Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study

Glenoid loosening, a common complication of shoulder arthroplasty, could relate to implant design and bone quality. However, the role of bone density has not been tested experimentally yet. In this study, tests on cadaveric specimens of varying bone density were performed to evaluate the effects of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.e18-e28
Hauptverfasser: Chamseddine, Mohamad, Breden, Sebastian, Pietschmann, Matthias F., Müller, Peter E., Chevalier, Yan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e28
container_issue 1
container_start_page e18
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 28
creator Chamseddine, Mohamad
Breden, Sebastian
Pietschmann, Matthias F.
Müller, Peter E.
Chevalier, Yan
description Glenoid loosening, a common complication of shoulder arthroplasty, could relate to implant design and bone quality. However, the role of bone density has not been tested experimentally yet. In this study, tests on cadaveric specimens of varying bone density were performed to evaluate the effects of bone quality on loosening of typical anatomic glenoid implants. Cadaveric scapulae scanned with a quantitative computed tomography scanner to determine bone mineral density (BMD) were implanted with either pegged or keeled cemented glenoid components and tested under constant glenohumeral load while a humeral head component was moved cyclically in the inferior and superior directions. Implant superior and inferior edge lifting, defined as displacement from the underlying bone, was measured with linear variable differential transducers until we reached 23,000 test cycles, and statistical testing was performed for differences in edge lifting due to implant design and related to periprosthetic BMD. Edge lifting was statistically significant at all time points, but on average, implant design had no effect. Lifting was highest in specimens in which BMD below the lifting edge was lower, with trends of increased displacement with decreased BMD. Implant lifting was greater in glenoids of lower bone density for both implant designs. This finding suggests that fixation failure will most likely occur in bone of lower density and that the fixation design itself may play a secondary role.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2115756364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274618305391</els_id><sourcerecordid>2115756364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-1c02c225b2592426ac6ea687a9a82c778e58f0ef324d26be677e56c402939d5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlHUKN8_oJeKYy92B2zAbk_VKm0qRUoOyRlhPM6y8poN4Cj-92G12x57YsQ880rvQ8hnBiUDJr9tyk3EkgNrSlAlMH5CLpioeCEFwKc8g2gKrmp5Ti5j3ABAWwM_I-cV7H-b9oKkRwxuF3xMa0zO0s5PSF9nM7q0UDMMaFOkeUcH926S8xP1AzWTSX6b6ZcRJ-_6SN1Ek09mpHHt57HHQE1I6-B3o4lp-b7fv7kUPI1p7pdrcjqYMeLN8b0iz79un1Z3xf3D7z-rn_eFrUSVCmaBW85Fx0XLay6NlWhko0xrGm6ValA0A-BQ8brnskOpFAppc8W2anvRVVfk6yE3F3ydMSa9ddHiOJoJ_Rw1Z0woIStZZ5QdUJtdxICD3gW3NWHRDPRett7oLFvvZWtQOsvON1-O8XO3xf7fxV-7GfhxADCXfHMYdLQOJ4u9C1ms7r37T_wHaNiRew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115756364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chamseddine, Mohamad ; Breden, Sebastian ; Pietschmann, Matthias F. ; Müller, Peter E. ; Chevalier, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chamseddine, Mohamad ; Breden, Sebastian ; Pietschmann, Matthias F. ; Müller, Peter E. ; Chevalier, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Glenoid loosening, a common complication of shoulder arthroplasty, could relate to implant design and bone quality. However, the role of bone density has not been tested experimentally yet. In this study, tests on cadaveric specimens of varying bone density were performed to evaluate the effects of bone quality on loosening of typical anatomic glenoid implants. Cadaveric scapulae scanned with a quantitative computed tomography scanner to determine bone mineral density (BMD) were implanted with either pegged or keeled cemented glenoid components and tested under constant glenohumeral load while a humeral head component was moved cyclically in the inferior and superior directions. Implant superior and inferior edge lifting, defined as displacement from the underlying bone, was measured with linear variable differential transducers until we reached 23,000 test cycles, and statistical testing was performed for differences in edge lifting due to implant design and related to periprosthetic BMD. Edge lifting was statistically significant at all time points, but on average, implant design had no effect. Lifting was highest in specimens in which BMD below the lifting edge was lower, with trends of increased displacement with decreased BMD. Implant lifting was greater in glenoids of lower bone density for both implant designs. This finding suggests that fixation failure will most likely occur in bone of lower density and that the fixation design itself may play a secondary role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30274689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods ; basic science study ; bone ; Bone Density ; Cadaver ; clinical biomechanics ; Female ; Humans ; Humeral Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humeral Head - surgery ; implant design ; implant fixation ; Male ; Prosthesis Design ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.e18-e28</ispartof><rights>2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-1c02c225b2592426ac6ea687a9a82c778e58f0ef324d26be677e56c402939d5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-1c02c225b2592426ac6ea687a9a82c778e58f0ef324d26be677e56c402939d5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chamseddine, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breden, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietschmann, Matthias F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Glenoid loosening, a common complication of shoulder arthroplasty, could relate to implant design and bone quality. However, the role of bone density has not been tested experimentally yet. In this study, tests on cadaveric specimens of varying bone density were performed to