Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer

Advanced stage at diagnosis is an independent, unexplained contributor to racial disparity in endometrial cancer. We sought to investigate whether, prior to diagnosis, provider recognition of the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer, postmenopausal bleeding, differs by patient race. Black and Whit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2018-12, Vol.219 (6), p.593.e1-593.e14
Hauptverfasser: Doll, Kemi M., Khor, Sara, Odem-Davis, Katherine, He, Hao, Wolff, Erika M., Flum, David R., Ramsey, Scott D., Goff, Barbara A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 593.e14
container_issue 6
container_start_page 593.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 219
creator Doll, Kemi M.
Khor, Sara
Odem-Davis, Katherine
He, Hao
Wolff, Erika M.
Flum, David R.
Ramsey, Scott D.
Goff, Barbara A.
description Advanced stage at diagnosis is an independent, unexplained contributor to racial disparity in endometrial cancer. We sought to investigate whether, prior to diagnosis, provider recognition of the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer, postmenopausal bleeding, differs by patient race. Black and White women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (2001 through 2011) from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare who had at least 2 years of claims prior to diagnosis were identified. Bleeding diagnoses along with procedures done prior to diagnosis were captured via claims data. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with diagnostic workup and multivariate models built to determine the association of appropriate diagnostic procedures with stage at diagnosis. In all, 4354 White and 537 Black women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were included. Compared to White women, Black women were less likely to have guideline-concordant care: postmenopausal bleeding and appropriate diagnostic evaluation (70% vs 79%, P < .001), with adjusted relative risk ratios of 1.12–1.73 for different nonguideline-concordant pathways: bleeding without diagnostic procedures, alternative bleeding descriptions, and neither bleeding nor procedures. These pathways were associated with higher odds of advanced stage at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90–2.88). The lack of recognition and evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding is associated with advanced stage at diagnosis in endometrial cancer. Older Black women are at highest risk for the most aggressive histology types, yet they are less likely to have guideline-concordant evaluation of vaginal bleeding. Efforts aimed at improving recognition–among patients and providers–of postmenopausal bleeding in Black women could substantially reduce disparities in endometrial cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116843493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937818308329</els_id><sourcerecordid>2116843493</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-926c4b113b65bcd91c00e7bd2b9a26e685a417a5d0ec0f8d669ae818e0f1d75a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15aJ2mbJuBFxS8QBFG8CCFNpmvWbrMmXcF_b-uuHj0NwzzvC_MQckQho0D56TzTcz_LGFCRgcyggC0ypSCrlAsutskUAFgq80pMyF6M83Flku2SSQ5MUpHLKXl99C0mvknqFtG6bpYENH7Wud75LtGdTfBTtyv9s7ouuWi1eU9f3lyPiXVxqcNAYhxP2Fm_wD443SZGdwbDAdlpdBvxcDP3yfP11dPlbXr_cHN3eX6fmrzkfSoZN0VNaV7zsjZWUgOAVW1ZLTXjyEWpC1rp0gIaaITlXGoUVCA01FalzvfJybp3GfzHCmOvFi4abFvdoV9FxSjlosgLmQ8oW6Mm-BgDNmoZ3EKHL0VBjVbVXI1W1WhVgVSD1SF0vOlf1Qu0f5FfjQNwtgZw-PLTYVDROBwUWDfo7JX17r_-bya_iXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116843493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Doll, Kemi M. ; Khor, Sara ; Odem-Davis, Katherine ; He, Hao ; Wolff, Erika M. ; Flum, David R. ; Ramsey, Scott D. ; Goff, Barbara A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doll, Kemi M. ; Khor, Sara ; Odem-Davis, Katherine ; He, Hao ; Wolff, Erika M. ; Flum, David R. ; Ramsey, Scott D. ; Goff, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><description>Advanced stage at diagnosis is an independent, unexplained contributor to racial disparity in endometrial cancer. We sought to investigate whether, prior to diagnosis, provider recognition of the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer, postmenopausal bleeding, differs by patient race. Black and White women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (2001 through 2011) from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare who had at least 2 years of claims prior to diagnosis were identified. Bleeding diagnoses along with procedures done prior to diagnosis were captured via claims data. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with diagnostic workup and multivariate models built to determine the association of appropriate diagnostic procedures with stage at diagnosis. In all, 4354 White and 537 Black women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were included. Compared to White women, Black women were less likely to have guideline-concordant care: postmenopausal bleeding and appropriate diagnostic evaluation (70% vs 79%, P &lt; .001), with adjusted relative risk ratios of 1.12–1.73 for different nonguideline-concordant pathways: bleeding without diagnostic procedures, alternative bleeding descriptions, and neither bleeding nor procedures. These pathways were associated with higher odds of advanced stage at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90–2.88). The lack of recognition and evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding is associated with advanced stage at diagnosis in endometrial