Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study

Objective Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of endocrinology 2018-10, Vol.179 (4), p.261-267
Hauptverfasser: Fuss, C T, Treitl, M, Rayes, N, Podrabsky, P, Fenske, W K, Heinrich, D A, Reincke, M, Petersen, T-O, Fassnacht, M, Quinkler, M, Kickuth, R, Hahner, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue 4
container_start_page 261
container_title European journal of endocrinology
container_volume 179
creator Fuss, C T
Treitl, M
Rayes, N
Podrabsky, P
Fenske, W K
Heinrich, D A
Reincke, M
Petersen, T-O
Fassnacht, M
Quinkler, M
Kickuth, R
Hahner, S
description Objective Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. Design and methods We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. Results Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm2 (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm2, FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. Conclusion This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure.
doi_str_mv 10.1530/EJE-18-0328
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117818392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117818392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3778-1cc08bf3bcafee96dddb9c50cc685cc802e8597b2a670b9b0b7014cae4ba2aad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLxDAUhuEgio6XlXsJuBGketK0TepOhnFUFMELuCsn6alEehmTVvTf22HUhQtXyeLhg_Myti_gRKQSTmfXs0joCGSs19hEJCqPMi2f19kENCRRkiVyi22H8Aogxj9ssi0JkGklxYTN77F02Luu5fSx6MLgiXcVx9JTizV_J9fygM2idu3LGUc-J99gy2-HuneW2p48f-iH8nOXbVRYB9r7fnfY08XscXoZ3dzNr6bnN5GRSulIWAvaVNJYrIjyrCxLk9sUrM10aq2GmHSaKxNjpsDkBowCkVikxGCMWModdrTaXfjubaDQF40LluoaW-qGUMRCKC20zOORHv6hr93gx6uWKgahVarUqI5XyvouBE9VsfCuQf9ZCCiWfYuxbyF0sew76oPvzcE0VP7an6AjECtgXBesGwu5yln8d_QLlliFdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2120187577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Fuss, C T ; Treitl, M ; Rayes, N ; Podrabsky, P ; Fenske, W K ; Heinrich, D A ; Reincke, M ; Petersen, T-O ; Fassnacht, M ; Quinkler, M ; Kickuth, R ; Hahner, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Fuss, C T ; Treitl, M ; Rayes, N ; Podrabsky, P ; Fenske, W K ; Heinrich, D A ; Reincke, M ; Petersen, T-O ; Fassnacht, M ; Quinkler, M ; Kickuth, R ; Hahner, S</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. Design and methods We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. Results Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm2 (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm2, FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. Conclusion This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0804-4643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-683X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30068731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Bioscientifica Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical Study ; Endocrine disorders ; Fluoroscopy ; Health risk assessment ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>European journal of endocrinology, 2018-10, Vol.179 (4), p.261-267</ispartof><rights>2018 The authors</rights><rights>Copyright BioScientifica Ltd. Oct 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3778-1cc08bf3bcafee96dddb9c50cc685cc802e8597b2a670b9b0b7014cae4ba2aad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b3778-1cc08bf3bcafee96dddb9c50cc685cc802e8597b2a670b9b0b7014cae4ba2aad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30068731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fuss, C T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treitl, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayes, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podrabsky, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenske, W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reincke, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, T-O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassnacht, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinkler, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kickuth, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahner, S</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study</title><title>European journal of endocrinology</title><addtitle>Eur J Endocrinol</addtitle><description>Objective Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. Design and methods We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. Results Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm2 (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm2, FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. Conclusion This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure.