Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the accuracy of reduction of the acetabular articular surface using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner (O-Arm) and screw navigation compared with a classical open technique. DESIGN:Prospective matched cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/PARTICIP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2018-12, Vol.32 (12), p.612-616
Hauptverfasser: Sebaaly, Amer, Jouffroy, Pomme, Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre, Rodaix, Camille, Riouallon, Guillaume
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 616
container_issue 12
container_start_page 612
container_title Journal of orthopaedic trauma
container_volume 32
creator Sebaaly, Amer
Jouffroy, Pomme
Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre
Rodaix, Camille
Riouallon, Guillaume
description OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the accuracy of reduction of the acetabular articular surface using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner (O-Arm) and screw navigation compared with a classical open technique. DESIGN:Prospective matched cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Adult patients with acute acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients were treated by 2 senior surgeons using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome measure was articular reduction. Secondary outcomes were radiation dosage, operative variables [operative time, time for image acquisition, intraoperative bleeding (cell saver), number of surgical plates, and number of screws], and postoperative variables (first postoperative day pain on the visual analog scale, postoperative transfusion, and hemoglobin change). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Thirty-five patients were treated in the inclusion period (2016–2017) and were matched to 35 cases in our database (2013–2016). Mean age was 43 years, and the most common fracture type was a both-column fracture (OTA/AO type C). Postoperative image analysis showed that reduction was achieved in 87.1% of the cases in the O-Arm group versus 64.7% in the control group (P < 0.05). Mean gap of the articular fragments was 3.6 mm in the O-Arm group compared with 5.6 mm (P = 0.01) in the control group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regards to all other studied variables except a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusions and an increase in surgical time with the O-Arm group. Finally, the total radiation dose was decreased using the intraoperative O-Arm compared with a routine postoperative computed tomography scan (dose length product in O-Arm498 mGy.cm; dose length product in historical group715 mGy.cm). CONCLUSIONS:Using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation for displaced acetabular fractures allow screw navigation with increasing articular surface reduction accuracy. Operative and anesthesia times were not increased, whereas radiation exposure to the patient was significantly decreased. We recommend the use of intraoperative imaging for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117391843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117391843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-bcb1063d6eadf757bfdcde9e7cfb50aeed1a795eb4d188b75e72e223c4bfb05e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1v2zAQQIkiQe26_QdFwTGLEn5IppjNdpvEgBEPdWfhSJ5ipZKokFIC__uqsFsEGXLLLe_eAY-Qr5xdcqbV1XK7u2SvhkuRfiBTnkmeCKH5GZmyXLMkk1JPyKcYH0coZ0J8JBPJhNZS6Sl5XLd9AN9hgL56RrryLdIlQkN3vvEPAbr9gULr6D08Vw8j41ta-kC_V7GrwaKjC4s9mKGGQG8C2H4IGK_pYjQ1HZysP_vBHT6T8xLqiF9Oe0Z-3fzYre6SzfZ2vVpsEiuzeZoYazibSzdHcKXKlCmddahR2dJkDBAdB6UzNKnjeW5UhkqgENKmpjQsQzkjF0dvF_zTgLEvmiparGto0Q-xEJwrqXmeyhFNj6gNPsaAZdGFqoFwKDgr_lYuxsrF28rj2bfTh8E06P4f_cs6AvkRePF1jyH-rocXDMUeoe7377v_AC_3ixc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117391843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sebaaly, Amer ; Jouffroy, Pomme ; Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre ; Rodaix, Camille ; Riouallon, Guillaume</creator><creatorcontrib>Sebaaly, Amer ; Jouffroy, Pomme ; Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre ; Rodaix, Camille ; Riouallon, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the accuracy of reduction of the acetabular articular surface using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner (O-Arm) and screw navigation compared with a classical open technique. DESIGN:Prospective matched cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Adult patients with acute acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients were treated by 2 senior surgeons using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome measure was articular reduction. Secondary outcomes were radiation dosage, operative variables [operative time, time for image acquisition, intraoperative bleeding (cell saver), number of surgical plates, and number of screws], and postoperative variables (first postoperative day pain on the visual analog scale, postoperative transfusion, and hemoglobin change). P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Thirty-five patients were treated in the inclusion period (2016–2017) and were matched to 35 cases in our database (2013–2016). Mean age was 43 years, and the most common fracture type was a both-column fracture (OTA/AO type C). Postoperative image analysis showed that reduction was achieved in 87.1% of the cases in the O-Arm group versus 64.7% in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Mean gap of the articular fragments was 3.6 mm in the O-Arm group compared with 5.6 mm (P = 0.01) in the control group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regards to all other studied variables except a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusions and an increase in surgical time with the O-Arm group. Finally, the total radiation dose was decreased using the intraoperative O-Arm compared with a routine postoperative computed tomography scan (dose length product in O-Arm498 mGy.cm; dose length product in historical group715 mGy.cm). CONCLUSIONS:Using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation for displaced acetabular fractures allow screw navigation with increasing articular surface reduction accuracy. Operative and anesthesia times were not increased, whereas radiation exposure to the patient was significantly decreased. We recommend the use of intraoperative imaging for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30299379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2018-12, Vol.32 (12), p.612-616</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-bcb1063d6eadf757bfdcde9e7cfb50aeed1a795eb4d188b75e72e223c4bfb05e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-bcb1063d6eadf757bfdcde9e7cfb50aeed1a795eb4d188b75e72e223c4bfb05e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30299379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sebaaly, Amer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouffroy, Pomme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodaix, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riouallon, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the