Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds
Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2018-10, Vol.80, p.8-15 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | O'Connor, John D. Rutherford, Megan Bennett, Damien Hill, Janet C. Beverland, David E. Dunne, Nicholas J. Lennon, Alex B. |
description | Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ± 0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2120206263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929018306158</els_id><sourcerecordid>2118356598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8fc9829f66cc45117f3fa2888148e9c59ddba89e10eaa4c1683c4f1f1def9a1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqV2hI3LiZEZh_sNM0ak1e4kbXhGEufYwMjMDY9Kv4aWXyWhdu3HATzu-eQzgIXVNSU0L7d3M9jzYsoE81I5TXZKhJ0zxDB8qHpmINJ8_RgRBGK8EEuUCXKc2EkKEdxEt00RDGBtHRA_p9DP6uyhAXfLIrdkFN1t9h6_HmrVNFUA7nkMu56xFWpzQs4DNeVbZlJmwT9gFP1hiIuzBCvgfw2NllTDhErMOyqghTMcInUC6fHsqdzzG4hFXGyS4lK-J75X7s6WkFmNIr9MIol-D147xC3z99_HZzWx2_fv5y8-FY6VawXHGjBWfC9L3WbUfpYBqjGOecthyE7sQ0jYoLoASUajXteaNbQw2dwAhFVXOF3p591xh-bpCyXGzS4JzyELYkGWWEkZ71TUHf_IPOYYu-vK5QlDdd3wleqP5M6RhSimDkGu2i4oOkRO7tyVk-tSf39iQZZGmvLF4_2m_jAtPftae6CvD-DED5j18Woky6dKBhshF0llOw_8v4A6xjsfc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118356598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>O'Connor, John D. ; Rutherford, Megan ; Bennett, Damien ; Hill, Janet C. ; Beverland, David E. ; Dunne, Nicholas J. ; Lennon, Alex B.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, John D. ; Rutherford, Megan ; Bennett, Damien ; Hill, Janet C. ; Beverland, David E. ; Dunne, Nicholas J. ; Lennon, Alex B.</creatorcontrib><description>Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ± 0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p < 0.001) and increased at mid-stance by 15% (p = 0.02) for the slower group compared to controls. There were no differences between operated and non-operated limbs for the slower group or the faster group, suggesting good biomechanical recovery at long-term follow-up. Loading, at different walking speeds, presented here can improve the relevance of preclinical testing methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30227951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomechanics ; Biomedical materials ; Contact force ; Data processing ; Floor coverings ; Gait ; Hip ; Hip contact forces ; Joint surgery ; Kinematics ; Limbs ; Mathematical analysis ; Musculoskeletal modelling ; Patients ; Short term ; Standard deviation ; Surgical implants ; Test procedures ; Total hip arthroplasty ; Total hip replacement ; Transplants & implants ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2018-10, Vol.80, p.8-15</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 26, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8fc9829f66cc45117f3fa2888148e9c59ddba89e10eaa4c1683c4f1f1def9a1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8fc9829f66cc45117f3fa2888148e9c59ddba89e10eaa4c1683c4f1f1def9a1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929018306158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30227951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Janet C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverland, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Alex B.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ± 0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p < 0.001) and increased at mid-stance by 15% (p = 0.02) for the slower group compared to controls. There were no differences between operated and non-operated limbs for the slower group or the faster group, suggesting good biomechanical recovery at long-term follow-up. Loading, at different walking speeds, presented here can improve the relevance of preclinical testing methods.</description><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Contact force</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Floor coverings</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Hip contact forces</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Limbs</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal modelling</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Short term</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Total hip replacement</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqV2hI3LiZEZh_sNM0ak1e4kbXhGEufYwMjMDY9Kv4aWXyWhdu3HATzu-eQzgIXVNSU0L7d3M9jzYsoE81I5TXZKhJ0zxDB8qHpmINJ8_RgRBGK8EEuUCXKc2EkKEdxEt00RDGBtHRA_p9DP6uyhAXfLIrdkFN1t9h6_HmrVNFUA7nkMu56xFWpzQs4DNeVbZlJmwT9gFP1hiIuzBCvgfw2NllTDhErMOyqghTMcInUC6fHsqdzzG4hFXGyS4lK-J75X7s6WkFmNIr9MIol-D147xC3z99_HZzWx2_fv5y8-FY6VawXHGjBWfC9L3WbUfpYBqjGOecthyE7sQ0jYoLoASUajXteaNbQw2dwAhFVXOF3p591xh-bpCyXGzS4JzyELYkGWWEkZ71TUHf_IPOYYu-vK5QlDdd3wleqP5M6RhSimDkGu2i4oOkRO7tyVk-tSf39iQZZGmvLF4_2m_jAtPftae6CvD-DED5j18Woky6dKBhshF0llOw_8v4A6xjsfc</recordid><startdate>20181026</startdate><enddate>20181026</enddate><creator>O'Connor, John D.