Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review

Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Developmental medicine and child neurology 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430
Hauptverfasser: Marks, Kevin P, Madsen Sjö, Nina, Wilson, Philip
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 430
container_issue 4
container_start_page 419
container_title Developmental medicine and child neurology
container_volume 61
creator Marks, Kevin P
Madsen Sjö, Nina
Wilson, Philip
description Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis. Results US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial. Interpretation Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. Resumen Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática Objetivo El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación. Método La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dmcn.14044
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111745582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111745582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUQAdRbK1u_ACZpQip88rLXYlPqIrUrsPN5EZH8qiZpKV_b9JUl85i5g4cDpdDyDlnU96d67TQ5ZQrptQBGXPlhU7gq_CQjBnjwuGeECNyYu0XY0x6rjomI8mE8oTrjQlGVbGCGhqzRtpapFVGm0-ksw-0FMqULhrox7cWbWOqsgRTd19T7qjlYjZAurtNCWsDNxSo3doGi86paY1rg5tTcpRBbvFs_07I8v7uPXp05q8PT9Fs7uh-MSdjGjUPGQCoIFMq4D4GvpeFoe-Dr4UvUaQ8yGQIyk3c0FOhlEmipZDgCanlhFwO3lVdffcbx4WxGvMcSqxaG4sul69cNxAdejWguq6srTGLV7UpoN7GnMV91rjPGu-ydvDF3tsmBaZ_6G_HDuADsDE5bv9RxbfP0csg_QE2iYGq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111745582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis. Results US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial. Interpretation Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. Resumen Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática Objetivo El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación. Método La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos. Resultados Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento. Interpretación Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening). Resume USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA Objetivo O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas. Método A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados. Resultados Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica. Interpretação Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese. Follow the links from the to view the translations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30246256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Mass Screening ; Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis ; Scandinavian and Nordic Countries ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430</ispartof><rights>2018 Mac Keith Press</rights><rights>2018 Mac Keith Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdmcn.14044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdmcn.14044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><title>Developmental medicine and child neurology</title><addtitle>Dev Med Child Neurol</addtitle><description>Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis. Results US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial. Interpretation Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. Resumen Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática Objetivo El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación. Método La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos. Resultados Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento. Interpretación Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening). Resume USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA Objetivo O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas. Método A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados. Resultados Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica. Interpretação Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese. Follow the links from the to view the translations.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0012-1622</issn><issn>1469-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUQAdRbK1u_ACZpQip88rLXYlPqIrUrsPN5EZH8qiZpKV_b9JUl85i5g4cDpdDyDlnU96d67TQ5ZQrptQBGXPlhU7gq_CQjBnjwuGeECNyYu0XY0x6rjomI8mE8oTrjQlGVbGCGhqzRtpapFVGm0-ksw-0FMqULhrox7cWbWOqsgRTd19T7qjlYjZAurtNCWsDNxSo3doGi86paY1rg5tTcpRBbvFs_07I8v7uPXp05q8PT9Fs7uh-MSdjGjUPGQCoIFMq4D4GvpeFoe-Dr4UvUaQ8yGQIyk3c0FOhlEmipZDgCanlhFwO3lVdffcbx4WxGvMcSqxaG4sul69cNxAdejWguq6srTGLV7UpoN7GnMV91rjPGu-ydvDF3tsmBaZ_6G_HDuADsDE5bv9RxbfP0csg_QE2iYGq</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Marks, Kevin P</creator><creator>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creator><creator>Wilson, Philip</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><author>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marks, Kevin P</au><au>Madsen Sjö, Nina</au><au>Wilson, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Med Child Neurol</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>419-430</pages><issn>0012-1622</issn><eissn>1469-8749</eissn><abstract>Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis. Results US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial. Interpretation Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. Resumen Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática Objetivo El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación. Método La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos. Resultados Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento. Interpretación Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening). Resume USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA Objetivo O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas. Método A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados. Resultados Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica. Interpretação Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas. What this paper adds General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening. Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best. The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched. This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese. Follow the links from the to view the translations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>30246256</pmid><doi>10.1111/dmcn.14044</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1622
ispartof Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430
issn 0012-1622
1469-8749
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111745582
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content
subjects Child, Preschool
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Mass Screening
Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A42%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20use%20of%20the%20Ages%20and%20Stages%20Questionnaires%20in%20the%20USA%20and%20Scandinavia:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20medicine%20and%20child%20neurology&rft.au=Marks,%20Kevin%20P&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=419-430&rft.issn=0012-1622&rft.eissn=1469-8749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dmcn.14044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111745582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111745582&rft_id=info:pmid/30246256&rfr_iscdi=true