Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission
Introduction The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transperineal ultrasound can be used to decide whether to admit a pregnant woman due to labor. Material and methods In this analytical cross‐sectional observational study, transperineal ultrasound was performed on pregnant women with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2019-02, Vol.98 (2), p.162-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Cuerva, Marcos J. García‐Casarrubios, Patricia García‐Calvo, Laura Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica Ordás, Polan Magdaleno, Fernando Bartha, José L. |
description | Introduction
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transperineal ultrasound can be used to decide whether to admit a pregnant woman due to labor.
Material and methods
In this analytical cross‐sectional observational study, transperineal ultrasound was performed on pregnant women with intact membranes who came to the hospital due to contractions. A decision was made to admit women due to labor based on the ultrasound measurements. The ultrasound measurements were used to determine cervical dilation, the angle of progression, and fetal head position. The managing midwives were blinded to the results and made the final decision to admit the women based on digital vaginal examination.
Results
It was possible to decide whether a woman had to be admitted for delivery or discharged due to the latent phase of labor according to the ultrasound examination in 55 of the 57 cases (96.5%). In four of the 55 cases, the decision based on ultrasound differed from the midwife's decision (7.3%). There was strong agreement between the decision to admit the pregnant women based on ultrasound measurements and the digital vaginal examination (Cohen's kappa: 0.844). It was possible to measure cervical dilation with ultrasound in 52 of the 57 cases (91.2%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the cervical dilation measurements was 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.539‐0.848).
Conclusions
There was strong agreement between the ultrasound and digital vaginal examination results in the decision to admit singleton pregnant women at term due to labor. A large number of vaginal examinations could be avoided by using intrapartum ultrasound. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.13474 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116846793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116846793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-f0d9ec128feb7017972bb0f0cd7c9c9d2606f3672c543456da9153d709bfbf003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCNC9eQyTbMcBm8guFDXNU0Tp0Ob1KRl8O3NOOrChdmcJOc7H4cfoRMClySdK-Xf4iVhXPAdNCU5QAac0F00BQCS5YzLCTqIcZVeVPBiH00Y0KIQjEzR60s02FvcuCGoXoVh7PDYpnv0o6vTNx5M6HAfzJtTbsBr3xmH182wxNpvZvTQeBdxZawPBi997JtBtVjVXRNjah2hPavaaI6_6yF6ubl-XtxlD4-394v5Q6aZZDyzUEujCS2sqQQQIQWtKrCga6GlljXNIbcsF1TPOOOzvFaSzFgtQFa2sgDsEJ1vvX3w76OJQ5kW0KZtlTN-jCUlJC94LiRL6NkfdOXH4NJ2iUpGAlTSRF1sKR18jMHYsg9Np8JHSaDc5F5uci-_ck_w6bdyrDpT_6I_QSeAbIF105qPf1Tl_PH2aSv9BJwsjio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170910292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Cuerva, Marcos J. ; García‐Casarrubios, Patricia ; García‐Calvo, Laura ; Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica ; Ordás, Polan ; Magdaleno, Fernando ; Bartha, José L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos J. ; García‐Casarrubios, Patricia ; García‐Calvo, Laura ; Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica ; Ordás, Polan ; Magdaleno, Fernando ; Bartha, José L. ; ITU-R12 Group ; ITU‐R12 Group</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transperineal ultrasound can be used to decide whether to admit a pregnant woman due to labor.
Material and methods
In this analytical cross‐sectional observational study, transperineal ultrasound was performed on pregnant women with intact membranes who came to the hospital due to contractions. A decision was made to admit women due to labor based on the ultrasound measurements. The ultrasound measurements were used to determine cervical dilation, the angle of progression, and fetal head position. The managing midwives were blinded to the results and made the final decision to admit the women based on digital vaginal examination.
Results
It was possible to decide whether a woman had to be admitted for delivery or discharged due to the latent phase of labor according to the ultrasound examination in 55 of the 57 cases (96.5%). In four of the 55 cases, the decision based on ultrasound differed from the midwife's decision (7.3%). There was strong agreement between the decision to admit the pregnant women based on ultrasound measurements and the digital vaginal examination (Cohen's kappa: 0.844). It was possible to measure cervical dilation with ultrasound in 52 of the 57 cases (91.2%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the cervical dilation measurements was 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.539‐0.848).
Conclusions
There was strong agreement between the ultrasound and digital vaginal examination results in the decision to admit singleton pregnant women at term due to labor. A large number of vaginal examinations could be avoided by using intrapartum ultrasound.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30288731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>cervical dilation ; childbirth ; Childbirth & labor ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Home births ; hospital admission ; Hospitalization ; intrapartum ultrasound ; labor ; Midwifery ; Pregnancy ; Teenage pregnancy ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019-02, Vol.98 (2), p.162-166</ispartof><rights>2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><rights>2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-f0d9ec128feb7017972bb0f0cd7c9c9d2606f3672c543456da9153d709bfbf003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-f0d9ec128feb7017972bb0f0cd7c9c9d2606f3672c543456da9153d709bfbf003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Faogs.13474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Faogs.13474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30288731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Casarrubios, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Calvo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordás, Polan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magdaleno, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITU-R12 Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITU‐R12 Group</creatorcontrib><title>Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transperineal ultrasound can be used to decide whether to admit a pregnant woman due to labor.
