Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task

ABSTRACT Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACLi) reduces mechanical knee joint stability. Differences in muscle activation patterns are commonly identified between ACLi individuals and uninjured controls (CON); however, how and which of these differences are adaptations to protect the knee or adver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.113-123
Hauptverfasser: Flaxman, Teresa E., Alkjær, Tine, Smale, Kenneth B., Simonsen, Erik B., Krogsgaard, Michael R., Benoit, Daniel L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title Journal of orthopaedic research
container_volume 37
creator Flaxman, Teresa E.
Alkjær, Tine
Smale, Kenneth B.
Simonsen, Erik B.
Krogsgaard, Michael R.
Benoit, Daniel L.
description ABSTRACT Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACLi) reduces mechanical knee joint stability. Differences in muscle activation patterns are commonly identified between ACLi individuals and uninjured controls (CON); however, how and which of these differences are adaptations to protect the knee or adversely increase risk of joint instability remain unclear. Since the neuromuscular system integrates activity of all muscles crossing the knee to create a moment‐of‐force that opposes an external load, this study sought to quantify differences in individual muscle electromyography (EMG)–moment relationships between ACLi and CON. Participants isometrically modulated ground reaction forces during a standing force matching protocol to elicit combinations of sagittal, frontal and transverse plane moments. Partial least squares regressions determined which internal joint moment(s) predicted activation of 10 leg muscles for each group. Compared to CON, ACLi demonstrated greater contribution of rectus femoris to knee extension, semitendinosus and gastrocnemii to knee flexion, and lateral gastrocnemii to knee external rotation moments. ACLi also showed lower contributions of biceps femoris to knee flexion, medial gastrocnemius to internal rotation, and varied hip muscle contributions to frontal plane hip moments. Between group differences in EMG–moment relationships during static conditions suggest neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane stability increases after ACL injury, while knee stability during knee abduction and external rotation is reduced. Clinical Significance: Clinical assessments of ACLi should account for deficits in frontal and rotational plane stability by including tasks that elicit such loads. Improving hamstring muscle balance, hip abductor and gastrocnemius function may benefit ACLi rehabilitation interventions and should be studied further. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res An isometric standing force matching protocol elicited combinations of sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane moments and electromyography of 10 leg muscles in ACL injured and uninjured young adults (controls). Principle component regressions demonstrated that neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane moments was greater, while neuromuscular contributions to knee abduction and external knee rotation moments are lesser in ACL injured participants compared to control. Findings may contribute to the understanding and prev
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jor.24145
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2113273242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2113273242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-9cf511196e47643a98a39c6e1f1d2e05a7c9a90f3ac7d24c4164299604b1be643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAHkJSwCtmM7eIlKeakICYHELnKcSeuS2MVOVLHjCAhuyEkIFNixGs3MN99ifoR2KTmkhLCjmQ-HjFMuVtCACsETwbKHVTQgWSoTwqTcQJsxzgghGWXH62gjJUwoIdkAvZ3aqoIAzkDE1uHR9fnHy3vjG3AtDlDr1noXp3YecQHtAsDhk-H44-XVulkXoMTalbhzf13Z1W3EZResm2CNF2An07bHC9Dfo6bf29IGMF9iXePKBwPYeNcGX-NWx8dttFbpOsLOT91C92eju-FFMr45vxyejBOTSiISZSpBKVUSeCZ5qtWxTpWRQCtaMiBCZ0ZpRapUm6xk3HAqOVNKEl7QAvqLLbS_9M6Df-ogtnljo4G61g58F3NGacqylHHWowdL1AQfY4Aqnwfb6PCcU5J_RZD3EeTfEfTs3o-2Kxoo_8jfn_fA0RJY2Bqe_zflVze3S-Unl9eVrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2113273242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Flaxman, Teresa E. ; Alkjær, Tine ; Smale, Kenneth B. ; Simonsen, Erik B. ; Krogsgaard, Michael R. ; Benoit, Daniel L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flaxman, Teresa E. ; Alkjær, Tine ; Smale, Kenneth B. ; Simonsen, Erik B. ; Krogsgaard, Michael R. ; Benoit, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACLi) reduces mechanical knee joint stability. Differences in muscle activation patterns are commonly identified between ACLi individuals and uninjured controls (CON); however, how and which of these differences are adaptations to protect the knee or adversely increase risk of joint instability remain unclear. Since the neuromuscular system integrates activity of all muscles crossing the knee to create a moment‐of‐force that opposes an external load, this study sought to quantify differences in individual muscle electromyography (EMG)–moment relationships between ACLi and CON. Participants isometrically modulated ground reaction forces during a standing force matching protocol to elicit combinations of sagittal, frontal and transverse plane moments. Partial least squares regressions determined which internal joint moment(s) predicted activation of 10 leg muscles for each group. Compared to CON, ACLi demonstrated greater contribution of rectus femoris to knee extension, semitendinosus and gastrocnemii to knee flexion, and lateral gastrocnemii to knee external rotation moments. ACLi also showed lower contributions of biceps femoris to knee flexion, medial gastrocnemius to internal rotation, and varied hip muscle contributions to frontal plane hip moments. Between group differences in EMG–moment relationships during static conditions suggest neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane stability increases after ACL injury, while knee stability during knee abduction and external rotation is reduced. Clinical Significance: Clinical assessments of ACLi should account for deficits in frontal and rotational plane stability by including tasks that elicit such loads. Improving hamstring muscle balance, hip abductor and gastrocnemius function may benefit ACLi rehabilitation interventions and should be studied further. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res An isometric standing force matching protocol elicited combinations of sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane moments and electromyography of 10 leg muscles in ACL injured and uninjured young adults (controls). Principle component regressions demonstrated that neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane moments was greater, while neuromuscular contributions to knee abduction and external knee rotation moments are lesser in ACL injured participants compared to control. Findings may contribute to the understanding and prevention of frontal and rotational plane instability after ACL injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.24145</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30259562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>ACL injury ; compensation strategies ; internal joint moments ; knee stability ; muscle activity</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.113-123</ispartof><rights>2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-9cf511196e47643a98a39c6e1f1d2e05a7c9a90f3ac7d24c4164299604b1be643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-9cf511196e47643a98a39c6e1f1d2e05a7c9a90f3ac7d24c4164299604b1be643</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8874-3359 ; 0000-0002-2580-7754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjor.24145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjor.24145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30259562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flaxman, Teresa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkjær, Tine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Erik B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogsgaard, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACLi) reduces mechanical knee joint stability. Differences in muscle activation patterns are commonly identified between ACLi individuals and uninjured controls (CON); however, how and which of these differences are adaptations to protect the knee or adversely increase risk of joint instability remain unclear. Since the neuromuscular system integrates activity of all muscles crossing the knee to create a moment‐of‐force that opposes an external load, this study sought to quantify differences in individual muscle electromyography (EMG)–moment relationships between ACLi and CON. Participants isometrically modulated ground reaction forces during a standing force matching protocol to elicit combinations of sagittal, frontal and transverse plane moments. Partial least squares regressions determined which internal joint moment(s) predicted activation of 10 leg muscles for each group. Compared to CON, ACLi demonstrated greater contribution of rectus femoris to knee extension, semitendinosus and gastrocnemii to knee flexion, and lateral gastrocnemii to knee external rotation moments. ACLi also showed lower contributions of biceps femoris to knee flexion, medial gastrocnemius to internal rotation, and varied hip muscle contributions to frontal plane hip moments. Between group differences in EMG–moment relationships during static conditions suggest neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane stability increases after ACL injury, while knee stability during knee abduction and external rotation is reduced. Clinical Significance: Clinical assessments of ACLi should account for deficits in frontal and rotational plane stability by including tasks that elicit such loads. Improving hamstring muscle balance, hip abductor and gastrocnemius function may benefit ACLi rehabilitation interventions and should be studied further. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res An isometric standing force matching protocol elicited combinations of sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane moments and electromyography of 10 leg muscles in ACL injured and uninjured young adults (controls). Principle component regressions demonstrated that neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane moments was greater, while neuromuscular contributions to knee abduction and external knee rotation moments are lesser in ACL injured participants compared to control. Findings may contribute to the understanding and prevention of frontal and rotational plane instability after ACL injury.</description><subject>ACL injury</subject><subject>compensation strategies</subject><subject>internal joint moments</subject><subject>knee stability</subject><subject>muscle activity</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUtOwzAQhi0EgvJYcAHkJSwCtmM7eIlKeakICYHELnKcSeuS2MVOVLHjCAhuyEkIFNixGs3MN99ifoR2KTmkhLCjmQ-HjFMuVtCACsETwbKHVTQgWSoTwqTcQJsxzgghGWXH62gjJUwoIdkAvZ3aqoIAzkDE1uHR9fnHy3vjG3AtDlDr1noXp3YecQHtAsDhk-H44-XVulkXoMTalbhzf13Z1W3EZResm2CNF2An07bHC9Dfo6bf29IGMF9iXePKBwPYeNcGX-NWx8dttFbpOsLOT91C92eju-FFMr45vxyejBOTSiISZSpBKVUSeCZ5qtWxTpWRQCtaMiBCZ0ZpRapUm6xk3HAqOVNKEl7QAvqLLbS_9M6Df-ogtnljo4G61g58F3NGacqylHHWowdL1AQfY4Aqnwfb6PCcU5J_RZD3EeTfEfTs3o-2Kxoo_8jfn_fA0RJY2Bqe_zflVze3S-Unl9eVrA</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Flaxman, Teresa E.