</creator><creator>Rutherford, Megan</creator><creator>Bennett, Damien</creator><creator>Hill, Janet C.</creator><creator>Beverland, David E.</creator><creator>Dunne, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Lennon, Alex B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181026</creationdate><title>Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds</title><author>O'Connor, John D. ; Rutherford, Megan ; Bennett, Damien ; Hill, Janet C. ; Beverland, David E. ; Dunne, Nicholas J. ; Lennon, Alex B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c492t-8fc9829f66cc45117f3fa2888148e9c59ddba89e10eaa4c1683c4f1f1def9a1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Contact force</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Floor coverings</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Hip contact forces</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Limbs</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal modelling</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Short term</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Total hip replacement</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Janet C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverland, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunne, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lennon, Alex B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Connor, John D.</au><au>Rutherford, Megan</au><au>Bennett, Damien</au><au>Hill, Janet C.</au><au>Beverland, David E.</au><au>Dunne, Nicholas J.</au><au>Lennon, Alex B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2018-10-26</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>8</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>8-15</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Variation in hip joint contact forces directly influences the performance of total hip replacements (THRs). Measurement and calculation of contact forces in THR patients has been limited by small sample sizes, wide variation in patient and surgical factors, and short-term follow-up. This study hypothesised that, at long-term follow-up, unilateral THR patients have similar calculated hip contact forces compared to controls walking at similar (self-selected) speeds and, in contrast, THR patients walking at slower (self-selected) speeds have reduced hip contact forces. It was further hypothesised that there is no difference in calculated hip contact forces between operated and non-operated limbs at long-term follow-up for both faster and slower patients. Gait analysis data for THR patients walking at faster (walking speed: 1.29 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 11) and slower (walking speed: 0.72 ± 0.09 m/s; n = 11) speeds were used. Healthy subjects constituted the control group (walking speed: 1.36 ± 0.12 m/s; n = 10). Hip contact forces were calculated using static optimisation. There was no significant difference (p > 0.31) in hip contact forces between faster and control groups. Conversely, force was reduced at heel strike by 19% (p = 0.002), toe-off by 31% (p < 0.001) and increased at mid-stance by 15% (p = 0.02) for the slower group compared to controls. There were no differences between operated and non-operated limbs for the slower group or the faster group, suggesting good biomechanical recovery at long-term follow-up. Loading, at different walking speeds, presented here can improve the relevance of preclinical testing methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30227951</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.033</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2018-10, Vol.80, p.8-15 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2120206263 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biomechanics Biomedical materials Contact force Data processing Floor coverings Gait Hip Hip contact forces Joint surgery Kinematics Limbs Mathematical analysis Musculoskeletal modelling Patients Short term Standard deviation Surgical implants Test procedures Total hip arthroplasty Total hip replacement Transplants & implants Walking |
title | Long-term hip loading in unilateral total hip replacement patients is no different between limbs or compared to healthy controls at similar walking speeds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A43%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20hip%20loading%20in%20unilateral%20total%20hip%20replacement%20patients%20is%20no%20different%20between%20limbs%20or%20compared%20to%20healthy%20controls%20at%20similar%20walking%20speeds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=O'Connor,%20John%20D.&rft.date=2018-10-26&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=8-15&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2118356598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118356598&rft_id=info:pmid/30227951&rft_els_id=S0021929018306158&rfr_iscdi=true |