Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success

Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293
Hauptverfasser: Richardson, T. Will, Gardali, Thomas, Jenkins, Stephen H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 293
container_issue 2
container_start_page 287
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 73
creator Richardson, T. Will
Gardali, Thomas
Jenkins, Stephen H
description Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/2007-566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21144276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40208523</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40208523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1r20AQBuClpFDHKeQPFEQPoRcls9_SLY7xRxsnhTbBvS0raRbkypKzKyf1v88ahwQKOQ07-zDMvIScUjhnNOcXDECnUqkPZBCfOmUZ1UdkAMBYKgX984kch7AC4JRmakAuf-FjjU-JbavkBnubjlrb7EIdks4lY7tGb5OJc1j2sdMmo8fatskthj75vS1LDOGEfHS2Cfj5pQ7J_XRyN56ni5-z7-PRIi0EFSqVIJXWuhSVsLxyXFgLgKXgTgFWlbWuYLzAPKPMSctzQMhooaSWEpBJzYfk7DB347uHbVzArOtQYtPYFrttMIxSIZhWEX79D666rY9XRcMF1TrLRUTfDqj0XQgendn4em39zlAw-xzNPkcTc4w0PdCnusHdu878WN7MBOz9l4Nfhb7zr14Ag0wy_javDj3-e_23_q9Rmmtplrczc321mE-vZW6mb4cXdde1-P6iz23XlD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234177894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><description>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/2007-566</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Advances in Wildlife Techniques ; Animal nesting ; bias ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; camera ; Cameras ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Meta-analysis ; nest predators ; nest success ; Nests ; Ornithology ; Photographic equipment ; Predation ; Predators ; Programming languages ; Reviews ; Sample size ; Songbirds ; Sparrows ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Tools and Technology ; Vegetation ; video ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2009 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40208523$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40208523$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardali, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</description><subject>Advances in Wildlife Techniques</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>bias</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>camera</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>nest predators</subject><subject>nest success</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><subject>Photographic equipment</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Programming languages</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Sparrows</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Tools and Technology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>video</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1r20AQBuClpFDHKeQPFEQPoRcls9_SLY7xRxsnhTbBvS0raRbkypKzKyf1v88ahwQKOQ07-zDMvIScUjhnNOcXDECnUqkPZBCfOmUZ1UdkAMBYKgX984kch7AC4JRmakAuf-FjjU-JbavkBnubjlrb7EIdks4lY7tGb5OJc1j2sdMmo8fatskthj75vS1LDOGEfHS2Cfj5pQ7J_XRyN56ni5-z7-PRIi0EFSqVIJXWuhSVsLxyXFgLgKXgTgFWlbWuYLzAPKPMSctzQMhooaSWEpBJzYfk7DB347uHbVzArOtQYtPYFrttMIxSIZhWEX79D666rY9XRcMF1TrLRUTfDqj0XQgendn4em39zlAw-xzNPkcTc4w0PdCnusHdu878WN7MBOz9l4Nfhb7zr14Ag0wy_javDj3-e_23_q9Rmmtplrczc321mE-vZW6mb4cXdde1-P6iz23XlD0</recordid><startdate>200902</startdate><enddate>200902</enddate><creator>Richardson, T. Will</creator><creator>Gardali, Thomas</creator><creator>Jenkins, Stephen H</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200902</creationdate><title>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</title><author>Richardson, T. Will ; Gardali, Thomas ; Jenkins, Stephen H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4146-5056777c4d4a3df34aa00ec43f60eddaafb23be9812f5a390e081b657550e2573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Advances in Wildlife Techniques</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>bias</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>camera</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>nest predators</topic><topic>nest success</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><topic>Photographic equipment</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Programming languages</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Sparrows</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Tools and Technology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>video</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, T. Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardali, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Stephen H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, T. Will</au><au>Gardali, Thomas</au><au>Jenkins, Stephen H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2009-02</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>293</epage><pages>287-293</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Identifying nest predators is critical to understanding predation pressures that birds face, and using surveillance cameras appears to be the most reliable method of nest predator identification. However, presence and methods of using camera equipment may introduce bias in predation rates. To summarize potential effects of cameras on nest success we reviewed published and unpublished studies that estimated daily nest predation for bird nests with and without surveillance cameras. We used meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesize the direction and magnitude of these effects from independent studies. We found evidence that, on average, use of camera equipment may reduce nest predation rates, although these differences were not always significant and varied relative to geographic regions, vegetation types, and study duration. Researchers using camera surveillance to monitor nests must be aware that the equipment may be affecting rates of predation and possibly biasing data collected on predator identity. Based on our review and analysis, we provide recommendations for researchers seeking to minimize or control for potential bias when using surveillance cameras to monitor nest predation.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2193/2007-566</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2009-02, Vol.73 (2), p.287-293
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21144276
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Advances in Wildlife Techniques
Animal nesting
bias
Bird nesting
Birds
camera
Cameras
Data processing
Datasets
Meta-analysis
nest predators
nest success
Nests
Ornithology
Photographic equipment
Predation
Predators
Programming languages
Reviews
Sample size
Songbirds
Sparrows
Studies
Surveillance
Tools and Technology
Vegetation
video
Wildlife management
title Review and Meta-Analysis of Camera Effects on Avian Nest Success
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Camera%20Effects%20on%20Avian%20Nest%20Success&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Richardson,%20T.%20Will&rft.date=2009-02&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=293&rft.pages=287-293&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/2007-566&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40208523%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234177894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40208523&rfr_iscdi=true