Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models

This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.87-94
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Sung-Jae, Jang, Seong-wook, Jung, Koo-Hyun, Kim, Yoon Sang, Lee, Seung-Jin, Yoo, Yon-sik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
container_volume 24
creator Kim, Sung-Jae
Jang, Seong-wook
Jung, Koo-Hyun
Kim, Yoon Sang
Lee, Seung-Jin
Yoo, Yon-sik
description This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of seven patients by using visualization and computer-aided design software. Three types of implant designs, namely, typical medialization, in between, and lateralization implants, were used for the reconstruction of 3D model; each design was designated as group I, II, and III, respectively. All possible combinations of virtual surgeries were evaluated for impingement-free ROM in all three groups. Maximal ROMs were compared. The effect of implant positions on ROM of the shoulder joints were investigated in each group. The all lateralization group (group III) showed significantly greatest maximal adduction, abduction and external rotation (ER). Adduction and abduction were significantly increased by the glenoid component inferior translation in all three groups. (In group I, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2115280757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0949265818302409</els_id><sourcerecordid>2115280757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-45700b20f036a5f23ca605fe6bf91774067bd5d9f4a4e6c992438ed90d8325283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcGOFCEQJUbjzq5-gBfTRy89FtBAdzxtNuqabOJFz4Rpih06dDMCvcl8iP8rnVk9mlRSUPXqPYpHyDsKewpUfpz2U8x7BrTfQw0qX5Ad7bhsGTD-kuxg6IaWSdFfkeucJwCqxCBekysOTPZcyB35fbuYcM4-N9E1fj755RFnXErrEmKTTL1unTkWH5ftVI7YPAZc4nGdMZnQTNEvpTGuYGoSPmHK2JRYaicf4xpsLZtUjimegsnl3Ky5alSajd965zBVuU06mJrnaDHkN-SVMyHj2-d8Q35--fzj7r59-P71293tQztypUrbCQVwYOCASyMc46ORIBzKgxuoUh1IdbDCDq4zHcpxGFjHe7QD2J4zwXp-Qz5ceE8p_loxFz37PGKoT8G4Zs0orTBQQlUovUDHFHNO6PQp-dmks6agNzf0pKsbenNDQw0q68z7Z_r1MKP9N_H3-yvg0wVQd8Ynj0nn0eMyovUJx6Jt9P-h_wM0XZ4O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115280757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, Sung-Jae ; Jang, Seong-wook ; Jung, Koo-Hyun ; Kim, Yoon Sang ; Lee, Seung-Jin ; Yoo, Yon-sik</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Jae ; Jang, Seong-wook ; Jung, Koo-Hyun ; Kim, Yoon Sang ; Lee, Seung-Jin ; Yoo, Yon-sik</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of seven patients by using visualization and computer-aided design software. Three types of implant designs, namely, typical medialization, in between, and lateralization implants, were used for the reconstruction of 3D model; each design was designated as group I, II, and III, respectively. All possible combinations of virtual surgeries were evaluated for impingement-free ROM in all three groups. Maximal ROMs were compared. The effect of implant positions on ROM of the shoulder joints were investigated in each group. The all lateralization group (group III) showed significantly greatest maximal adduction, abduction and external rotation (ER). Adduction and abduction were significantly increased by the glenoid component inferior translation in all three groups. (In group I, p &lt; 0.001 for adduction, p = 0.002 for abduction, respectively; in group II, p = 0.025, p &lt; 0.001, respectively; in group III, p = 0.038, p = 0.011, respectively). Increasing humerus retroversion might have some effect on increasing abduction. In group II and III, internal rotation (IR) and ER were significantly affected by the humerus retroversion (in group II, p = 0.033 for IR, p = 0.007 for ER, respectively; in group III, p = 0.004, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). In group III, ER was also significantly affected by the glenoid component inferior translation (p = 0.003). Lateralization design model showed greatest ROM of the shoulder joint. The effects of implant positions on impingement-free ROM exhibited different tendencies between medialization and lateralization implant models. Humerus retroversion affected both IR and ER, especially in lateralization design. Increasing glenoid inferior translation increases both adduction and abduction regardless of implant designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0949-2658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-2023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30268356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods ; Humans ; Humerus - diagnostic imaging ; Humerus - surgery ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Prosthesis Design ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Scapula - diagnostic imaging ; Scapula - surgery ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.87-94</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-45700b20f036a5f23ca605fe6bf91774067bd5d9f4a4e6c992438ed90d8325283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-45700b20f036a5f23ca605fe6bf91774067bd5d9f4a4e6c992438ed90d8325283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30268356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seong-wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Koo-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yoon Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Yon-sik</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</title><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><description>This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of seven patients by using visualization and computer-aided design software. Three types of implant designs, namely, typical medialization, in between, and lateralization implants, were used for the reconstruction of 3D model; each design was designated as group I, II, and III, respectively. All possible combinations of virtual surgeries were evaluated for impingement-free ROM in all three groups. Maximal ROMs were compared. The effect of implant positions on ROM of the shoulder joints were investigated in each group. The all lateralization group (group III) showed significantly greatest maximal adduction, abduction and external rotation (ER). Adduction and abduction were significantly increased by the glenoid component inferior translation in all three groups. (In group I, p &lt; 0.001 for adduction, p = 0.002 for abduction, respectively; in group II, p = 0.025, p &lt; 0.001, respectively; in group III, p = 0.038, p = 0.011, respectively). Increasing humerus retroversion might have some effect on increasing abduction. In group II and III, internal rotation (IR) and ER were significantly affected by the humerus retroversion (in group II, p = 0.033 for IR, p = 0.007 for ER, respectively; in group III, p = 0.004, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). In group III, ER was also significantly affected by the glenoid component inferior translation (p = 0.003). Lateralization design model showed greatest ROM of the shoulder joint. The effects of implant positions on impingement-free ROM exhibited different tendencies between medialization and lateralization implant models. Humerus retroversion affected both IR and ER, especially in lateralization design. Increasing glenoid inferior translation increases both adduction and abduction regardless of implant designs.