</creator><creator>Alkjær, Tine</creator><creator>Smale, Kenneth B.</creator><creator>Simonsen, Erik B.</creator><creator>Krogsgaard, Michael R.</creator><creator>Benoit, Daniel L.</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-3359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-7754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task</title><author>Flaxman, Teresa E. ; Alkjær, Tine ; Smale, Kenneth B. ; Simonsen, Erik B. ; Krogsgaard, Michael R. ; Benoit, Daniel L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3605-9cf511196e47643a98a39c6e1f1d2e05a7c9a90f3ac7d24c4164299604b1be643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ACL injury</topic><topic>compensation strategies</topic><topic>internal joint moments</topic><topic>knee stability</topic><topic>muscle activity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flaxman, Teresa E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkjær, Tine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smale, Kenneth B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonsen, Erik B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krogsgaard, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flaxman, Teresa E.</au><au>Alkjær, Tine</au><au>Smale, Kenneth B.</au><au>Simonsen, Erik B.</au><au>Krogsgaard, Michael R.</au><au>Benoit, Daniel L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Res</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>113-123</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACLi) reduces mechanical knee joint stability. Differences in muscle activation patterns are commonly identified between ACLi individuals and uninjured controls (CON); however, how and which of these differences are adaptations to protect the knee or adversely increase risk of joint instability remain unclear. Since the neuromuscular system integrates activity of all muscles crossing the knee to create a moment‐of‐force that opposes an external load, this study sought to quantify differences in individual muscle electromyography (EMG)–moment relationships between ACLi and CON. Participants isometrically modulated ground reaction forces during a standing force matching protocol to elicit combinations of sagittal, frontal and transverse plane moments. Partial least squares regressions determined which internal joint moment(s) predicted activation of 10 leg muscles for each group. Compared to CON, ACLi demonstrated greater contribution of rectus femoris to knee extension, semitendinosus and gastrocnemii to knee flexion, and lateral gastrocnemii to knee external rotation moments. ACLi also showed lower contributions of biceps femoris to knee flexion, medial gastrocnemius to internal rotation, and varied hip muscle contributions to frontal plane hip moments. Between group differences in EMG–moment relationships during static conditions suggest neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane stability increases after ACL injury, while knee stability during knee abduction and external rotation is reduced. Clinical Significance: Clinical assessments of ACLi should account for deficits in frontal and rotational plane stability by including tasks that elicit such loads. Improving hamstring muscle balance, hip abductor and gastrocnemius function may benefit ACLi rehabilitation interventions and should be studied further. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res An isometric standing force matching protocol elicited combinations of sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane moments and electromyography of 10 leg muscles in ACL injured and uninjured young adults (controls). Principle component regressions demonstrated that neuromuscular contributions to sagittal plane moments was greater, while neuromuscular contributions to knee abduction and external knee rotation moments are lesser in ACL injured participants compared to control. Findings may contribute to the understanding and prevention of frontal and rotational plane instability after ACL injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30259562</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.24145</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-3359</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-7754</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0266
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic research, 2019-01, Vol.37 (1), p.113-123
issn 0736-0266
1554-527X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2113273242
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects ACL injury
compensation strategies
internal joint moments
knee stability
muscle activity
title Differences in EMG–moment relationships between ACL‐injured and uninjured adults during a weight‐bearing multidirectional force control task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20EMG%E2%80%93moment%20relationships%20between%20ACL%E2%80%90injured%20and%20uninjured%20adults%20during%20a%20weight%E2%80%90bearing%20multidirectional%20force%20control%20task&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Flaxman,%20Teresa%20E.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=113-123&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.24145&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2113273242%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2113273242&rft_id=info:pmid/30259562&rfr_iscdi=true