The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking

We explored the impact of gender role orientation (masculinity and femininity) on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Caring and critical thinking are at the core of professional nursing education. Previous studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impact of gender rol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of nursing studies 2019-01, Vol.89, p.18-23
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Nai-Yu, Hsu, Wen-Yi, Hung, Chao-An, Wu, Pei-Ling, Pai, Hsiang-Chu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 23
container_issue
container_start_page 18
container_title International journal of nursing studies
container_volume 89
creator Liu, Nai-Yu
Hsu, Wen-Yi
Hung, Chao-An
Wu, Pei-Ling
Pai, Hsiang-Chu
description We explored the impact of gender role orientation (masculinity and femininity) on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Caring and critical thinking are at the core of professional nursing education. Previous studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impact of gender roles on caring behaviour and critical thinking. We employed a quantitative correlational study. Nursing students (N = 449; female = 310, male = 139) who had at least had one month of clinical practice experience were recruited from four universities in Taiwan. Students’ ages ranged from 19 to 29 years (Mean age = 21.24 years, SD = 1.28). Data were collected from August 2016 to July 2017, using three questionnaires: Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort Scale (CARE-Q), and Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Partial least squares structural equation modelling and generalized linear models were conducted to test the research model and hypotheses. Findings indicated that students who reported higher caring and masculinity presented greater critical thinking (ß = .37 and ß = 0.24, respectively; ps < .001). Students’ gender, age, femininity, or clinical practice experience, however, were not significantly associated with critical thinking (ß = -0.01, ß = 0.09, ß = .10, and ß = 0.01, respectively; ps > .05). In addition, students who reported higher masculinity and femininity presented greater caring behaviour (ß = .22 and ß = 0.38, respectively; ps < .001). Students’ gender, age or clinical practice experience were not significantly associated with caring behaviour (ß = .04, ß = .03, and ß = -0.05, respectively; ps > 0.05). The findings confirmed a direct influence of caring and masculinity on critical thinking. Masculinity indirectly affected critical thinking via caring behaviour. Caring and masculinity accounted for 34.4% of the variance in critical thinking, and masculinity and femininity accounted for 29.1% of the variance in caring behaviour. Our study confirms the effect of age, gender role, and caring behaviour on critical thinking. We recommend that the cultivation of nursing care behaviour focus on students’ gender role orientation. In addition, clinical nurse educators, when working with male students on patient caring, should consider their gender role orientation and support male nursing students’ ways of presenting caring behaviours.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2120192620</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002074891830213X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2120192620</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-568ed2e2a65c7657fb9f83aa205005ab6b3d182ca453d162b186836749cd4d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0FYaAGzfd5qc7neyUwT8YcDOCu5BOquem7ZuMSfeAO1_D1_NJrMudceFGCCQhX9WpnEPIBWctZ1y9nts4p63UdWsF47plpmWsf0R2XA-y6Qz_-pjsGBOsGTptzsizWmfGkGT6KTmTTHJlerUj7noPFKYJ_ErzRG8gBSi05AVoLhHS6taYE8WFUgHv9KgK9ffPX9S7EtMNHWHv7mLeCnUpUF_iGr1b6LqP6Ru-PydPJrdUeHG_n5Mv799dX35srj5_-HT59qrx0qi16ZWGIEA41ftB9cM0mklL5wTr8WNuVKMMXAvvuh4PSoxcKy3V0BkfuiA6eU5enfrelvx9g7raQ6welsUlyFu1gqNRRijBEH35Dzrj-AmnQ0pL3hnRK6TUifIl11pgsrclHlz5YTmzxxDsbB9CsMcQLDMWZ8XCi_v223iA8LfswXUE3pwAQD_uIhRbPXrtIcSCQdiQ4_80_gC28p0N</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183149256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Liu, Nai-Yu ; Hsu, Wen-Yi ; Hung, Chao-An ; Wu, Pei-Ling ; Pai, Hsiang-Chu</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nai-Yu ; Hsu, Wen-Yi ; Hung, Chao-An ; Wu, Pei-Ling ; Pai, Hsiang-Chu</creatorcontrib><description>We explored the impact of gender role orientation (masculinity and femininity) on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Caring and critical thinking are at the core of professional nursing education. Previous studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impact of gender roles on caring behaviour and critical thinking. We employed a quantitative correlational study. Nursing students (N = 449; female = 310, male = 139) who had at least had one month of clinical practice experience were recruited from four universities in Taiwan. Students’ ages ranged from 19 to 29 years (Mean age = 21.24 years, SD = 1.28). Data were collected from August 2016 to July 2017, using three questionnaires: Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort Scale (CARE-Q), and Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Partial least squares structural equation modelling and generalized linear models were conducted to test the research model and hypotheses. Findings indicated that students who reported higher caring and masculinity presented greater critical thinking (ß = .37 and ß = 0.24, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age, femininity, or clinical practice experience, however, were not significantly associated with critical thinking (ß = -0.01, ß = 0.09, ß = .10, and ß = 0.01, respectively; ps &gt; .05). In addition, students who reported higher masculinity