Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency
Objective To compare voice outcomes of autogenous fat injection versus medialization laryngoplasty in patients with glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold paresis or atrophy. Methods A retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2017 of all patients who underwent lipoinjection or medialization...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2019-05, Vol.129 (5), p.1164-1168 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1168 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1164 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 129 |
| creator | M. Dominguez, Laura Villarreal, Ricardo Simpson, C. Blake |
| description | Objective
To compare voice outcomes of autogenous fat injection versus medialization laryngoplasty in patients with glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold paresis or atrophy.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2017 of all patients who underwent lipoinjection or medialization laryngoplasty (ML) for glottic insufficiency. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, surgical intervention, Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) and Glottal Function Index (GFI) scores, follow‐up time (minimum 3 months), and concomitant voice therapy.
Results
Eighty‐three patients were initially identified and limited to 28 based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty‐five procedures were performed with a total of 15 fat injections and 20 MLs. The mean age was 60.7 years in the lipoinjection group and 55.6 years in the ML group. There was no significant difference in pretreatment VHI‐10 scores between the two groups. Using the lowest recorded voice scores during the follow‐up period, both groups had a significant decrease (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.27573 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116116143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2210413892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-31a5a7e0419894ba2e2804c5c2b609a6d5a72591ad34e98a05e0b1a5f9de97dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AFS8CJCNR_NtjnK4hdUF0RFTyGbTiVLtqlJi9Rfb3ZXPXgQBgZmnnkzmRehQ4LPCMb03Co_nNGc52wDjQhnJM2E4JtoFJssLTh92UG7IcwxJjnjeBvtMEyLLMYImWdnNCTTvtNuASFxdVKa1plmDrozrkmewYc-JHdQGWXNp1oVy_hi8-Zaq0I3JLXzyb1rWuWVHTqjk2vrumW-bUJf10YbaPSwj7ZqZQMcfOc99HR1-Ti5Scvp9e3kokw1iz9IGVFc5YAzIgqRzRQFWuBMc01nYyzUuIpdygVRFctAFApzwLM4U4sKRF5ptodO1rqtd-89hE4uTNBgrWrA9UFSQsbLyFhEj_-gc9f7Jm4nKSVxBVYIGqnTNaW9C8FDLVtvFvECkmC5NEAuDZArAyJ89C3ZzxZQ_aI_F48AWQMfxsLwj5QsLx5e16JfzveR3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2210413892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>M. Dominguez, Laura ; Villarreal, Ricardo ; Simpson, C. Blake</creator><creatorcontrib>M. Dominguez, Laura ; Villarreal, Ricardo ; Simpson, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare voice outcomes of autogenous fat injection versus medialization laryngoplasty in patients with glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold paresis or atrophy.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2017 of all patients who underwent lipoinjection or medialization laryngoplasty (ML) for glottic insufficiency. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, surgical intervention, Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) and Glottal Function Index (GFI) scores, follow‐up time (minimum 3 months), and concomitant voice therapy.
Results
Eighty‐three patients were initially identified and limited to 28 based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty‐five procedures were performed with a total of 15 fat injections and 20 MLs. The mean age was 60.7 years in the lipoinjection group and 55.6 years in the ML group. There was no significant difference in pretreatment VHI‐10 scores between the two groups. Using the lowest recorded voice scores during the follow‐up period, both groups had a significant decrease (P < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores (VHI‐10: fat decreased from 27.8 to 14.2, ML decreased from 30.5 to 9.1; GFI: fat decreased from 13.7 to 5.27, ML decreased from 13.6 to 4.6). When evaluating the entire follow‐up period (median 19 months in fat group, 16.3 months in ML), only the ML group maintained a significant improvement in VHI‐10 (median delta 14.5) and GFI (median delta 7) compared to preoperative scores.
Conclusion
Although both autogenous fat injection and ML result in improved voice scores in the short term, the effect of fat injection appears to be limited, as evidenced by worsening VHI‐10 and GFI scores over time.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 129:1164–1168, 2019</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.27573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30284284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>autologous fat ; Glottic insufficiency ; Injections ; Larynx ; lipoinjection ; medialization laryngoplasty ; Voice communication</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2019-05, Vol.129 (5), p.1164-1168</ispartof><rights>2018 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-31a5a7e0419894ba2e2804c5c2b609a6d5a72591ad34e98a05e0b1a5f9de97dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-31a5a7e0419894ba2e2804c5c2b609a6d5a72591ad34e98a05e0b1a5f9de97dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.27573$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.27573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>M. Dominguez, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villarreal, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><title>Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare voice outcomes of autogenous fat injection versus medialization laryngoplasty in patients with glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold paresis or atrophy.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2017 of all patients who underwent lipoinjection or medialization laryngoplasty (ML) for glottic insufficiency. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, surgical intervention, Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) and Glottal Function Index (GFI) scores, follow‐up time (minimum 3 months), and concomitant voice therapy.
