Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices

Safety standards for clinical diagnostic ultrasonic devices were developed for use in relatively low-frequency systems (1–10 MHz), under the assumption that non-linear effects would be negligible. This article reviews ways in which neglecting non-linear wave propagation affects the measurements and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2019-01, Vol.45 (1), p.11-20
Hauptverfasser: Jafarzadeh, Ehsan, Sinclair, Anthony N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Ultrasound in medicine & biology
container_volume 45
creator Jafarzadeh, Ehsan
Sinclair, Anthony N.
description Safety standards for clinical diagnostic ultrasonic devices were developed for use in relatively low-frequency systems (1–10 MHz), under the assumption that non-linear effects would be negligible. This article reviews ways in which neglecting non-linear wave propagation affects the measurements and calculations required to comply with safety standards and U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance that recognizes these standards. An attempt is made to evaluate whether ignoring non-linear effects could result in significant error in the exposure quantities defined in these standards at either low or high frequencies, based on published literature. This article maintains that although non-linear effects have been considered in some parts of safety standards related to hydrophone requirements, the coverage is inadequate, especially for modern equipment with high working frequencies. A new approach is required to assess the magnitude of thermal heating for recently developed high-frequency systems to incorporate non-linear effects. In contrast, the current approach for evaluating the risk of cavitation can be used after appropriate modifications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117157699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301562918303715</els_id><sourcerecordid>2117157699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-8638bfa5d47a8c2a7c8c6245cbf568f3192c77b6c47642c7811c416fdc8388a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_BSk--dKZS9sk9U02f8FQcQ59C2majoyumUk72H9v5qb4KBzcHfe5X1-ELgAPAQO9Wgy7unXSL3VZGDskGPgQByNwgPrAWR6THD4OUR8nGOKMkryHTrxfYIwZTdgx6iWY5CSlpI9en2wT16bR0kXvcq2jF2dXci5bY5tINmU0lZVuN9G0DYl0pY8q66KxkfPG-taoaPZ9iu0COtZro7Q_RUeVrL0-2_sBmt3dvo0e4snz_ePoZhKrhOM25jThRSWzMmWSKyKZ4oqSNFNFlVFeJZATxVhBVcpoGkIOoFKgVal4wrlkyQBd7uaunP3stG_F0nil61o22nZeEAAGGaN5HtDrHaqc9d7pSqycWUq3EYDFVlOxEH81FVtNBQ5GIDSf7_d0RSj_tv6IGIDxDtDh27XRTnhldKN0aZxWrSit-c-eL-KBj2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117157699</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan ; Sinclair, Anthony N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan ; Sinclair, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><description>Safety standards for clinical diagnostic ultrasonic devices were developed for use in relatively low-frequency systems (1–10 MHz), under the assumption that non-linear effects would be negligible. This article reviews ways in which neglecting non-linear wave propagation affects the measurements and calculations required to comply with safety standards and U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance that recognizes these standards. An attempt is made to evaluate whether ignoring non-linear effects could result in significant error in the exposure quantities defined in these standards at either low or high frequencies, based on published literature. This article maintains that although non-linear effects have been considered in some parts of safety standards related to hydrophone requirements, the coverage is inadequate, especially for modern equipment with high working frequencies. A new approach is required to assess the magnitude of thermal heating for recently developed high-frequency systems to incorporate non-linear effects. In contrast, the current approach for evaluating the risk of cavitation can be used after appropriate modifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30292462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Humans ; Mechanical index ; Non-linear acoustics ; Patient Safety ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Safety standards ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Thermal index ; Ultrasonography - adverse effects ; Ultrasonography - methods ; Ultrasound imaging ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology, 2019-01, Vol.45 (1), p.11-20</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-8638bfa5d47a8c2a7c8c6245cbf568f3192c77b6c47642c7811c416fdc8388a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-8638bfa5d47a8c2a7c8c6245cbf568f3192c77b6c47642c7811c416fdc8388a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2000-5699</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562918303715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30292462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>Safety standards for clinical diagnostic ultrasonic devices were developed for use in relatively low-frequency systems (1–10 MHz), under the assumption that non-linear effects would be negligible. This article reviews