Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study
BACKGROUNDExclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery. OBJECTIVEThe goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potenti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 2019-01, Vol.82 (1), p.11-14 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 14 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 11 |
| container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
| container_volume | 82 |
| creator | Bompy, Lisa Gerenton, Brice Cristofari, Sarra Stivala, Alessio Moris, Vivien See, Leslie-Ann Rizzi, Philippe Braye, Fabienne Meningaud, Jean-Paul Zwetyenga, Narcisse Guillier, David |
| description | BACKGROUNDExclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery.
OBJECTIVEThe goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potential impact of aesthetic breast implants on breastfeeding.
STUDY DESIGNA retrospective study was carried out in 3 French university hospitals. The main inclusion criterion was adult women of childbearing age (18–50 years old) with bilateral breast hypoplasia. Some features of the surgery, such as the operative indication, the surgical approach, the implant position against the pectoral muscle, and implants features (material, volume, profile), were collected. We conducted a survey by phone about childbirth after the procedure. If the women had children after surgery, we asked them if they breastfed and the characteristics of breastfeeding.
RESULTSIn total, 1316 patients received breast implants in the 3 centers from January 2011 to October 2016 and met our inclusion criteria. We included 1073 patients; 998 women had breast implants with no pregnancy. Among the 75 patients (7%) who gave birth after the surgery, 51 wanted to breastfeed (68%). The patients with a retroglandular implant were significantly less able to breastfeed compared with the patients with retromuscular implants (P = 0.0005). No difference was found for age, the type of surgery, the surgical approach, and the shape or type of implant between the successful breastfeeding group and failed breastfeeding group.
CONCLUSIONA woman with aesthetic breast implants has a 75% chance of breastfeeding if desired, regardless of the type and the volume of the implant and the surgical approach. She has an 82% probability of breastfeeding with retromuscular implants and 17% with retroglandular implants. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001651 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2121495476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121495476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b25a84beb1484fc16aab78265a7b2b34fc1fb441c06082812cf8c25ec513bb8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AUI-cgl4TQy3gNikIhDLObLdSRvIhu2A-va4tCDEgbnM6Nc324_QPiVHlJxkx4_5_RH5FTSVdA2NqORpwjOi1tGIUKGSjAi-hba9f4kMUyLdRFuccCYV5yPU3zS9tgF3LT5zoH0oASZVO8W5tZ37qkKHI1TrNuBL0GFw4HH1jeN8mDbQBh2qrj3FOb4d6lDZqLjK4gcIrvM92FC9A34Mw2S-izZKXXvYW-Ud9Hx58XR-nYzvrm7O83FiOZE0MUxqJQyY-IIoLU21NpliqdSZYYYvpNIIQS1JiWKKMlsqyyRYSbkxyvAddLic27vubQAfiqbyFur4B3SDLxhlVJxIkaURFUvUxmO9g7LoXdVoNy8oKRZeF9Hr4q_Xse1gtWEwDUx-mr7NjYBaAh9dHcD513r4AFfMQNdh9v_sT7QSi90</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121495476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Bompy, Lisa ; Gerenton, Brice ; Cristofari, Sarra ; Stivala, Alessio ; Moris, Vivien ; See, Leslie-Ann ; Rizzi, Philippe ; Braye, Fabienne ; Meningaud, Jean-Paul ; Zwetyenga, Narcisse ; Guillier, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Bompy, Lisa ; Gerenton, Brice ; Cristofari, Sarra ; Stivala, Alessio ; Moris, Vivien ; See, Leslie-Ann ; Rizzi, Philippe ; Braye, Fabienne ; Meningaud, Jean-Paul ; Zwetyenga, Narcisse ; Guillier, David</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDExclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery.
OBJECTIVEThe goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potential impact of aesthetic breast implants on breastfeeding.
