Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau

An improved Costanza model was developed to assess the health of the Jinhe River Watershed ecosystem. The watershed is located at the center of the Huangtu Plateau in China and has suffered a severe disturbance in the last few decades. Three indicators including vigor, organization, and resilience w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EcoHealth 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.127-136
Hauptverfasser: Suo, An-Ning, Xiong, You-Cai, Wang, Tian-Ming, Yue, Dong-Xia, Ge, Jian-Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title EcoHealth
container_volume 5
creator Suo, An-Ning
Xiong, You-Cai
Wang, Tian-Ming
Yue, Dong-Xia
Ge, Jian-Ping
description An improved Costanza model was developed to assess the health of the Jinhe River Watershed ecosystem. The watershed is located at the center of the Huangtu Plateau in China and has suffered a severe disturbance in the last few decades. Three indicators including vigor, organization, and resilience were calculated respectively by merging ground-based observations with remotely sensed data on a watershed scale. Health indices of 12 topographic sub-watersheds were calculated using a modified Costanza formula. Health evaluated results indicated that sub-watersheds in the Huangtu mountain region were relatively healthy ecosystems with scores over 0.673. The sub-watersheds in the loess mountain and the loess gully regions, e.g., Jinghe, Heihe, and Honghe regions, scored moderately; their evaluated value ranged from 0.505 to 0.606. The two sub-watersheds in the loess gully region and all sub-watersheds in the loess hilly region scored the lowest, less than 0.50 and were considered unhealthy ecosystems. It can be argued that the loess hilly region and the loess gully regions should be in primary consideration for ecological protection and rehabilitation. This study provided a possible quantitative model for ecological planning and landscape management with respect to topographic conditions in this area.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21229885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21229885</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-abac203d4270a20892449831f6132aebe970cc86787cfff0f9f6abc68665c1273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKBDEQRYMovj_AjTQu3LVW0j15LEXUUQRFFJchk6nMg35oqlvQrzfjDA4IripwT90Uh7EjDmccQJ0Th8IUOYDOgUuVf22wXS65yI3gsPn7BrHD9ojmAMWgVLDNdrhWWhkud9njlW_pkzqssyG6qptmF0RIVGPTZW3Iuilmd7NmksbT7ANj9uo6jDTFcdY2P-mwd82k67PHKiWuP2BbwVWEh6u5z16ur54vh_n9w83t5cV97kuALncj5wUU41IocAK0EWVpdMGD5IVwOEKjwHst050-hADBBOlGXmopB54LVeyz02XvW2zfe6TO1jPyWFWuwbYnK7gQRutBAk_-gPO2j026LTEDrWRhFhBfQj62RBGDfYuz2sVPy8EuXNula5tc24Vr-5V2jlfF_ajG8XpjJTcBYglQipoJxvXP_7d-A8uGiR8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215876395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Suo, An-Ning ; Xiong, You-Cai ; Wang, Tian-Ming ; Yue, Dong-Xia ; Ge, Jian-Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Suo, An-Ning ; Xiong, You-Cai ; Wang, Tian-Ming ; Yue, Dong-Xia ; Ge, Jian-Ping</creatorcontrib><description>An improved Costanza model was developed to assess the health of the Jinhe River Watershed ecosystem. The watershed is located at the center of the Huangtu Plateau in China and has suffered a severe disturbance in the last few decades. Three indicators including vigor, organization, and resilience were calculated respectively by merging ground-based observations with remotely sensed data on a watershed scale. Health indices of 12 topographic sub-watersheds were calculated using a modified Costanza formula. Health evaluated results indicated that sub-watersheds in the Huangtu mountain region were relatively healthy ecosystems with scores over 0.673. The sub-watersheds in the loess mountain and the loess gully regions, e.g., Jinghe, Heihe, and Honghe regions, scored moderately; their evaluated value ranged from 0.505 to 0.606. The two sub-watersheds in the loess gully region and all sub-watersheds in the loess hilly region scored the lowest, less than 0.50 and were considered unhealthy ecosystems. It can be argued that the loess hilly region and the loess gully regions should be in primary consideration for ecological protection and rehabilitation. This study provided a possible quantitative model for ecological planning and landscape management with respect to topographic conditions in this area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-9202</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-9210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18787916</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; China ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Crops, Agricultural - growth &amp; development ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem assessment ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Health ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Geographic Information Systems ; Geography ; Gullies ; Human Activities ; Humans ; Loess ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microbiology ; Models, Theoretical ; Mountain regions ; Plant Development ; Public Health ; River ecology ; Rivers ; Satellite Communications ; Soil - analysis ; Soil - standards ; Trees - growth &amp; development ; Water and Health ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>EcoHealth, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.127-136</ispartof><rights>International Association for Ecology and Health 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-abac203d4270a20892449831f6132aebe970cc86787cfff0f9f6abc68665c1273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-abac203d4270a20892449831f6132aebe970cc86787cfff0f9f6abc68665c1273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18787916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suo, An-Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, You-Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tian-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Dong-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jian-Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau</title><title>EcoHealth</title><addtitle>EcoHealth</addtitle><addtitle>Ecohealth</addtitle><description>An improved Costanza model was developed to assess the health of the Jinhe River Watershed ecosystem. The watershed is located at the center of the Huangtu Plateau in China and has suffered a severe disturbance in the last few decades. Three indicators including vigor, organization, and resilience were calculated respectively by merging ground-based observations with remotely sensed data on a watershed scale. Health indices of 12 topographic sub-watersheds were calculated using a modified Costanza formula. Health evaluated results indicated that sub-watersheds in the Huangtu mountain region were relatively healthy ecosystems with scores over 0.673. The sub-watersheds in the loess mountain and the loess gully regions, e.g., Jinghe, Heihe, and Honghe regions, scored moderately; their evaluated value ranged from 0.505 to 0.606. The two sub-watersheds in the loess gully region and all sub-watersheds in the loess hilly region scored the lowest, less than 0.50 and were considered unhealthy ecosystems. It can be argued that the loess hilly region and the loess gully regions should be in primary consideration for ecological protection and rehabilitation. This study provided a possible quantitative model for ecological planning and landscape management with respect to topographic conditions in this area.