Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals

In this study we present the test-retest reliability of pre-intervention EEG/ERP (electroencephalogram/event-related potentials) data across four recording intervals separated by a washout period (18–22 days). POz-recording-reference EEG/ERP (28 sites, average reference) were recorded from thirty-tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2018-12, Vol.134, p.30-43
Hauptverfasser: Ip, Cheng-Teng, Ganz, Melanie, Ozenne, Brice, Sluth, Lasse B., Gram, Mikkel, Viardot, Geoffrey, l'Hostis, Philippe, Danjou, Philippe, Knudsen, Gitte M., Christensen, Søren R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue
container_start_page 30
container_title International journal of psychophysiology
container_volume 134
creator Ip, Cheng-Teng
Ganz, Melanie
Ozenne, Brice
Sluth, Lasse B.
Gram, Mikkel
Viardot, Geoffrey
l'Hostis, Philippe
Danjou, Philippe
Knudsen, Gitte M.
Christensen, Søren R.
description In this study we present the test-retest reliability of pre-intervention EEG/ERP (electroencephalogram/event-related potentials) data across four recording intervals separated by a washout period (18–22 days). POz-recording-reference EEG/ERP (28 sites, average reference) were recorded from thirty-two healthy male participants. Participants were randomly allocated into different intervention sequences, each with four intervention regimens: 10 mg vortioxetine, 20 mg vortioxetine, 15 mg escitalopram and Placebo. We report classical EEG spectra: δ (1–4 Hz), θ (4–8 Hz), α (8–12 Hz), β (12–30 Hz), γ1 (30–45 Hz) and γ2 (45–80 Hz) of resting state and vigilance-controlled, and of auditory steady state response, as well as ERP components N100, P200 and P300 in auditory oddball task and error related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) in hybrid flanker task. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We found that θ, α and β of continuous EEG were highly reliable (ICCs ≥ 0.84). Evoked power of other tasks demonstrated larger variability and less reliability compared to the absolute power of continuous EEG. Furthermore, reliabilities of ERP measures were lower compared to those of the EEG spectra. We saw fair to excellent reliability of the amplitude of the components such as Pe (0.60–0.82) and P300 (0.55–0.80). Moreover, blood tests confirmed that there was no measurable drug carry-over from the previous intervention. The results support that EEG/ERP is reliable across four recording intervals, thus it can be used to assess the effect of different doses and types of drugs with CNS effects. •Test-retest reliabilities of EEG and ERP over four recordings interval were reported.•Assumption-free modeling on the covariance matrix was applied to test any existing session's effects.•The absolute power spectra of θ, α and β showed excellent reliability; P300 and Pe showed fair to excellent reliability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2112614017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167876018300606</els_id><sourcerecordid>2112614017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ce895d437cf2a77392b6c784339216d394e8833df0428f3557a83b2fc3923053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_wsilN635aJvkThlzCgOHzOvQpqea0TUz6Qb792bUeevVe-A855zkQWhKSUoJLR42qd3swtF8uZQRKlOiUkLEBRpTKVgiCiUu0TiCIpGiICN0E8KGRIIqdY1GnLCcUyXG6GPlIbFdD_4AXW9dh3sIfeLhFNhDa8vKtrY_Ytfg-XyBy67G8_cVdgfwuHF7HyHjfG27TzzsKdtwi66aGHD3mxO0fp6vZy_J8m3xOntaJiajRZ8YkCqvMy5Mw0ohuGJVYYTMeKxoUXOVgZSc1w3JmGx4notS8oo1JvY5yfkE3Q9rd9597-OD9dYGA21bduD2QTNKWUEzQkVEiwE13oXgodE7b7elP2pK9Mmo3uizUX0yqonS0VccnP7e2FdbqP_Gzgoj8DgAED96sOB1MBY6A7WNZnpdO_vfjR_CGYpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112614017</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ip, Cheng-Teng ; Ganz, Melanie ; Ozenne, Brice ; Sluth, Lasse B. ; Gram, Mikkel ; Viardot, Geoffrey ; l'Hostis, Philippe ; Danjou, Philippe ; Knudsen, Gitte M. ; Christensen, Søren R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ip, Cheng-Teng ; Ganz, Melanie ; Ozenne, Brice ; Sluth, Lasse B. ; Gram, Mikkel ; Viardot, Geoffrey ; l'Hostis, Philippe ; Danjou, Philippe ; Knudsen, Gitte M. ; Christensen, Søren R.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study we present the test-retest reliability of pre-intervention EEG/ERP (electroencephalogram/event-related potentials) data across four recording intervals separated by a washout period (18–22 days). POz-recording-reference EEG/ERP (28 sites, average reference) were recorded from thirty-two healthy male participants. Participants were randomly allocated into different intervention sequences, each with four intervention regimens: 10 mg vortioxetine, 20 mg vortioxetine, 15 mg escitalopram and Placebo. We report classical EEG spectra: δ (1–4 Hz), θ (4–8 Hz), α (8–12 Hz), β (12–30 Hz), γ1 (30–45 Hz) and γ2 (45–80 Hz) of resting state and vigilance-controlled, and of auditory steady state response, as well as ERP components N100, P200 and P300 in auditory oddball task and error related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) in hybrid flanker task. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We found that θ, α and β of continuous EEG were highly reliable (ICCs ≥ 0.84). Evoked power of other tasks demonstrated larger variability and less reliability compared to the absolute power of continuous EEG. Furthermore, reliabilities of ERP measures were lower compared to those of the EEG spectra. We saw fair to excellent reliability of the amplitude of the components such as Pe (0.60–0.82) and P300 (0.55–0.80). Moreover, blood tests confirmed that there was no measurable drug carry-over from the previous intervention. The results support that EEG/ERP is reliable across four recording intervals, thus it can be used to assess the effect of different doses and types of drugs with CNS effects. •Test-retest reliabilities of EEG and ERP over four recordings interval were reported.•Assumption-free modeling on the covariance matrix was applied to test any existing session's effects.•The absolute power spectra of θ, α and β showed excellent reliability; P300 and Pe showed fair to excellent reliability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30253197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Crossover design ; EEG ; ERP ; Repeated measurements ; Test-retest reliability</subject><ispartof>International journal of psychophysiology, 2018-12, Vol.134, p.30-43</ispartof><rights>2018 H. Lundbeck A/S</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 H. Lundbeck A/S. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ce895d437cf2a77392b6c784339216d394e8833df0428f3557a83b2fc3923053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ce895d437cf2a77392b6c784339216d394e8833df0428f3557a83b2fc3923053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0381-6676</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876018300606$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30253197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ip, Cheng-Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganz, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozenne, Brice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluth, Lasse B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gram, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viardot, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>l'Hostis, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danjou, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Gitte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Søren R.</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals</title><title>International journal of psychophysiology</title><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><description>In this study we present the test-retest reliability of pre-intervention EEG/ERP (electroencephalogram/event-related potentials) data across four recording intervals separated by a washout period (18–22 days). POz-recording-reference EEG/ERP (28 sites, average reference) were recorded from thirty-two healthy male participants. Participants were randomly allocated into different intervention sequences, each with four intervention regimens: 10 mg vortioxetine, 20 mg vortioxetine, 15 mg escitalopram and Placebo. We report classical EEG spectra: δ (1–4 Hz), θ (4–8 Hz), α (8–12 Hz), β (12–30 Hz), γ1 (30–45 Hz) and γ2 (45–80 Hz) of resting state and vigilance-controlled, and of auditory steady state response, as well as ERP components N100, P200 and P300 in auditory oddball task and error related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) in hybrid flanker task. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We found that θ, α and β of continuous EEG were highly reliable (ICCs ≥ 0.84). Evoked power of other tasks demonstrated larger variability and less reliability compared to the absolute power of continuous EEG. Furthermore, reliabilities of ERP measures were lower compared to those of the EEG spectra. We saw fair to excellent reliability of the amplitude of the components such as Pe (0.60–0.82) and P300 (0.55–0.80). Moreover, blood tests confirmed that there was no measurable drug carry-over from the previous intervention. The results support that EEG/ERP is reliable across four recording intervals, thus it can be used to assess the effect of different doses and types of drugs with CNS effects. •Test-retest reliabilities of EEG and ERP over four recordings interval were reported.•Assumption-free modeling on the covariance matrix was applied to test any existing session's effects.•The absolute power spectra of θ, α and β showed excellent reliability; P300 and Pe showed fair to excellent reliability.</description><subject>Crossover design</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>ERP</subject><subject>Repeated measurements</subject><subject>Test-retest reliability</subject><issn>0167-8760</issn><issn>1872-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_wsilN635aJvkThlzCgOHzOvQpqea0TUz6Qb792bUeevVe-A855zkQWhKSUoJLR42qd3swtF8uZQRKlOiUkLEBRpTKVgiCiUu0TiCIpGiICN0E8KGRIIqdY1GnLCcUyXG6GPlIbFdD_4AXW9dh3sIfeLhFNhDa8vKtrY_Ytfg-XyBy67G8_cVdgfwuHF7HyHjfG27TzzsKdtwi66aGHD3mxO0fp6vZy_J8m3xOntaJiajRZ8YkCqvMy5Mw0ohuGJVYYTMeKxoUXOVgZSc1w3JmGx4notS8oo1JvY5yfkE3Q9rd9597-OD9dYGA21bduD2QTNKWUEzQkVEiwE13oXgodE7b7elP2pK9Mmo3uizUX0yqonS0VccnP7e2FdbqP_Gzgoj8DgAED96sOB1MBY6A7WNZnpdO_vfjR_CGYpU</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Ip, Cheng-Teng</creator><creator>Ganz, Melanie</creator><creator>Ozenne, Brice</creator><creator>Sluth, Lasse B.