Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management

Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All general...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of rural health 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349
Hauptverfasser: Nixon, Garry, Blattner, Katharina, Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara, Muirhead, Jillian, Finnie, Wendy L., Lawrenson, Ross, Kerse, Ngaire
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 349
container_issue 5
container_start_page 342
container_title The Australian journal of rural health
container_volume 26
creator Nixon, Garry
Blattner, Katharina
Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara
Muirhead, Jillian
Finnie, Wendy L.
Lawrenson, Ross
Kerse, Ngaire
description Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals. Main outcome measures Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care. Result Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm. Conclusion Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajr.12472
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117819576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117326708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgipfRhS8gATcKVnNpm9SdDF4RFS8bN-U0PZUOvYxJyzA7H8Fn9EmMU3UhmECSxcfPyU_INmeH3K8jmNhDLkIllsg6D0MW8EiHy_7NpA4iocUa2XBuwhhLGA9XyZpkfgul14m5a8um-3h7bwt_GLBI-6qz4Nq-yWnZUNtbqOgNzugzQgVNfkwfoMBufkBfe6jKbk7hS9ZTMB1tGzqFrsSmozU08IK1f26SlQIqh1vf94g8nZ0-ji-C69vzy_HJdWCk1iLAjEWRZLlRJpd5mKAWSiZcRpibOMMsExDLkGXc8EhBppSSsZRJpiPj_8kSOSJ7Q-7Utq89ui6tS2ew8lNj27tUcK40TyIVe7r7h07a3jZ-uoWSIlZMe7U_KGNb5ywW6dSWNdh5yln61Xzqm08XzXu7853YZzXmv_Knag-OBjArK5z_n5SeXN0PkZ-d2o2m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117326708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</creator><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals. Main outcome measures Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care. Result Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm. Conclusion Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30303278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>access to services ; Clinical assessment ; diagnostic imaging ; Diagnostic systems ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical personnel ; Nursing ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Physicians ; Quality assurance ; Quality control ; Quality of care ; Rural communities ; Rural health care ; rural health services ; rural hospital ; rural medical education ; Safety ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of rural health, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349</ispartof><rights>2018 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajr.12472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajr.12472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30303278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muirhead, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnie, Wendy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenson, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><title>The Australian journal of rural health</title><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals. Main outcome measures Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care. Result Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm. Conclusion Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</description><subject>access to services</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>rural health services</subject><subject>rural hospital</subject><subject>rural medical education</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1038-5282</issn><issn>1440-1584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgipfRhS8gATcKVnNpm9SdDF4RFS8bN-U0PZUOvYxJyzA7H8Fn9EmMU3UhmECSxcfPyU_INmeH3K8jmNhDLkIllsg6D0MW8EiHy_7NpA4iocUa2XBuwhhLGA9XyZpkfgul14m5a8um-3h7bwt_GLBI-6qz4Nq-yWnZUNtbqOgNzugzQgVNfkwfoMBufkBfe6jKbk7hS9ZTMB1tGzqFrsSmozU08IK1f26SlQIqh1vf94g8nZ0-ji-C69vzy_HJdWCk1iLAjEWRZLlRJpd5mKAWSiZcRpibOMMsExDLkGXc8EhBppSSsZRJpiPj_8kSOSJ7Q-7Utq89ui6tS2ew8lNj27tUcK40TyIVe7r7h07a3jZ-uoWSIlZMe7U_KGNb5ywW6dSWNdh5yln61Xzqm08XzXu7853YZzXmv_Knag-OBjArK5z_n5SeXN0PkZ-d2o2m</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Nixon, Garry</creator><creator>Blattner, Katharina</creator><creator>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creator><creator>Muirhead, Jillian</creator><creator>Finnie, Wendy L.</creator><creator>Lawrenson, Ross</creator><creator>Kerse, Ngaire</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><author>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>access to services</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>rural health services</topic><topic>rural hospital</topic><topic>rural medical education</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muirhead, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnie, Wendy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenson, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nixon, Garry</au><au>Blattner, Katharina</au><au>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</au><au>Muirhead, Jillian</au><au>Finnie, Wendy L.</au><au>Lawrenson, Ross</au><au>Kerse, Ngaire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>342-349</pages><issn>1038-5282</issn><eissn>1440-1584</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals. Main outcome measures Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care. Result Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm. Conclusion Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30303278</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajr.12472</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1038-5282
ispartof The Australian journal of rural health, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349
issn 1038-5282
1440-1584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117819576
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects access to services
Clinical assessment
diagnostic imaging
Diagnostic systems
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Medical diagnosis
Medical imaging
Medical personnel
Nursing
Patient safety
Patients
Physicians
Quality assurance
Quality control
Quality of care
Rural communities
Rural health care
rural health services
rural hospital
rural medical education
Safety
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
title Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90care%20ultrasound%20in%20rural%20New%20Zealand:%20Safety,%20quality%20and%20impact%20on%20patient%20management&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Nixon,%20Garry&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=342-349&rft.issn=1038-5282&rft.eissn=1440-1584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajr.12472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117326708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117326708&rft_id=info:pmid/30303278&rfr_iscdi=true