Results
Eighty‐three patients were initially identified and limited to 28 based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty‐five procedures were performed with a total of 15 fat injections and 20 MLs. The mean age was 60.7 years in the lipoinjection group and 55.6 years in the ML group. There was no significant difference in pretreatment VHI‐10 scores between the two groups. Using the lowest recorded voice scores during the follow‐up period, both groups had a significant decrease (P < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores (VHI‐10: fat decreased from 27.8 to 14.2, ML decreased from 30.5 to 9.1; GFI: fat decreased from 13.7 to 5.27, ML decreased from 13.6 to 4.6). When evaluating the entire follow‐up period (median 19 months in fat group, 16.3 months in ML), only the ML group maintained a significant improvement in VHI‐10 (median delta 14.5) and GFI (median delta 7) compared to preoperative scores.
Conclusion
Although both autogenous fat injection and ML result in improved voice scores in the short term, the effect of fat injection appears to be limited, as evidenced by worsening VHI‐10 and GFI scores over time.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 129:1164–1168, 2019</description><subject>autologous fat</subject><subject>Glottic insufficiency</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Larynx</subject><subject>lipoinjection</subject><subject>medialization laryngoplasty</subject><subject>Voice communication</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun5c_AFS8CJCNR_NtjnK4hdUF0RFTyGbTiVLtqlJi9Rfb3ZXPXgQBgZmnnkzmRehQ4LPCMb03Co_nNGc52wDjQhnJM2E4JtoFJssLTh92UG7IcwxJjnjeBvtMEyLLMYImWdnNCTTvtNuASFxdVKa1plmDrozrkmewYc-JHdQGWXNp1oVy_hi8-Zaq0I3JLXzyb1rWuWVHTqjk2vrumW-bUJf10YbaPSwj7ZqZQMcfOc99HR1-Ti5Scvp9e3kokw1iz9IGVFc5YAzIgqRzRQFWuBMc01nYyzUuIpdygVRFctAFApzwLM4U4sKRF5ptodO1rqtd-89hE4uTNBgrWrA9UFSQsbLyFhEj_-gc9f7Jm4nKSVxBVYIGqnTNaW9C8FDLVtvFvECkmC5NEAuDZArAyJ89C3ZzxZQ_aI_F48AWQMfxsLwj5QsLx5e16JfzveR3Q</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>M. Dominguez, Laura</creator><creator>Villarreal, Ricardo</creator><creator>Simpson, C. Blake</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency</title><author>M. Dominguez, Laura ; Villarreal, Ricardo ; Simpson, C. Blake</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3573-31a5a7e0419894ba2e2804c5c2b609a6d5a72591ad34e98a05e0b1a5f9de97dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>autologous fat</topic><topic>Glottic insufficiency</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Larynx</topic><topic>lipoinjection</topic><topic>medialization laryngoplasty</topic><topic>Voice communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>M. Dominguez, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villarreal, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, C. Blake</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>M. Dominguez, Laura</au><au>Villarreal, Ricardo</au><au>Simpson, C. Blake</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1164</spage><epage>1168</epage><pages>1164-1168</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare voice outcomes of autogenous fat injection versus medialization laryngoplasty in patients with glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold paresis or atrophy.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2017 of all patients who underwent lipoinjection or medialization laryngoplasty (ML) for glottic insufficiency. Charts were reviewed for demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, surgical intervention, Voice Handicap Index‐10 (VHI‐10) and Glottal Function Index (GFI) scores, follow‐up time (minimum 3 months), and concomitant voice therapy.
Results
Eighty‐three patients were initially identified and limited to 28 based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirty‐five procedures were performed with a total of 15 fat injections and 20 MLs. The mean age was 60.7 years in the lipoinjection group and 55.6 years in the ML group. There was no significant difference in pretreatment VHI‐10 scores between the two groups. Using the lowest recorded voice scores during the follow‐up period, both groups had a significant decrease (P < 0.05) compared to preoperative scores (VHI‐10: fat decreased from 27.8 to 14.2, ML decreased from 30.5 to 9.1; GFI: fat decreased from 13.7 to 5.27, ML decreased from 13.6 to 4.6). When evaluating the entire follow‐up period (median 19 months in fat group, 16.3 months in ML), only the ML group maintained a significant improvement in VHI‐10 (median delta 14.5) and GFI (median delta 7) compared to preoperative scores.
Conclusion
Although both autogenous fat injection and ML result in improved voice scores in the short term, the effect of fat injection appears to be limited, as evidenced by worsening VHI‐10 and GFI scores over time.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 129:1164–1168, 2019</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30284284</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.27573</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2019-05, Vol.129 (5), p.1164-1168 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2116116143 |
| source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | autologous fat Glottic insufficiency Injections Larynx lipoinjection medialization laryngoplasty Voice communication |
| title | Voice Outcomes of Lipoinjection Versus Medialization Laryngoplasty for Nonparalytic Glottic Insufficiency |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A19%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voice%20Outcomes%20of%20Lipoinjection%20Versus%20Medialization%20Laryngoplasty%20for%20Nonparalytic%20Glottic%20Insufficiency&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=M.%20Dominguez,%20Laura&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1164&rft.epage=1168&rft.pages=1164-1168&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.27573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2210413892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2210413892&rft_id=info:pmid/30284284&rfr_iscdi=true |