Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology
Pain is ubiquitous, but effective pain relief eludes many. Research has shown that some pain behaviours are perceived as gendered, and this may influence the way men and women express and cope with pain, but such enquiries have not extended to specific methods of pain relief. Our aim was to explore...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain (Amsterdam) 2019-02, Vol.160 (2), p.395-406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 395 |
container_title | Pain (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 160 |
creator | Wratten, Samantha Eccleston, Christopher Keogh, Edmund |
description | Pain is ubiquitous, but effective pain relief eludes many. Research has shown that some pain behaviours are perceived as gendered, and this may influence the way men and women express and cope with pain, but such enquiries have not extended to specific methods of pain relief. Our aim was to explore perceptions of the most socially acceptable ways for men and women to relieve pain. Across 2 studies, 60 participants (50% men) aged 18 to 78 years completed a Q-sort task, sorting different pain relief strategies by the social acceptability for either women (study 1; N = 30) or men (study 2; N = 30). Analyses revealed 2 stereotypes for each sex. The overarching stereotype for women suggested it is most acceptable for them to use pain relief strategies considered conventional and effective. However, a second stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for women to use strategies that generally conform to feminine gender norms and stereotypes. The overarching male stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for men to use pain relief aligned with stereotypical masculinity; however, a second stereotype also emerged, characterised by conventional and effective responses to pain, much like the overarching stereotype for women. These differing viewpoints seem to depend on whether gender norm conformity or perceived analgesic efficacy is believed to determine social acceptability. These studies provide initial evidence of both a gendered and ungendered lens through which pain relief can be viewed, which may influence how men and women use pain relief. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001409 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2112612598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2112612598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-bb36ac731f393b61af97e45fb16413c8b6b1a23fcc3bffff36d033374d9c27b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtr4zAQhUXZ0qaXv9D14744K2kcKXosYdtdCGwL7VtBSPIocda2XMmm5N_XubQsnZdhmG_OYQ4h3xmdMqrkz820M1U7pf8VK6g6IRM2lzwXgsM3MqFAixzUTJ2Ti5Q2I8Q5V2fkHCifcSn5hLw8YHTY9VVoUxZ8tsK2xIhlZtoyG9rPcWeXRawr9FkbYpP2QOrHZei3HaZsSFW7yh7zBvt1KEMdVtsrcupNnfD62C_J892vp8XvfPn3_s_idpm7gkrIrQVhnATmQYEVzHglsZh5y0TBwM2tsMxw8M6B9WOBKCkAyKJUjksLcEl-HHS7GF4HTL1uquSwrk2LYUiaM8YF4zM1H1F5QF0MKUX0uotVY-JWM6p30eqN3v2qv0Y7Xt4cTQbbYPl595HlCBQH4C3UYy7pXz28YdRrNHW_3usJUCLnlCnKxynfKQO8A2RYhqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112612598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Wratten, Samantha ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Keogh, Edmund</creator><creatorcontrib>Wratten, Samantha ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Keogh, Edmund</creatorcontrib><description>Pain is ubiquitous, but effective pain relief eludes many. Research has shown that some pain behaviours are perceived as gendered, and this may influence the way men and women express and cope with pain, but such enquiries have not extended to specific methods of pain relief. Our aim was to explore perceptions of the most socially acceptable ways for men and women to relieve pain. Across 2 studies, 60 participants (50% men) aged 18 to 78 years completed a Q-sort task, sorting different pain relief strategies by the social acceptability for either women (study 1; N = 30) or men (study 2; N = 30). Analyses revealed 2 stereotypes for each sex. The overarching stereotype for women suggested it is most acceptable for them to use pain relief strategies considered conventional and effective. However, a second stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for women to use strategies that generally conform to feminine gender norms and stereotypes. The overarching male stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for men to use pain relief aligned with stereotypical masculinity; however, a second stereotype also emerged, characterised by conventional and effective responses to pain, much like the overarching stereotype for women. These differing viewpoints seem to depend on whether gender norm conformity or perceived analgesic efficacy is believed to determine social acceptability. These studies provide initial evidence of both a gendered and ungendered lens through which pain relief can be viewed, which may influence how men and women use pain relief.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-3959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001409</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30252772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Gender Identity ; Humans ; Male ; Masculinity ; Middle Aged ; Pain - diagnosis ; Pain - physiopathology ; Pain - psychology ; Pain Measurement ; Perception ; Reference Values ; Sex Characteristics ; Stereotyping ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Pain (Amsterdam), 2019-02, Vol.160 (2), p.395-406</ispartof><rights>Wolters Kluwer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-bb36ac731f393b61af97e45fb16413c8b6b1a23fcc3bffff36d033374d9c27b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-bb36ac731f393b61af97e45fb16413c8b6b1a23fcc3bffff36d033374d9c27b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30252772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wratten, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Edmund</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology</title><title>Pain (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><description>Pain is ubiquitous, but effective pain relief eludes many. Research has shown that some pain behaviours are perceived as gendered, and this may influence the way men and women express and cope with pain, but such enquiries