Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds

In the first decades after logging, the vegetation structure of harvested areas changes rapidly due to succession. For shrubland birds, many of which specialize on regeneration of specific ages, the changing vegetation structure makes determining how much habitat is available for individual species...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.226-231
Hauptverfasser: Schlossberg, Scott, King, David I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 73
creator Schlossberg, Scott
King, David I
description In the first decades after logging, the vegetation structure of harvested areas changes rapidly due to succession. For shrubland birds, many of which specialize on regeneration of specific ages, the changing vegetation structure makes determining how much habitat is available for individual species difficult. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine how populations of shrubland birds in the eastern United States and Canada respond to succession in the first 20 years after timber harvest. Based on those results, we used the area under the abundance–time regression curves to estimate the proportion of regenerating forest actually used by each bird species. Of the 28 species for which we had sufficient data, 14 showed significant changes in abundance over time. For 6 species, abundance was highest immediately after logging and decreased thereafter. Abundances of 7 other species were initially low, peaked roughly 10 years after harvest, and declined thereafter. Based on these results, shrubland birds would be expected to occupy a mean of just 53% (SD = 17%) of regenerating forests up to 20 years old. Thus, current estimates of habitat availability for shrubland birds may be too high by a factor of 2. Our findings also suggest that managed openings should be maintained on longer rotations than are currently used, providing habitat for birds that prefer older regeneration.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2007-518
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21202898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40208515</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40208515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4808-3c4d3b36e6c84e466589e9109799b5815c0f2b6c626e1331cbf97430b3b605193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouF7APyAUH8SX6uTaFJ900V3FG15Y30KTTdestdGkRf33dl1xQfBpGObjzDkHoS0M-wTn9IAAZCnHcgn1ujVLicTZMuoBEJJyhh9X0VqMUwCKsRQ9dHjjY1P5ycTVk-SuNcbG6HydFPU4GRbaNUWTPMRiYhNfJndPodXV7HTswjhuoJWyqKLd_Jnr6OH05L4_TC-uB2f9o4tUMwkypYaNqabCCiOZZUJwmdscQ57lueYScwMl0cIIIiymFBtd5hmjoKkWwLsQ62h3rvsa_FtrY6NeXDS26pxY30ZFMAEic9mBO3_AqW9D3XlThDICGWOsg_bmkAk-xmBL9RrcSxE-FQY1q1DNKlRdhR2aztF3V9nPfzl1Proc0O__23N-GhsffnkGBCTHfKHnYmM_fu9FeFYioxlXo6uB6g9G7P6GMXW7CK6d97X93-gXHo6SRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234207444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Schlossberg, Scott ; King, David I</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlossberg, Scott ; King, David I</creatorcontrib><description>In the first decades after logging, the vegetation structure of harvested areas changes rapidly due to succession. For shrubland birds, many of which specialize on regeneration of specific ages, the changing vegetation structure makes determining how much habitat is available for individual species difficult. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine how populations of shrubland birds in the eastern United States and Canada respond to succession in the first 20 years after timber harvest. Based on those results, we used the area under the abundance–time regression curves to estimate the proportion of regenerating forest actually used by each bird species. Of the 28 species for which we had sufficient data, 14 showed significant changes in abundance over time. For 6 species, abundance was highest immediately after logging and decreased thereafter. Abundances of 7 other species were initially low, peaked roughly 10 years after harvest, and declined thereafter. Based on these results, shrubland birds would be expected to occupy a mean of just 53% (SD = 17%) of regenerating forests up to 20 years old. Thus, current estimates of habitat availability for shrubland birds may be too high by a factor of 2. Our findings also suggest that managed openings should be maintained on longer rotations than are currently used, providing habitat for birds that prefer older regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2007-518</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Aves ; Birds ; Changes ; Community ; Estimates ; Forest conservation ; Forest habitats ; Forest management ; Forest regeneration ; Forest restoration ; Habitat availability ; Habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Harvest ; Logging ; Management and Conservation ; meta-analysis ; population size ; shrubland birds ; Shrublands ; Studies ; succession ; timber harvest ; Trees ; Vegetation ; Vegetation mapping ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.226-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4808-3c4d3b36e6c84e466589e9109799b5815c0f2b6c626e1331cbf97430b3b605193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4808-3c4d3b36e6c84e466589e9109799b5815c0f2b6c626e1331cbf97430b3b605193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40208515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40208515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlossberg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David I</creatorcontrib><title>Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>In the first decades after logging, the vegetation structure of harvested areas changes rapidly due to succession. For shrubland birds, many of which specialize on regeneration of specific ages, the changing vegetation structure makes determining how much habitat is available for individual species difficult. