Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method

Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080
Hauptverfasser: Boudreaux, Lauren, Key, Douglas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1080
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1074
container_title Journal of cosmetic dermatology
container_volume 18
creator Boudreaux, Lauren
Key, Douglas J.
description Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients. Methods Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders. Results Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders. Conclusion Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocd.12791
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111746226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111746226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQQC0EouWz4QDIS4SUEn-SOOyq8lelbmAduZMJpEriECeg7DgCZ-QkuE3pEm9saZ6eNY-QM-ZPmDtXKwPphPEoZntkzGQkPM7CYH_3Fv6IHFm78n3mmOCQjITPZciVGpNiai1aW2LVUpPRutHQ5oAUsywHDT1d9rTBtjG2Rjf5QKorXfQ2t2u8MNXrz9d3i01Ja93mG0vXginRXtOp05naWExpie2bSU_IQaYLi6fb-5i83N0-zx68-eL-cTadeyB4zDwMZQCQaqVTBVJpqUBlEcaKKykxBhRpKCT4yxSkYL50U8ZUGIUqCgMIYnFMLgav-_-9Q9smZW4Bi0JXaDqbcFctcgF46NDLAQW3om0wS-omL3XTJ8xP1nWTdd1kU9fB51tvtywx3aF_OR3ABuAzL7D_R5U8LWY3g_QXIlSHNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111746226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients. Methods Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders. Results Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders. Conclusion Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-2130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12791</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30246288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; aesthetic practice assessment ; aesthetic practice management ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cosmetic Techniques ; Face - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; non‐expert grader assessment ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods ; Perception ; Photography ; practice assessment ; practice management ; Random Allocation ; Rejuvenation ; Retrospective Studies ; statistical photograph analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocd.12791$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocd.12791$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><title>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients. Methods Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders. Results Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders. Conclusion Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>aesthetic practice assessment</subject><subject>aesthetic practice management</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques</subject><subject>Face - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>non‐expert grader assessment</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>practice assessment</subject><subject>practice management</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rejuvenation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>statistical photograph analysis</subject><issn>1473-2130</issn><issn>1473-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtOwzAQQC0EouWz4QDIS4SUEn-SOOyq8lelbmAduZMJpEriECeg7DgCZ-QkuE3pEm9saZ6eNY-QM-ZPmDtXKwPphPEoZntkzGQkPM7CYH_3Fv6IHFm78n3mmOCQjITPZciVGpNiai1aW2LVUpPRutHQ5oAUsywHDT1d9rTBtjG2Rjf5QKorXfQ2t2u8MNXrz9d3i01Ja93mG0vXginRXtOp05naWExpie2bSU_IQaYLi6fb-5i83N0-zx68-eL-cTadeyB4zDwMZQCQaqVTBVJpqUBlEcaKKykxBhRpKCT4yxSkYL50U8ZUGIUqCgMIYnFMLgav-_-9Q9smZW4Bi0JXaDqbcFctcgF46NDLAQW3om0wS-omL3XTJ8xP1nWTdd1kU9fB51tvtywx3aF_OR3ABuAzL7D_R5U8LWY3g_QXIlSHNQ</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Boudreaux, Lauren</creator><creator>Key, Douglas J.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</title><author>Boudreaux, Lauren ; Key, Douglas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3291-e645ccda8ad8c48a48c8f7e982844e9ce3d634c0bdc43104c8f1186768765c593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>aesthetic practice assessment</topic><topic>aesthetic practice management</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques</topic><topic>Face - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>non‐expert grader assessment</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>practice assessment</topic><topic>practice management</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rejuvenation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>statistical photograph analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boudreaux, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boudreaux, Lauren</au><au>Key, Douglas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cosmetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cosmet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1080</epage><pages>1074-1080</pages><issn>1473-2130</issn><eissn>1473-2165</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Regardless of changes in clinical techniques and approaches, practices may find value in self‐assessment. Objective To propose a retrospective method by which an aesthetic practice may use patient before and after photographs to assess practice efficacy among long standing patients. Methods Patients who had been with the practice and undergone various aesthetic procedures (n = 73, 59 women, age range 25‐83 years) were selected, with associated photographs before treatment and after their last intervention, covering an average period of 10.71 ± 1.32 years. Photographs were examined by 11 non‐expert graders in random order (along with duplicate photographs of 50 untreated individuals) who guessed and recorded the perceived age of each patient. The difference between the actual and estimated age was compared with that of the after picture to derive numerical values, averaged from among the 11 graders for each patient photo set, followed by statistical testing for confidence interval (CI) to group patients as high, medium, or low responders. Results Of 73 patients, 26 were graded as responders, 23 as medium, and 24 as low, meaning that average perceived aging changed little as per the non‐expert graders. Conclusion Statistical analysis of before and after photographs over time may provide physicians with a window into their performance.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>30246288</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocd.12791</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7879-6094</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1473-2130
ispartof Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2019-08, Vol.18 (4), p.1074-1080
issn 1473-2130
1473-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111746226
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
aesthetic practice assessment
aesthetic practice management
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cosmetic Techniques
Face - diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
non‐expert grader assessment
Outcome Assessment, Health Care - methods
Perception
Photography
practice assessment
practice management
Random Allocation
Rejuvenation
Retrospective Studies
statistical photograph analysis
title Assessment of practice efficacy by retrospective analysis of long‐term patient outcomes: A proposed method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20practice%20efficacy%20by%20retrospective%20analysis%20of%20long%E2%80%90term%20patient%20outcomes:%20A%20proposed%20method&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cosmetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Boudreaux,%20Lauren&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1080&rft.pages=1074-1080&rft.issn=1473-2130&rft.eissn=1473-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocd.12791&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111746226%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111746226&rft_id=info:pmid/30246288&rfr_iscdi=true