have not extended to specific methods of pain relief. Our aim was to explore perceptions of the most socially acceptable ways for men and women to relieve pain. Across 2 studies, 60 participants (50% men) aged 18 to 78 years completed a Q-sort task, sorting different pain relief strategies by the social acceptability for either women (study 1; N = 30) or men (study 2; N = 30). Analyses revealed 2 stereotypes for each sex. The overarching stereotype for women suggested it is most acceptable for them to use pain relief strategies considered conventional and effective. However, a second stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for women to use strategies that generally conform to feminine gender norms and stereotypes. The overarching male stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for men to use pain relief aligned with stereotypical masculinity; however, a second stereotype also emerged, characterised by conventional and effective responses to pain, much like the overarching stereotype for women. These differing viewpoints seem to depend on whether gender norm conformity or perceived analgesic efficacy is believed to determine social acceptability. These studies provide initial evidence of both a gendered and ungendered lens through which pain relief can be viewed, which may influence how men and women use pain relief.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender Identity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Stereotyping</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0304-3959</issn><issn>1872-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkFtr4zAQhUXZ0qaXv9D14744K2kcKXosYdtdCGwL7VtBSPIocda2XMmm5N_XubQsnZdhmG_OYQ4h3xmdMqrkz820M1U7pf8VK6g6IRM2lzwXgsM3MqFAixzUTJ2Ti5Q2I8Q5V2fkHCifcSn5hLw8YHTY9VVoUxZ8tsK2xIhlZtoyG9rPcWeXRawr9FkbYpP2QOrHZei3HaZsSFW7yh7zBvt1KEMdVtsrcupNnfD62C_J892vp8XvfPn3_s_idpm7gkrIrQVhnATmQYEVzHglsZh5y0TBwM2tsMxw8M6B9WOBKCkAyKJUjksLcEl-HHS7GF4HTL1uquSwrk2LYUiaM8YF4zM1H1F5QF0MKUX0uotVY-JWM6p30eqN3v2qv0Y7Xt4cTQbbYPl595HlCBQH4C3UYy7pXz28YdRrNHW_3usJUCLnlCnKxynfKQO8A2RYhqI</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Wratten, Samantha</creator><creator>Eccleston, Christopher</creator><creator>Keogh, Edmund</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology</title><author>Wratten, Samantha ; Eccleston, Christopher ; Keogh, Edmund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4073-bb36ac731f393b61af97e45fb16413c8b6b1a23fcc3bffff36d033374d9c27b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender Identity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Stereotyping</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wratten, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eccleston, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Edmund</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wratten, Samantha</au><au>Eccleston, Christopher</au><au>Keogh, Edmund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology</atitle><jtitle>Pain (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Pain</addtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>160</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>395</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>395-406</pages><issn>0304-3959</issn><eissn>1872-6623</eissn><abstract>Pain is ubiquitous, but effective pain relief eludes many. Research has shown that some pain behaviours are perceived as gendered, and this may influence the way men and women express and cope with pain, but such enquiries have not extended to specific methods of pain relief. Our aim was to explore perceptions of the most socially acceptable ways for men and women to relieve pain. Across 2 studies, 60 participants (50% men) aged 18 to 78 years completed a Q-sort task, sorting different pain relief strategies by the social acceptability for either women (study 1; N = 30) or men (study 2; N = 30). Analyses revealed 2 stereotypes for each sex. The overarching stereotype for women suggested it is most acceptable for them to use pain relief strategies considered conventional and effective. However, a second stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for women to use strategies that generally conform to feminine gender norms and stereotypes. The overarching male stereotype suggested it is most acceptable for men to use pain relief aligned with stereotypical masculinity; however, a second stereotype also emerged, characterised by conventional and effective responses to pain, much like the overarching stereotype for women. These differing viewpoints seem to depend on whether gender norm conformity or perceived analgesic efficacy is believed to determine social acceptability. These studies provide initial evidence of both a gendered and ungendered lens through which pain relief can be viewed, which may influence how men and women use pain relief.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer</pub><pmid>30252772</pmid><doi>10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001409</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0304-3959 |
ispartof | Pain (Amsterdam), 2019-02, Vol.160 (2), p.395-406 |
issn | 0304-3959 1872-6623 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2112612598 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adolescent Adult Aged Female Gender Identity Humans Male Masculinity Middle Aged Pain - diagnosis Pain - physiopathology Pain - psychology Pain Measurement Perception Reference Values Sex Characteristics Stereotyping Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
title | Perceptions of gendered and ungendered pain relief norms and stereotypes using Q-methodology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T09%3A04%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20gendered%20and%20ungendered%20pain%20relief%20norms%20and%20stereotypes%20using%20Q-methodology&rft.jtitle=Pain%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Wratten,%20Samantha&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=160&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=395&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=395-406&rft.issn=0304-3959&rft.eissn=1872-6623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2112612598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112612598&rft_id=info:pmid/30252772&rfr_iscdi=true |