Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis
Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e222 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e215 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Bhimani, Abhiraj D. Selner, Ashley N. Esfahani, Darian R. Chiu, Ryan G. Rosinski, Clayton L. Rosenberg, David Mudreac, Andrew Diamond, Ryne J. Almadidy, Zayed Mehta, Ankit I. |
description | Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone.
Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined.
Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%).
Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci.
•Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114691608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875018321259</els_id><sourcerecordid>2114691608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVNDAC3RRedlNgh0n_kHdDAgo0khFMF27tnMjeUjiwU5aDU-PR0NZ9m58LZ3vk-5B6AslJSWUX2zKvyPMZUWoLIkqiVCf0CmVQhZScHX0sTfkBJ2ntCF5GK2lYJ_RCSMVp0w1p-j3_ThF46IZvenxTQ9uiqEF_NAbBwOME-5CxE_gX-cICV9B_gJew7ANMQdWweZEGHaXeIkffXourmCEzk94OZp-l3w6Q8ed6ROcv78L9Ov2Zn39o1j9vLu_Xq4Kxxo-FbYRpmaCss6YxllV18CdtB0XtaqYq0xnVWN41chWdgIsV1aBoCCdBaOIZQv07dC7jeFlhjTpwScHfW9GCHPSFaU1V5QTmdHqgLoYUorQ6W30g4k7TYney9UbvZer93I1UTrLzaGv7_2zHaD9iPxTmYHvBwDylX88RJ2ch9FB62N2pNvg_9f_BjhBjC0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2114691608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><description>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone.
Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined.
Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%).
Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci.
•Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30261395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anterior temporal lobectomy ; Electrode implant ; NSQIP ; Outcomes ; Temporal lobe epilepsy ; Temporal lobectomy</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875018321259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30261395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selner, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfahani, Darian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Ryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudreac, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Ryne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almadidy, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone.
Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined.
Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%).
Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci.
•Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</description><subject>Anterior temporal lobectomy</subject><subject>Electrode implant</subject><subject>NSQIP</subject><subject>Outcomes</subject><subject>Temporal lobe epilepsy</subject><subject>Temporal lobectomy</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURq0KVNDAC3RRedlNgh0n_kHdDAgo0khFMF27tnMjeUjiwU5aDU-PR0NZ9m58LZ3vk-5B6AslJSWUX2zKvyPMZUWoLIkqiVCf0CmVQhZScHX0sTfkBJ2ntCF5GK2lYJ_RCSMVp0w1p-j3_ThF46IZvenxTQ9uiqEF_NAbBwOME-5CxE_gX-cICV9B_gJew7ANMQdWweZEGHaXeIkffXourmCEzk94OZp-l3w6Q8ed6ROcv78L9Ov2Zn39o1j9vLu_Xq4Kxxo-FbYRpmaCss6YxllV18CdtB0XtaqYq0xnVWN41chWdgIsV1aBoCCdBaOIZQv07dC7jeFlhjTpwScHfW9GCHPSFaU1V5QTmdHqgLoYUorQ6W30g4k7TYney9UbvZer93I1UTrLzaGv7_2zHaD9iPxTmYHvBwDylX88RJ2ch9FB62N2pNvg_9f_BjhBjC0</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creator><creator>Selner, Ashley N.</creator><creator>Esfahani, Darian R.</creator><creator>Chiu, Ryan G.</creator><creator>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creator><creator>Rosenberg, David</creator><creator>Mudreac, Andrew</creator><creator>Diamond, Ryne J.</creator><creator>Almadidy, Zayed</creator><creator>Mehta, Ankit I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</title><author>Bhimani, Abhiraj D. ; Selner, Ashley N. ; Esfahani, Darian R. ; Chiu, Ryan G. ; Rosinski, Clayton L. ; Rosenberg, David ; Mudreac, Andrew ; Diamond, Ryne J. ; Almadidy, Zayed ; Mehta, Ankit I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b57a43713faa5cb944e6c8bf674923c2afb95a6258d8f7eb69b9e71e8cbea90b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anterior temporal lobectomy</topic><topic>Electrode implant</topic><topic>NSQIP</topic><topic>Outcomes</topic><topic>Temporal lobe epilepsy</topic><topic>Temporal lobectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selner, Ashley N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esfahani, Darian R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Ryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosinski, Clayton L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudreac, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Ryne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almadidy, Zayed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ankit I.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhimani, Abhiraj D.</au><au>Selner, Ashley N.</au><au>Esfahani, Darian R.</au><au>Chiu, Ryan G.</au><au>Rosinski, Clayton L.</au><au>Rosenberg, David</au><au>Mudreac, Andrew</au><au>Diamond, Ryne J.</au><au>Almadidy, Zayed</au><au>Mehta, Ankit I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>e215</spage><epage>e222</epage><pages>e215-e222</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) is the most common surgical procedure for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy. When scalp electroencephalography cannot adequately identify an epileptogenic site, electrode implantation may be used to monitor epileptic activity and localize a target focus before surgical resection. Whether the advantage of improved seizure localization justifies the added risk of electrode placement remains unclear. : The present study uses an international surgical database to explore whether a 2wo-stage approach, electrode implant followed by ATL, has a reasonable safety profile and is clinically worthwhile versus ATL alone.
Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for 2005 to 2016 were queried to identify patients undergoing ATL or electrode implant for epilepsy. The 30-day postoperative outcomes were analyzed for the electrode implant and ATL groups, and individual and combined risk profiles were determined.
Patients undergoing electrode implant followed by ATL had a predicted reoperation rate of 7.6%, readmission rate of 14.6%, and a 30-day mortality rate of 1.2%. The combined rate of patients having ≥1 medical complication for 2-staged procedures was higher, at 14.7%. The most common complications encountered were urinary tract infection (2.7%) and sepsis (2.7%).
Intracranial electrode placement increases the risk of complications when added to ATL. The severity of complications from electrode placement are mild, however, and as intracranial electrode recording provides a potentially large reduction in the surgical failure risk, electrode placement may be advisable for all but the most convincing seizure foci.
•Postoperative outcomes are compared for electrode implant and anterior temporal lobectomy.•A 14.7% combined rate of having at least one medical complication.•Diabetes was a significant predictor of reoperation after anterior temporal lobectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30261395</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4914-3195</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.e215-e222 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2114691608 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Anterior temporal lobectomy Electrode implant NSQIP Outcomes Temporal lobe epilepsy Temporal lobectomy |
title | Intracranial Electrode Placement for Seizures Before Temporal Lobectomy: A Risk-Benefit Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intracranial%20Electrode%20Placement%20for%20Seizures%20Before%20Temporal%20Lobectomy:%20A%20Risk-Benefit%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Bhimani,%20Abhiraj%20D.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=e215&rft.epage=e222&rft.pages=e215-e222&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2114691608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2114691608&rft_id=info:pmid/30261395&rft_els_id=S1878875018321259&rfr_iscdi=true |