Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study

To assess the feasibility of using an integrated multimodal data collection strategy to characterize the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Adult patients admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for >24 h and/or requiring vasopressor support were eligible for enrollment. W...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of critical care 2018-12, Vol.48, p.228-236
Hauptverfasser: Wood, Michael D., Maslove, David M., Muscedere, John, Scott, Stephen H., Boyd, J. Gordon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue
container_start_page 228
container_title Journal of critical care
container_volume 48
creator Wood, Michael D.
Maslove, David M.
Muscedere, John
Scott, Stephen H.
Boyd, J. Gordon
description To assess the feasibility of using an integrated multimodal data collection strategy to characterize the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Adult patients admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for >24 h and/or requiring vasopressor support were eligible for enrollment. We assessed cognitive and sensorimotor function at 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and with the KINARM robot. At 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge, 28/70 (40%) and 22/70 (31%) returned for follow-up testing, respectively. Prominent reasons for declining testing at 3- and 12-months included: not interested (40% and 38%) and health complications (31% and 31%). The majority of returning participants completed all tasks (96%–100%) and 100% of available data was recorded. On the RBANS, 54% (3 months) and 32% (12 months) of individuals were impaired in visuospatial/constructional skills. Similarly, the KINARM assessments demonstrated that 56% of individuals had visuospatial/executive dysfunction at 3 months, and 40% had impairment at 12 months. Individual scores indicated substantial variability. We demonstrated that it was feasible to quantify neurological dysfunction among participants that returned for follow-up testing. However, future investigations will need to implement multiple retention strategies. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02344043), retrospectively registered January 8, 2015. •ICU survivors are challenging to recruit for follow up studies as they were often disinterested or too ill to return for testing.•Of those that did return, the majority completed all tasks, and our multimodal robotic platform captured all data.•Many ICU survivors have visuospatial and executive dysfunction, even in a highly selected cohort that was well enough to participate in follow up
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111152659</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883944118305379</els_id><sourcerecordid>2111152659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7fd9cb3b0b4141bd7b9be22858f238dec07388f99f75c0d51bc886bdbf3a3b5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBF2CBLLFhk-CfZOIgNlUFBakSEoK1FdvXw40ydmsnkeYxeGM8ncKCBd54850j-3yEvOKs5ozv3o31aJOtBeOqZn3NOH9CNrxtu0rtePuUbJhSsuqbhl-Qy5xHxngnZfucXEgmGimY3JBf36KJM1o6g_0Z4hT3R3qX4ooOMo1mBDvjCnQIjt4vQ5jR42AmoAeYE9qCeBpgSdHGfcAH1C-hZGLAsKcYaF7SimtMD6hNhbHDRHGaAuT8_op6GDIanHA-0jwv7viCPPPDlOHl470lPz59_H79ubr9evPl-uq2slI1c9V511sjDTMNb7hxnekNCKFa5YVUDizrpFK-733XWuZabqxSO-OMl4M0LcgteXvuLd-9XyDP-oDZwjQNAeKSteDltGLX9gV98w86xiWF8rpCyTKrEGXPLRFnyqaYcwKv7xIehnTUnOmTMD3qkzB9EqZZr4uwEnr9WL2YA7i_kT-GCvDhDEDZYkVIOluEYMFhKnK0i_i__t8KH6sq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130012224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Wood, Michael D. ; Maslove, David M. ; Muscedere, John ; Scott, Stephen H. ; Boyd, J. Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael D. ; Maslove, David M. ; Muscedere, John ; Scott, Stephen H. ; Boyd, J. Gordon ; The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group ; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the feasibility of using an integrated multimodal data collection strategy to characterize the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Adult patients admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for &gt;24 h and/or requiring vasopressor support were eligible for enrollment. We assessed cognitive and sensorimotor function at 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and with the KINARM robot. At 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge, 28/70 (40%) and 22/70 (31%) returned for follow-up testing, respectively. Prominent reasons for declining testing at 3- and 12-months included: not interested (40% and 38%) and health complications (31% and 31%). The majority of returning participants completed all tasks (96%–100%) and 100% of available data was recorded. On the RBANS, 54% (3 months) and 32% (12 months) of individuals were impaired in visuospatial/constructional skills. Similarly, the KINARM assessments demonstrated that 56% of individuals had visuospatial/executive dysfunction at 3 months, and 40% had impairment at 12 months. Individual scores indicated substantial variability. We demonstrated that it was feasible to quantify neurological dysfunction among participants that returned for follow-up testing. However, future investigations will need to implement multiple retention strategies. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02344043), retrospectively registered January 8, 2015. •ICU survivors are challenging to recruit for follow up studies as they were often disinterested or too ill to return for testing.•Of those that did return, the majority completed all tasks, and our multimodal robotic platform captured all data.•Many ICU survivors have visuospatial and executive dysfunction, even in a highly selected cohort that was well enough to participate in follow up</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30243203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cognitive ability ; Critical care ; Critical illness ; Data collection ; Diabetes ; Feasibility studies ; Hypertension ; Illnesses ; KINARM ; Memory ; PICS ; Post-intensive care syndrome ; RBANS ; Robotics ; Sepsis</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2018-12, Vol.48, p.228-236</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7fd9cb3b0b4141bd7b9be22858f238dec07388f99f75c0d51bc886bdbf3a3b5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7fd9cb3b0b4141bd7b9be22858f238dec07388f99f75c0d51bc886bdbf3a3b5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0765-7158 ; 0000-0002-8821-1843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2130012224?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,64361,64363,64365,65309,72215</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30243203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslove, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muscedere, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, J. Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>To assess the feasibility of using an integrated multimodal data collection strategy to characterize the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Adult patients admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for &gt;24 h and/or requiring vasopressor support were eligible for enrollment. We assessed cognitive and sensorimotor function at 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and with the KINARM robot. At 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge, 28/70 (40%) and 22/70 (31%) returned for follow-up testing, respectively. Prominent reasons for declining testing at 3- and 12-months included: not interested (40% and 38%) and health complications (31% and 31%). The majority of returning participants completed all tasks (96%–100%) and 100% of available data was recorded. On the RBANS, 54% (3 months) and 32% (12 months) of individuals were impaired in visuospatial/constructional skills. Similarly, the KINARM assessments demonstrated that 56% of individuals had visuospatial/executive dysfunction at 3 months, and 40% had impairment at 12 months. Individual scores indicated substantial variability. We demonstrated that it was feasible to quantify neurological dysfunction among participants that returned for follow-up testing. However, future investigations will need to implement multiple retention strategies. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02344043), retrospectively registered January 8, 2015. •ICU survivors are challenging to recruit for follow up studies as they were often disinterested or too ill to return for testing.•Of those that did return, the majority completed all tasks, and our multimodal robotic platform captured all data.•Many ICU survivors have visuospatial and executive dysfunction, even in a highly selected cohort that was well enough to participate in follow up</description><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Critical illness</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>KINARM</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>PICS</subject><subject>Post-intensive care syndrome</subject><subject>RBANS</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EotOBF2CBLLFhk-CfZOIgNlUFBakSEoK1FdvXw40ydmsnkeYxeGM8ncKCBd54850j-3yEvOKs5ozv3o31aJOtBeOqZn3NOH9CNrxtu0rtePuUbJhSsuqbhl-Qy5xHxngnZfucXEgmGimY3JBf36KJM1o6g_0Z4hT3R3qX4ooOMo1mBDvjCnQIjt4vQ5jR42AmoAeYE9qCeBpgSdHGfcAH1C-hZGLAsKcYaF7SimtMD6hNhbHDRHGaAuT8_op6GDIanHA-0jwv7viCPPPDlOHl470lPz59_H79ubr9evPl-uq2slI1c9V511sjDTMNb7hxnekNCKFa5YVUDizrpFK-733XWuZabqxSO-OMl4M0LcgteXvuLd-9XyDP-oDZwjQNAeKSteDltGLX9gV98w86xiWF8rpCyTKrEGXPLRFnyqaYcwKv7xIehnTUnOmTMD3qkzB9EqZZr4uwEnr9WL2YA7i_kT-GCvDhDEDZYkVIOluEYMFhKnK0i_i__t8KH6sq</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Wood, Michael D.</creator><creator>Maslove, David M.</creator><creator>Muscedere, John</creator><creator>Scott, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Boyd, J. Gordon</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-7158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-1843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study</title><author>Wood, Michael D. ; Maslove, David M. ; Muscedere, John ; Scott, Stephen H. ; Boyd, J. Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-7fd9cb3b0b4141bd7b9be22858f238dec07388f99f75c0d51bc886bdbf3a3b5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Critical illness</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>KINARM</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>PICS</topic><topic>Post-intensive care syndrome</topic><topic>RBANS</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wood, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maslove, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muscedere, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, J. Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wood, Michael D.</au><au>Maslove, David M.</au><au>Muscedere, John</au><au>Scott, Stephen H.</au><au>Boyd, J. Gordon</au><aucorp>The Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</aucorp><aucorp>Canadian Critical Care Trials Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>228</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>228-236</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>To assess the feasibility of using an integrated multimodal data collection strategy to characterize the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Adult patients admitted to the ICU requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for &gt;24 h and/or requiring vasopressor support were eligible for enrollment. We assessed cognitive and sensorimotor function at 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and with the KINARM robot. At 3- and 12-months after ICU discharge, 28/70 (40%) and 22/70 (31%) returned for follow-up testing, respectively. Prominent reasons for declining testing at 3- and 12-months included: not interested (40% and 38%) and health complications (31% and 31%). The majority of returning participants completed all tasks (96%–100%) and 100% of available data was recorded. On the RBANS, 54% (3 months) and 32% (12 months) of individuals were impaired in visuospatial/constructional skills. Similarly, the KINARM assessments demonstrated that 56% of individuals had visuospatial/executive dysfunction at 3 months, and 40% had impairment at 12 months. Individual scores indicated substantial variability. We demonstrated that it was feasible to quantify neurological dysfunction among participants that returned for follow-up testing. However, future investigations will need to implement multiple retention strategies. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02344043), retrospectively registered January 8, 2015. •ICU survivors are challenging to recruit for follow up studies as they were often disinterested or too ill to return for testing.•Of those that did return, the majority completed all tasks, and our multimodal robotic platform captured all data.•Many ICU survivors have visuospatial and executive dysfunction, even in a highly selected cohort that was well enough to participate in follow up</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30243203</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-7158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-1843</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-9441
ispartof Journal of critical care, 2018-12, Vol.48, p.228-236
issn 0883-9441
1557-8615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111152659
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Cognitive ability
Critical care
Critical illness
Data collection
Diabetes
Feasibility studies
Hypertension
Illnesses
KINARM
Memory
PICS
Post-intensive care syndrome
RBANS
Robotics
Sepsis
title Robotic technology provides objective and quantifiable metrics of neurocognitive functioning in survivors of critical illness:A feasibility study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A22%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20technology%20provides%20objective%20and%20quantifiable%20metrics%20of%20neurocognitive%20functioning%20in%20survivors%20of%20critical%20illness:A%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Wood,%20Michael%20D.&rft.aucorp=The%20Canadian%20Critical%20Care%20Trials%20Group&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=228&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=228-236&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111152659%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130012224&rft_id=info:pmid/30243203&rft_els_id=S0883944118305379&rfr_iscdi=true