accuracy of reduction of the acetabular articular surface using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner (O-Arm) and screw navigation compared with a classical open technique. DESIGN:Prospective matched cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Adult patients with acute acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients were treated by 2 senior surgeons using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome measure was articular reduction. Secondary outcomes were radiation dosage, operative variables [operative time, time for image acquisition, intraoperative bleeding (cell saver), number of surgical plates, and number of screws], and postoperative variables (first postoperative day pain on the visual analog scale, postoperative transfusion, and hemoglobin change). P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Thirty-five patients were treated in the inclusion period (2016–2017) and were matched to 35 cases in our database (2013–2016). Mean age was 43 years, and the most common fracture type was a both-column fracture (OTA/AO type C). Postoperative image analysis showed that reduction was achieved in 87.1% of the cases in the O-Arm group versus 64.7% in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Mean gap of the articular fragments was 3.6 mm in the O-Arm group compared with 5.6 mm (P = 0.01) in the control group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regards to all other studied variables except a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusions and an increase in surgical time with the O-Arm group. Finally, the total radiation dose was decreased using the intraoperative O-Arm compared with a routine postoperative computed tomography scan (dose length product in O-Arm498 mGy.cm; dose length product in historical group715 mGy.cm). CONCLUSIONS:Using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation for displaced acetabular fractures allow screw navigation with increasing articular surface reduction accuracy. Operative and anesthesia times were not increased, whereas radiation exposure to the patient was significantly decreased. We recommend the use of intraoperative imaging for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1v2zAQQIkiQe26_QdFwTGLEn5IppjNdpvEgBEPdWfhSJ5ipZKokFIC__uqsFsEGXLLLe_eAY-Qr5xdcqbV1XK7u2SvhkuRfiBTnkmeCKH5GZmyXLMkk1JPyKcYH0coZ0J8JBPJhNZS6Sl5XLd9AN9hgL56RrryLdIlQkN3vvEPAbr9gULr6D08Vw8j41ta-kC_V7GrwaKjC4s9mKGGQG8C2H4IGK_pYjQ1HZysP_vBHT6T8xLqiF9Oe0Z-3fzYre6SzfZ2vVpsEiuzeZoYazibSzdHcKXKlCmddahR2dJkDBAdB6UzNKnjeW5UhkqgENKmpjQsQzkjF0dvF_zTgLEvmiparGto0Q-xEJwrqXmeyhFNj6gNPsaAZdGFqoFwKDgr_lYuxsrF28rj2bfTh8E06P4f_cs6AvkRePF1jyH-rocXDMUeoe7377v_AC_3ixc</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Sebaaly, Amer</creator><creator>Jouffroy, Pomme</creator><creator>Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre</creator><creator>Rodaix, Camille</creator><creator>Riouallon, Guillaume</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study</title><author>Sebaaly, Amer ; Jouffroy, Pomme ; Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre ; Rodaix, Camille ; Riouallon, Guillaume</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3564-bcb1063d6eadf757bfdcde9e7cfb50aeed1a795eb4d188b75e72e223c4bfb05e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sebaaly, Amer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jouffroy, Pomme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodaix, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riouallon, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sebaaly, Amer</au><au>Jouffroy, Pomme</au><au>Emmanuel Moreau, Pierre</au><au>Rodaix, Camille</au><au>Riouallon, Guillaume</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>612</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>612-616</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the accuracy of reduction of the acetabular articular surface using an intraoperative computed tomography scanner (O-Arm) and screw navigation compared with a classical open technique. DESIGN:Prospective matched cohort study. SETTING:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Adult patients with acute acetabular fractures were included in the study. All patients were treated by 2 senior surgeons using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome measure was articular reduction. Secondary outcomes were radiation dosage, operative variables [operative time, time for image acquisition, intraoperative bleeding (cell saver), number of surgical plates, and number of screws], and postoperative variables (first postoperative day pain on the visual analog scale, postoperative transfusion, and hemoglobin change). P &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS:Thirty-five patients were treated in the inclusion period (2016–2017) and were matched to 35 cases in our database (2013–2016). Mean age was 43 years, and the most common fracture type was a both-column fracture (OTA/AO type C). Postoperative image analysis showed that reduction was achieved in 87.1% of the cases in the O-Arm group versus 64.7% in the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Mean gap of the articular fragments was 3.6 mm in the O-Arm group compared with 5.6 mm (P = 0.01) in the control group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in regards to all other studied variables except a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusions and an increase in surgical time with the O-Arm group. Finally, the total radiation dose was decreased using the intraoperative O-Arm compared with a routine postoperative computed tomography scan (dose length product in O-Arm498 mGy.cm; dose length product in historical group715 mGy.cm). CONCLUSIONS:Using intraoperative imaging and screw navigation for displaced acetabular fractures allow screw navigation with increasing articular surface reduction accuracy. Operative and anesthesia times were not increased, whereas radiation exposure to the patient was significantly decreased. We recommend the use of intraoperative imaging for the treatment of displaced acetabular fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>30299379</pmid><doi>10.1097/BOT.0000000000001324</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5339
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2018-12, Vol.32 (12), p.612-616
issn 0890-5339
1531-2291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117391843
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Intraoperative Cone Beam Tomography and Navigation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures: A Comparative Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T20%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Cone%20Beam%20Tomography%20and%20Navigation%20for%20Displaced%20Acetabular%20Fractures:%20A%20Comparative%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Sebaaly,%20Amer&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=612&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=612-616&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117391843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117391843&rft_id=info:pmid/30299379&rfr_iscdi=true