Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China
Implementation and sustainability of the evidence-based practice (EBP) approach within systems of health-care delivery require leadership and organizational support, yet few instruments have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the EBP Nursing Leaders...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation & the health professions 2019-09, Vol.42 (3), p.328-343 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 343 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 328 |
| container_title | Evaluation & the health professions |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Zhang, Yin-Ping Liu, Wen-Hui Yan, Yi-Tian Porr, Caroline Zhang, Yao Wei, Huan-Huan |
| description | Implementation and sustainability of the evidence-based practice (EBP) approach within systems of health-care delivery require leadership and organizational support, yet few instruments have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and the EBP Work Environment Scale to Mainland China’s cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese version. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 clinical nurses. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 419 nurses from Mainland China. A content validity index of .985 and .982 was achieved. The split-half coefficient was .890 for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and .892 for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Test–retest reliability was .871 and .855, respectively. Principal component analysis resulted in a one-factor structure explaining 62.069% of the total variance for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and 62.242% of the total variance for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Both of the newly cross-culturally adapted scales possess adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability and validity and therefore may be utilized in health-care environments to assess leadership and organizational support for EBP in Mainland China. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0163278718801439 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117821685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278718801439</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2263221062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e209fa4eefb37a0882c6ced22e69126d83d10216874cb6be44748830f1beff773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhS0EokNhzwpZYsMm4Edie5ZDNDykASpRxDJy7JuOS2JPbadSfwz_FYcZQKrEyovzneN770HoOSWvKZXyDaGCM6kkVYrQmq8foBVtGlbxNVUP0WqRq0U_Q09SuiaEsqaRj9EZJ5xQLsUK_bxId2YfJsjRGXwJKTt_hcOA8x7w9tZZ8AaqtzqBxRdRm-wM4M9zTAu2A20hpr074K9Gj4C1t7-N30P8gbf-1sXgJ_D5JG-GDBG3MaRUtfOY56hHvLH6kHV2wWPn8Sft_LjEtHvn9VP0aNBjgmen9xx9e7e9bD9Uuy_vP7abXWW4aHIFjKwHXQMMPZeaKMWMMGAZA7GmTFjFLSWMCiVr04se6lrWSnEy0B6GQUp-jl4dcw8x3MzlCN3kkoGxTAJhTh0r11ZLQFPQl_fQ6zBHX6brGCttMEoEKxQ5UmZZNsLQHaKbdLzrKOmW6rr71RXLi1Pw3E9g_xr-dFWA6ggkfQX_fv1v4C8dbaFa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2263221062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Zhang, Yin-Ping ; Liu, Wen-Hui ; Yan, Yi-Tian ; Porr, Caroline ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan-Huan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin-Ping ; Liu, Wen-Hui ; Yan, Yi-Tian ; Porr, Caroline ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan-Huan</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation and sustainability of the evidence-based practice (EBP) approach within systems of health-care delivery require leadership and organizational support, yet few instruments have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and the EBP Work Environment Scale to Mainland China’s cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese version. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 clinical nurses. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 419 nurses from Mainland China. A content validity index of .985 and .982 was achieved. The split-half coefficient was .890 for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and .892 for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Test–retest reliability was .871 and .855, respectively. Principal component analysis resulted in a one-factor structure explaining 62.069% of the total variance for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and 62.242% of the total variance for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Both of the newly cross-culturally adapted scales possess adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability and validity and therefore may be utilized in health-care environments to assess leadership and organizational support for EBP in Mainland China.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278718801439</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30301376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Chinese languages ; Clinical nursing ; Content Validity ; Cultural Context ; Evidence Based Practice ; Evidence-based nursing ; Factor Structure ; Health administration ; Health care ; Health care delivery ; Health technology assessment ; Leadership ; Nursing ; Organizational support ; Practice nursing ; Principal components analysis ; Professional practice ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Reliability ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Work environment</subject><ispartof>Evaluation & the health professions, 2019-09, Vol.42 (3), p.328-343</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e209fa4eefb37a0882c6ced22e69126d83d10216874cb6be44748830f1beff773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e209fa4eefb37a0882c6ced22e69126d83d10216874cb6be44748830f1beff773</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278718801439$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278718801439$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30301376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi-Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan-Huan</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China</title><title>Evaluation & the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>Implementation and sustainability of the evidence-based practice (EBP) approach within systems of health-care delivery require leadership and organizational support, yet few instruments have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and the EBP Work Environment Scale to Mainland China’s cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese version. