Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays several important roles in forest ecosystem development, undergoing chemical, physical and/or biological reactions that affect ecosystem nutrient retention. Very few studies have focused on gross rates of DOM production, and we know of no study that has directly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosystems (New York) 2009-02, Vol.12 (2), p.240-260
Hauptverfasser: Uselman, Shauna M, Qualls, Robert G, Lilienfein, Juliane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 260
container_issue 2
container_start_page 240
container_title Ecosystems (New York)
container_volume 12
creator Uselman, Shauna M
Qualls, Robert G
Lilienfein, Juliane
description Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays several important roles in forest ecosystem development, undergoing chemical, physical and/or biological reactions that affect ecosystem nutrient retention. Very few studies have focused on gross rates of DOM production, and we know of no study that has directly measured DOM production from root litter. Our objectives were to quantify major sources of total potentially water-soluble organic matter (DOMtps) production, with an emphasis on production from root litter, to quantify and compare total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P (DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps) production, and to quantify changes in their production during forest primary succession and ecosystem development at the Mt. Shasta Mudflows ecosystem chronosequence. To do so, we exhaustively extracted freshly senesced root and leaf and other aboveground litter for DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps by vegetation category, and we calculated DOMtps production (g m⁻² y⁻¹) at the ecosystem level using data for annual production of fine root and aboveground litter. DOM production from throughfall was calculated by measuring throughfall volume and concentration over 2 years. Results showed that DOMtps production from root litter was a very important source of DOMtps in the Mount Shasta mudflow ecosystems, in some cases comparable to production from leaf litter for DONtps and larger than production from leaf litter for DOPtps. Total DOCtps and DONtps production from all sources increased early in succession from the 77- to the 255-year-old ecosystem. However, total DOPtps production across the ecosystem chronosequence showed a unique pattern. Generally, the relative importance of root litter for total fine detrital DOCtps and DONtps production increased significantly during ecosystem development. Furthermore, DOCtps and DONtps production were predominantly driven by changes in biomass production during ecosystem development, whereas changes in litter solubility due to changes in species composition had a smaller effect. We suggest that DOMtps production from root litter may be an important source of organic matter for the accumulation of SOM during forest ecosystem development.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10021-008-9220-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21229288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40603432</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40603432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a44113759bc15f5d5be0930b4e3813680898f9aa3b9c40afd83f308aa33c6aaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuEzEUHSGQKIUPYIGwkGDVgevHTGx2VVQeUkQj2q6tO44dJnLsYntA-XucTlUkFmxsX5-Hj3Wa5iWF9xRg8SHXldEWQLaKMWj7R80JFbxroWfq8d2ZtUoKeNo8y3kHQDspxEnze53iZjJljIFER65jQU_WsdhQRvT-QK6inwZvyWXaYhgNWZ6Rb2cEw4asyblJMec6kAsT8yEXuyfLHymGmO3PyQZjP5LvMRbyy6Y8ZbKy6MhqLMWm580Thz7bF_f7aXPz6eJ6-aVdXX7-ujxftUYwVloUglK-6NRgaOe6TTdYUBwGYbmkvJcglXQKkQ_KCEC3kdxxkPWCmx7R8dPm3ex7m2KNlIvej9lY7zHYOGXNKGOKSVmJb_4h7uKUQs1WOSAoV2pRSXQm3X08Wadv07jHdNAU9LEHPfegaw_62IPuq-btvTFmg94lDGbMD8IagAtOj95s5uUKha1NfwP8z_zVLNrlEtODqYAeqiur-OsZdxg1blN9-OaKAeVAewDoJP8D-KOpdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210413997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Uselman, Shauna M ; Qualls, Robert G ; Lilienfein, Juliane</creator><creatorcontrib>Uselman, Shauna M ; Qualls, Robert G ; Lilienfein, Juliane</creatorcontrib><description>Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays several important roles in forest ecosystem development, undergoing chemical, physical and/or biological reactions that affect ecosystem nutrient retention. Very few studies have focused on gross rates of DOM production, and we know of no study that has directly measured DOM production from root litter. Our objectives were to quantify major sources of total potentially water-soluble organic matter (DOMtps) production, with an emphasis on production from root litter, to quantify and compare total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P (DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps) production, and to quantify changes in their production during forest primary succession and ecosystem development at the Mt. Shasta Mudflows ecosystem chronosequence. To do so, we exhaustively extracted freshly senesced root and leaf and other aboveground litter for DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps by vegetation category, and we calculated DOMtps production (g m⁻² y⁻¹) at the ecosystem level using data for annual production of fine root and aboveground litter. DOM production from throughfall was calculated by measuring throughfall volume and concentration over 2 years. Results showed that DOMtps production from root litter was a very important source of DOMtps in the Mount Shasta mudflow ecosystems, in some cases comparable to production from leaf litter for DONtps and larger than production from leaf litter for DOPtps. Total DOCtps and DONtps production from all sources increased early in succession from the 77- to the 255-year-old ecosystem. However, total DOPtps production across the ecosystem chronosequence showed a unique pattern. Generally, the relative importance of root litter for total fine detrital DOCtps and DONtps production increased