Material and methods
In this analytical cross‐sectional observational study, transperineal ultrasound was performed on pregnant women with intact membranes who came to the hospital due to contractions. A decision was made to admit women due to labor based on the ultrasound measurements. The ultrasound measurements were used to determine cervical dilation, the angle of progression, and fetal head position. The managing midwives were blinded to the results and made the final decision to admit the women based on digital vaginal examination.
Results
It was possible to decide whether a woman had to be admitted for delivery or discharged due to the latent phase of labor according to the ultrasound examination in 55 of the 57 cases (96.5%). In four of the 55 cases, the decision based on ultrasound differed from the midwife's decision (7.3%). There was strong agreement between the decision to admit the pregnant women based on ultrasound measurements and the digital vaginal examination (Cohen's kappa: 0.844). It was possible to measure cervical dilation with ultrasound in 52 of the 57 cases (91.2%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the cervical dilation measurements was 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.539‐0.848).
Conclusions
There was strong agreement between the ultrasound and digital vaginal examination results in the decision to admit singleton pregnant women at term due to labor. A large number of vaginal examinations could be avoided by using intrapartum ultrasound.</description><subject>cervical dilation</subject><subject>childbirth</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Home births</subject><subject>hospital admission</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>intrapartum ultrasound</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Teenage pregnancy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoznjZ-AAScCNC9eQyTbMcBm8guFDXNU0Tp0Ob1KRl8O3NOOrChdmcJOc7H4cfoRMClySdK-Xf4iVhXPAdNCU5QAac0F00BQCS5YzLCTqIcZVeVPBiH00Y0KIQjEzR60s02FvcuCGoXoVh7PDYpnv0o6vTNx5M6HAfzJtTbsBr3xmH182wxNpvZvTQeBdxZawPBi997JtBtVjVXRNjah2hPavaaI6_6yF6ubl-XtxlD4-394v5Q6aZZDyzUEujCS2sqQQQIQWtKrCga6GlljXNIbcsF1TPOOOzvFaSzFgtQFa2sgDsEJ1vvX3w76OJQ5kW0KZtlTN-jCUlJC94LiRL6NkfdOXH4NJ2iUpGAlTSRF1sKR18jMHYsg9Np8JHSaDc5F5uci-_ck_w6bdyrDpT_6I_QSeAbIF105qPf1Tl_PH2aSv9BJwsjio</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Cuerva, Marcos J.</creator><creator>García‐Casarrubios, Patricia</creator><creator>García‐Calvo, Laura</creator><creator>Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica</creator><creator>Ordás, Polan</creator><creator>Magdaleno, Fernando</creator><creator>Bartha, José L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission</title><author>Cuerva, Marcos J. ; García‐Casarrubios, Patricia ; García‐Calvo, Laura ; Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica ; Ordás, Polan ; Magdaleno, Fernando ; Bartha, José L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-f0d9ec128feb7017972bb0f0cd7c9c9d2606f3672c543456da9153d709bfbf003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cervical dilation</topic><topic>childbirth</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Home births</topic><topic>hospital admission</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>intrapartum ultrasound</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Teenage pregnancy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuerva, Marcos J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Casarrubios, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García‐Calvo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ordás, Polan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magdaleno, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartha, José L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITU-R12 Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ITU‐R12 Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuerva, Marcos J.</au><au>García‐Casarrubios, Patricia</au><au>García‐Calvo, Laura</au><au>Gutiérrez‐Simon, Mónica</au><au>Ordás, Polan</au><au>Magdaleno, Fernando</au><au>Bartha, José L.</au><aucorp>ITU-R12 Group</aucorp><aucorp>ITU‐R12 Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>162-166</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that transperineal ultrasound can be used to decide whether to admit a pregnant woman due to labor.
Material and methods
In this analytical cross‐sectional observational study, transperineal ultrasound was performed on pregnant women with intact membranes who came to the hospital due to contractions. A decision was made to admit women due to labor based on the ultrasound measurements. The ultrasound measurements were used to determine cervical dilation, the angle of progression, and fetal head position. The managing midwives were blinded to the results and made the final decision to admit the women based on digital vaginal examination.
Results
It was possible to decide whether a woman had to be admitted for delivery or discharged due to the latent phase of labor according to the ultrasound examination in 55 of the 57 cases (96.5%). In four of the 55 cases, the decision based on ultrasound differed from the midwife's decision (7.3%). There was strong agreement between the decision to admit the pregnant women based on ultrasound measurements and the digital vaginal examination (Cohen's kappa: 0.844). It was possible to measure cervical dilation with ultrasound in 52 of the 57 cases (91.2%). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the cervical dilation measurements was 0.736 (95% confidence interval 0.539‐0.848).
Conclusions
There was strong agreement between the ultrasound and digital vaginal examination results in the decision to admit singleton pregnant women at term due to labor. A large number of vaginal examinations could be avoided by using intrapartum ultrasound.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30288731</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.13474</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8013-4732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019-02, Vol.98 (2), p.162-166 |
issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116846793 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | cervical dilation childbirth Childbirth & labor Clinical decision making Decision making Home births hospital admission Hospitalization intrapartum ultrasound labor Midwifery Pregnancy Teenage pregnancy Ultrasonic imaging Women Womens health |
title | Use of intrapartum ultrasound in term pregnant women with contractions before hospital admission |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20intrapartum%20ultrasound%20in%20term%20pregnant%20women%20with%20contractions%20before%20hospital%20admission&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Cuerva,%20Marcos%20J.&rft.aucorp=ITU-R12%20Group&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=162-166&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.13474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116846793%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170910292&rft_id=info:pmid/30288731&rfr_iscdi=true |