cancer. Older Black women are at highest risk for the most aggressive histology types, yet they are less likely to have guideline-concordant evaluation of vaginal bleeding. Efforts aimed at improving recognition–among patients and providers–of postmenopausal bleeding in Black women could substantially reduce disparities in endometrial cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30291839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>African-Americans ; Aged ; Black or African American ; Black People ; endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - complications ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Endometrial Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - ethnology ; Female ; health care disparities ; Healthcare Disparities ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; postmenopausal bleeding ; Postmenopause ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; racial health disparities ; Risk Factors ; SEER Program ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare ; United States - epidemiology ; Uterine Hemorrhage - diagnosis ; Uterine Hemorrhage - ethnology ; Uterine Hemorrhage - etiology ; White People ; Women's Health Services - standards</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-12, Vol.219 (6), p.593.e1-593.e14</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-926c4b113b65bcd91c00e7bd2b9a26e685a417a5d0ec0f8d669ae818e0f1d75a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-926c4b113b65bcd91c00e7bd2b9a26e685a417a5d0ec0f8d669ae818e0f1d75a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937818308329$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30291839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doll, Kemi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khor, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem-Davis, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Erika M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flum, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goff, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><title>Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Advanced stage at diagnosis is an independent, unexplained contributor to racial disparity in endometrial cancer. We sought to investigate whether, prior to diagnosis, provider recognition of the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer, postmenopausal bleeding, differs by patient race. Black and White women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (2001 through 2011) from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare who had at least 2 years of claims prior to diagnosis were identified. Bleeding diagnoses along with procedures done prior to diagnosis were captured via claims data. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with diagnostic workup and multivariate models built to determine the association of appropriate diagnostic procedures with stage at diagnosis. In all, 4354 White and 537 Black women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were included. Compared to White women, Black women were less likely to have guideline-concordant care: postmenopausal bleeding and appropriate diagnostic evaluation (70% vs 79%, P &lt; .001), with adjusted relative risk ratios of 1.12–1.73 for different nonguideline-concordant pathways: bleeding without diagnostic procedures, alternative bleeding descriptions, and neither bleeding nor procedures. These pathways were associated with higher odds of advanced stage at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90–2.88). The lack of recognition and evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding is associated with advanced stage at diagnosis in endometrial cancer. Older Black women are at highest risk for the most aggressive histology types, yet they are less likely to have guideline-concordant evaluation of vaginal bleeding. Efforts aimed at improving recognition–among patients and providers–of postmenopausal bleeding in Black women could substantially reduce disparities in endometrial cancer.</description><subject>African-Americans</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Black or African American</subject><subject>Black People</subject><subject>endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - ethnology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health care disparities</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>postmenopausal bleeding</subject><subject>Postmenopause</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>racial health disparities</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>SEER Program</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - diagnosis</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - ethnology</subject><subject>Uterine Hemorrhage - etiology</subject><subject>White People</subject><subject>Women's Health Services - standards</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxBzxIj15aJ2mbJuBFxS8QBFG8CCFNpmvWbrMmXcF_b-uuHj0NwzzvC_MQckQho0D56TzTcz_LGFCRgcyggC0ypSCrlAsutskUAFgq80pMyF6M83Flku2SSQ5MUpHLKXl99C0mvknqFtG6bpYENH7Wud75LtGdTfBTtyv9s7ouuWi1eU9f3lyPiXVxqcNAYhxP2Fm_wD443SZGdwbDAdlpdBvxcDP3yfP11dPlbXr_cHN3eX6fmrzkfSoZN0VNaV7zsjZWUgOAVW1ZLTXjyEWpC1rp0gIaaITlXGoUVCA01FalzvfJybp3GfzHCmOvFi4abFvdoV9FxSjlosgLmQ8oW6Mm-BgDNmoZ3EKHL0VBjVbVXI1W1WhVgVSD1SF0vOlf1Qu0f5FfjQNwtgZw-PLTYVDROBwUWDfo7JX17r_-bya_iXo</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Doll, Kemi M.</creator><creator>Khor, Sara</creator><creator>Odem-Davis, Katherine</creator><creator>He, Hao</creator><creator>Wolff, Erika M.</creator><creator>Flum, David R.</creator><creator>Ramsey, Scott D.