Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management
Objective To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors. Design Cross‐sectional descriptive study. Setting Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand. Participants All general...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of rural health 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 342 |
container_title | The Australian journal of rural health |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Nixon, Garry Blattner, Katharina Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara Muirhead, Jillian Finnie, Wendy L. Lawrenson, Ross Kerse, Ngaire |
description | Objective
To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors.
Design
Cross‐sectional descriptive study.
Setting
Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand.
Participants
All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals.
Main outcome measures
Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care.
Result
Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm.
Conclusion
Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajr.12472 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117819576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117326708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgipfRhS8gATcKVnNpm9SdDF4RFS8bN-U0PZUOvYxJyzA7H8Fn9EmMU3UhmECSxcfPyU_INmeH3K8jmNhDLkIllsg6D0MW8EiHy_7NpA4iocUa2XBuwhhLGA9XyZpkfgul14m5a8um-3h7bwt_GLBI-6qz4Nq-yWnZUNtbqOgNzugzQgVNfkwfoMBufkBfe6jKbk7hS9ZTMB1tGzqFrsSmozU08IK1f26SlQIqh1vf94g8nZ0-ji-C69vzy_HJdWCk1iLAjEWRZLlRJpd5mKAWSiZcRpibOMMsExDLkGXc8EhBppSSsZRJpiPj_8kSOSJ7Q-7Utq89ui6tS2ew8lNj27tUcK40TyIVe7r7h07a3jZ-uoWSIlZMe7U_KGNb5ywW6dSWNdh5yln61Xzqm08XzXu7853YZzXmv_Knag-OBjArK5z_n5SeXN0PkZ-d2o2m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117326708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</creator><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors.
Design
Cross‐sectional descriptive study.
Setting
Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand.
Participants
All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals.
Main outcome measures
Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care.
Result
Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm.
Conclusion
Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1038-5282</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12472</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30303278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>access to services ; Clinical assessment ; diagnostic imaging ; Diagnostic systems ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical personnel ; Nursing ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Physicians ; Quality assurance ; Quality control ; Quality of care ; Rural communities ; Rural health care ; rural health services ; rural hospital ; rural medical education ; Safety ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of rural health, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349</ispartof><rights>2018 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajr.12472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajr.12472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30303278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muirhead, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnie, Wendy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenson, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><title>The Australian journal of rural health</title><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors.
Design
Cross‐sectional descriptive study.
Setting
Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand.
Participants
All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals.
Main outcome measures
Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care.
Result
Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm.
Conclusion
Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</description><subject>access to services</subject><subject>Clinical assessment</subject><subject>diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>rural health services</subject><subject>rural hospital</subject><subject>rural medical education</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1038-5282</issn><issn>1440-1584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgipfRhS8gATcKVnNpm9SdDF4RFS8bN-U0PZUOvYxJyzA7H8Fn9EmMU3UhmECSxcfPyU_INmeH3K8jmNhDLkIllsg6D0MW8EiHy_7NpA4iocUa2XBuwhhLGA9XyZpkfgul14m5a8um-3h7bwt_GLBI-6qz4Nq-yWnZUNtbqOgNzugzQgVNfkwfoMBufkBfe6jKbk7hS9ZTMB1tGzqFrsSmozU08IK1f26SlQIqh1vf94g8nZ0-ji-C69vzy_HJdWCk1iLAjEWRZLlRJpd5mKAWSiZcRpibOMMsExDLkGXc8EhBppSSsZRJpiPj_8kSOSJ7Q-7Utq89ui6tS2ew8lNj27tUcK40TyIVe7r7h07a3jZ-uoWSIlZMe7U_KGNb5ywW6dSWNdh5yln61Xzqm08XzXu7853YZzXmv_Knag-OBjArK5z_n5SeXN0PkZ-d2o2m</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Nixon, Garry</creator><creator>Blattner, Katharina</creator><creator>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creator><creator>Muirhead, Jillian</creator><creator>Finnie, Wendy L.</creator><creator>Lawrenson, Ross</creator><creator>Kerse, Ngaire</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</title><author>Nixon, Garry ; Blattner, Katharina ; Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara ; Muirhead, Jillian ; Finnie, Wendy L. ; Lawrenson, Ross ; Kerse, Ngaire</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-eb05530dc7cd3d49e82739135edc6bebb2a6340b1c157ab77736339b85c038093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>access to services</topic><topic>Clinical assessment</topic><topic>diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>rural health services</topic><topic>rural hospital</topic><topic>rural medical education</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Garry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blattner, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muirhead, Jillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnie, Wendy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenson, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerse, Ngaire</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nixon, Garry</au><au>Blattner, Katharina</au><au>Koroheke‐Rogers, Marara</au><au>Muirhead, Jillian</au><au>Finnie, Wendy L.</au><au>Lawrenson, Ross</au><au>Kerse, Ngaire</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of rural health</jtitle><addtitle>Aust J Rural Health</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>349</epage><pages>342-349</pages><issn>1038-5282</issn><eissn>1440-1584</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the safety, quality and impact of point‐of‐care ultrasound on patient management when performed by rural generalist doctors.
Design
Cross‐sectional descriptive study.
Setting
Six rural small hospitals serving a range of communities in rural New Zealand.
Participants
All generalist doctors practising ultrasound in the study hospitals.
Main outcome measures
Technical quality, accuracy, impact on diagnostic certainty, patient disposition and overall patient care.
Result
Participants correctly interpreted 90% of images and a similar percentage of point‐of‐care ultrasound findings when compared with the results of formal imaging or the final diagnosis. In total, 87% of scans contributed to the diagnostic process, changing the diagnostic probability. There was a 4% overall reduction in the number of patients needing hospital admission or transfer to an urban base hospital. The overall impact on patient care was positive for 71% of point‐of‐care ultrasound scans. Three percent of scans had the potential for patient harm.
Conclusion
Rural generalists’ practise a broad scope of point‐of‐care ultrasound that, when used as a part of the full clinical assessment, has a positive impact on patient care, improving diagnostic certainty and reducing the need for hospital admission and inter‐hospital transfer. There are challenges in learning and maintaining the skills needed to practise a high standard of point‐of‐care ultrasound in this context. Further consideration needs to be given to the development safe scopes of practice, training, credentialing and quality assurance.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30303278</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajr.12472</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1038-5282 |
ispartof | The Australian journal of rural health, 2018-10, Vol.26 (5), p.342-349 |
issn | 1038-5282 1440-1584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117819576 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | access to services Clinical assessment diagnostic imaging Diagnostic systems Hospitalization Hospitals Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medical personnel Nursing Patient safety Patients Physicians Quality assurance Quality control Quality of care Rural communities Rural health care rural health services rural hospital rural medical education Safety Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound |
title | Point‐of‐care ultrasound in rural New Zealand: Safety, quality and impact on patient management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Point%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90care%20ultrasound%20in%20rural%20New%20Zealand:%20Safety,%20quality%20and%20impact%20on%20patient%20management&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20rural%20health&rft.au=Nixon,%20Garry&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=349&rft.pages=342-349&rft.issn=1038-5282&rft.eissn=1440-1584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajr.12472&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117326708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117326708&rft_id=info:pmid/30303278&rfr_iscdi=true |