STUDY DESIGNA retrospective study was carried out in 3 French university hospitals. The main inclusion criterion was adult women of childbearing age (18–50 years old) with bilateral breast hypoplasia. Some features of the surgery, such as the operative indication, the surgical approach, the implant position against the pectoral muscle, and implants features (material, volume, profile), were collected. We conducted a survey by phone about childbirth after the procedure. If the women had children after surgery, we asked them if they breastfed and the characteristics of breastfeeding.
RESULTSIn total, 1316 patients received breast implants in the 3 centers from January 2011 to October 2016 and met our inclusion criteria. We included 1073 patients; 998 women had breast implants with no pregnancy. Among the 75 patients (7%) who gave birth after the surgery, 51 wanted to breastfeed (68%). The patients with a retroglandular implant were significantly less able to breastfeed compared with the patients with retromuscular implants (P = 0.0005). No difference was found for age, the type of surgery, the surgical approach, and the shape or type of implant between the successful breastfeeding group and failed breastfeeding group.
CONCLUSIONA woman with aesthetic breast implants has a 75% chance of breastfeeding if desired, regardless of the type and the volume of the implant and the surgical approach. She has an 82% probability of breastfeeding with retromuscular implants and 17% with retroglandular implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001651</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30325833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Feeding - methods ; Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data ; Breast Implantation - adverse effects ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Cohort Studies ; Esthetics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; France ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Patient Safety ; Pregnancy ; Reference Values ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2019-01, Vol.82 (1), p.11-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b25a84beb1484fc16aab78265a7b2b34fc1fb441c06082812cf8c25ec513bb8b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325833$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bompy, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerenton, Brice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristofari, Sarra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stivala, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moris, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>See, Leslie-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzi, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braye, Fabienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meningaud, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwetyenga, Narcisse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillier, David</creatorcontrib><title>Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDExclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery.
OBJECTIVEThe goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potential impact of aesthetic breast implants on breastfeeding.
STUDY DESIGNA retrospective study was carried out in 3 French university hospitals. The main inclusion criterion was adult women of childbearing age (18–50 years old) with bilateral breast hypoplasia. Some features of the surgery, such as the operative indication, the surgical approach, the implant position against the pectoral muscle, and implants features (material, volume, profile), were collected. We conducted a survey by phone about childbirth after the procedure. If the women had children after surgery, we asked them if they breastfed and the characteristics of breastfeeding.
RESULTSIn total, 1316 patients received breast implants in the 3 centers from January 2011 to October 2016 and met our inclusion criteria. We included 1073 patients; 998 women had breast implants with no pregnancy. Among the 75 patients (7%) who gave birth after the surgery, 51 wanted to breastfeed (68%). The patients with a retroglandular implant were significantly less able to breastfeed compared with the patients with retromuscular implants (P = 0.0005). No difference was found for age, the type of surgery, the surgical approach, and the shape or type of implant between the successful breastfeeding group and failed breastfeeding group.