</creator><creator>Goff, Barbara A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer</title><author>Doll, Kemi M. ; Khor, Sara ; Odem-Davis, Katherine ; He, Hao ; Wolff, Erika M. ; Flum, David R. ; Ramsey, Scott D. ; Goff, Barbara A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-926c4b113b65bcd91c00e7bd2b9a26e685a417a5d0ec0f8d669ae818e0f1d75a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>African-Americans</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Black or African American</topic><topic>Black People</topic><topic>endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - ethnology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health care disparities</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>postmenopausal bleeding</topic><topic>Postmenopause</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>racial health disparities</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>SEER Program</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - diagnosis</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - ethnology</topic><topic>Uterine Hemorrhage - etiology</topic><topic>White People</topic><topic>Women's Health Services - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doll, Kemi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khor, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odem-Davis, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolff, Erika M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flum, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goff, Barbara A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doll, Kemi M.</au><au>Khor, Sara</au><au>Odem-Davis, Katherine</au><au>He, Hao</au><au>Wolff, Erika M.</au><au>Flum, David R.</au><au>Ramsey, Scott D.</au><au>Goff, Barbara A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>219</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>593.e1</spage><epage>593.e14</epage><pages>593.e1-593.e14</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Advanced stage at diagnosis is an independent, unexplained contributor to racial disparity in endometrial cancer. We sought to investigate whether, prior to diagnosis, provider recognition of the cardinal symptom of endometrial cancer, postmenopausal bleeding, differs by patient race. Black and White women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (2001 through 2011) from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare who had at least 2 years of claims prior to diagnosis were identified. Bleeding diagnoses along with procedures done prior to diagnosis were captured via claims data. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with diagnostic workup and multivariate models built to determine the association of appropriate diagnostic procedures with stage at diagnosis. In all, 4354 White and 537 Black women diagnosed with endometrial cancer were included. Compared to White women, Black women were less likely to have guideline-concordant care: postmenopausal bleeding and appropriate diagnostic evaluation (70% vs 79%, P &lt; .001), with adjusted relative risk ratios of 1.12–1.73 for different nonguideline-concordant pathways: bleeding without diagnostic procedures, alternative bleeding descriptions, and neither bleeding nor procedures. These pathways were associated with higher odds of advanced stage at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.90–2.88). The lack of recognition and evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding is associated with advanced stage at diagnosis in endometrial cancer. Older Black women are at highest risk for the most aggressive histology types, yet they are less likely to have guideline-concordant evaluation of vaginal bleeding. Efforts aimed at improving recognition–among patients and providers–of postmenopausal bleeding in Black women could substantially reduce disparities in endometrial cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30291839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.040</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018-12, Vol.219 (6), p.593.e1-593.e14
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116843493
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects African-Americans
Aged
Black or African American
Black People
endometrial cancer
Endometrial Neoplasms - complications
Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis
Endometrial Neoplasms - epidemiology
Endometrial Neoplasms - ethnology
Female
health care disparities
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Logistic Models
postmenopausal bleeding
Postmenopause
Practice Guidelines as Topic
racial health disparities
Risk Factors
SEER Program
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare
United States - epidemiology
Uterine Hemorrhage - diagnosis
Uterine Hemorrhage - ethnology
Uterine Hemorrhage - etiology
White People
Women's Health Services - standards
title Role of bleeding recognition and evaluation in Black-White disparities in endometrial cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T23%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20bleeding%20recognition%20and%20evaluation%20in%20Black-White%20disparities%20in%20endometrial%20cancer&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Doll,%20Kemi%20M.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=219&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=593.e1&rft.epage=593.e14&rft.pages=593.e1-593.e14&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116843493%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116843493&rft_id=info:pmid/30291839&rft_els_id=S0002937818308329&rfr_iscdi=true