ways in which neglecting non-linear wave propagation affects the measurements and calculations required to comply with safety standards and U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance that recognizes these standards. An attempt is made to evaluate whether ignoring non-linear effects could result in significant error in the exposure quantities defined in these standards at either low or high frequencies, based on published literature. This article maintains that although non-linear effects have been considered in some parts of safety standards related to hydrophone requirements, the coverage is inadequate, especially for modern equipment with high working frequencies. A new approach is required to assess the magnitude of thermal heating for recently developed high-frequency systems to incorporate non-linear effects. In contrast, the current approach for evaluating the risk of cavitation can be used after appropriate modifications.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mechanical index</subject><subject>Non-linear acoustics</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Safety standards</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Thermal index</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_BSk--dKZS9sk9U02f8FQcQ59C2majoyumUk72H9v5qb4KBzcHfe5X1-ELgAPAQO9Wgy7unXSL3VZGDskGPgQByNwgPrAWR6THD4OUR8nGOKMkryHTrxfYIwZTdgx6iWY5CSlpI9en2wT16bR0kXvcq2jF2dXci5bY5tINmU0lZVuN9G0DYl0pY8q66KxkfPG-taoaPZ9iu0COtZro7Q_RUeVrL0-2_sBmt3dvo0e4snz_ePoZhKrhOM25jThRSWzMmWSKyKZ4oqSNFNFlVFeJZATxVhBVcpoGkIOoFKgVal4wrlkyQBd7uaunP3stG_F0nil61o22nZeEAAGGaN5HtDrHaqc9d7pSqycWUq3EYDFVlOxEH81FVtNBQ5GIDSf7_d0RSj_tv6IGIDxDtDh27XRTnhldKN0aZxWrSit-c-eL-KBj2g</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan</creator><creator>Sinclair, Anthony N.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-5699</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices</title><author>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan ; Sinclair, Anthony N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-8638bfa5d47a8c2a7c8c6245cbf568f3192c77b6c47642c7811c416fdc8388a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mechanical index</topic><topic>Non-linear acoustics</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Safety standards</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Thermal index</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Anthony N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafarzadeh, Ehsan</au><au>Sinclair, Anthony N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>11-20</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>Safety standards for clinical diagnostic ultrasonic devices were developed for use in relatively low-frequency systems (1–10 MHz), under the assumption that non-linear effects would be negligible. This article reviews ways in which neglecting non-linear wave propagation affects the measurements and calculations required to comply with safety standards and U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidance that recognizes these standards. An attempt is made to evaluate whether ignoring non-linear effects could result in significant error in the exposure quantities defined in these standards at either low or high frequencies, based on published literature. This article maintains that although non-linear effects have been considered in some parts of safety standards related to hydrophone requirements, the coverage is inadequate, especially for modern equipment with high working frequencies. A new approach is required to assess the magnitude of thermal heating for recently developed high-frequency systems to incorporate non-linear effects. In contrast, the current approach for evaluating the risk of cavitation can be used after appropriate modifications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30292462</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.021</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-5699</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5629
ispartof Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2019-01, Vol.45 (1), p.11-20
issn 0301-5629
1879-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2117157699
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Humans
Mechanical index
Non-linear acoustics
Patient Safety
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Safety standards
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Thermal index
Ultrasonography - adverse effects
Ultrasonography - methods
Ultrasound imaging
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
title Non-linear Wave Propagation and Safety Standards for Diagnostic Ultrasound Devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A36%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-linear%20Wave%20Propagation%20and%20Safety%20Standards%20for%20Diagnostic%20Ultrasound%20Devices&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Jafarzadeh,%20Ehsan&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=11-20&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117157699%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117157699&rft_id=info:pmid/30292462&rft_els_id=S0301562918303715&rfr_iscdi=true