CONCLUSIONA woman with aesthetic breast implants has a 75% chance of breastfeeding if desired, regardless of the type and the volume of the implant and the surgical approach. She has an 82% probability of breastfeeding with retromuscular implants and 17% with retroglandular implants.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - methods</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EgrK8AUI-cgl4TQy3gNikIhDLObLdSRvIhu2A-va4tCDEgbnM6Nc324_QPiVHlJxkx4_5_RH5FTSVdA2NqORpwjOi1tGIUKGSjAi-hba9f4kMUyLdRFuccCYV5yPU3zS9tgF3LT5zoH0oASZVO8W5tZ37qkKHI1TrNuBL0GFw4HH1jeN8mDbQBh2qrj3FOb4d6lDZqLjK4gcIrvM92FC9A34Mw2S-izZKXXvYW-Ud9Hx58XR-nYzvrm7O83FiOZE0MUxqJQyY-IIoLU21NpliqdSZYYYvpNIIQS1JiWKKMlsqyyRYSbkxyvAddLic27vubQAfiqbyFur4B3SDLxhlVJxIkaURFUvUxmO9g7LoXdVoNy8oKRZeF9Hr4q_Xse1gtWEwDUx-mr7NjYBaAh9dHcD513r4AFfMQNdh9v_sT7QSi90</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Bompy, Lisa</creator><creator>Gerenton, Brice</creator><creator>Cristofari, Sarra</creator><creator>Stivala, Alessio</creator><creator>Moris, Vivien</creator><creator>See, Leslie-Ann</creator><creator>Rizzi, Philippe</creator><creator>Braye, Fabienne</creator><creator>Meningaud, Jean-Paul</creator><creator>Zwetyenga, Narcisse</creator><creator>Guillier, David</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study</title><author>Bompy, Lisa ; Gerenton, Brice ; Cristofari, Sarra ; Stivala, Alessio ; Moris, Vivien ; See, Leslie-Ann ; Rizzi, Philippe ; Braye, Fabienne ; Meningaud, Jean-Paul ; Zwetyenga, Narcisse ; Guillier, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3051-b25a84beb1484fc16aab78265a7b2b34fc1fb441c06082812cf8c25ec513bb8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - methods</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bompy, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerenton, Brice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristofari, Sarra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stivala, Alessio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moris, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>See, Leslie-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rizzi, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braye, Fabienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meningaud, Jean-Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwetyenga, Narcisse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillier, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bompy, Lisa</au><au>Gerenton, Brice</au><au>Cristofari, Sarra</au><au>Stivala, Alessio</au><au>Moris, Vivien</au><au>See, Leslie-Ann</au><au>Rizzi, Philippe</au><au>Braye, Fabienne</au><au>Meningaud, Jean-Paul</au><au>Zwetyenga, Narcisse</au><au>Guillier, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>11-14</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDExclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended by the World Health Organization during the first 6 months of life. In parallel, breast augmentation with implants is one of the most performed operations in aesthetic surgery.
OBJECTIVEThe goal of our study was therefore to analyze the potential impact of aesthetic breast implants on breastfeeding.
STUDY DESIGNA retrospective study was carried out in 3 French university hospitals. The main inclusion criterion was adult women of childbearing age (18–50 years old) with bilateral breast hypoplasia. Some features of the surgery, such as the operative indication, the surgical approach, the implant position against the pectoral muscle, and implants features (material, volume, profile), were collected. We conducted a survey by phone about childbirth after the procedure. If the women had children after surgery, we asked them if they breastfed and the characteristics of breastfeeding.
RESULTSIn total, 1316 patients received breast implants in the 3 centers from January 2011 to October 2016 and met our inclusion criteria. We included 1073 patients; 998 women had breast implants with no pregnancy. Among the 75 patients (7%) who gave birth after the surgery, 51 wanted to breastfeed (68%). The patients with a retroglandular implant were significantly less able to breastfeed compared with the patients with retromuscular implants (P = 0.0005). No difference was found for age, the type of surgery, the surgical approach, and the shape or type of implant between the successful breastfeeding group and failed breastfeeding group.
CONCLUSIONA woman with aesthetic breast implants has a 75% chance of breastfeeding if desired, regardless of the type and the volume of the implant and the surgical approach. She has an 82% probability of breastfeeding with retromuscular implants and 17% with retroglandular implants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30325833</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000001651</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
| ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 2019-01, Vol.82 (1), p.11-14 |
| issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2121495476 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Adult Breast Feeding - methods Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data Breast Implantation - adverse effects Breast Implantation - methods Cohort Studies Esthetics Female Follow-Up Studies France Hospitals, University Humans Middle Aged Patient Safety Pregnancy Reference Values Retrospective Studies Risk Assessment |
| title | Impact on Breastfeeding According to Implant Features in Breast Augmentation: A Multicentric Retrospective Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20on%20Breastfeeding%20According%20to%20Implant%20Features%20in%20Breast%20Augmentation:%20A%20Multicentric%20Retrospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Bompy,%20Lisa&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=11-14&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001651&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121495476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121495476&rft_id=info:pmid/30325833&rfr_iscdi=true |