Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method
Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1080 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1074 |
container_title | Journal of cosmetic dermatology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Boudreaux, Lauren Key, Douglas J. |
description | Summary
Background
Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment.
Objective
To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients.
Methods
Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders.
Results
Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders.
Conclusion
Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocd.12791 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111746226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111746226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQQC0EouWz4QDIS4SUEn-SOOyq8lelbmAduZMJpEriECeg7DgCZ-QkuE3pEm9saZ6eNY-QM-ZPmDtXKwPphPEoZntkzGQkPM7CYH_3Fv6IHFm78n3mmOCQjITPZciVGpNiai1aW2LVUpPRutHQ5oAUsywHDT1d9rTBtjG2Rjf5QKorXfQ2t2u8MNXrz9d3i01Ja93mG0vXginRXtOp05naWExpie2bSU_IQaYLi6fb-5i83N0-zx68-eL-cTadeyB4zDwMZQCQaqVTBVJpqUBlEcaKKykxBhRpKCT4yxSkYL50U8ZUGIUqCgMIYnFMLgav-_-9Q9smZW4Bi0JXaDqbcFctcgF46NDLAQW3om0wS-omL3XTJ8xP1nWTdd1kU9fB51tvtywx3aF_OR3ABuAzL7D_R5U8LWY3g_QXIlSHNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111746226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment.
Objective
To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients.
Methods
Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders.
Results
Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders.
Conclusion
Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30246288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; aesthetic practice assessment ; aesthetic practice management ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cosmetic Techniques ; Face - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; non‐expert grader assessment ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods ; Perception ; Photography ; practice assessment ; practice management ; Random Allocation ; Rejuvenation ; Retrospective Studies ; statistical photograph analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocd.12791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocd.12791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment.
Objective
To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients.
Methods
Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders.
Results
Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders.
Conclusion
Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>aesthetic practice assessment</subject><subject>aesthetic practice management</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques</subject><subject>Face - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>non‐expert grader assessment</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>practice assessment</subject><subject>practice management</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rejuvenation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>statistical photograph analysis</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQQC0EouWz4QDIS4SUEn-SOOyq8lelbmAduZMJpEriECeg7DgCZ-QkuE3pEm9saZ6eNY-QM-ZPmDtXKwPphPEoZntkzGQkPM7CYH_3Fv6IHFm78n3mmOCQjITPZciVGpNiai1aW2LVUpPRutHQ5oAUsywHDT1d9rTBtjG2Rjf5QKorXfQ2t2u8MNXrz9d3i01Ja93mG0vXginRXtOp05naWExpie2bSU_IQaYLi6fb-5i83N0-zx68-eL-cTadeyB4zDwMZQCQaqVTBVJpqUBlEcaKKykxBhRpKCT4yxSkYL50U8ZUGIUqCgMIYnFMLgav-_-9Q9smZW4Bi0JXaDqbcFctcgF46NDLAQW3om0wS-omL3XTJ8xP1nWTdd1kU9fB51tvtywx3aF_OR3ABuAzL7D_R5U8LWY3g_QXIlSHNQ</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Boudreaux, Lauren</creator><creator>Key, Douglas J.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><author>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>aesthetic practice assessment</topic><topic>aesthetic practice management</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques</topic><topic>Face - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>non‐expert grader assessment</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>practice assessment</topic><topic>practice management</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rejuvenation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>statistical photograph analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boudreaux, Lauren</au><au>Key, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1080</epage><pages>1074-1080</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment.
Objective
To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients.
Methods
Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders.
Results
Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders.
Conclusion
Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>30246288</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocd.12791</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1473-2130 |
ispartof | Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080 |
issn | 1473-2130 1473-2165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111746226 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult aesthetic practice assessment aesthetic practice management Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Cosmetic Techniques Face - diagnostic imaging Female Humans Male Middle Aged non‐expert grader assessment Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods Perception Photography practice assessment practice management Random Allocation Rejuvenation Retrospective Studies statistical photograph analysis |
title | Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20practice%20efficacy%20by%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20long%E2%80%90term%20patient%20outcomes:%20A%20proposed%20method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Boudreaux,%20Lauren&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1080&rft.pages=1074-1080&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocd.12791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111746226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111746226&rft_id=info:pmid/30246288&rfr_iscdi=true |