and femininity presented greater caring behaviour (ß = .22 and ß = 0.38, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age or clinical practice experience were not significantly associated with caring behaviour (ß = .04, ß = .03, and ß = -0.05, respectively; ps &gt; 0.05). The findings confirmed a direct influence of caring and masculinity on critical thinking. Masculinity indirectly affected critical thinking via caring behaviour. Caring and masculinity accounted for 34.4% of the variance in critical thinking, and masculinity and femininity accounted for 29.1% of the variance in caring behaviour. Our study confirms the effect of age, gender role, and caring behaviour on critical thinking. We recommend that the cultivation of nursing care behaviour focus on students’ gender role orientation. In addition, clinical nurse educators, when working with male students on patient caring, should consider their gender role orientation and support male nursing students’ ways of presenting caring behaviours.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-491X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30316956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Behavior ; Caregiving ; Caring ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Critical thinking ; Cultivation ; Femininity ; Gender ; Gender role ; Gender role orientation ; Generalized linear models ; Linear analysis ; Males ; Masculinity ; Medical education ; Nurse tutors ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Questionnaires ; Sex roles ; Stereotype ; Student nurse ; Students</subject><ispartof>International journal of nursing studies, 2019-01, Vol.89, p.18-23</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-568ed2e2a65c7657fb9f83aa205005ab6b3d182ca453d162b186836749cd4d243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-568ed2e2a65c7657fb9f83aa205005ab6b3d182ca453d162b186836749cd4d243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6557-5719</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30316956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nai-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Wen-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chao-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Pei-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pai, Hsiang-Chu</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking</title><title>International journal of nursing studies</title><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><description>We explored the impact of gender role orientation (masculinity and femininity) on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Caring and critical thinking are at the core of professional nursing education. Previous studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impact of gender roles on caring behaviour and critical thinking. We employed a quantitative correlational study. Nursing students (N = 449; female = 310, male = 139) who had at least had one month of clinical practice experience were recruited from four universities in Taiwan. Students’ ages ranged from 19 to 29 years (Mean age = 21.24 years, SD = 1.28). Data were collected from August 2016 to July 2017, using three questionnaires: Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort Scale (CARE-Q), and Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Partial least squares structural equation modelling and generalized linear models were conducted to test the research model and hypotheses. Findings indicated that students who reported higher caring and masculinity presented greater critical thinking (ß = .37 and ß = 0.24, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age, femininity, or clinical practice experience, however, were not significantly associated with critical thinking (ß = -0.01, ß = 0.09, ß = .10, and ß = 0.01, respectively; ps &gt; .05). In addition, students who reported higher masculinity and femininity presented greater caring behaviour (ß = .22 and ß = 0.38, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age or clinical practice experience were not significantly associated with caring behaviour (ß = .04, ß = .03, and ß = -0.05, respectively; ps &gt; 0.05). The findings confirmed a direct influence of caring and masculinity on critical thinking. Masculinity indirectly affected critical thinking via caring behaviour. Caring and masculinity accounted for 34.4% of the variance in critical thinking, and masculinity and femininity accounted for 29.1% of the variance in caring behaviour. Our study confirms the effect of age, gender role, and caring behaviour on critical thinking. We recommend that the cultivation of nursing care behaviour focus on students’ gender role orientation. In addition, clinical nurse educators, when working with male students on patient caring, should consider their gender role orientation and support male nursing students’ ways of presenting caring behaviours.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Caregiving</subject><subject>Caring</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender role</subject><subject>Gender role orientation</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Linear analysis</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Nurse tutors</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sex roles</subject><subject>Stereotype</subject><subject>Student