</description><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Endocrine disorders</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>0804-4643</issn><issn>1479-683X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90EtLxDAUhuEgio6XlXsJuBGketK0TepOhnFUFMELuCsn6alEehmTVvTf22HUhQtXyeLhg_Myti_gRKQSTmfXs0joCGSs19hEJCqPMi2f19kENCRRkiVyi22H8Aogxj9ssi0JkGklxYTN77F02Luu5fSx6MLgiXcVx9JTizV_J9fygM2idu3LGUc-J99gy2-HuneW2p48f-iH8nOXbVRYB9r7fnfY08XscXoZ3dzNr6bnN5GRSulIWAvaVNJYrIjyrCxLk9sUrM10aq2GmHSaKxNjpsDkBowCkVikxGCMWModdrTaXfjubaDQF40LluoaW-qGUMRCKC20zOORHv6hr93gx6uWKgahVarUqI5XyvouBE9VsfCuQf9ZCCiWfYuxbyF0sew76oPvzcE0VP7an6AjECtgXBesGwu5yln8d_QLlliFdw</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Fuss, C T</creator><creator>Treitl, M</creator><creator>Rayes, N</creator><creator>Podrabsky, P</creator><creator>Fenske, W K</creator><creator>Heinrich, D A</creator><creator>Reincke, M</creator><creator>Petersen, T-O</creator><creator>Fassnacht, M</creator><creator>Quinkler, M</creator><creator>Kickuth, R</creator><creator>Hahner, S</creator><general>Bioscientifica Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study</title><author>Fuss, C T ; Treitl, M ; Rayes, N ; Podrabsky, P ; Fenske, W K ; Heinrich, D A ; Reincke, M ; Petersen, T-O ; Fassnacht, M ; Quinkler, M ; Kickuth, R ; Hahner, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b3778-1cc08bf3bcafee96dddb9c50cc685cc802e8597b2a670b9b0b7014cae4ba2aad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Endocrine disorders</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fuss, C T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treitl, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayes, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podrabsky, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenske, W K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reincke, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petersen, T-O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fassnacht, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinkler, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kickuth, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahner, S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of endocrinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fuss, C T</au><au>Treitl, M</au><au>Rayes, N</au><au>Podrabsky, P</au><au>Fenske, W K</au><au>Heinrich, D A</au><au>Reincke, M</au><au>Petersen, T-O</au><au>Fassnacht, M</au><au>Quinkler, M</au><au>Kickuth, R</au><au>Hahner, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of endocrinology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Endocrinol</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>179</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>261-267</pages><issn>0804-4643</issn><eissn>1479-683X</eissn><abstract>Objective Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) represents the current diagnostic standard for subtype differentiation in primary aldosteronism (PA). However, AVS has its drawbacks. It is invasive, expensive, requires an experienced interventional radiologist and comes with radiation exposure. However, exact radiation exposure of patients undergoing AVS has never been examined. Design and methods We retrospectively analyzed radiation exposure of 656 AVS performed between 1999 and 2017 at four university hospitals. The primary outcomes were dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT). Consecutively the effective dose (ED) was approximately calculated. Results Median DAP was found to be 32.5 Gy*cm2 (0.3–3181) and FT 18 min (0.3–184). The calculated ED was 6.4 mSv (0.1–636). Remarkably, values between participating centers highly varied: Median DAP ranged from 16 to 147 Gy*cm2, FT from 16 to 27 min, and ED from 3.2 to 29 mSv. As main reason for this variation, differences regarding AVS protocols between centers could be identified, such as number of sampling locations, frames per second and the use of digital subtraction angiographies. Conclusion This first systematic assessment of radiation exposure in AVS not only shows fairly high values for patients, but also states notable differences among the centers. Thus, we not only recommend taking into account the risk of radiation exposure, when referring patients to undergo AVS, but also to establish improved standard operating procedures to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Bioscientifica Ltd</pub><pmid>30068731</pmid><doi>10.1530/EJE-18-0328</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0804-4643
ispartof European journal of endocrinology, 2018-10, Vol.179 (4), p.261-267
issn 0804-4643
1479-683X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117818392
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Clinical Study
Endocrine disorders
Fluoroscopy
Health risk assessment
Sampling
title Radiation exposure of adrenal vein sampling: a German Multicenter Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T04%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20exposure%20of%20adrenal%20vein%20sampling:%20a%20German%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20endocrinology&rft.au=Fuss,%20C%20T&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=179&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=261-267&rft.issn=0804-4643&rft.eissn=1479-683X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1530/EJE-18-0328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117818392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2120187577&rft_id=info:pmid/30068731&rfr_iscdi=true