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 clinical nurses. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 419 nurses from Mainland China. A content validity index of .985 and .982 was achieved. The split-half coefficient was .890 for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and .892 for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Test–retest reliability was .871 and .855, respectively. Principal component analysis resulted in a one-factor structure explaining 62.069% of the total variance for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and 62.242% of the total variance for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Both of the newly cross-culturally adapted scales possess adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability and validity and therefore may be utilized in health-care environments to assess leadership and organizational support for EBP in Mainland China.</description><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Content Validity</subject><subject>Cultural Context</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Factor Structure</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care delivery</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Organizational support</subject><subject>Practice nursing</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAUhS0EokNhzwpZYsMm4Edie5ZDNDykASpRxDJy7JuOS2JPbadSfwz_FYcZQKrEyovzneN770HoOSWvKZXyDaGCM6kkVYrQmq8foBVtGlbxNVUP0WqRq0U_Q09SuiaEsqaRj9EZJ5xQLsUK_bxId2YfJsjRGXwJKTt_hcOA8x7w9tZZ8AaqtzqBxRdRm-wM4M9zTAu2A20hpr074K9Gj4C1t7-N30P8gbf-1sXgJ_D5JG-GDBG3MaRUtfOY56hHvLH6kHV2wWPn8Sft_LjEtHvn9VP0aNBjgmen9xx9e7e9bD9Uuy_vP7abXWW4aHIFjKwHXQMMPZeaKMWMMGAZA7GmTFjFLSWMCiVr04se6lrWSnEy0B6GQUp-jl4dcw8x3MzlCN3kkoGxTAJhTh0r11ZLQFPQl_fQ6zBHX6brGCttMEoEKxQ5UmZZNsLQHaKbdLzrKOmW6rr71RXLi1Pw3E9g_xr-dFWA6ggkfQX_fv1v4C8dbaFa</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Zhang, Yin-Ping</creator><creator>Liu, Wen-Hui</creator><creator>Yan, Yi-Tian</creator><creator>Porr, Caroline</creator><creator>Zhang, Yao</creator><creator>Wei, Huan-Huan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China</title><author>Zhang, Yin-Ping ; Liu, Wen-Hui ; Yan, Yi-Tian ; Porr, Caroline ; Zhang, Yao ; Wei, Huan-Huan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e209fa4eefb37a0882c6ced22e69126d83d10216874cb6be44748830f1beff773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Content Validity</topic><topic>Cultural Context</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Factor Structure</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care delivery</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Organizational support</topic><topic>Practice nursing</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yin-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wen-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Yi-Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porr, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Huan-Huan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Yin-Ping</au><au>Liu, Wen-Hui</au><au>Yan, Yi-Tian</au><au>Porr, Caroline</au><au>Zhang, Yao</au><au>Wei, Huan-Huan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation & the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>328-343</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><abstract>Implementation and sustainability of the evidence-based practice (EBP) approach within systems of health-care delivery require leadership and organizational support, yet few instruments have been developed specifically in Mainland China. The purpose of this study was to adapt the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and the EBP Work Environment Scale to Mainland China’s cultural context and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly adapted Chinese version. A pilot study was conducted in Mainland China with 25 clinical nurses. A subsequent validation study was conducted with 419 nurses from Mainland China. A content validity index of .985 and .982 was achieved. The split-half coefficient was .890 for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and .892 for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Test–retest reliability was .871 and .855, respectively. Principal component analysis resulted in a one-factor structure explaining 62.069% of the total variance for the EBP Nursing Leadership Scale and 62.242% of the total variance for the EBP Work Environment Scale. Both of the newly cross-culturally adapted scales possess adequate internal consistency and test–retest reliability and validity and therefore may be utilized in health-care environments to assess leadership and organizational support for EBP in Mainland China.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30301376</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278718801439</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-0356</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0163-2787 |
| ispartof | Evaluation & the health professions, 2019-09, Vol.42 (3), p.328-343 |
| issn | 0163-2787 1552-3918 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117821685 |
| source | Access via SAGE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Chinese languages Clinical nursing Content Validity Cultural Context Evidence Based Practice Evidence-based nursing Factor Structure Health administration Health care Health care delivery Health technology assessment Leadership Nursing Organizational support Practice nursing Principal components analysis Professional practice Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Reliability Validation studies Validity Work environment |
| title | Psychometric Testing of the Evidence-Based Practice Nursing Leadership Scale and the Work Environment Scale After Cross-Cultural Adaptation in Mainland China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A01%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Testing%20of%20the%20Evidence-Based%20Practice%20Nursing%20Leadership%20Scale%20and%20the%20Work%20Environment%20Scale%20After%20Cross-Cultural%20Adaptation%20in%20Mainland%20China&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Zhang,%20Yin-Ping&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=328-343&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278718801439&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2263221062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2263221062&rft_id=info:pmid/30301376&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278718801439&rfr_iscdi=true |