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humerus - surgery</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Scapula - surgery</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0949-2658</issn><issn>1436-2023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcGOFCEQJUbjzq5-gBfTRy89FtBAdzxtNuqabOJFz4Rpih06dDMCvcl8iP8rnVk9mlRSUPXqPYpHyDsKewpUfpz2U8x7BrTfQw0qX5Ad7bhsGTD-kuxg6IaWSdFfkeucJwCqxCBekysOTPZcyB35fbuYcM4-N9E1fj755RFnXErrEmKTTL1unTkWH5ftVI7YPAZc4nGdMZnQTNEvpTGuYGoSPmHK2JRYaicf4xpsLZtUjimegsnl3Ky5alSajd965zBVuU06mJrnaDHkN-SVMyHj2-d8Q35--fzj7r59-P71293tQztypUrbCQVwYOCASyMc46ORIBzKgxuoUh1IdbDCDq4zHcpxGFjHe7QD2J4zwXp-Qz5ceE8p_loxFz37PGKoT8G4Zs0orTBQQlUovUDHFHNO6PQp-dmks6agNzf0pKsbenNDQw0q68z7Z_r1MKP9N_H3-yvg0wVQd8Ynj0nn0eMyovUJx6Jt9P-h_wM0XZ4O</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Kim, Sung-Jae</creator><creator>Jang, Seong-wook</creator><creator>Jung, Koo-Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Yoon Sang</creator><creator>Lee, Seung-Jin</creator><creator>Yoo, Yon-sik</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models</title><author>Kim, Sung-Jae ; Jang, Seong-wook ; Jung, Koo-Hyun ; Kim, Yoon Sang ; Lee, Seung-Jin ; Yoo, Yon-sik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-45700b20f036a5f23ca605fe6bf91774067bd5d9f4a4e6c992438ed90d8325283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humerus - surgery</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scapula - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Scapula - surgery</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sung-Jae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Seong-wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Koo-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yoon Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Yon-sik</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sung-Jae</au><au>Jang, Seong-wook</au><au>Jung, Koo-Hyun</au><au>Kim, Yoon Sang</au><au>Lee, Seung-Jin</au><au>Yoo, Yon-sik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Sci</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>87-94</pages><issn>0949-2658</issn><eissn>1436-2023</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to investigate impingement-free range of motion (ROM) of the glenohumeral joint following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with three types of implant models using computational motion analysis. Three-dimensional (3D) scapulohumeral models were created from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of seven patients by using visualization and computer-aided design software. Three types of implant designs, namely, typical medialization, in between, and lateralization implants, were used for the reconstruction of 3D model; each design was designated as group I, II, and III, respectively. All possible combinations of virtual surgeries were evaluated for impingement-free ROM in all three groups. Maximal ROMs were compared. The effect of implant positions on ROM of the shoulder joints were investigated in each group. The all lateralization group (group III) showed significantly greatest maximal adduction, abduction and external rotation (ER). Adduction and abduction were significantly increased by the glenoid component inferior translation in all three groups. (In group I, p &lt; 0.001 for adduction, p = 0.002 for abduction, respectively; in group II, p = 0.025, p &lt; 0.001, respectively; in group III, p = 0.038, p = 0.011, respectively). Increasing humerus retroversion might have some effect on increasing abduction. In group II and III, internal rotation (IR) and ER were significantly affected by the humerus retroversion (in group II, p = 0.033 for IR, p = 0.007 for ER, respectively; in group III, p = 0.004, p &lt; 0.001, respectively). In group III, ER was also significantly affected by the glenoid component inferior translation (p = 0.003). Lateralization design model showed greatest ROM of the shoulder joint. The effects of implant positions on impingement-free ROM exhibited different tendencies between medialization and lateralization implant models. Humerus retroversion affected both IR and ER, especially in lateralization design. Increasing glenoid inferior translation increases both adduction and abduction regardless of implant designs.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30268356</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0949-2658
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, 2019-01, Vol.24 (1), p.87-94
issn 0949-2658
1436-2023
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2115280757
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder - methods
Humans
Humerus - diagnostic imaging
Humerus - surgery
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Scapula - diagnostic imaging
Scapula - surgery
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Analysis of impingement-free range of motion of the glenohumeral joint after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using three different implant models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A25%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20impingement-free%20range%20of%20motion%20of%20the%20glenohumeral%20joint%20after%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty%20using%20three%20different%20implant%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20science%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20Japanese%20Orthopaedic%20Association&rft.au=Kim,%20Sung-Jae&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=87-94&rft.issn=0949-2658&rft.eissn=1436-2023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2115280757%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115280757&rft_id=info:pmid/30268356&rft_els_id=S0949265818302409&rfr_iscdi=true