Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions

Multiple-site concerted proton–electron transfer (MS-CPET) reactions were studied in a three-component system. 1-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) was oxidized to the stable radical TEMPO by electron transfer to ferrocenium oxidants coupled to proton transfer to various pyridine bases....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017-08, Vol.139 (30), p.10312-10319
Hauptverfasser: Morris, Wesley D, Mayer, James M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10319
container_issue 30
container_start_page 10312
container_title Journal of the American Chemical Society
container_volume 139
creator Morris, Wesley D
Mayer, James M
description Multiple-site concerted proton–electron transfer (MS-CPET) reactions were studied in a three-component system. 1-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) was oxidized to the stable radical TEMPO by electron transfer to ferrocenium oxidants coupled to proton transfer to various pyridine bases. These MS-CPET reactions contrast with the usual reactivity of TEMPOH by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to a single e –/H+ acceptor. The three-component reactions proceed by pre-equilibrium formation of a hydrogen-bonded adduct between TEMPOH and the pyridine base, and the adduct is then oxidized by the ferrocenium in a bimolecular MS-CPET step. The second-order rate constants, measured using stopped-flow kinetic techniques, spanned 4 orders of magnitude. An advantage of this system is that the MS-CPET driving force could be independently varied by changing either the pK a of the base or the reduction potential (E°) of the oxidant. Changes in ΔG°MS‑CPET from either source had the same effect on the MS-CPET rate constants, and a combined Brønsted plot of ln­(k MS‑CPET) vs ln­(K eq) was linear with a slope of 0.46. These results imply a synchronous concerted mechanism, in which the proton and electron transfer components of the CPET process make equal contributions to the rate constants. The only outliers to the Brønsted correlation are the reactions with sterically hindered pyridines, which apparently hinder the close approach of proton donor and acceptor that facilitates MS-CPET. These three-component reactions are compared with a related HAT reaction of TEMPOH, with the 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxyl radical. The MS-CPET and HAT oxidations of TEMPOH at the same driving force occurred with similar rate constants. While this is an imperfect comparison, the data suggest that the separation of the proton and electron to different reagents does not significantly inhibit the proton-coupled electron transfer process.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/jacs.7b03562
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116867545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116867545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-52dfdec85d6a5e69b70a77ec9671eccb9beaa352706e3cf8ff53fe53377705d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mobk5vnqVHD3bmR5O0RxnzBwwUneeSpi_a0SU1aRH_ezM29TLwFN7LJ58X3hehc4KnBFNyvVI6TGWFGRf0AI0JpzjlhIpDNMYY01Tmgo3QSQirWGY0J8doRHMhSSbxGH2-QKe86hv7ljx51zubKFsn8xZ072Ox9MoGAz6ZGxNbIWli790DpDO37pwF2yczZzX4HuqdIV4NXQv7LM-gdN84G07RkVFtgLPdOUGvt_Pl7D5dPN49zG4WqcqKvE85rU0NOue1UBxEUUmspARdxP-D1lVRgVKMU4kFMG1yYzgzwBmTUmJeczZBl1tv593HAKEv103Q0LbKghtCSQkRcRk8-x8lBeGcFyJjEb3aotq7EDyYsvPNWvmvkuByk0q5SaXcpRLxi515qNZQ_8I_MfyN3rxaucHbuJP9rm_FFZdt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1915559643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Morris, Wesley D ; Mayer, James M</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Wesley D ; Mayer, James M</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple-site concerted proton–electron transfer (MS-CPET) reactions were studied in a three-component system. 1-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) was oxidized to the stable radical TEMPO by electron transfer to ferrocenium oxidants coupled to proton transfer to various pyridine bases. These MS-CPET reactions contrast with the usual reactivity of TEMPOH by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to a single e –/H+ acceptor. The three-component reactions proceed by pre-equilibrium formation of a hydrogen-bonded adduct between TEMPOH and the pyridine base, and the adduct is then oxidized by the ferrocenium in a bimolecular MS-CPET step. The second-order rate constants, measured using stopped-flow kinetic techniques, spanned 4 orders of magnitude. An advantage of this system is that the MS-CPET driving force could be independently varied by changing either the pK a of the base or the reduction potential (E°) of the oxidant. Changes in ΔG°MS‑CPET