Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences
We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments (N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and wh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological science 2018-12, Vol.29 (12), p.1930-1941 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1941 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1930 |
container_title | Psychological science |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Zivony, Alon Lamy, Dominique |
description | We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments (N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0956797618799302 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116846825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0956797618799302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2154969238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-428348270948b8da06fcd0748c1e846a91bb980b59835661bab3b891e99fdcf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd1LwzAUxYMobk7ffZKAL75Uk37kw7fRzSkMRNTnkrTpyGjTmaSD_fembCoMzMslnN89B84F4Bqje4wpfUA8I5RTghnlPEHxCRjjlNCIxwydgvEgR4M-AhfOrVF4NCHnYBRQlmWUjoHJO-O1WSnj4dT7MHRnRAPnZiVWqg3_R_judds3vYugMBVcdKKJZlZvlYG52PjeKvgstgq-9aLRXvigNDs403Wt7GAbEpz66pUplbsEZ7VonLo6zAn4fJp_5M_R8nXxkk-XUZki6qM0ZknKYop4yiSrBCJ1WSGashIrlhLBsZScIZlxlmSEYClkIhnHivO6KmuaTMDd3ndjuxDtfNFqV6qmEUZ1vStijEkwYnEW0NsjdN31NnQwUFnKCY8TFii0p0rbOWdVXWysboXdFRgVwy2K41uElZuDcS9bVf0u_JQfgGgPuFD1X-q_ht8yoZEB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154969238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Zivony, Alon ; Lamy, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Zivony, Alon ; Lamy, Dominique</creatorcontrib><description>We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments (N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0956797618799302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30285577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cues ; Dissociation ; Identity ; Objectives ; Stimulus</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2018-12, Vol.29 (12), p.1930-1941</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-428348270948b8da06fcd0748c1e846a91bb980b59835661bab3b891e99fdcf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-428348270948b8da06fcd0748c1e846a91bb980b59835661bab3b891e99fdcf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797618799302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797618799302$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30285577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zivony, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, Dominique</creatorcontrib><title>Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments (N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button.</description><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dissociation</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd1LwzAUxYMobk7ffZKAL75Uk37kw7fRzSkMRNTnkrTpyGjTmaSD_fembCoMzMslnN89B84F4Bqje4wpfUA8I5RTghnlPEHxCRjjlNCIxwydgvEgR4M-AhfOrVF4NCHnYBRQlmWUjoHJO-O1WSnj4dT7MHRnRAPnZiVWqg3_R_judds3vYugMBVcdKKJZlZvlYG52PjeKvgstgq-9aLRXvigNDs403Wt7GAbEpz66pUplbsEZ7VonLo6zAn4fJp_5M_R8nXxkk-XUZki6qM0ZknKYop4yiSrBCJ1WSGashIrlhLBsZScIZlxlmSEYClkIhnHivO6KmuaTMDd3ndjuxDtfNFqV6qmEUZ1vStijEkwYnEW0NsjdN31NnQwUFnKCY8TFii0p0rbOWdVXWysboXdFRgVwy2K41uElZuDcS9bVf0u_JQfgGgPuFD1X-q_ht8yoZEB</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Zivony, Alon</creator><creator>Lamy, Dominique</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences</title><author>Zivony, Alon ; Lamy, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-428348270948b8da06fcd0748c1e846a91bb980b59835661bab3b891e99fdcf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dissociation</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zivony, Alon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamy, Dominique</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zivony, Alon</au><au>Lamy, Dominique</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1930</spage><epage>1941</epage><pages>1930-1941</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments (N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30285577</pmid><doi>10.1177/0956797618799302</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-7976 |
ispartof | Psychological science, 2018-12, Vol.29 (12), p.1930-1941 |
issn | 0956-7976 1467-9280 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116846825 |
source | Access via SAGE; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Cues Dissociation Identity Objectives Stimulus |
title | Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contingent%20Attentional%20Engagement:%20Stimulus-%20and%20Goal-Driven%20Capture%20Have%20Qualitatively%20Different%20Consequences&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Zivony,%20Alon&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1930&rft.epage=1941&rft.pages=1930-1941&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0956797618799302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2154969238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154969238&rft_id=info:pmid/30285577&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0956797618799302&rfr_iscdi=true |