Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success
Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 293 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Richardson, T. Will Gardali, Thomas Jenkins, Stephen H |
description | Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2193/2007-566 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21144276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40208523</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40208523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1r20AQBuClpFDHKeQPFEQPoRcls9_SLY7xRxsnhTbBvS0raRbkypKzKyf1v88ahwQKOQ07-zDMvIScUjhnNOcXDECnUqkPZBCfOmUZ1UdkAMBYKgX984kch7AC4JRmakAuf-FjjU-JbavkBnubjlrb7EIdks4lY7tGb5OJc1j2sdMmo8fatskthj75vS1LDOGEfHS2Cfj5pQ7J_XRyN56ni5-z7-PRIi0EFSqVIJXWuhSVsLxyXFgLgKXgTgFWlbWuYLzAPKPMSctzQMhooaSWEpBJzYfk7DB347uHbVzArOtQYtPYFrttMIxSIZhWEX79D666rY9XRcMF1TrLRUTfDqj0XQgendn4em39zlAw-xzNPkcTc4w0PdCnusHdu878WN7MBOz9l4Nfhb7zr14Ag0wy_javDj3-e_23_q9Rmmtplrczc321mE-vZW6mb4cXdde1-P6iz23XlD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234177894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2007-566</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Advances in Wildlife Techniques ; Animal nesting ; bias ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; camera ; Cameras ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Meta-analysis ; nest predators ; nest success ; Nests ; Ornithology ; Photographic equipment ; Predation ; Predators ; Programming languages ; Reviews ; Sample size ; Songbirds ; Sparrows ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Tools and Technology ; Vegetation ; video ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40208523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40208523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardali, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</description><subject>Advances in Wildlife Techniques</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>bias</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>camera</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>nest predators</subject><subject>nest success</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Photographic equipment</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Programming languages</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Sparrows</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tools and Technology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>video</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1r20AQBuClpFDHKeQPFEQPoRcls9_SLY7xRxsnhTbBvS0raRbkypKzKyf1v88ahwQKOQ07-zDMvIScUjhnNOcXDECnUqkPZBCfOmUZ1UdkAMBYKgX984kch7AC4JRmakAuf-FjjU-JbavkBnubjlrb7EIdks4lY7tGb5OJc1j2sdMmo8fatskthj75vS1LDOGEfHS2Cfj5pQ7J_XRyN56ni5-z7-PRIi0EFSqVIJXWuhSVsLxyXFgLgKXgTgFWlbWuYLzAPKPMSctzQMhooaSWEpBJzYfk7DB347uHbVzArOtQYtPYFrttMIxSIZhWEX79D666rY9XRcMF1TrLRUTfDqj0XQgendn4em39zlAw-xzNPkcTc4w0PdCnusHdu878WN7MBOz9l4Nfhb7zr14Ag0wy_javDj3-e_23_q9Rmmtplrczc321mE-vZW6mb4cXdde1-P6iz23XlD0</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>Richardson, T. Will</creator><creator>Gardali, Thomas</creator><creator>Jenkins, Stephen H</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><author>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advances in Wildlife Techniques</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>bias</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>camera</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>nest predators</topic><topic>nest success</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Photographic equipment</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Programming languages</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Sparrows</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tools and Technology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>video</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardali, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, T. Will</au><au>Gardali, Thomas</au><au>Jenkins, Stephen H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>287-293</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2007-566</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21144276 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Advances in Wildlife Techniques Animal nesting bias Bird nesting Birds camera Cameras Data processing Datasets Meta-analysis nest predators nest success Nests Ornithology Photographic equipment Predation Predators Programming languages Reviews Sample size Songbirds Sparrows Studies Surveillance Tools and Technology Vegetation video Wildlife management |
title | Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Camera%20Effects%20on%20Avian%20Nest%20Success&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Richardson,%20T.%20Will&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=287-293&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2007-566&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40208523%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234177894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40208523&rfr_iscdi=true |