nurse</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0020-7489</issn><issn>1873-491X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2KFTEQhYMoznX0FYaAGzfd5qc7neyUwT8YcDOCu5BOquem7ZuMSfeAO1_D1_NJrMudceFGCCQhX9WpnEPIBWctZ1y9nts4p63UdWsF47plpmWsf0R2XA-y6Qz_-pjsGBOsGTptzsizWmfGkGT6KTmTTHJlerUj7noPFKYJ_ErzRG8gBSi05AVoLhHS6taYE8WFUgHv9KgK9ffPX9S7EtMNHWHv7mLeCnUpUF_iGr1b6LqP6Ru-PydPJrdUeHG_n5Mv799dX35srj5_-HT59qrx0qi16ZWGIEA41ftB9cM0mklL5wTr8WNuVKMMXAvvuh4PSoxcKy3V0BkfuiA6eU5enfrelvx9g7raQ6welsUlyFu1gqNRRijBEH35Dzrj-AmnQ0pL3hnRK6TUifIl11pgsrclHlz5YTmzxxDsbB9CsMcQLDMWZ8XCi_v223iA8LfswXUE3pwAQD_uIhRbPXrtIcSCQdiQ4_80_gC28p0N</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Liu, Nai-Yu</creator><creator>Hsu, Wen-Yi</creator><creator>Hung, Chao-An</creator><creator>Wu, Pei-Ling</creator><creator>Pai, Hsiang-Chu</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-5719</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking</title><author>Liu, Nai-Yu ; Hsu, Wen-Yi ; Hung, Chao-An ; Wu, Pei-Ling ; Pai, Hsiang-Chu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-568ed2e2a65c7657fb9f83aa205005ab6b3d182ca453d162b186836749cd4d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Caregiving</topic><topic>Caring</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender role</topic><topic>Gender role orientation</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Linear analysis</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Nurse tutors</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sex roles</topic><topic>Stereotype</topic><topic>Student nurse</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nai-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Wen-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, Chao-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Pei-Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pai, Hsiang-Chu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Nai-Yu</au><au>Hsu, Wen-Yi</au><au>Hung, Chao-An</au><au>Wu, Pei-Ling</au><au>Pai, Hsiang-Chu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking</atitle><jtitle>International journal of nursing studies</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Nurs Stud</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>89</volume><spage>18</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>18-23</pages><issn>0020-7489</issn><eissn>1873-491X</eissn><abstract>We explored the impact of gender role orientation (masculinity and femininity) on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking. Caring and critical thinking are at the core of professional nursing education. Previous studies revealed inconsistent findings regarding the impact of gender roles on caring behaviour and critical thinking. We employed a quantitative correlational study. Nursing students (N = 449; female = 310, male = 139) who had at least had one month of clinical practice experience were recruited from four universities in Taiwan. Students’ ages ranged from 19 to 29 years (Mean age = 21.24 years, SD = 1.28). Data were collected from August 2016 to July 2017, using three questionnaires: Taiwan Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CTDI), Caring Assessment Report Evaluation Q-sort Scale (CARE-Q), and Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). Partial least squares structural equation modelling and generalized linear models were conducted to test the research model and hypotheses. Findings indicated that students who reported higher caring and masculinity presented greater critical thinking (ß = .37 and ß = 0.24, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age, femininity, or clinical practice experience, however, were not significantly associated with critical thinking (ß = -0.01, ß = 0.09, ß = .10, and ß = 0.01, respectively; ps &gt; .05). In addition, students who reported higher masculinity and femininity presented greater caring behaviour (ß = .22 and ß = 0.38, respectively; ps &lt; .001). Students’ gender, age or clinical practice experience were not significantly associated with caring behaviour (ß = .04, ß = .03, and ß = -0.05, respectively; ps &gt; 0.05). The findings confirmed a direct influence of caring and masculinity on critical thinking. Masculinity indirectly affected critical thinking via caring behaviour. Caring and masculinity accounted for 34.4% of the variance in critical thinking, and masculinity and femininity accounted for 29.1% of the variance in caring behaviour. Our study confirms the effect of age, gender role, and caring behaviour on critical thinking. We recommend that the cultivation of nursing care behaviour focus on students’ gender role orientation. In addition, clinical nurse educators, when working with male students on patient caring, should consider their gender role orientation and support male nursing students’ ways of presenting caring behaviours.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30316956</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-5719</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7489
ispartof International journal of nursing studies, 2019-01, Vol.89, p.18-23
issn 0020-7489
1873-491X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2120192620
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Age
Behavior
Caregiving
Caring
Clinical medicine
Clinical nursing
Critical thinking
Cultivation
Femininity
Gender
Gender role
Gender role orientation
Generalized linear models
Linear analysis
Males
Masculinity
Medical education
Nurse tutors
Nursing
Nursing care
Questionnaires
Sex roles
Stereotype
Student nurse
Students
title The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A09%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20gender%20role%20orientation%20on%20student%20nurses%E2%80%99%20caring%20behaviour%20and%20critical%20thinking&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20nursing%20studies&rft.au=Liu,%20Nai-Yu&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=89&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=18-23&rft.issn=0020-7489&rft.eissn=1873-491X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2120192620%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183149256&rft_id=info:pmid/30316956&rft_els_id=S002074891830213X&rfr_iscdi=true