significantly during ecosystem development. Furthermore, DOCtps and DONtps production were predominantly driven by changes in biomass production during ecosystem development, whereas changes in litter solubility due to changes in species composition had a smaller effect. We suggest that DOMtps production from root litter may be an important source of organic matter for the accumulation of SOM during forest ecosystem development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9840</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10021-008-9220-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: New York : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Age ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; belowground production ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbon ; Chronosequences ; Dissolved organic matter ; Ecological succession ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Management ; Forest ecosystems ; Forest soils ; forest succession ; Forestry ; forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geochemistry ; Geoecology/Natural Processes ; Hydrology/Water Resources ; Leaf litter ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Mineral soils ; Mudflows ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient retention ; Organic soils ; Phosphorus ; Plant litter ; Plant Sciences ; roots ; Soil ecology ; Soil organic matter ; solubility ; Species composition ; Synecology ; temperate forests ; Throughfall ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Ecosystems (New York), 2009-02, Vol.12 (2), p.240-260</ispartof><rights>2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a44113759bc15f5d5be0930b4e3813680898f9aa3b9c40afd83f308aa33c6aaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a44113759bc15f5d5be0930b4e3813680898f9aa3b9c40afd83f308aa33c6aaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40603432$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40603432$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21234317$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uselman, Shauna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qualls, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienfein, Juliane</creatorcontrib><title>Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter</title><title>Ecosystems (New York)</title><addtitle>Ecosystems</addtitle><description>Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays several important roles in forest ecosystem development, undergoing chemical, physical and/or biological reactions that affect ecosystem nutrient retention. Very few studies have focused on gross rates of DOM production, and we know of no study that has directly measured DOM production from root litter. Our objectives were to quantify major sources of total potentially water-soluble organic matter (DOMtps) production, with an emphasis on production from root litter, to quantify and compare total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P (DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps) production, and to quantify changes in their production during forest primary succession and ecosystem development at the Mt. Shasta Mudflows ecosystem chronosequence. To do so, we exhaustively extracted freshly senesced root and leaf and other aboveground litter for DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps by vegetation category, and we calculated DOMtps production (g m⁻² y⁻¹) at the ecosystem level using data for annual production of fine root and aboveground litter. DOM production from throughfall was calculated by measuring throughfall volume and concentration over 2 years. Results showed that DOMtps production from root litter was a very important source of DOMtps in the Mount Shasta mudflow ecosystems, in some cases comparable to production from leaf litter for DONtps and larger than production from leaf litter for DOPtps. Total DOCtps and DONtps production from all sources increased early in succession from the 77- to the 255-year-old ecosystem. However, total DOPtps production across the ecosystem chronosequence showed a unique pattern. Generally, the relative importance of root litter for total fine detrital DOCtps and DONtps production increased significantly during ecosystem development. Furthermore, DOCtps and DONtps production were predominantly driven by changes in biomass production during ecosystem development, whereas changes in litter solubility due to changes in species composition had a smaller effect. We suggest that DOMtps production from root litter may be an important source of organic matter for the accumulation of SOM during forest ecosystem development.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>belowground production</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Chronosequences</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>forest succession</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geoecology/Natural Processes</subject><subject>Hydrology/Water Resources</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mineral soils</subject><subject>Mudflows</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient retention</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Plant litter</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>roots</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>solubility</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temperate forests</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1432-9840</issn><issn>1435-0629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuEzEUHSGQKIUPYIGwkGDVgevHTGx2VVQeUkQj2q6tO44dJnLsYntA-XucTlUkFmxsX5-Hj3Wa5iWF9xRg8SHXldEWQLaKMWj7R80JFbxroWfq8d2ZtUoKeNo8y3kHQDspxEnze53iZjJljIFER65jQU_WsdhQRvT-QK6inwZvyWXaYhgNWZ6Rb2cEw4asyblJMec6kAsT8yEXuyfLHymGmO3PyQZjP5LvMRbyy6Y8ZbKy6MhqLMWm580Thz7bF_f7aXPz6eJ6-aVdXX7-ujxftUYwVloUglK-6NRgaOe6TTdYUBwGYbmkvJcglXQKkQ_KCEC3kdxxkPWCmx7R8dPm3ex7m2KNlIvej9lY7zHYOGXNKGOKSVmJb_4h7uKUQs1WOSAoV2pRSXQm3X08Wadv07jHdNAU9LEHPfegaw_62IPuq-btvTFmg94lDGbMD8IagAtOj95s5uUKha1NfwP8z_zVLNrlEtODqYAeqiur-OsZdxg1blN9-OaKAeVAewDoJP8D-KOpdA</recordid><startdate>20090201</startdate><enddate>20090201</enddate><creator>Uselman, Shauna