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine how populations of shrubland birds in the eastern United States and Canada respond to succession in the first 20 years after timber harvest. Based on those results, we used the area under the abundance–time regression curves to estimate the proportion of regenerating forest actually used by each bird species. Of the 28 species for which we had sufficient data, 14 showed significant changes in abundance over time. For 6 species, abundance was highest immediately after logging and decreased thereafter. Abundances of 7 other species were initially low, peaked roughly 10 years after harvest, and declined thereafter. Based on these results, shrubland birds would be expected to occupy a mean of just 53% (SD = 17%) of regenerating forests up to 20 years old. Thus, current estimates of habitat availability for shrubland birds may be too high by a factor of 2. Our findings also suggest that managed openings should be maintained on longer rotations than are currently used, providing habitat for birds that prefer older regeneration.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forest regeneration</subject><subject>Forest restoration</subject><subject>Habitat availability</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Management and Conservation</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>population size</subject><subject>shrubland birds</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>timber harvest</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation mapping</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFtLxDAQhYMouF7APyAUH8SX6uTaFJ900V3FG15Y30KTTdestdGkRf33dl1xQfBpGObjzDkHoS0M-wTn9IAAZCnHcgn1ujVLicTZMuoBEJJyhh9X0VqMUwCKsRQ9dHjjY1P5ycTVk-SuNcbG6HydFPU4GRbaNUWTPMRiYhNfJndPodXV7HTswjhuoJWyqKLd_Jnr6OH05L4_TC-uB2f9o4tUMwkypYaNqabCCiOZZUJwmdscQ57lueYScwMl0cIIIiymFBtd5hmjoKkWwLsQ62h3rvsa_FtrY6NeXDS26pxY30ZFMAEic9mBO3_AqW9D3XlThDICGWOsg_bmkAk-xmBL9RrcSxE-FQY1q1DNKlRdhR2aztF3V9nPfzl1Proc0O__23N-GhsffnkGBCTHfKHnYmM_fu9FeFYioxlXo6uB6g9G7P6GMXW7CK6d97X93-gXHo6SRA</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>Schlossberg, Scott</creator><creator>King, David I</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds</title><author>Schlossberg, Scott ; King, David I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4808-3c4d3b36e6c84e466589e9109799b5815c0f2b6c626e1331cbf97430b3b605193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forest regeneration</topic><topic>Forest restoration</topic><topic>Habitat availability</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Management and Conservation</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>population size</topic><topic>shrubland birds</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>timber harvest</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation mapping</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlossberg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, David I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlossberg, Scott</au><au>King, David I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>226-231</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>In the first decades after logging, the vegetation structure of harvested areas changes rapidly due to succession. For shrubland birds, many of which specialize on regeneration of specific ages, the changing vegetation structure makes determining how much habitat is available for individual species difficult. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine how populations of shrubland birds in the eastern United States and Canada respond to succession in the first 20 years after timber harvest. Based on those results, we used the area under the abundance–time regression curves to estimate the proportion of regenerating forest actually used by each bird species. Of the 28 species for which we had sufficient data, 14 showed significant changes in abundance over time. For 6 species, abundance was highest immediately after logging and decreased thereafter. Abundances of 7 other species were initially low, peaked roughly 10 years after harvest, and declined thereafter. Based on these results, shrubland birds would be expected to occupy a mean of just 53% (SD = 17%) of regenerating forests up to 20 years old. Thus, current estimates of habitat availability for shrubland birds may be too high by a factor of 2. Our findings also suggest that managed openings should be maintained on longer rotations than are currently used, providing habitat for birds that prefer older regeneration.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2007-518</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.226-231
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21202898
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal populations
Aves
Birds
Changes
Community
Estimates
Forest conservation
Forest habitats
Forest management
Forest regeneration
Forest restoration
Habitat availability
Habitat conservation
Habitats
Harvest
Logging
Management and Conservation
meta-analysis
population size
shrubland birds
Shrublands
Studies
succession
timber harvest
Trees
Vegetation
Vegetation mapping
Wildlife management
title Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A43%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postlogging%20Succession%20and%20Habitat%20Usage%20of%20Shrubland%20Birds&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Schlossberg,%20Scott&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=226-231&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2007-518&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40208515%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234207444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40208515&rfr_iscdi=true