Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model

Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10–15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better compari...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2018-10, Vol.121 (4), p.739-748
Hauptverfasser: Eugene, N., Oliver, C.M., Bassett, M.G., Poulton, T.E., Kuryba, A., Johnston, C., Anderson, I.D., Moonesinghe, S.R., Grocott, M.P., Murray, D.M., Cromwell, D.A., Walker, K., Cripps, Martin, Cripps, Paul, Davies, Emma, Drake, Sharon, Galsworthy, Mike, Goodwin, James, Salih, Tom, Lourtie, Jose, Papadimitriou, Dimitri, Peden, Carol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 748
container_issue 4
container_start_page 739
container_title British journal of anaesthesia : BJA
container_volume 121
creator Eugene, N.
Oliver, C.M.
Bassett, M.G.
Poulton, T.E.
Kuryba, A.
Johnston, C.
Anderson, I.D.
Moonesinghe, S.R.
Grocott, M.P.
Murray, D.M.
Cromwell, D.A.
Walker, K.
Cripps, Martin
Cripps, Paul
Davies, Emma
Drake, Sharon
Galsworthy, Mike
Goodwin, James
Salih, Tom
Lourtie, Jose
Papadimitriou, Dimitri
Peden, Carol
description Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10–15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858–0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low- and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111149021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091218305786</els_id><sourcerecordid>2111149021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39ac91f6df7e9457314c7f6c813f72eb0a3eb3fa25ca9d883cc095000e04c9603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVFvFCEUhYnR2G31B_hiePRlxsswyyz61NRWTTbtiz4TFu5UxhkYgdlkf5d_ULpb65uEBHLynXsCh5A3DGoGTLwf6t2g6wbYpgZRQyOekRVrO1aJrmPPyQoAugoka87IeUoDAOsauX5Jzjg0XJS9Ir8_4R7HME_oM9XeUuczRq9Hutejszq74GnoqaY-FJBGl35SbYcl5aNlCraofYhFXMZM5-IoeqKLtxjvg_P3FKdyQ28OdNSzjiGH6UDTUrR4-EDzD6S3x5wSev2Ebv-hl4t1-ZR8jHtFXvR6TPj68bwg32-uv119qbZ3n79eXW4rw6XIFZfaSNYL23co23XHWWu6XpgN433X4A40xx3vdbM2WtrNhhsDcl3-DKE1UgC_IO9Oc-cYfi2YsppcMjiO2mNYkmpYWa2EhhWUnVATQ0oRezVHN-l4UAzUQ1dqUKUr9dCVAqFKV8Xz9nH8spvQPjn-llOAjycAyyP3DqNKpnyuQesimqxscP8Z_wdEcalX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111149021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eugene, N. ; Oliver, C.M. ; Bassett, M.G. ; Poulton, T.E. ; Kuryba, A. ; Johnston, C. ; Anderson, I.D. ; Moonesinghe, S.R. ; Grocott, M.P. ; Murray, D.M. ; Cromwell, D.A. ; Walker, K. ; Cripps, Martin ; Cripps, Paul ; Davies, Emma ; Drake, Sharon ; Galsworthy, Mike ; Goodwin, James ; Salih, Tom ; Lourtie, Jose ; Papadimitriou, Dimitri ; Peden, Carol</creator><creatorcontrib>Eugene, N. ; Oliver, C.M. ; Bassett, M.G. ; Poulton, T.E. ; Kuryba, A. ; Johnston, C. ; Anderson, I.D. ; Moonesinghe, S.R. ; Grocott, M.P. ; Murray, D.M. ; Cromwell, D.A. ; Walker, K. ; Cripps, Martin ; Cripps, Paul ; Davies, Emma ; Drake, Sharon ; Galsworthy, Mike ; Goodwin, James ; Salih, Tom ; Lourtie, Jose ; Papadimitriou, Dimitri ; Peden, Carol ; the NELA collaboration ; NELA collaboration</creatorcontrib><description>Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10–15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858–0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low- and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30236236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; emergency laparotomy ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Forecasting ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Laparotomy - adverse effects ; Laparotomy - mortality ; Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Middle Aged ; Models, Statistical ; Neoplasms - complications ; postoperative mortality ; postoperative outcome ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Adjustment ; Risk Factors ; United Kingdom - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2018-10, Vol.121 (4), p.739-748</ispartof><rights>2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39ac91f6df7e9457314c7f6c813f72eb0a3eb3fa25ca9d883cc095000e04c9603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39ac91f6df7e9457314c7f6c813f72eb0a3eb3fa25ca9d883cc095000e04c9603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236236$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eugene, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulton, T.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuryba, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, I.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moonesinghe, S.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cripps, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cripps, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galsworthy, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salih, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lourtie, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peden, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the NELA collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELA collaboration</creatorcontrib><title>Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10–15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858–0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low- and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>emergency laparotomy</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparotomy - mortality</subject><subject>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>postoperative mortality</subject><subject>postoperative outcome</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Adjustment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVFvFCEUhYnR2G31B_hiePRlxsswyyz61NRWTTbtiz4TFu5UxhkYgdlkf5d_ULpb65uEBHLynXsCh5A3DGoGTLwf6t2g6wbYpgZRQyOekRVrO1aJrmPPyQoAugoka87IeUoDAOsauX5Jzjg0XJS9Ir8_4R7HME_oM9XeUuczRq9Hutejszq74GnoqaY-FJBGl35SbYcl5aNlCraofYhFXMZM5-IoeqKLtxjvg_P3FKdyQ28OdNSzjiGH6UDTUrR4-EDzD6S3x5wSev2Ebv-hl4t1-ZR8jHtFXvR6TPj68bwg32-uv119qbZ3n79eXW4rw6XIFZfaSNYL23co23XHWWu6XpgN433X4A40xx3vdbM2WtrNhhsDcl3-DKE1UgC_IO9Oc-cYfi2YsppcMjiO2mNYkmpYWa2EhhWUnVATQ0oRezVHN-l4UAzUQ1dqUKUr9dCVAqFKV8Xz9nH8spvQPjn-llOAjycAyyP3DqNKpnyuQesimqxscP8Z_wdEcalX</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Eugene, N.</creator><creator>Oliver, C.M.</creator><creator>Bassett, M.G.</creator><creator>Poulton, T.E.</creator><creator>Kuryba, A.</creator><creator>Johnston, C.</creator><creator>Anderson, I.D.</creator><creator>Moonesinghe, S.R.</creator><creator>Grocott, M.P.</creator><creator>Murray, D.M.</creator><creator>Cromwell, D.A.