Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review
Aim The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities. Method The review was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Developmental medicine and child neurology 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 430 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Developmental medicine and child neurology |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Marks, Kevin P Madsen Sjö, Nina Wilson, Philip |
description | Aim
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.
Method
The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.
Results
US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial.
Interpretation
Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
Resumen
Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática
Objetivo
El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación.
Método
La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/dmcn.14044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111745582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111745582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUQAdRbK1u_ACZpQip88rLXYlPqIrUrsPN5EZH8qiZpKV_b9JUl85i5g4cDpdDyDlnU96d67TQ5ZQrptQBGXPlhU7gq_CQjBnjwuGeECNyYu0XY0x6rjomI8mE8oTrjQlGVbGCGhqzRtpapFVGm0-ksw-0FMqULhrox7cWbWOqsgRTd19T7qjlYjZAurtNCWsDNxSo3doGi86paY1rg5tTcpRBbvFs_07I8v7uPXp05q8PT9Fs7uh-MSdjGjUPGQCoIFMq4D4GvpeFoe-Dr4UvUaQ8yGQIyk3c0FOhlEmipZDgCanlhFwO3lVdffcbx4WxGvMcSqxaG4sul69cNxAdejWguq6srTGLV7UpoN7GnMV91rjPGu-ydvDF3tsmBaZ_6G_HDuADsDE5bv9RxbfP0csg_QE2iYGq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111745582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</creator><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.
Method
The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.
Results
US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial.
Interpretation
Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
Resumen
Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática
Objetivo
El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación.
Método
La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos.
Resultados
Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento.
Interpretación
Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening).
Resume
USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
Objetivo
O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas.
Método
A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados.
Resultados
Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica.
Interpretação
Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese.
Follow the links from the to view the translations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.14044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30246256</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Mass Screening ; Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis ; Scandinavian and Nordic Countries ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430</ispartof><rights>2018 Mac Keith Press</rights><rights>2018 Mac Keith Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdmcn.14044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdmcn.14044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30246256$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><title>Developmental medicine and child neurology</title><addtitle>Dev Med Child Neurol</addtitle><description>Aim
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.
Method
The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.
Results
US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial.
Interpretation
Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
Resumen
Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática
Objetivo
El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación.
Método
La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos.
Resultados
Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento.
Interpretación
Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening).
Resume
USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
Objetivo
O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas.
Método
A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados.
Resultados
Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica.
Interpretação
Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese.
Follow the links from the to view the translations.</description><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0012-1622</issn><issn>1469-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUQAdRbK1u_ACZpQip88rLXYlPqIrUrsPN5EZH8qiZpKV_b9JUl85i5g4cDpdDyDlnU96d67TQ5ZQrptQBGXPlhU7gq_CQjBnjwuGeECNyYu0XY0x6rjomI8mE8oTrjQlGVbGCGhqzRtpapFVGm0-ksw-0FMqULhrox7cWbWOqsgRTd19T7qjlYjZAurtNCWsDNxSo3doGi86paY1rg5tTcpRBbvFs_07I8v7uPXp05q8PT9Fs7uh-MSdjGjUPGQCoIFMq4D4GvpeFoe-Dr4UvUaQ8yGQIyk3c0FOhlEmipZDgCanlhFwO3lVdffcbx4WxGvMcSqxaG4sul69cNxAdejWguq6srTGLV7UpoN7GnMV91rjPGu-ydvDF3tsmBaZ_6G_HDuADsDE5bv9RxbfP0csg_QE2iYGq</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Marks, Kevin P</creator><creator>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creator><creator>Wilson, Philip</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</title><author>Marks, Kevin P ; Madsen Sjö, Nina ; Wilson, Philip</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3654-f0cec190aaa48f44817e876f9977a7c273e2d18f39a45b5964933bbc323a623c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Scandinavian and Nordic Countries</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marks, Kevin P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madsen Sjö, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Philip</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marks, Kevin P</au><au>Madsen Sjö, Nina</au><au>Wilson, Philip</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Developmental medicine and child neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Med Child Neurol</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>430</epage><pages>419-430</pages><issn>0012-1622</issn><eissn>1469-8749</eissn><abstract>Aim
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate screening practices with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) in the USA and Scandinavia and to identify practical lessons and research opportunities.
Method
The review was performed for ASQ‐ and ASQ:SE‐related studies in children from birth to 5 years. From nine databases and 1689 references (published from 1988–2018), 127 articles were included and categorized using Covidence online software. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklists were used before data synthesis.
Results
US studies primarily use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to detect delays in general and at‐risk populations in medical settings, which increases early detection, clinician‐referral, and intervention rates. Scandinavian studies commonly use the ASQ/ASQ:SE to monitor developmental–behavioural differences in intervention/exposure‐based cohorts. Pre‐visit screening yields completion/return rates of 83% to more than 90% and fosters same‐day interpretation. When referrals are indicated, systemwide care coordination or colocation with a developmental–behavioural specialist is beneficial.
