Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecotoxicology (London) 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 755 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 741 |
container_title | Ecotoxicology (London) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Davoren, M Ní Shúilleabháin, S Halloran, J.O Hartl, M.G.J Sheehan, D O'Brien, N.M van Pelt, F.N.A.M Mothersill, C |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21114668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21114668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFqGzEQhkVpqR23D9BLK3rIbZMZaVfaPSbGTQKGBpychVYrJWvWK1fShvrtK2NDIYdhLt_8_PMR8g3hCgHkdUQQpSgAqjyMFfUHMsdK8oIDyo9kDo3gRcMaNiMXMW4BoJElfCYzFFihgGZOHp9sTPRWp2TDgd7s98Fr80qdDzS9WroyPvm_vfGDf-mNHujqTQ-TTr0fqXd0FdOkQz9aurFdv7Njil_IJ6eHaL-e94I8_1o9Le-L9e-7h-XNujC8xlQwLDlvhdQN460zxnGQyNpOc4G1rgCRibaVlrWNk9xW0DWSV2Unnai71nV8QS5Pubnxnyk_oXZ9NHYY9Gj9FBVDxFKIOoM_34FbP4Uxd8tMKaRg2dKC4AkywccYrFP70O90OCgEdXStTq5Vdq2OrtUx-Ps5eGp3tvt_cZabgR8nwGmv9Evoo3reMEAOUFc5qOL_AAQwgkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214676296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3017</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16151609</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECOTEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Boston : Springer US</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects ; Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism ; Animals ; Artemia - drug effects ; Artemia salina ; beta-Galactosidase - antagonists & inhibitors ; Bioassays ; Biological Assay ; Brackish ; Chemical analysis ; Diatoms - drug effects ; Diatoms - growth & development ; elutriate ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - enzymology ; Experimental design ; Geologic Sediments - analysis ; hormesis ; Ireland ; Lethal Dose 50 ; Luminescent Proteins - metabolism ; Metals, Heavy - analysis ; Metals, Heavy - toxicity ; Microtox ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Organic Chemicals - toxicity ; Pore water ; porewater ; Porosity ; Salinity ; Seawater ; Sediments ; Skeletonema costatum ; Sodium Chloride - analysis ; Toxicity Tests ; Trophic levels ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><ispartof>Ecotoxicology (London), 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755</ispartof><rights>2005 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16151609$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, J.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, M.G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, N.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><title>Ecotoxicology (London)</title><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects</subject><subject>Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artemia - drug effects</subject><subject>Artemia salina</subject><subject>beta-Galactosidase - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Biological Assay</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Diatoms - drug effects</subject><subject>Diatoms - growth & development</subject><subject>elutriate</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - enzymology</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - analysis</subject><subject>hormesis</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Lethal Dose 50</subject><subject>Luminescent Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - analysis</subject><subject>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</subject><subject>Microtox</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - toxicity</subject><subject>Pore water</subject><subject>porewater</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Skeletonema costatum</subject><subject>Sodium Chloride - analysis</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><issn>0963-9292</issn><issn>1573-3017</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFqGzEQhkVpqR23D9BLK3rIbZMZaVfaPSbGTQKGBpychVYrJWvWK1fShvrtK2NDIYdhLt_8_PMR8g3hCgHkdUQQpSgAqjyMFfUHMsdK8oIDyo9kDo3gRcMaNiMXMW4BoJElfCYzFFihgGZOHp9sTPRWp2TDgd7s98Fr80qdDzS9WroyPvm_vfGDf-mNHujqTQ-TTr0fqXd0FdOkQz9aurFdv7Njil_IJ6eHaL-e94I8_1o9Le-L9e-7h-XNujC8xlQwLDlvhdQN460zxnGQyNpOc4G1rgCRibaVlrWNk9xW0DWSV2Unnai71nV8QS5Pubnxnyk_oXZ9NHYY9Gj9FBVDxFKIOoM_34FbP4Uxd8tMKaRg2dKC4AkywccYrFP70O90OCgEdXStTq5Vdq2OrtUx-Ps5eGp3tvt_cZabgR8nwGmv9Evoo3reMEAOUFc5qOL_AAQwgkw</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Davoren, M</creator><creator>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creator><creator>Halloran, J.O</creator><creator>Hartl, M.G.J</creator><creator>Sheehan, D</creator><creator>O'Brien, N.M</creator><creator>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creator><creator>Mothersill, C</creator><general>Boston : Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</title><author>Davoren, M ; Ní Shúilleabháin, S ; Halloran, J.O ; Hartl, M.G.J ; Sheehan, D ; O'Brien, N.M ; van Pelt, F.N.A.M ; Mothersill, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-21433b67a923bfccf30712bda3618a501126bb7e2b9f73e50d97354d7f68dbfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects</topic><topic>Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artemia - drug effects</topic><topic>Artemia