</creator><creator>Walker, K.</creator><creator>Cripps, Martin</creator><creator>Cripps, Paul</creator><creator>Davies, Emma</creator><creator>Drake, Sharon</creator><creator>Galsworthy, Mike</creator><creator>Goodwin, James</creator><creator>Salih, Tom</creator><creator>Lourtie, Jose</creator><creator>Papadimitriou, Dimitri</creator><creator>Peden, Carol</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model</title><author>Eugene, N. ; Oliver, C.M. ; Bassett, M.G. ; Poulton, T.E. ; Kuryba, A. ; Johnston, C. ; Anderson, I.D. ; Moonesinghe, S.R. ; Grocott, M.P. ; Murray, D.M. ; Cromwell, D.A. ; Walker, K. ; Cripps, Martin ; Cripps, Paul ; Davies, Emma ; Drake, Sharon ; Galsworthy, Mike ; Goodwin, James ; Salih, Tom ; Lourtie, Jose ; Papadimitriou, Dimitri ; Peden, Carol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-39ac91f6df7e9457314c7f6c813f72eb0a3eb3fa25ca9d883cc095000e04c9603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>emergency laparotomy</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparotomy - mortality</topic><topic>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>postoperative mortality</topic><topic>postoperative outcome</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Adjustment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eugene, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulton, T.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuryba, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, I.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moonesinghe, S.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grocott, M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cripps, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cripps, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drake, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galsworthy, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salih, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lourtie, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, Dimitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peden, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the NELA collaboration</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NELA collaboration</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eugene, N.</au><au>Oliver, C.M.</au><au>Bassett, M.G.</au><au>Poulton, T.E.</au><au>Kuryba, A.</au><au>Johnston, C.</au><au>Anderson, I.D.</au><au>Moonesinghe, S.R.</au><au>Grocott, M.P.</au><au>Murray, D.M.</au><au>Cromwell, D.A.</au><au>Walker, K.</au><au>Cripps, Martin</au><au>Cripps, Paul</au><au>Davies, Emma</au><au>Drake, Sharon</au><au>Galsworthy, Mike</au><au>Goodwin, James</au><au>Salih, Tom</au><au>Lourtie, Jose</au><au>Papadimitriou, Dimitri</au><au>Peden, Carol</au><aucorp>the NELA collaboration</aucorp><aucorp>NELA collaboration</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>739</spage><epage>748</epage><pages>739-748</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Among patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, 30-day postoperative mortality is around 10–15%. The risk of death among these patients, however, varies greatly because of their clinical characteristics. We developed a risk prediction model for 30-day postoperative mortality to enable better comparison of outcomes between hospitals. We analysed data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) on patients having an emergency laparotomy between December 2013 and November 2015. A prediction model was developed using multivariable logistic regression, with potential risk factors identified from existing prediction models, national guidelines, and clinical experts. Continuous risk factors were transformed if necessary to reflect their non-linear relationship with 30-day mortality. The performance of the model was assessed in terms of its calibration and discrimination. Interval validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling. There were 4458 (11.5%) deaths within 30-days among the 38 830 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Variables associated with death included (among others): age, blood pressure, heart rate, physiological variables, malignancy, and ASA physical status classification. The predicted risk of death among patients ranged from 1% to 50%. The model demonstrated excellent calibration and discrimination, with a C-statistic of 0.863 (95% confidence interval, 0.858–0.867). The model retained its high discrimination during internal validation, with a bootstrap derived C-statistic of 0.861. The NELA risk prediction model for emergency laparotomies discriminates well between low- and high-risk patients and is suitable for producing risk-adjusted provider mortality statistics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30236236</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0912
ispartof British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2018-10, Vol.121 (4), p.739-748
issn 0007-0912
1471-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2111149021
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
emergency laparotomy
Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data
Female
Forecasting
Hemodynamics
Humans
Laparotomy - adverse effects
Laparotomy - mortality
Laparotomy - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical Audit
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Neoplasms - complications
postoperative mortality
postoperative outcome
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Risk Adjustment
Risk Factors
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Young Adult
title Development and internal validation of a novel risk adjustment model for adult patients undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery: the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit risk model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20internal%20validation%20of%20a%20novel%20risk%20adjustment%20model%20for%20adult%20patients%20undergoing%20emergency%20laparotomy%20surgery:%20the%20National%20Emergency%20Laparotomy%20Audit%20risk%20model&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Eugene,%20N.&rft.aucorp=the%20NELA%20collaboration&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=739&rft.epage=748&rft.pages=739-748&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111149021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111149021&rft_id=info:pmid/30236236&rft_els_id=S0007091218305786&rfr_iscdi=true