Social Network Limits Language Complexity
Natural languages vary widely in the degree to which they make use of nested compositional structure in their grammars. It has long been noted by linguists that the languages historically spoken in small communities develop much deeper levels of compositional embedding than those spoken by larger gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive science 2018-11, Vol.42 (8), p.2790-2817 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2817 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2790 |
container_title | Cognitive science |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew Onnis, Luca |
description | Natural languages vary widely in the degree to which they make use of nested compositional structure in their grammars. It has long been noted by linguists that the languages historically spoken in small communities develop much deeper levels of compositional embedding than those spoken by larger groups. Recently, this observation has been confirmed by a robust statistical analysis of the World Atlas of Language Structures. In order to examine this connection mechanistically, we propose an agent‐based model that accounts for key cultural evolutionary features of language transfer and language change. We identify transitivity as a physical parameter of social networks critical for the evolution of compositional structure and the hierarchical patterning of scale‐free distributions as inhibitory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cogs.12683 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114708381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2114708381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-4e5ba85a32c4ec418683b85c095a0f5dc3d95f1a75b73130586b17ef0b81ee703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90DFPwzAQBWALgaAUFn4AqsQCSCnnXBw7I4qgIEV0KMyW4zpVSlKXOFHpv8clhYGBW2759PT0CLmgMKb-7rRduDENY4EHZEAZo0HMITkkA8A4CiCkeEJOnVsCQBxjckxOEMI4ijgOyM3M6lJVoxfTbmzzPsrKumzdKFOrRacWZpTael2Zz7LdnpGjQlXOnO__kLw9PrymT0E2nTyn91mgMUEMIsNyJZjCUEdGR1T4WrlgGhKmoGBzjfOEFVRxlnOkCEzEOeWmgFxQYzjgkFz3uevGfnTGtbIunTZVpVbGdk6GlEYcBArq6dUfurRds_LtvGKQYAiMe3XbK91Y5xpTyHVT1qrZSgpyN6DcDSi_B_T4ch_Z5bWZ_9KfxTygPdiUldn-EyXT6WTWh34BMBZ4Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2150932057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Network Limits Language Complexity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew ; Onnis, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew ; Onnis, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Natural languages vary widely in the degree to which they make use of nested compositional structure in their grammars. It has long been noted by linguists that the languages historically spoken in small communities develop much deeper levels of compositional embedding than those spoken by larger groups. Recently, this observation has been confirmed by a robust statistical analysis of the World Atlas of Language Structures. In order to examine this connection mechanistically, we propose an agent‐based model that accounts for key cultural evolutionary features of language transfer and language change. We identify transitivity as a physical parameter of social networks critical for the evolution of compositional structure and the hierarchical patterning of scale‐free distributions as inhibitory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-0213</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-6709</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12683</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30264473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agent‐based model ; Cultural Evolution ; Embedding ; Grammaticalization ; Humans ; Language ; Language change ; Language complexity ; Language evolution ; Linguistics ; Pattern formation ; Social network ; Social Networking ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Cognitive science, 2018-11, Vol.42 (8), p.2790-2817</ispartof><rights>2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-4e5ba85a32c4ec418683b85c095a0f5dc3d95f1a75b73130586b17ef0b81ee703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-4e5ba85a32c4ec418683b85c095a0f5dc3d95f1a75b73130586b17ef0b81ee703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcogs.12683$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcogs.12683$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30264473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onnis, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Social Network Limits Language Complexity</title><title>Cognitive science</title><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>Natural languages vary widely in the degree to which they make use of nested compositional structure in their grammars. It has long been noted by linguists that the languages historically spoken in small communities develop much deeper levels of compositional embedding than those spoken by larger groups. Recently, this observation has been confirmed by a robust statistical analysis of the World Atlas of Language Structures. In order to examine this connection mechanistically, we propose an agent‐based model that accounts for key cultural evolutionary features of language transfer and language change. We identify transitivity as a physical parameter of social networks critical for the evolution of compositional structure and the hierarchical patterning of scale‐free distributions as inhibitory.</description><subject>Agent‐based model</subject><subject>Cultural Evolution</subject><subject>Embedding</subject><subject>Grammaticalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language change</subject><subject>Language complexity</subject><subject>Language evolution</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Pattern formation</subject><subject>Social network</subject><subject>Social Networking</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0364-0213</issn><issn>1551-6709</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90DFPwzAQBWALgaAUFn4AqsQCSCnnXBw7I4qgIEV0KMyW4zpVSlKXOFHpv8clhYGBW2759PT0CLmgMKb-7rRduDENY4EHZEAZo0HMITkkA8A4CiCkeEJOnVsCQBxjckxOEMI4ijgOyM3M6lJVoxfTbmzzPsrKumzdKFOrRacWZpTael2Zz7LdnpGjQlXOnO__kLw9PrymT0E2nTyn91mgMUEMIsNyJZjCUEdGR1T4WrlgGhKmoGBzjfOEFVRxlnOkCEzEOeWmgFxQYzjgkFz3uevGfnTGtbIunTZVpVbGdk6GlEYcBArq6dUfurRds_LtvGKQYAiMe3XbK91Y5xpTyHVT1qrZSgpyN6DcDSi_B_T4ch_Z5bWZ_9KfxTygPdiUldn-EyXT6WTWh34BMBZ4Qw</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew</creator><creator>Onnis, Luca</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Social Network Limits Language Complexity</title><author>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew ; Onnis, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-4e5ba85a32c4ec418683b85c095a0f5dc3d95f1a75b73130586b17ef0b81ee703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agent‐based model</topic><topic>Cultural Evolution</topic><topic>Embedding</topic><topic>Grammaticalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language change</topic><topic>Language complexity</topic><topic>Language evolution</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Pattern formation</topic><topic>Social network</topic><topic>Social Networking</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onnis, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lou‐Magnuson, Matthew</au><au>Onnis, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Network Limits Language Complexity</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive science</jtitle><addtitle>Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2790</spage><epage>2817</epage><pages>2790-2817</pages><issn>0364-0213</issn><eissn>1551-6709</eissn><abstract>Natural languages vary widely in the degree to which they make use of nested compositional structure in their grammars. It has long been noted by linguists that the languages historically spoken in small communities develop much deeper levels of compositional embedding than those spoken by larger groups. Recently, this observation has been confirmed by a robust statistical analysis of the World Atlas of Language Structures. In order to examine this connection mechanistically, we propose an agent‐based model that accounts for key cultural evolutionary features of language transfer and language change. We identify transitivity as a physical parameter of social networks critical for the evolution of compositional structure and the hierarchical patterning of scale‐free distributions as inhibitory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30264473</pmid><doi>10.1111/cogs.12683</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-0213 |
ispartof | Cognitive science, 2018-11, Vol.42 (8), p.2790-2817 |
issn | 0364-0213 1551-6709 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114708381 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Agent‐based model Cultural Evolution Embedding Grammaticalization Humans Language Language change Language complexity Language evolution Linguistics Pattern formation Social network Social Networking Social networks Social organization Statistical analysis |
title | Social Network Limits Language Complexity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Network%20Limits%20Language%20Complexity&rft.jtitle=Cognitive%20science&rft.au=Lou%E2%80%90Magnuson,%20Matthew&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2790&rft.epage=2817&rft.pages=2790-2817&rft.issn=0364-0213&rft.eissn=1551-6709&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cogs.12683&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2114708381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2150932057&rft_id=info:pmid/30264473&rfr_iscdi=true |