordid><startdate>20181112</startdate><enddate>20181112</enddate><creator>Cannon, Jeffrey W.</creator><creator>Jack, Susan</creator><creator>Wu, Yue</creator><creator>Zhang, Jane</creator><creator>Baker, Michael G.</creator><creator>Geelhoed, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Fraser, John</creator><creator>Carapetis, Jonathan R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-1631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-5405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-9605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181112</creationdate><title>An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections</title><author>Cannon, Jeffrey W. ; Jack, Susan ; Wu, Yue ; Zhang, Jane ; Baker, Michael G. ; Geelhoed, Elizabeth ; Fraser, John ; Carapetis, Jonathan R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-64a3c3dfafa91ba8bfd006b7a6a428746cc5b46804c3f41cd42b5b83a1bc0d153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Burden</topic><topic>Cellulitis</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cost-effective</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Economic</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Group A streptococcus</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Pharynx</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pyogenes</topic><topic>Vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jack, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geelhoed, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carapetis, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cannon, Jeffrey W.</au><au>Jack, Susan</au><au>Wu, Yue</au><au>Zhang, Jane</au><au>Baker, Michael G.</au><au>Geelhoed, Elizabeth</au><au>Fraser, John</au><au>Carapetis, Jonathan R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2018-11-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>46</issue><spage>6968</spage><epage>6978</epage><pages>6968-6978</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>•Half the annual health and economic burden of GAS disease is due to cellulitis.•Preventing cellulitis and other skin infections maximises a vaccine’s value.•Half the value for Indigenous children was from preventing rheumatic heart disease.
Group A streptococcus (GAS) causes an exceptionally diverse range of diseases, raising questions about the optimal product characteristics of a commercially viable vaccine. The objectives of this study were to (1) estimate the current health and economic burdens caused by 24 diseases attributable to GAS each year in Australia and (2) use these estimates to explore the value of a GAS vaccine for different clinical indications, age schedules, and population groups.
For objective 1, we estimated the population heath and economic burdens by synthesising data from administrative databases, nationally representative surveys, literature reviews, public reimbursement schedules, and expert opinion. For objective 2, we modelled the prospective lifetime burden of GAS for all infants from birth, for children from 5 years of age, and for adults from 65 years of age. A vaccine was assumed to reduce each GAS disease by 70% for a period of 10 years, and the difference in outcomes between vaccinated and non-vaccinated cohorts were used to calculate the cost-effective value of vaccination.
The annual health and economic burdens of GAS diseases totalled 23,528 disability-adjusted life years and AU$185.1 million in healthcare costs respectively; approximately half of each measure was due to cellulitis, followed by other skin infections and throat infections. Reducing the incidence of throat infections, skin infections, and cellulitis in non-Indigenous cohorts resulted in 30%, 33%, and 28% of the total vaccine value for an infant schedule (cost-effective vaccine price AU$260 per course); 47%, 26%, and 22% of the value for a child schedule (AU$289); and 2%, 15% and 74% for an adult schedule (AU$489).
A vaccine that prevents GAS cellulitis and other skin infections, in addition to throat infections, would maximise its value and commercial viability, with a cost-effective price in line with other recently-licensed and funded vaccines in Australia.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30340879</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.001</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9421-1631</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-5405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1321-9605</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2018-11, Vol.36 (46), p.6968-6978 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2123716007 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adults Age Antigens Burden Cellulitis Children Children & youth Cost-effective Disease Diseases Economic Economics Epidemiology Fatalities Group A streptococcus Immunization Infants Infections Literature reviews Pharynx Population Proteins Schedules Skin Streptococcus Streptococcus infections Streptococcus pyogenes Vaccine Vaccines Viability |
title | An economic case for a vaccine to prevent group A streptococcus skin infections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T01%3A44%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20economic%20case%20for%20a%20vaccine%20to%20prevent%20group%20A%20streptococcus%20skin%20infections&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Cannon,%20Jeffrey%20W.&rft.date=2018-11-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=46&rft.spage=6968&rft.epage=6978&rft.pages=6968-6978&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.10.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2125626738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2125626738&rft_id=info:pmid/30340879&rft_els_id=S0264410X18313525&rfr_iscdi=true |