Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals
Passive source classification in the underwater environment is a challenging problem in part because propagation through the space- and time-varying media introduces variability and uncertainty in the signal. Acoustic propagation codes can predict received fields accurately but they are sensitive to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009-10, Vol.126 (4_Supplement), p.2183-2183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4_Supplement |
container_start_page | 2183 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Bissinger, Brett E. Culver, R. Lee Bose, N.K. |
description | Passive source classification in the underwater environment is a challenging problem in part because propagation through the space- and time-varying media introduces variability and uncertainty in the signal. Acoustic propagation codes can predict received fields accurately but they are sensitive to input environmental parameters which cannot be known exactly. This uncertainty in environmental knowledge used in signal predictions results in imperfect statistical class models. Classifiers that rely on simulations of the environment must therefore be robust to imperfect statistical models. Maximum likelihood methods provide ideal performance when the class models are correct but their performance quickly deteriorates when class models are imperfect. Minimum distance methods generally offer robustness to mismatches at the expense of performance, with that trade-off governed by the distance metric used. Several well-studied distance metrics are discussed and it is explained how the Hellinger distance offers robustness to outliers while retaining the performance of a maximum likelihood method, properties that make it well-suited for classification of passive underwater acoustic signals. Examples are provided to quantify the robustness properties of the Hellinger distance when applied to classification of passive underwater acoustic signals and compare its performance to the maximum likelihood method. [Work supported by ONR Undersea Signal Processing.] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.3248538 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21108961</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21108961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c651-f9ad31607d73a471d0c7ed31f43980663def7cc4698dadc0fac273d4b114fd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LxDAUxIMouK4e_AY5CR665jVpmhxlUVdYUdB7iPmzRNq0Jq3itzfL7ml4w4_HzCB0DWQFUMMdrGjNREPFCVpAU5NKNDU7RQtCCFRMcn6OLnL-KmcjqFygt5cQQz_3eOO6LsSdS9iGPOloHDadzjn4YPQUhogHj8e98ePwHK1Lv3oqtDbDnKdgcA67qLt8ic58EXd11CV6f3z4WG-q7evT8_p-WxneQOWlthQ4aW1LNWvBEtO64nhGpSCcU-t8awzjUlhtDfHa1C217BOAeSvoEt0cvo5p-J5dnlQfsikVdHQlj6oBiJAcCnh7AE0ack7OqzGFXqc_BUTtF1OgjovRfzNfXto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21108961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bissinger, Brett E. ; Culver, R. Lee ; Bose, N.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Brett E. ; Culver, R. Lee ; Bose, N.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Passive source classification in the underwater environment is a challenging problem in part because propagation through the space- and time-varying media introduces variability and uncertainty in the signal. Acoustic propagation codes can predict received fields accurately but they are sensitive to input environmental parameters which cannot be known exactly. This uncertainty in environmental knowledge used in signal predictions results in imperfect statistical class models. Classifiers that rely on simulations of the environment must therefore be robust to imperfect statistical models. Maximum likelihood methods provide ideal performance when the class models are correct but their performance quickly deteriorates when class models are imperfect. Minimum distance methods generally offer robustness to mismatches at the expense of performance, with that trade-off governed by the distance metric used. Several well-studied distance metrics are discussed and it is explained how the Hellinger distance offers robustness to outliers while retaining the performance of a maximum likelihood method, properties that make it well-suited for classification of passive underwater acoustic signals. Examples are provided to quantify the robustness properties of the Hellinger distance when applied to classification of passive underwater acoustic signals and compare its performance to the maximum likelihood method. [Work supported by ONR Undersea Signal Processing.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.3248538</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009-10, Vol.126 (4_Supplement), p.2183-2183</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Brett E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culver, R. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, N.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Passive source classification in the underwater environment is a challenging problem in part because propagation through the space- and time-varying media introduces variability and uncertainty in the signal. Acoustic propagation codes can predict received fields accurately but they are sensitive to input environmental parameters which cannot be known exactly. This uncertainty in environmental knowledge used in signal predictions results in imperfect statistical class models. Classifiers that rely on simulations of the environment must therefore be robust to imperfect statistical models. Maximum likelihood methods provide ideal performance when the class models are correct but their performance quickly deteriorates when class models are imperfect. Minimum distance methods generally offer robustness to mismatches at the expense of performance, with that trade-off governed by the distance metric used. Several well-studied distance metrics are discussed and it is explained how the Hellinger distance offers robustness to outliers while retaining the performance of a maximum likelihood method, properties that make it well-suited for classification of passive underwater acoustic signals. Examples are provided to quantify the robustness properties of the Hellinger distance when applied to classification of passive underwater acoustic signals and compare its performance to the maximum likelihood method. [Work supported by ONR Undersea Signal Processing.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE9LxDAUxIMouK4e_AY5CR665jVpmhxlUVdYUdB7iPmzRNq0Jq3itzfL7ml4w4_HzCB0DWQFUMMdrGjNREPFCVpAU5NKNDU7RQtCCFRMcn6OLnL-KmcjqFygt5cQQz_3eOO6LsSdS9iGPOloHDadzjn4YPQUhogHj8e98ePwHK1Lv3oqtDbDnKdgcA67qLt8ic58EXd11CV6f3z4WG-q7evT8_p-WxneQOWlthQ4aW1LNWvBEtO64nhGpSCcU-t8awzjUlhtDfHa1C217BOAeSvoEt0cvo5p-J5dnlQfsikVdHQlj6oBiJAcCnh7AE0ack7OqzGFXqc_BUTtF1OgjovRfzNfXto</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Bissinger, Brett E.</creator><creator>Culver, R. Lee</creator><creator>Bose, N.K.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals</title><author>Bissinger, Brett E. ; Culver, R. Lee ; Bose, N.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c651-f9ad31607d73a471d0c7ed31f43980663def7cc4698dadc0fac273d4b114fd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Brett E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culver, R. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bose, N.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bissinger, Brett E.</au><au>Culver, R. Lee</au><au>Bose, N.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>4_Supplement</issue><spage>2183</spage><epage>2183</epage><pages>2183-2183</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Passive source classification in the underwater environment is a challenging problem in part because propagation through the space- and time-varying media introduces variability and uncertainty in the signal. Acoustic propagation codes can predict received fields accurately but they are sensitive to input environmental parameters which cannot be known exactly. This uncertainty in environmental knowledge used in signal predictions results in imperfect statistical class models. Classifiers that rely on simulations of the environment must therefore be robust to imperfect statistical models. Maximum likelihood methods provide ideal performance when the class models are correct but their performance quickly deteriorates when class models are imperfect. Minimum distance methods generally offer robustness to mismatches at the expense of performance, with that trade-off governed by the distance metric used. Several well-studied distance metrics are discussed and it is explained how the Hellinger distance offers robustness to outliers while retaining the performance of a maximum likelihood method, properties that make it well-suited for classification of passive underwater acoustic signals. Examples are provided to quantify the robustness properties of the Hellinger distance when applied to classification of passive underwater acoustic signals and compare its performance to the maximum likelihood method. [Work supported by ONR Undersea Signal Processing.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.3248538</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009-10, Vol.126 (4_Supplement), p.2183-2183 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21108961 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; Acoustical Society of America (AIP); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Minimum Hellinger distance classification of passive underwater acoustic signals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A20%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20Hellinger%20distance%20classification%20of%20passive%20underwater%20acoustic%20signals&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Bissinger,%20Brett%20E.&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=4_Supplement&rft.spage=2183&rft.epage=2183&rft.pages=2183-2183&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.3248538&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21108961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21108961&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |