Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry
Objectives The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a compa...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2018-10, Vol.29 (S16), p.270-275 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 275 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S16 |
| container_start_page | 270 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Feine, Jocelyne Abou‐Ayash, Samir Al Mardini, Majd Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine Bornstein, Michael M. Braegger, Urs Cao, Olivia Cordaro, Luca Eycken, Didier Fillion, Mathieu Gebran, Georges Huynh‐Ba, Guy Joda, Tim Levine, Robert Mattheos, Nikos Oates, Thomas W. Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani Santosa, Robert Shahdad, Shakeel Storelli, Stefano Sykaras, Nikitas Treviño Santos, Alejandro Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike Williams, Mary Ann H. Wilson, Thomas G. Wismeijer, Daniel Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela Yao, Coral Jie Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal |
| description | Objectives
The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant‐retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health‐related quality of life (e.g., SF‐36).
Materials and methods
The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved.
Results
Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients’ ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient‐reported outcomes.
Conclusions
Patient‐reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients’ satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.13299 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2121492832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121017201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-c49ed43ac4a1fb880a57da4f7e5bd99aa10b58f3deff8a8af31d421f209841b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFq3DAQBmARGpJtmkNeoAh6aQ9OZiR7LeVWljZZWEgJydnI8og62JYj2YS99RH6jH2SKrtJDoXqItB8-hl-xs4QzjGdC9uFc5RC6wO2wCVABgXgO7YADUVW4hKP2fsYHwBgqZU-YscSpFCoygWzV8HPI5d8fbfmKz9EGuIc-S2NPkyX_IeZWhqmP79-h90LNdzPk_U98Z5MnANFbmL0tjXPs6d2-snbfuzMMPEmfWzjFLYf2KEzXaTTl_uE3X__dre6zjY3V-vV101mpVI6s7mmJpfG5gZdrRSYomxM7koq6kZrYxDqQjnZkHPKKOMkNrlAJ0CrHGuQJ-zzPncM_nGmOFV9Gy11aRvyc6wECsy1UFIk-ukf-uDnMKTtdgqwFIBJfdkrG3yMgVw1hrY3YVshVM_NV6n5atd8sh9fEue6p-ZNvladwMUePLUdbf-fVK02t_vIvw3Gjs0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121017201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Feine, Jocelyne ; Abou‐Ayash, Samir ; Al Mardini, Majd ; Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos ; Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Braegger, Urs ; Cao, Olivia ; Cordaro, Luca ; Eycken, Didier ; Fillion, Mathieu ; Gebran, Georges ; Huynh‐Ba, Guy ; Joda, Tim ; Levine, Robert ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Oates, Thomas W. ; Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani ; Santosa, Robert ; Shahdad, Shakeel ; Storelli, Stefano ; Sykaras, Nikitas ; Treviño Santos, Alejandro ; Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike ; Williams, Mary Ann H. ; Wilson, Thomas G. ; Wismeijer, Daniel ; Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela ; Yao, Coral Jie ; Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</creator><creatorcontrib>Feine, Jocelyne ; Abou‐Ayash, Samir ; Al Mardini, Majd ; Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos ; Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Braegger, Urs ; Cao, Olivia ; Cordaro, Luca ; Eycken, Didier ; Fillion, Mathieu ; Gebran, Georges ; Huynh‐Ba, Guy ; Joda, Tim ; Levine, Robert ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Oates, Thomas W. ; Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani ; Santosa, Robert ; Shahdad, Shakeel ; Storelli, Stefano ; Sykaras, Nikitas ; Treviño Santos, Alejandro ; Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike ; Williams, Mary Ann H. ; Wilson, Thomas G. ; Wismeijer, Daniel ; Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela ; Yao, Coral Jie ; Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant‐retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health‐related quality of life (e.g., SF‐36).
Materials and methods
The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved.
Results
Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients’ ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient‐reported outcomes.
Conclusions
Patient‐reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients’ satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.13299</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30328187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>clinical research ; clinical trials ; Dental Implants ; Dental materials ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental prosthetics ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; Denture Design ; Denture, Partial, Fixed ; Denture, Partial, Removable ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Immediate Dental Implant Loading ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery ; Mucosa ; Neck ; Occupational health ; Oral hygiene ; Pain ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; patient‐centered outcomes ; Prostheses ; prosthodontics ; Quality of Life ; Ratings ; Rehabilitation ; Restoration ; Surgical implants ; systematic reviews ; Teeth ; Transplants & implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2018-10, Vol.29 (S16), p.270-275</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-c49ed43ac4a1fb880a57da4f7e5bd99aa10b58f3deff8a8af31d421f209841b03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-c49ed43ac4a1fb880a57da4f7e5bd99aa10b58f3deff8a8af31d421f209841b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7773-8957</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.13299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.13299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30328187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feine, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Ayash, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Mardini, Majd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braegger, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordaro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eycken, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fillion, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebran, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh‐Ba, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joda, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattheos, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santosa, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahdad, Shakeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storelli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykaras, Nikitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño Santos, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wismeijer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Coral Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</creatorcontrib><title>Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant‐retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health‐related quality of life (e.g., SF‐36).
Materials and methods
The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved.
Results
Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients’ ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient‐reported outcomes.