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Crops, Agricultural - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem assessment</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Geographic Information Systems</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Human Activities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Loess</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Satellite Communications</subject><subject>Soil - analysis</subject><subject>Soil - standards</subject><subject>Trees - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Water and Health</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1612-9202</issn><issn>1612-9210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKBDEQRYMovj_AjTQu3LVW0j15LEXUUQRFFJchk6nMg35oqlvQrzfjDA4IripwT90Uh7EjDmccQJ0Th8IUOYDOgUuVf22wXS65yI3gsPn7BrHD9ojmAMWgVLDNdrhWWhkud9njlW_pkzqssyG6qptmF0RIVGPTZW3Iuilmd7NmksbT7ANj9uo6jDTFcdY2P-mwd82k67PHKiWuP2BbwVWEh6u5z16ur54vh_n9w83t5cV97kuALncj5wUU41IocAK0EWVpdMGD5IVwOEKjwHst050-hADBBOlGXmopB54LVeyz02XvW2zfe6TO1jPyWFWuwbYnK7gQRutBAk_-gPO2j026LTEDrWRhFhBfQj62RBGDfYuz2sVPy8EuXNula5tc24Vr-5V2jlfF_ajG8XpjJTcBYglQipoJxvXP_7d-A8uGiR8</recordid><startdate>20080601</startdate><enddate>20080601</enddate><creator>Suo, An-Ning</creator><creator>Xiong, You-Cai</creator><creator>Wang, Tian-Ming</creator><creator>Yue, Dong-Xia</creator><creator>Ge, Jian-Ping</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080601</creationdate><title>Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau</title><author>Suo, An-Ning ; Xiong, You-Cai ; Wang, Tian-Ming ; Yue, Dong-Xia ; Ge, Jian-Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-abac203d4270a20892449831f6132aebe970cc86787cfff0f9f6abc68665c1273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Crops, Agricultural - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem assessment</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Geographic Information Systems</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Human Activities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Loess</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Satellite Communications</topic><topic>Soil - analysis</topic><topic>Soil - standards</topic><topic>Trees - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Water and Health</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suo, An-Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, You-Cai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tian-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Dong-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Jian-Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>EcoHealth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suo, An-Ning</au><au>Xiong, You-Cai</au><au>Wang, Tian-Ming</au><au>Yue, Dong-Xia</au><au>Ge, Jian-Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau</atitle><jtitle>EcoHealth</jtitle><stitle>EcoHealth</stitle><addtitle>Ecohealth</addtitle><date>2008-06-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>127-136</pages><issn>1612-9202</issn><eissn>1612-9210</eissn><abstract>An improved Costanza model was developed to assess the health of the Jinhe River Watershed ecosystem. The watershed is located at the center of the Huangtu Plateau in China and has suffered a severe disturbance in the last few decades. Three indicators including vigor, organization, and resilience were calculated respectively by merging ground-based observations with remotely sensed data on a watershed scale. Health indices of 12 topographic sub-watersheds were calculated using a modified Costanza formula. Health evaluated results indicated that sub-watersheds in the Huangtu mountain region were relatively healthy ecosystems with scores over 0.673. The sub-watersheds in the loess mountain and the loess gully regions, e.g., Jinghe, Heihe, and Honghe regions, scored moderately; their evaluated value ranged from 0.505 to 0.606. The two sub-watersheds in the loess gully region and all sub-watersheds in the loess hilly region scored the lowest, less than 0.50 and were considered unhealthy ecosystems. It can be argued that the loess hilly region and the loess gully regions should be in primary consideration for ecological protection and rehabilitation. This study provided a possible quantitative model for ecological planning and landscape management with respect to topographic conditions in this area.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18787916</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-9202
ispartof EcoHealth, 2008-06, Vol.5 (2), p.127-136
issn 1612-9202
1612-9210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21229885
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Ecology
Animals
Aquatic ecosystems
China
Conservation of Natural Resources
Crops, Agricultural - growth & development
Ecosystem
Ecosystem assessment
Ecosystems
Environmental Health
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Geographic Information Systems
Geography
Gullies
Human Activities
Humans
Loess
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microbiology
Models, Theoretical
Mountain regions
Plant Development
Public Health
River ecology
Rivers
Satellite Communications
Soil - analysis
Soil - standards
Trees - growth & development
Water and Health
Watersheds
title Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Jinghe River Watershed on the Huangtu Plateau
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A37%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20Health%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Jinghe%20River%20Watershed%20on%20the%20Huangtu%20Plateau&rft.jtitle=EcoHealth&rft.au=Suo,%20An-Ning&rft.date=2008-06-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=127-136&rft.issn=1612-9202&rft.eissn=1612-9210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10393-008-0167-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21229885%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215876395&rft_id=info:pmid/18787916&rfr_iscdi=true