Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology (London) 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755
Hauptverfasser: Davoren, M, Ní Shúilleabháin, S, Halloran, J.O, Hartl, M.G.J, Sheehan, D, O'Brien, N.M, van Pelt, F.N.A.M, Mothersill, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 755
container_issue 7
container_start_page 741
container_title Ecotoxicology (London)
container_volume 14
creator Davoren, M
Ní Shúilleabháin, S
Halloran, J.O
Hartl, M.G.J
Sheehan, D
O'Brien, N.M
van Pelt, F.N.A.M
Mothersill, C
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21114668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21114668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFqGzEQhkVpqR23D9BLK3rIbZMZaVfaPSbGTQKGBpychVYrJWvWK1fShvrtK2NDIYdhLt_8_PMR8g3hCgHkdUQQpSgAqjyMFfUHMsdK8oIDyo9kDo3gRcMaNiMXMW4BoJElfCYzFFihgGZOHp9sTPRWp2TDgd7s98Fr80qdDzS9WroyPvm_vfGDf-mNHujqTQ-TTr0fqXd0FdOkQz9aurFdv7Njil_IJ6eHaL-e94I8_1o9Le-L9e-7h-XNujC8xlQwLDlvhdQN460zxnGQyNpOc4G1rgCRibaVlrWNk9xW0DWSV2Unnai71nV8QS5Pubnxnyk_oXZ9NHYY9Gj9FBVDxFKIOoM_34FbP4Uxd8tMKaRg2dKC4AkywccYrFP70O90OCgEdXStTq5Vdq2OrtUx-Ps5eGp3tvt_cZabgR8nwGmv9Evoo3reMEAOUFc5qOL_AAQwgkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214676296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3017</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16151609</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECOTEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects ; Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism ; Animals ; Artemia - drug effects ; Artemia salina ; beta-Galactosidase - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Bioassays ; Biological Assay ; Brackish ; Chemical analysis ; Diatoms - drug effects ; Diatoms - growth &amp; development ; elutriate ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - enzymology ; Experimental design ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; hormesis ; Ireland ; Lethal Dose 50 ; Luminescent Proteins - metabolism ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Metals, Heavy - toxicity ; Microtox ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Organic Chemicals - toxicity ; Pore water ; porewater ; Porosity ; Salinity ; Seawater ; Sediments ; Skeletonema costatum ; Sodium Chloride - analysis ; Toxicity Tests ; Trophic levels ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology (London), 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755</ispartof><rights>2005 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16151609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, J.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, M.G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, N.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><title>Ecotoxicology (London)</title><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects</subject><subject>Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artemia - drug effects</subject><subject>Artemia salina</subject><subject>beta-Galactosidase - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biological Assay</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Diatoms - drug effects</subject><subject>Diatoms - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>elutriate</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - enzymology</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>hormesis</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Lethal Dose 50</subject><subject>Luminescent Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</subject><subject>Microtox</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - toxicity</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>porewater</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Skeletonema costatum</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>0963-9292</issn><issn>1573-3017</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFqGzEQhkVpqR23D9BLK3rIbZMZaVfaPSbGTQKGBpychVYrJWvWK1fShvrtK2NDIYdhLt_8_PMR8g3hCgHkdUQQpSgAqjyMFfUHMsdK8oIDyo9kDo3gRcMaNiMXMW4BoJElfCYzFFihgGZOHp9sTPRWp2TDgd7s98Fr80qdDzS9WroyPvm_vfGDf-mNHujqTQ-TTr0fqXd0FdOkQz9aurFdv7Njil_IJ6eHaL-e94I8_1o9Le-L9e-7h-XNujC8xlQwLDlvhdQN460zxnGQyNpOc4G1rgCRibaVlrWNk9xW0DWSV2Unnai71nV8QS5Pubnxnyk_oXZ9NHYY9Gj9FBVDxFKIOoM_34FbP4Uxd8tMKaRg2dKC4AkywccYrFP70O90OCgEdXStTq5Vdq2OrtUx-Ps5eGp3tvt_cZabgR8nwGmv9Evoo3reMEAOUFc5qOL_AAQwgkw</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Davoren, M</creator><creator>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creator><creator>Halloran, J.O</creator><creator>Hartl, M.G.J</creator><creator>Sheehan, D</creator><creator>O'Brien, N.M</creator><creator>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creator><creator>Mothersill, C</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><author>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects</topic><topic>Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artemia - drug effects</topic><topic>Artemia salina</topic><topic>beta-Galactosidase - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biological Assay</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Diatoms - drug effects</topic><topic>Diatoms - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>elutriate</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - enzymology</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>hormesis</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Lethal Dose 50</topic><topic>Luminescent Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</topic><topic>Microtox</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - toxicity</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>porewater</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Skeletonema costatum</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, J.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, M.G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, N.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davoren, M</au><au>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</au><au>Halloran, J.O</au><au>Hartl, M.G.J</au><au>Sheehan, D</au><au>O'Brien, N.M</au><au>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</au><au>Mothersill, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>741-755</pages><issn>0963-9292</issn><eissn>1573-3017</eissn><coden>ECOTEL</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>16151609</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-9292
ispartof Ecotoxicology (London), 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755
issn 0963-9292
1573-3017
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21114668
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Algae
Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects
Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism
Animals
Artemia - drug effects
Artemia salina
beta-Galactosidase - antagonists & inhibitors
Bioassays
Biological Assay
Brackish
Chemical analysis
Diatoms - drug effects
Diatoms - growth & development
elutriate
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Escherichia coli - drug effects
Escherichia coli - enzymology
Experimental design
Geologic Sediments - analysis
hormesis
Ireland
Lethal Dose 50
Luminescent Proteins - metabolism
Metals, Heavy - analysis
Metals, Heavy - toxicity
Microtox
Organic Chemicals - analysis
Organic Chemicals - toxicity
Pore water
porewater
Porosity
Salinity
Seawater
Sediments
Skeletonema costatum
Sodium Chloride - analysis
Toxicity Tests
Trophic levels
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
title Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test%20Battery%20Approach%20for%20the%20Ecotoxicological%20Evaluation%20of%20Estuarine%20Sediments&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20(London)&rft.au=Davoren,%20M&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=741-755&rft.issn=0963-9292&rft.eissn=1573-3017&rft.coden=ECOTEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21114668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214676296&rft_id=info:pmid/16151609&rfr_iscdi=true