evaluate the effects of bone quality on loosening of typical anatomic glenoid implants. Cadaveric scapulae scanned with a quantitative computed tomography scanner to determine bone mineral density (BMD) were implanted with either pegged or keeled cemented glenoid components and tested under constant glenohumeral load while a humeral head component was moved cyclically in the inferior and superior directions. Implant superior and inferior edge lifting, defined as displacement from the underlying bone, was measured with linear variable differential transducers until we reached 23,000 test cycles, and statistical testing was performed for differences in edge lifting due to implant design and related to periprosthetic BMD. Edge lifting was statistically significant at all time points, but on average, implant design had no effect. Lifting was highest in specimens in which BMD below the lifting edge was lower, with trends of increased displacement with decreased BMD. Implant lifting was greater in glenoids of lower bone density for both implant designs. This finding suggests that fixation failure will most likely occur in bone of lower density and that the fixation design itself may play a secondary role.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</subject><subject>basic science study</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>clinical biomechanics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humeral Head - surgery</subject><subject>implant design</subject><subject>implant fixation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlHUKN8_oJeKYy92B2zAbk_VKm0qRUoOyRlhPM6y8poN4Cj-92G12x57YsQ880rvQ8hnBiUDJr9tyk3EkgNrSlAlMH5CLpioeCEFwKc8g2gKrmp5Ti5j3ABAWwM_I-cV7H-b9oKkRwxuF3xMa0zO0s5PSF9nM7q0UDMMaFOkeUcH926S8xP1AzWTSX6b6ZcRJ-_6SN1Ek09mpHHt57HHQE1I6-B3o4lp-b7fv7kUPI1p7pdrcjqYMeLN8b0iz79un1Z3xf3D7z-rn_eFrUSVCmaBW85Fx0XLay6NlWhko0xrGm6ValA0A-BQ8brnskOpFAppc8W2anvRVVfk6yE3F3ydMSa9ddHiOJoJ_Rw1Z0woIStZZ5QdUJtdxICD3gW3NWHRDPRett7oLFvvZWtQOsvON1-O8XO3xf7fxV-7GfhxADCXfHMYdLQOJ4u9C1ms7r37T_wHaNiRew</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Chamseddine, Mohamad</creator><creator>Breden, Sebastian</creator><creator>Pietschmann, Matthias F.</creator><creator>Müller, Peter E.</creator><creator>Chevalier, Yan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study</title><author>Chamseddine, Mohamad ; Breden, Sebastian ; Pietschmann, Matthias F. ; Müller, Peter E. ; Chevalier, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-1c02c225b2592426ac6ea687a9a82c778e58f0ef324d26be677e56c402939d5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</topic><topic>basic science study</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>clinical biomechanics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humeral Head - surgery</topic><topic>implant design</topic><topic>implant fixation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chamseddine, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breden, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietschmann, Matthias F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, Peter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chamseddine, Mohamad</au><au>Breden, Sebastian</au><au>Pietschmann, Matthias F.</au><au>Müller, Peter E.</au><au>Chevalier, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e18</spage><epage>e28</epage><pages>e18-e28</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Glenoid loosening, a common complication of shoulder arthroplasty, could relate to implant design and bone quality. However, the role of bone density has not been tested experimentally yet. In this study, tests on cadaveric specimens of varying bone density were performed to evaluate the effects of bone quality on loosening of typical anatomic glenoid implants. Cadaveric scapulae scanned with a quantitative computed tomography scanner to determine bone mineral density (BMD) were implanted with either pegged or keeled cemented glenoid components and tested under constant glenohumeral load while a humeral head component was moved cyclically in the inferior and superior directions. Implant superior and inferior edge lifting, defined as displacement from the underlying bone, was measured with linear variable differential transducers until we reached 23,000 test cycles, and statistical testing was performed for differences in edge lifting due to implant design and related to periprosthetic BMD. Edge lifting was statistically significant at all time points, but on average, implant design had no effect. Lifting was highest in specimens in which BMD below the lifting edge was lower, with trends of increased displacement with decreased BMD. Implant lifting was greater in glenoids of lower bone density for both implant designs. This finding suggests that fixation failure will most likely occur in bone of lower density and that the fixation design itself may play a secondary role.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30274689</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.012</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2019-01, Vol.28 (1), p.e18-e28
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2115756364
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods
basic science study
bone
Bone Density
Cadaver
clinical biomechanics
Female
Humans
Humeral Head - diagnostic imaging
Humeral Head - surgery
implant design
implant fixation
Male
Prosthesis Design
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Total shoulder arthroplasty
title Periprosthetic bone quality affects the fixation of anatomic glenoids in total shoulder arthroplasty: in vitro study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Periprosthetic%20bone%20quality%20affects%20the%20fixation%20of%20anatomic%20glenoids%20in%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty:%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Chamseddine,%20Mohamad&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e18&rft.epage=e28&rft.pages=e18-e28&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2115756364%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115756364&rft_id=info:pmid/30274689&rft_els_id=S1058274618305391&rfr_iscdi=true