Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty

•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Maturitas 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5
Hauptverfasser: King, Samuel W., Lamb, Jonathan N., Cage, Emily S., Pandit, Hemant
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Maturitas
container_volume 117
creator King, Samuel W.
Lamb, Jonathan N.
Cage, Emily S.
Pandit, Hemant
description •Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures. Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2119917745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378512218304328</els_id><sourcerecordid>2119917745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1x07TpcZr4kiaxA5yjNHFZRj9GkoH278m0wRXJkmX5sV_7JeQG6BQoFHfraafC1tmg_DSjIKY0BtATMgZRsjQHgFMypqwUKYcsG5EL79eUUk5Zfk5GjDLIOc_HZLlEZzdu8GGFweqkwW5wqk0ap3QUQJ80Q9sO37Z_T8IQYmdlN4nqzbH66BET5cLKDZtW-bC7JGeNaj1eHfOEvD3cv86f0sXL4_N8tkh1ntGQYiGE4FrTAuqyKqCsUZuiElkDlcm1MKyMnDAV6Mo0kPGaAQcomOZNXpuaTcjtYW88_nOLPsjOeo1tq3octl5mAFUFZZnziJYHVMc_vcNGbpztlNtJoHJvp1zLPzvl3k5JYwCNk9dHkW3dofmb-_UvArMDgPHVL4tOem2x12isQx2kGey_Ij8bMYvp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2119917745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</creator><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><description>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures. Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30314554</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Complication ; Femoral Fractures - epidemiology ; Femoral Fractures - etiology ; Femur ; Humans ; Incidence ; Periprosthetic fracture ; Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology ; Risk Factors ; Total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Maturitas, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512218304328$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314554$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cage, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><title>Maturitas</title><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><description>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures. Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Complication</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Femoral Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Periprosthetic fracture</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0378-5122</issn><issn>1873-4111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF6BHLh1x07TpcZr4kiaxA5yjNHFZRj9GkoH278m0wRXJkmX5sV_7JeQG6BQoFHfraafC1tmg_DSjIKY0BtATMgZRsjQHgFMypqwUKYcsG5EL79eUUk5Zfk5GjDLIOc_HZLlEZzdu8GGFweqkwW5wqk0ap3QUQJ80Q9sO37Z_T8IQYmdlN4nqzbH66BET5cLKDZtW-bC7JGeNaj1eHfOEvD3cv86f0sXL4_N8tkh1ntGQYiGE4FrTAuqyKqCsUZuiElkDlcm1MKyMnDAV6Mo0kPGaAQcomOZNXpuaTcjtYW88_nOLPsjOeo1tq3octl5mAFUFZZnziJYHVMc_vcNGbpztlNtJoHJvp1zLPzvl3k5JYwCNk9dHkW3dofmb-_UvArMDgPHVL4tOem2x12isQx2kGey_Ij8bMYvp</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>King, Samuel W.</creator><creator>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creator><creator>Cage, Emily S.</creator><creator>Pandit, Hemant</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</title><author>King, Samuel W. ; Lamb, Jonathan N. ; Cage, Emily S. ; Pandit, Hemant</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e68885cc061b79617becd6982f19d4c8d374208d91c9df125b3151163c5f4bdb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Complication</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Femoral Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Periprosthetic fracture</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>King, Samuel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Jonathan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cage, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandit, Hemant</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>King, Samuel W.</au><au>Lamb, Jonathan N.</au><au>Cage, Emily S.</au><au>Pandit, Hemant</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Maturitas</jtitle><addtitle>Maturitas</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>0378-5122</issn><eissn>1873-4111</eissn><abstract>•Joint arthroplasty prevalence is increasing rapidly, as is fracture incidence.•Up to 2.5% and 3.5% fracture around primary TKA and THA respectively.•Reduced bone quality increases risk of periprosthetic fracture.•Risk is much higher in uncemented THA and certain implant shapes.•Morbidity, mortality and cost impact comparable with native neck of femur fractures. Total joint arthroplasties are increasing worldwide in both frequency and prevalence. When successful, they offer great improvements in quality of life. However, fractures around implants are often difficult to manage and require prolonged inpatient stays in tertiary hospitals. Management may differ between surgeons, but most patients will be managed surgically if mobility or joint stability is threatened. Those affected are often at higher risk from surgery, are frailer and at higher risk of mortality and a lifelong reduction in mobility. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, and patients should appreciate the risk and implications of this recognised complication of joint arthroplasty.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30314554</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7900-0174</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5122
ispartof Maturitas, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.1-5
issn 0378-5122
1873-4111
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2119917745
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects
Complication
Femoral Fractures - epidemiology
Femoral Fractures - etiology
Femur
Humans
Incidence
Periprosthetic fracture
Periprosthetic Fractures - epidemiology
Periprosthetic Fractures - etiology
Risk Factors
Total hip arthroplasty
title Periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip and total knee arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A25%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periprosthetic%20femoral%20fractures%20following%20total%20hip%20and%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Maturitas&rft.au=King,%20Samuel%20W.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=0378-5122&rft.eissn=1873-4111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.08.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2119917745%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2119917745&rft_id=info:pmid/30314554&rft_els_id=S0378512218304328&rfr_iscdi=true