Conclusions
Patient‐reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients’ satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.</description><subject>clinical research</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture Design</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Fixed</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Removable</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immediate Dental Implant Loading</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>patient‐centered outcomes</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>prosthodontics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>systematic reviews</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFq3DAQBmARGpJtmkNeoAh6aQ9OZiR7LeVWljZZWEgJydnI8og62JYj2YS99RH6jH2SKrtJDoXqItB8-hl-xs4QzjGdC9uFc5RC6wO2wCVABgXgO7YADUVW4hKP2fsYHwBgqZU-YscSpFCoygWzV8HPI5d8fbfmKz9EGuIc-S2NPkyX_IeZWhqmP79-h90LNdzPk_U98Z5MnANFbmL0tjXPs6d2-snbfuzMMPEmfWzjFLYf2KEzXaTTl_uE3X__dre6zjY3V-vV101mpVI6s7mmJpfG5gZdrRSYomxM7koq6kZrYxDqQjnZkHPKKOMkNrlAJ0CrHGuQJ-zzPncM_nGmOFV9Gy11aRvyc6wECsy1UFIk-ukf-uDnMKTtdgqwFIBJfdkrG3yMgVw1hrY3YVshVM_NV6n5atd8sh9fEue6p-ZNvladwMUePLUdbf-fVK02t_vIvw3Gjs0</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Feine, Jocelyne</creator><creator>Abou‐Ayash, Samir</creator><creator>Al Mardini, Majd</creator><creator>Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos</creator><creator>Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine</creator><creator>Bornstein, Michael M.</creator><creator>Braegger, Urs</creator><creator>Cao, Olivia</creator><creator>Cordaro, Luca</creator><creator>Eycken, Didier</creator><creator>Fillion, Mathieu</creator><creator>Gebran, Georges</creator><creator>Huynh‐Ba, Guy</creator><creator>Joda, Tim</creator><creator>Levine, Robert</creator><creator>Mattheos, Nikos</creator><creator>Oates, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani</creator><creator>Santosa, Robert</creator><creator>Shahdad, Shakeel</creator><creator>Storelli, Stefano</creator><creator>Sykaras, Nikitas</creator><creator>Treviño Santos, Alejandro</creator><creator>Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike</creator><creator>Williams, Mary Ann H.</creator><creator>Wilson, Thomas G.</creator><creator>Wismeijer, Daniel</creator><creator>Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela</creator><creator>Yao, Coral Jie</creator><creator>Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-8957</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry</title><author>Feine, Jocelyne ; Abou‐Ayash, Samir ; Al Mardini, Majd ; Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos ; Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine ; Bornstein, Michael M. ; Braegger, Urs ; Cao, Olivia ; Cordaro, Luca ; Eycken, Didier ; Fillion, Mathieu ; Gebran, Georges ; Huynh‐Ba, Guy ; Joda, Tim ; Levine, Robert ; Mattheos, Nikos ; Oates, Thomas W. ; Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani ; Santosa, Robert ; Shahdad, Shakeel ; Storelli, Stefano ; Sykaras, Nikitas ; Treviño Santos, Alejandro ; Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike ; Williams, Mary Ann H. ; Wilson, Thomas G. ; Wismeijer, Daniel ; Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela ; Yao, Coral Jie ; Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3889-c49ed43ac4a1fb880a57da4f7e5bd99aa10b58f3deff8a8af31d421f209841b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>clinical research</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture Design</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Fixed</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Removable</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immediate Dental Implant Loading</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>patient‐centered outcomes</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>prosthodontics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>systematic reviews</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feine, Jocelyne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou‐Ayash, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al Mardini, Majd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braegger, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordaro, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eycken, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fillion, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gebran, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huynh‐Ba, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joda, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattheos, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santosa, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahdad, Shakeel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storelli, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykaras, Nikitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treviño Santos, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mary Ann H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wismeijer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Coral Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feine, Jocelyne</au><au>Abou‐Ayash, Samir</au><au>Al Mardini, Majd</au><au>Santana, Ronaldo Barcelllos</au><au>Bjelke‐Holtermann, Trine</au><au>Bornstein, Michael M.</au><au>Braegger, Urs</au><au>Cao, Olivia</au><au>Cordaro, Luca</au><au>Eycken, Didier</au><au>Fillion, Mathieu</au><au>Gebran, Georges</au><au>Huynh‐Ba, Guy</au><au>Joda, Tim</au><au>Levine, Robert</au><au>Mattheos, Nikos</au><au>Oates, Thomas W.</au><au>Abd‐Ul‐Salam, Hani</au><au>Santosa, Robert</au><au>Shahdad, Shakeel</au><au>Storelli, Stefano</au><au>Sykaras, Nikitas</au><au>Treviño Santos, Alejandro</au><au>Stephanie Webersberger, Ulrike</au><au>Williams, Mary Ann H.</au><au>Wilson, Thomas G.</au><au>Wismeijer, Daniel</au><au>Wittneben, Julia‐Gabriela</au><au>Yao, Coral Jie</au><au>Zubiria, Juan Pablo Villareal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>S16</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>270-275</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant‐retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health‐related quality of life (e.g., SF‐36).
Materials and methods
The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved.
Results
Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients’ ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient‐reported outcomes.
Conclusions
Patient‐reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients’ satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30328187</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.13299</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-8957</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2018-10, Vol.29 (S16), p.270-275 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2121492832 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | clinical research clinical trials Dental Implants Dental materials Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported Dental prosthetics Dental Restoration Failure Dental restorative materials Dentistry Denture Design Denture, Partial, Fixed Denture, Partial, Removable Esthetics, Dental Humans Immediate Dental Implant Loading Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery Mucosa Neck Occupational health Oral hygiene Pain Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Satisfaction Patients patient‐centered outcomes Prostheses prosthodontics Quality of Life Ratings Rehabilitation Restoration Surgical implants systematic reviews Teeth Transplants & implants Treatment Outcome |
| title | Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: Patient‐reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A54%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%203%20ITI%20Consensus%20Report:%20Patient%E2%80%90reported%20outcome%20measures%20associated%20with%20implant%20dentistry&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Feine,%20Jocelyne&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=S16&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=270-275&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.13299&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121017201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121017201&rft_id=info:pmid/30328187&rfr_iscdi=true |