Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis

Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222
Hauptverfasser: Bhimani, Abhiraj D., Selner, Ashley N., Esfahani, Darian R., Chiu, Ryan G., Rosinski, Clayton L., Rosenberg, David, Mudreac, Andrew, Diamond, Ryne J., Almadidy, Zayed, Mehta, Ankit I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e222
container_issue
container_start_page e215
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 121
creator Bhimani, Abhiraj D.
Selner, Ashley N.
Esfahani, Darian R.
Chiu, Ryan G.
Rosinski, Clayton L.
Rosenberg, David
Mudreac, Andrew
Diamond, Ryne J.
Almadidy, Zayed
Mehta, Ankit I.
description Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined. Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%). Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci. •Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114691608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875018321259</els_id><sourcerecordid>2114691608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVNDAC3RRedlNgh0n_kHdDAgo0khFMF27tnMjeUjiwU5aDU-PR0NZ9m58LZ3vk-5B6AslJSWUX2zKvyPMZUWoLIkqiVCf0CmVQhZScHX0sTfkBJ2ntCF5GK2lYJ_RCSMVp0w1p-j3_ThF46IZvenxTQ9uiqEF_NAbBwOME-5CxE_gX-cICV9B_gJew7ANMQdWweZEGHaXeIkffXourmCEzk94OZp-l3w6Q8ed6ROcv78L9Ov2Zn39o1j9vLu_Xq4Kxxo-FbYRpmaCss6YxllV18CdtB0XtaqYq0xnVWN41chWdgIsV1aBoCCdBaOIZQv07dC7jeFlhjTpwScHfW9GCHPSFaU1V5QTmdHqgLoYUorQ6W30g4k7TYney9UbvZer93I1UTrLzaGv7_2zHaD9iPxTmYHvBwDylX88RJ2ch9FB62N2pNvg_9f_BjhBjC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2114691608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><description>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined. Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%). Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci. •Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30261395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anterior temporal lobectomy ; Electrode implant ; NSQIP ; Outcomes ; Temporal lobe epilepsy ; Temporal lobectomy</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875018321259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selner, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfahani, Darian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Ryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudreac, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Ryne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almadidy, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined. Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%). Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci. •Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</description><subject>Anterior temporal lobectomy</subject><subject>Electrode implant</subject><subject>NSQIP</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Temporal lobe epilepsy</subject><subject>Temporal lobectomy</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVNDAC3RRedlNgh0n_kHdDAgo0khFMF27tnMjeUjiwU5aDU-PR0NZ9m58LZ3vk-5B6AslJSWUX2zKvyPMZUWoLIkqiVCf0CmVQhZScHX0sTfkBJ2ntCF5GK2lYJ_RCSMVp0w1p-j3_ThF46IZvenxTQ9uiqEF_NAbBwOME-5CxE_gX-cICV9B_gJew7ANMQdWweZEGHaXeIkffXourmCEzk94OZp-l3w6Q8ed6ROcv78L9Ov2Zn39o1j9vLu_Xq4Kxxo-FbYRpmaCss6YxllV18CdtB0XtaqYq0xnVWN41chWdgIsV1aBoCCdBaOIZQv07dC7jeFlhjTpwScHfW9GCHPSFaU1V5QTmdHqgLoYUorQ6W30g4k7TYney9UbvZer93I1UTrLzaGv7_2zHaD9iPxTmYHvBwDylX88RJ2ch9FB62N2pNvg_9f_BjhBjC0</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creator><creator>Selner, Ashley N.</creator><creator>Esfahani, Darian R.</creator><creator>Chiu, Ryan G.</creator><creator>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creator><creator>Rosenberg, David</creator><creator>Mudreac, Andrew</creator><creator>Diamond, Ryne J.</creator><creator>Almadidy, Zayed</creator><creator>Mehta, Ankit I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><author>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anterior temporal lobectomy</topic><topic>Electrode implant</topic><topic>NSQIP</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Temporal lobe epilepsy</topic><topic>Temporal lobectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selner, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfahani, Darian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Ryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudreac, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Ryne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almadidy, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</au><au>Selner, Ashley N.</au><au>Esfahani, Darian R.</au><au>Chiu, Ryan G.</au><au>Rosinski, Clayton L.</au><au>Rosenberg, David</au><au>Mudreac, Andrew</au><au>Diamond, Ryne J.</au><au>Almadidy, Zayed</au><au>Mehta, Ankit I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>e215</spage><epage>e222</epage><pages>e215-e222</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined. Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%). Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci. •Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30261395</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114691608
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anterior temporal lobectomy
Electrode implant
NSQIP
Outcomes
Temporal lobe epilepsy
Temporal lobectomy
title Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intracranial%20Electrode%20Placement%20for%20Seizures%20Before%20Temporal%20Lobectomy:%20A%20Risk-Benefit%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Bhimani,%20Abhiraj%20D.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=e215&rft.epage=e222&rft.pages=e215-e222&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2114691608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2114691608&rft_id=info:pmid/30261395&rft_els_id=S1878875018321259&rfr_iscdi=true