M</creator><creator>Qualls, Robert G</creator><creator>Lilienfein, Juliane</creator><general>New York : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090201</creationdate><title>Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter</title><author>Uselman, Shauna M ; Qualls, Robert G ; Lilienfein, Juliane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-a44113759bc15f5d5be0930b4e3813680898f9aa3b9c40afd83f308aa33c6aaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>belowground production</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Chronosequences</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>forest succession</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geoecology/Natural Processes</topic><topic>Hydrology/Water Resources</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mineral soils</topic><topic>Mudflows</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient retention</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Plant litter</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>roots</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>solubility</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temperate forests</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uselman, Shauna M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qualls, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilienfein, Juliane</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uselman, Shauna M</au><au>Qualls, Robert G</au><au>Lilienfein, Juliane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystems (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Ecosystems</stitle><date>2009-02-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>240-260</pages><issn>1432-9840</issn><eissn>1435-0629</eissn><abstract>Dissolved organic matter (DOM) plays several important roles in forest ecosystem development, undergoing chemical, physical and/or biological reactions that affect ecosystem nutrient retention. Very few studies have focused on gross rates of DOM production, and we know of no study that has directly measured DOM production from root litter. Our objectives were to quantify major sources of total potentially water-soluble organic matter (DOMtps) production, with an emphasis on production from root litter, to quantify and compare total potentially soluble organic C, N, and P (DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps) production, and to quantify changes in their production during forest primary succession and ecosystem development at the Mt. Shasta Mudflows ecosystem chronosequence. To do so, we exhaustively extracted freshly senesced root and leaf and other aboveground litter for DOCtps, DONtps, and DOPtps by vegetation category, and we calculated DOMtps production (g m⁻² y⁻¹) at the ecosystem level using data for annual production of fine root and aboveground litter. DOM production from throughfall was calculated by measuring throughfall volume and concentration over 2 years. Results showed that DOMtps production from root litter was a very important source of DOMtps in the Mount Shasta mudflow ecosystems, in some cases comparable to production from leaf litter for DONtps and larger than production from leaf litter for DOPtps. Total DOCtps and DONtps production from all sources increased early in succession from the 77- to the 255-year-old ecosystem. However, total DOPtps production across the ecosystem chronosequence showed a unique pattern. Generally, the relative importance of root litter for total fine detrital DOCtps and DONtps production increased significantly during ecosystem development. Furthermore, DOCtps and DONtps production were predominantly driven by changes in biomass production during ecosystem development, whereas changes in litter solubility due to changes in species composition had a smaller effect. We suggest that DOMtps production from root litter may be an important source of organic matter for the accumulation of SOM during forest ecosystem development.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>New York : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10021-008-9220-6</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9840
ispartof Ecosystems (New York), 2009-02, Vol.12 (2), p.240-260
issn 1432-9840
1435-0629
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21229288
source SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR
subjects Age
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
belowground production
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Carbon
Chronosequences
Dissolved organic matter
Ecological succession
Ecology
Ecosystems
Environmental Management
Forest ecosystems
Forest soils
forest succession
Forestry
forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Geochemistry
Geoecology/Natural Processes
Hydrology/Water Resources
Leaf litter
Leaves
Life Sciences
Mineral soils
Mudflows
Nitrogen
Nutrient retention
Organic soils
Phosphorus
Plant litter
Plant Sciences
roots
Soil ecology
Soil organic matter
solubility
Species composition
Synecology
temperate forests
Throughfall
Zoology
title Production of Total Potentially Soluble Organic C, N, and P Across an Ecosystem Chronosequence: Root versus Leaf Litter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A39%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Production%20of%20Total%20Potentially%20Soluble%20Organic%20C,%20N,%20and%20P%20Across%20an%20Ecosystem%20Chronosequence:%20Root%20versus%20Leaf%20Litter&rft.jtitle=Ecosystems%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Uselman,%20Shauna%20M&rft.date=2009-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=240-260&rft.issn=1432-9840&rft.eissn=1435-0629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10021-008-9220-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40603432%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210413997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40603432&rfr_iscdi=true