</creator><creator>Gram, Mikkel</creator><creator>Viardot, Geoffrey</creator><creator>l'Hostis, Philippe</creator><creator>Danjou, Philippe</creator><creator>Knudsen, Gitte M.</creator><creator>Christensen, Søren R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6676</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals</title><author>Ip, Cheng-Teng ; Ganz, Melanie ; Ozenne, Brice ; Sluth, Lasse B. ; Gram, Mikkel ; Viardot, Geoffrey ; l'Hostis, Philippe ; Danjou, Philippe ; Knudsen, Gitte M. ; Christensen, Søren R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-ce895d437cf2a77392b6c784339216d394e8833df0428f3557a83b2fc3923053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Crossover design</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>ERP</topic><topic>Repeated measurements</topic><topic>Test-retest reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ip, Cheng-Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganz, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozenne, Brice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluth, Lasse B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gram, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viardot, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>l'Hostis, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danjou, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knudsen, Gitte M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Søren R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ip, Cheng-Teng</au><au>Ganz, Melanie</au><au>Ozenne, Brice</au><au>Sluth, Lasse B.</au><au>Gram, Mikkel</au><au>Viardot, Geoffrey</au><au>l'Hostis, Philippe</au><au>Danjou, Philippe</au><au>Knudsen, Gitte M.</au><au>Christensen, Søren R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals</atitle><jtitle>International journal of psychophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Psychophysiol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>134</volume><spage>30</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>30-43</pages><issn>0167-8760</issn><eissn>1872-7697</eissn><abstract>In this study we present the test-retest reliability of pre-intervention EEG/ERP (electroencephalogram/event-related potentials) data across four recording intervals separated by a washout period (18–22 days). POz-recording-reference EEG/ERP (28 sites, average reference) were recorded from thirty-two healthy male participants. Participants were randomly allocated into different intervention sequences, each with four intervention regimens: 10 mg vortioxetine, 20 mg vortioxetine, 15 mg escitalopram and Placebo. We report classical EEG spectra: δ (1–4 Hz), θ (4–8 Hz), α (8–12 Hz), β (12–30 Hz), γ1 (30–45 Hz) and γ2 (45–80 Hz) of resting state and vigilance-controlled, and of auditory steady state response, as well as ERP components N100, P200 and P300 in auditory oddball task and error related negativity (ERN) and error positivity (Pe) in hybrid flanker task. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We found that θ, α and β of continuous EEG were highly reliable (ICCs ≥ 0.84). Evoked power of other tasks demonstrated larger variability and less reliability compared to the absolute power of continuous EEG. Furthermore, reliabilities of ERP measures were lower compared to those of the EEG spectra. We saw fair to excellent reliability of the amplitude of the components such as Pe (0.60–0.82) and P300 (0.55–0.80). Moreover, blood tests confirmed that there was no measurable drug carry-over from the previous intervention. The results support that EEG/ERP is reliable across four recording intervals, thus it can be used to assess the effect of different doses and types of drugs with CNS effects. •Test-retest reliabilities of EEG and ERP over four recordings interval were reported.•Assumption-free modeling on the covariance matrix was applied to test any existing session's effects.•The absolute power spectra of θ, α and β showed excellent reliability; P300 and Pe showed fair to excellent reliability.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30253197</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.007</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0381-6676</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8760
ispartof International journal of psychophysiology, 2018-12, Vol.134, p.30-43
issn 0167-8760
1872-7697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2112614017
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Crossover design
EEG
ERP
Repeated measurements
Test-retest reliability
title Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A52%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-intervention%20test-retest%20reliability%20of%20EEG%20and%20ERP%20over%20four%20recording%20intervals&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20psychophysiology&rft.au=Ip,%20Cheng-Teng&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=134&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=30-43&rft.issn=0167-8760&rft.eissn=1872-7697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2112614017%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112614017&rft_id=info:pmid/30253197&rft_els_id=S0167876018300606&rfr_iscdi=true