Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty
•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Maturitas 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Maturitas |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | King, Samuel W. Lamb, Jonathan N. Cage, Emily S. Pandit, Hemant |
description | •Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures.
Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2119917745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378512218304328</els_id><sourcerecordid>2119917745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1x07TpcZr4kiaxA5yjNHFZRj9GkoH278m0wRXJkmX5sV_7JeQG6BQoFHfraafC1tmg_DSjIKY0BtATMgZRsjQHgFMypqwUKYcsG5EL79eUUk5Zfk5GjDLIOc_HZLlEZzdu8GGFweqkwW5wqk0ap3QUQJ80Q9sO37Z_T8IQYmdlN4nqzbH66BET5cLKDZtW-bC7JGeNaj1eHfOEvD3cv86f0sXL4_N8tkh1ntGQYiGE4FrTAuqyKqCsUZuiElkDlcm1MKyMnDAV6Mo0kPGaAQcomOZNXpuaTcjtYW88_nOLPsjOeo1tq3octl5mAFUFZZnziJYHVMc_vcNGbpztlNtJoHJvp1zLPzvl3k5JYwCNk9dHkW3dofmb-_UvArMDgPHVL4tOem2x12isQx2kGey_Ij8bMYvp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119917745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><description>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures.
Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30314554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Complication ; Femoral Fractures - epidemiology ; Femoral Fractures - etiology ; Femur ; Humans ; Incidence ; Periprosthetic fracture ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology ; Risk Factors ; Total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Maturitas, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512218304328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cage, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Maturitas</title><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><description>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures.
Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Periprosthetic fracture</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0378-5122</issn><issn>1873-4111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1x07TpcZr4kiaxA5yjNHFZRj9GkoH278m0wRXJkmX5sV_7JeQG6BQoFHfraafC1tmg_DSjIKY0BtATMgZRsjQHgFMypqwUKYcsG5EL79eUUk5Zfk5GjDLIOc_HZLlEZzdu8GGFweqkwW5wqk0ap3QUQJ80Q9sO37Z_T8IQYmdlN4nqzbH66BET5cLKDZtW-bC7JGeNaj1eHfOEvD3cv86f0sXL4_N8tkh1ntGQYiGE4FrTAuqyKqCsUZuiElkDlcm1MKyMnDAV6Mo0kPGaAQcomOZNXpuaTcjtYW88_nOLPsjOeo1tq3octl5mAFUFZZnziJYHVMc_vcNGbpztlNtJoHJvp1zLPzvl3k5JYwCNk9dHkW3dofmb-_UvArMDgPHVL4tOem2x12isQx2kGey_Ij8bMYvp</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>King, Samuel W.</creator><creator>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creator><creator>Cage, Emily S.</creator><creator>Pandit, Hemant</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><author>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Periprosthetic fracture</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cage, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Samuel W.</au><au>Lamb, Jonathan N.</au><au>Cage, Emily S.</au><au>Pandit, Hemant</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0378-5122</issn><eissn>1873-4111</eissn><abstract>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures.
Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30314554</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5122 |
ispartof | Maturitas, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5 |
issn | 0378-5122 1873-4111 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2119917745 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Complication Femoral Fractures - epidemiology Femoral Fractures - etiology Femur Humans Incidence Periprosthetic fracture Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology Risk Factors Total hip arthroplasty |
title | Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periprosthetic%20femoral%20fractures%20following%20total%20hip%20and%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Maturitas&rft.au=King,%20Samuel%20W.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0378-5122&rft.eissn=1873-4111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2119917745%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119917745&rft_id=info:pmid/30314554&rft_els_id=S0378512218304328&rfr_iscdi=true |