Interpretation
Practical implementation lessons are reviewed. Research opportunities include investigating and measuring the ASQ/ASQ:SE's ‘overall’ sections. Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish translations are available but up‐to‐date norming and validation studies are needed throughout Scandinavia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate outcomes in screened versus unscreened cohorts.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
Resumen
Uso comparativo de los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas en los Estados Unidos y Escandinavia: una revisión sistemática
Objetivo
El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue investigar las prácticas de detección con los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas (ASQ) y los Cuestionarios de Edades y Etapas: Social‐Emocional (ASQ‐SE) en EE. UU. y Escandinavia e identificar lecciones prácticas y oportunidades de investigación.
Método
La revisión se realizó para estudios relacionados con ASQ y ASQ‐SE SE en niños desde el nacimiento hasta los 5 años. De nueve bases de datos y 1.689 referencias (publicadas entre 1.988 y 2.018), se incluyeron 127 artículos y se categorizaron utilizando el software en línea Covidence. Las listas de verificación del Programa de Habilidades de Evaluación Crítica se usaron antes de la síntesis de datos.
Resultados
Los estudios de EE. UU. principalmente usan ASQ / ASQ‐SE para detectar retrasos en poblaciones generales y en riesgo en entornos médicos, lo que aumenta la detección temprana, la referencia de los médicos y las tasas de intervención. Los estudios escandinavos utilizan comúnmente el ASQ / ASQ‐SE para monitorear las diferencias de desarrollo y comportamiento en las cohortes basadas en intervención / exposición. El tamizaje previo a la visita (pre‐screening) arroja tasas de finalización / retorno del 83% a más del 90%, y favorece la interpretación de los resultados en el mismo día. Cuando se indican derivaciones o interconsultas esta información es beneficiosa, para la coordinación a nivel de sistema de atención o la asignación de un especialista en neurodesarrollo y el comportamiento.
Interpretación
Revisamos las lecciones prácticas de implementación. Las oportunidades de investigación incluyen investigar y medir las secciones ‘generales’ de ASQ / ASQ‐SE. Las traducciones en danés, noruego y sueco están disponibles, pero se necesitan estudios actualizados de normalización y validación en toda Escandinavia. Se necesitan ensayos controlados aleatorios para investigar los resultados en cohortes tamizadas versus no tamizadas (pre‐screening).
Resume
USO COMPARATIVO DOS QUESTIONÁRIOS IDADES E ESTÁGIOS NOS EUA E NA ESCANDINÁVIA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA
Objetivo
O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi investigar as práticas de avaliação com os Questionários Idades e Estágios (QIE) e os Questionários Idades e Estágios: Social‐emocional (QIE:SE) nos EUA e na Escandinávia, e identificar lições práticas e oportunidades para pesquisas.
Método
A revisão foi realizada para estudos relacionados ao QIE e QIE:SE em crianças do nascimento aos 5 anos de idade. A partir de nove bases de dados e 1689 referências (publicadas de 1988 a 2018), 127 artigos foram incluídos e categorizados usando o software online Covidence. As listsa do Programa de Habilidades de Avaliação Crítica foram aplicadas antes da síntese de dados.
Resultados
Estudos americanos primariamente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para detectar atrasos na população geral e de risco em ambientes médicos, o que aumenta a detecção precoce, encaminhamentos clínicos e intervenções. Estudos escandinavos comumente usam o QIE/QIE:SE para monitorar diferenças desenvolvimentais‐comportamentais em coortes de intervenção ou que tiveram alguma exposição. Avaliações pré‐visita permitem taxas de finalização/retorno de 83% a mais de 90%, e fomenta a interpretação no mesmo dia. Quando encaminhamentos são indicados, a coordenação do cuidado no sistema com um especialista desenvolvimental‐comportamental é benéfica.
Interpretação
Lições para implementação prática são revisadas. Oportunidades de pesquisas incluem investigar e medir as seções gerais do QIE/QIE:SE. As traduções para dinamarquês, norueguês e sueco estão disponíveis, mas estudos atuais de normatização e validação são necessários em toda a Escandinávia. Estudos clínicos randomizados são necessários para investigar os desfechos de coortes avaliadas versus não avaliadas.
What this paper adds
General and at‐risk populations broadly benefited from periodic Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and/or Ages and Stages Questionnaires: Social‐Emotional (ASQ:SE) screening.
Pre‐visit ASQ and/or ASQ:SE screenining implementation systems work best.
The ASQ and ASQ:SE ‘overall’ sections are not quantifiable and under‐researched.
This article's has been translated into Spanish and Portuguese.
Follow the links from the to view the translations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>30246256</pmid><doi>10.1111/dmcn.14044</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-1684</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-1622 |
ispartof | Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2019-04, Vol.61 (4), p.419-430 |
issn | 0012-1622 1469-8749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111745582 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Child, Preschool Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Mass Screening Neurodevelopmental Disorders - diagnosis Scandinavian and Nordic Countries Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
title | Comparative use of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in the USA and Scandinavia: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A42%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20use%20of%20the%20Ages%20and%20Stages%20Questionnaires%20in%20the%20USA%20and%20Scandinavia:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Developmental%20medicine%20and%20child%20neurology&rft.au=Marks,%20Kevin%20P&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=430&rft.pages=419-430&rft.issn=0012-1622&rft.eissn=1469-8749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dmcn.14044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111745582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111745582&rft_id=info:pmid/30246256&rfr_iscdi=true |