from either source had the same effect on the MS-CPET rate constants, and a combined Brønsted plot of ln­(k MS‑CPET) vs ln­(K eq) was linear with a slope of 0.46. These results imply a synchronous concerted mechanism, in which the proton and electron transfer components of the CPET process make equal contributions to the rate constants. The only outliers to the Brønsted correlation are the reactions with sterically hindered pyridines, which apparently hinder the close approach of proton donor and acceptor that facilitates MS-CPET. These three-component reactions are compared with a related HAT reaction of TEMPOH, with the 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxyl radical. The MS-CPET and HAT oxidations of TEMPOH at the same driving force occurred with similar rate constants. While this is an imperfect comparison, the data suggest that the separation of the proton and electron to different reagents does not significantly inhibit the proton-coupled electron transfer process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7863</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-5126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b03562</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28671470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>electron transfer ; hydrogen ; hydrogen bonding ; oxidants ; pyridines</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017-08, Vol.139 (30), p.10312-10319</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-52dfdec85d6a5e69b70a77ec9671eccb9beaa352706e3cf8ff53fe53377705d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-52dfdec85d6a5e69b70a77ec9671eccb9beaa352706e3cf8ff53fe53377705d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3943-5250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jacs.7b03562$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.7b03562$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28671470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Wesley D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, James M</creatorcontrib><title>Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions</title><title>Journal of the American Chemical Society</title><addtitle>J. Am. Chem. Soc</addtitle><description>Multiple-site concerted proton–electron transfer (MS-CPET) reactions were studied in a three-component system. 1-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) was oxidized to the stable radical TEMPO by electron transfer to ferrocenium oxidants coupled to proton transfer to various pyridine bases. These MS-CPET reactions contrast with the usual reactivity of TEMPOH by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to a single e –/H+ acceptor. The three-component reactions proceed by pre-equilibrium formation of a hydrogen-bonded adduct between TEMPOH and the pyridine base, and the adduct is then oxidized by the ferrocenium in a bimolecular MS-CPET step. The second-order rate constants, measured using stopped-flow kinetic techniques, spanned 4 orders of magnitude. An advantage of this system is that the MS-CPET driving force could be independently varied by changing either the pK a of the base or the reduction potential (E°) of the oxidant. Changes in ΔG°MS‑CPET from either source had the same effect on the MS-CPET rate constants, and a combined Brønsted plot of ln­(k MS‑CPET) vs ln­(K eq) was linear with a slope of 0.46. These results imply a synchronous concerted mechanism, in which the proton and electron transfer components of the CPET process make equal contributions to the rate constants. The only outliers to the Brønsted correlation are the reactions with sterically hindered pyridines, which apparently hinder the close approach of proton donor and acceptor that facilitates MS-CPET. These three-component reactions are compared with a related HAT reaction of TEMPOH, with the 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxyl radical. The MS-CPET and HAT oxidations of TEMPOH at the same driving force occurred with similar rate constants. While this is an imperfect comparison, the data suggest that the separation of the proton and electron to different reagents does not significantly inhibit the proton-coupled electron transfer process.