salina</topic><topic>beta-Galactosidase - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Biological Assay</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Diatoms - drug effects</topic><topic>Diatoms - growth & development</topic><topic>elutriate</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - enzymology</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - analysis</topic><topic>hormesis</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Lethal Dose 50</topic><topic>Luminescent Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - analysis</topic><topic>Metals, Heavy - toxicity</topic><topic>Microtox</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - toxicity</topic><topic>Pore water</topic><topic>porewater</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Skeletonema costatum</topic><topic>Sodium Chloride - analysis</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davoren, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halloran, J.O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartl, M.G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, N.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mothersill, C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davoren, M</au><au>Ní Shúilleabháin, S</au><au>Halloran, J.O</au><au>Hartl, M.G.J</au><au>Sheehan, D</au><au>O'Brien, N.M</au><au>van Pelt, F.N.A.M</au><au>Mothersill, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments</atitle><jtitle>Ecotoxicology (London)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecotoxicology</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>755</epage><pages>741-755</pages><issn>0963-9292</issn><eissn>1573-3017</eissn><coden>ECOTEL</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall sensitivity and applicability of a number of bioassays representing multiple trophic levels, for the preliminary ecotoxicological screening (Tier I) of estuarine sediments. Chemical analyses were conducted on sediments from all sampling sites to assist in interpreting results. As sediment is an inherently complex, heterogeneous geological matrix, the toxicity associated with different exposure routes (solid, porewater and elutriate phases) was also assessed. A stimulatory response was detected following exposure of some sediment phases to both the Microtox® and algal bioassays. Of the bioassays and endpoints employed in this study, the algal test was the most responsive to both elutriates and porewaters. Salinity controls, which corresponded to the salinity of the neat porewater samples, were found to have significant effects on the growth of the algae. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the inclusion of a salinity control in algal toxicity tests, the results of which emphasise the importance of incorporating appropriate controls in experimental design. While differential responses were observed, the site characterised as the most polluted on the basis of chemical analysis was consistently ranked the most toxic with all test species and all test phases. In terms of identifying appropriate Tier I screening tests for sediments, this study demonstrated both the Microtox® and algal bioassays to be more sensitive than the bacterial enzyme assays and the invertebrate lethality assay employing Artemia salina. The findings of this study highlight that salinity effects and geophysical properties need to be taken into account when interpreting the results of the bioassays.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Boston : Springer US</pub><pmid>16151609</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9292 |
ispartof | Ecotoxicology (London), 2005-10, Vol.14 (7), p.741-755 |
issn | 0963-9292 1573-3017 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21114668 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algae Aliivibrio fischeri - drug effects Aliivibrio fischeri - metabolism Animals Artemia - drug effects Artemia salina beta-Galactosidase - antagonists & inhibitors Bioassays Biological Assay Brackish Chemical analysis Diatoms - drug effects Diatoms - growth & development elutriate Environmental Monitoring - methods Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - enzymology Experimental design Geologic Sediments - analysis hormesis Ireland Lethal Dose 50 Luminescent Proteins - metabolism Metals, Heavy - analysis Metals, Heavy - toxicity Microtox Organic Chemicals - analysis Organic Chemicals - toxicity Pore water porewater Porosity Salinity Seawater Sediments Skeletonema costatum Sodium Chloride - analysis Toxicity Tests Trophic levels Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity |
title | Test Battery Approach for the Ecotoxicological Evaluation of Estuarine Sediments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Test%20Battery%20Approach%20for%20the%20Ecotoxicological%20Evaluation%20of%20Estuarine%20Sediments&rft.jtitle=Ecotoxicology%20(London)&rft.au=Davoren,%20M&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=755&rft.pages=741-755&rft.issn=0963-9292&rft.eissn=1573-3017&rft.coden=ECOTEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10646-005-0022-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21114668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214676296&rft_id=info:pmid/16151609&rfr_iscdi=true |