</description><subject>electron transfer</subject><subject>hydrogen</subject><subject>hydrogen bonding</subject><subject>oxidants</subject><subject>pyridines</subject><issn>0002-7863</issn><issn>1520-5126</issn><issn>1520-5126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9LwzAUx4Mobk5vnqVHD3bmR5O0RxnzBwwUneeSpi_a0SU1aRH_ezM29TLwFN7LJ58X3hehc4KnBFNyvVI6TGWFGRf0AI0JpzjlhIpDNMYY01Tmgo3QSQirWGY0J8doRHMhSSbxGH2-QKe86hv7ljx51zubKFsn8xZ072Ox9MoGAz6ZGxNbIWli790DpDO37pwF2yczZzX4HuqdIV4NXQv7LM-gdN84G07RkVFtgLPdOUGvt_Pl7D5dPN49zG4WqcqKvE85rU0NOue1UBxEUUmspARdxP-D1lVRgVKMU4kFMG1yYzgzwBmTUmJeczZBl1tv593HAKEv103Q0LbKghtCSQkRcRk8-x8lBeGcFyJjEb3aotq7EDyYsvPNWvmvkuByk0q5SaXcpRLxi515qNZQ_8I_MfyN3rxaucHbuJP9rm_FFZdt</recordid><startdate>20170802</startdate><enddate>20170802</enddate><creator>Morris, Wesley D</creator><creator>Mayer, James M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-5250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170802</creationdate><title>Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions</title><author>Morris, Wesley D ; Mayer, James M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-52dfdec85d6a5e69b70a77ec9671eccb9beaa352706e3cf8ff53fe53377705d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>electron transfer</topic><topic>hydrogen</topic><topic>hydrogen bonding</topic><topic>oxidants</topic><topic>pyridines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Wesley D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, James M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Chemical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Wesley D</au><au>Mayer, James M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Chemical Society</jtitle><addtitle>J. Am. Chem. Soc</addtitle><date>2017-08-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>30</issue><spage>10312</spage><epage>10319</epage><pages>10312-10319</pages><issn>0002-7863</issn><issn>1520-5126</issn><eissn>1520-5126</eissn><abstract>Multiple-site concerted proton–electron transfer (MS-CPET) reactions were studied in a three-component system. 1-Hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH) was oxidized to the stable radical TEMPO by electron transfer to ferrocenium oxidants coupled to proton transfer to various pyridine bases. These MS-CPET reactions contrast with the usual reactivity of TEMPOH by hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) to a single e –/H+ acceptor. The three-component reactions proceed by pre-equilibrium formation of a hydrogen-bonded adduct between TEMPOH and the pyridine base, and the adduct is then oxidized by the ferrocenium in a bimolecular MS-CPET step. The second-order rate constants, measured using stopped-flow kinetic techniques, spanned 4 orders of magnitude. An advantage of this system is that the MS-CPET driving force could be independently varied by changing either the pK a of the base or the reduction potential (E°) of the oxidant. Changes in ΔG°MS‑CPET from either source had the same effect on the MS-CPET rate constants, and a combined Brønsted plot of ln­(k MS‑CPET) vs ln­(K eq) was linear with a slope of 0.46. These results imply a synchronous concerted mechanism, in which the proton and electron transfer components of the CPET process make equal contributions to the rate constants. The only outliers to the Brønsted correlation are the reactions with sterically hindered pyridines, which apparently hinder the close approach of proton donor and acceptor that facilitates MS-CPET. These three-component reactions are compared with a related HAT reaction of TEMPOH, with the 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxyl radical. The MS-CPET and HAT oxidations of TEMPOH at the same driving force occurred with similar rate constants. While this is an imperfect comparison, the data suggest that the separation of the proton and electron to different reagents does not significantly inhibit the proton-coupled electron transfer process.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>28671470</pmid><doi>10.1021/jacs.7b03562</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3943-5250</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7863
ispartof Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2017-08, Vol.139 (30), p.10312-10319
issn 0002-7863
1520-5126
1520-5126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116867545
source ACS Publications
subjects electron transfer
hydrogen
hydrogen bonding
oxidants
pyridines
title Separating Proton and Electron Transfer Effects in Three-Component Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T14%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Separating%20Proton%20and%20Electron%20Transfer%20Effects%20in%20Three-Component%20Concerted%20Proton-Coupled%20Electron%20Transfer%20Reactions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Chemical%20Society&rft.au=Morris,%20Wesley%20D&rft.date=2017-08-02&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=30&rft.spage=10312&rft.epage=10319&rft.pages=10312-10319&rft.issn=0002-7863&rft.eissn=1520-5126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/jacs.7b03562&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116867545%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1915559643&rft_id=info:pmid/28671470&rfr_iscdi=true