Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus

Neonatal exploratory laparotomies are often performed with a transumbilical incision in our institution, so umbilical ostomy placement has become more common. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of neonates with ostomy placement at the umbilicus in comparison to more traditional sto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2019-02, Vol.29 (2), p.243-247
Hauptverfasser: Sujka, Joseph, Alemayehu, Hanna, Benedict, Leo Andrew, Sobrino, Justin A, St Peter, Shawn D, Fraser, Jason D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 247
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A
container_volume 29
creator Sujka, Joseph
Alemayehu, Hanna
Benedict, Leo Andrew
Sobrino, Justin A
St Peter, Shawn D
Fraser, Jason D
description Neonatal exploratory laparotomies are often performed with a transumbilical incision in our institution, so umbilical ostomy placement has become more common. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of neonates with ostomy placement at the umbilicus in comparison to more traditional stoma locations. Retrospective study of neonates that underwent an exploratory laparotomy with ostomy creation between January 2010 and September 2015. Demographics, presentation, feedings, ostomy position, postoperative complications, and outcomes were collected. Comparative analysis was performed in STATA with P-value
doi_str_mv 10.1089/lap.2018.0185
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2109336019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2109336019</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-38d9dee3de77f5b547101241aa9d2126c47fdeb2ed49166fb2232d32894695b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp69Co9eumaTNKPeJPFLyisgnsOaTJlK22zNulh_72tu-vAMDPw8MI8hNwyumQ0lw-N3i2Bsnw5dnJG5ixJslhSLs7HnUqIUwFyRq68_6ZjSS4uyYxTAEhYNief6yEY16KPXBWtfXDtPiqc0aF2XVR30WpbN7bH7jH6aLTBFrswkWGLJ1qHv2vTlnVTm8Ffk4tKNx5vjnNBNi_PX6u3uFi_vq-eitiA5CHmuZUWkVvMsiopE5ExykAwraUFBqkRWWWxBLRCsjStSgAOlkMuRSqTMucLcn_I3fXuZ0AfVFt7g02jO3SDVzB-z3lKmRzR-ICa3nnfY6V2fd3qfq8YVZNFNVpUk0U1WRz5u2P0ULZo_-mTNv4Lj8Jsdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2109336019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sujka, Joseph ; Alemayehu, Hanna ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sobrino, Justin A ; St Peter, Shawn D ; Fraser, Jason D</creator><creatorcontrib>Sujka, Joseph ; Alemayehu, Hanna ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sobrino, Justin A ; St Peter, Shawn D ; Fraser, Jason D</creatorcontrib><description>Neonatal exploratory laparotomies are often performed with a transumbilical incision in our institution, so umbilical ostomy placement has become more common. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of neonates with ostomy placement at the umbilicus in comparison to more traditional stoma locations. Retrospective study of neonates that underwent an exploratory laparotomy with ostomy creation between January 2010 and September 2015. Demographics, presentation, feedings, ostomy position, postoperative complications, and outcomes were collected. Comparative analysis was performed in STATA with P-value &lt;.05 determined as significant. Results reported as means ± standard deviation and medians with interquartile ranges. Fifty-four children were included, 37% (n = 20) had stomas at the umbilicus. Most common other stoma location was the right lower quadrant (63%, n = 34). Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was the most common indication for surgery in both groups. Days to stoma output were similar between the two groups, [3 (1, 6) versus 2 (1, 5), P = .96]. Days to initiation of feeds were delayed in the umbilical ostomy group [15 (9.5, 23.5) versus 6 (4, 10), P = .02]. Comparing only NEC patients, initiation of feeds was similar [22 (14, 56) versus 15.5 (8, 43), P = .73]. Umbilical ostomies had an increase in prolapse/peristomal hernias (7 versus 3, P = .01), but no patients required operative revision. Umbilical ostomies had similar time to stoma function compared to other sites, but a delay in initiation of oral feeds likely secondary to a higher percentage of patients with NEC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-6429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30222517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Enteral Nutrition ; Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - surgery ; Female ; Hernia - etiology ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Ostomy - adverse effects ; Ostomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prolapse ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Stomas - adverse effects ; Surgical Stomas - physiology ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Umbilicus - surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2019-02, Vol.29 (2), p.243-247</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-38d9dee3de77f5b547101241aa9d2126c47fdeb2ed49166fb2232d32894695b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-38d9dee3de77f5b547101241aa9d2126c47fdeb2ed49166fb2232d32894695b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30222517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sujka, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemayehu, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, Justin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St Peter, Shawn D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Jason D</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus</title><title>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</title><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A</addtitle><description>Neonatal exploratory laparotomies are often performed with a transumbilical incision in our institution, so umbilical ostomy placement has become more common. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of neonates with ostomy placement at the umbilicus in comparison to more traditional stoma locations. Retrospective study of neonates that underwent an exploratory laparotomy with ostomy creation between January 2010 and September 2015. Demographics, presentation, feedings, ostomy position, postoperative complications, and outcomes were collected. Comparative analysis was performed in STATA with P-value &lt;.05 determined as significant. Results reported as means ± standard deviation and medians with interquartile ranges. Fifty-four children were included, 37% (n = 20) had stomas at the umbilicus. Most common other stoma location was the right lower quadrant (63%, n = 34). Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was the most common indication for surgery in both groups. Days to stoma output were similar between the two groups, [3 (1, 6) versus 2 (1, 5), P = .96]. Days to initiation of feeds were delayed in the umbilical ostomy group [15 (9.5, 23.5) versus 6 (4, 10), P = .02]. Comparing only NEC patients, initiation of feeds was similar [22 (14, 56) versus 15.5 (8, 43), P = .73]. Umbilical ostomies had an increase in prolapse/peristomal hernias (7 versus 3, P = .01), but no patients required operative revision. Umbilical ostomies had similar time to stoma function compared to other sites, but a delay in initiation of oral feeds likely secondary to a higher percentage of patients with NEC.</description><subject>Enteral Nutrition</subject><subject>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ostomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prolapse</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Stomas - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgical Stomas - physiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Umbilicus - surgery</subject><issn>1092-6429</issn><issn>1557-9034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rp69Co9eumaTNKPeJPFLyisgnsOaTJlK22zNulh_72tu-vAMDPw8MI8hNwyumQ0lw-N3i2Bsnw5dnJG5ixJslhSLs7HnUqIUwFyRq68_6ZjSS4uyYxTAEhYNief6yEY16KPXBWtfXDtPiqc0aF2XVR30WpbN7bH7jH6aLTBFrswkWGLJ1qHv2vTlnVTm8Ffk4tKNx5vjnNBNi_PX6u3uFi_vq-eitiA5CHmuZUWkVvMsiopE5ExykAwraUFBqkRWWWxBLRCsjStSgAOlkMuRSqTMucLcn_I3fXuZ0AfVFt7g02jO3SDVzB-z3lKmRzR-ICa3nnfY6V2fd3qfq8YVZNFNVpUk0U1WRz5u2P0ULZo_-mTNv4Lj8Jsdw</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Sujka, Joseph</creator><creator>Alemayehu, Hanna</creator><creator>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creator><creator>Sobrino, Justin A</creator><creator>St Peter, Shawn D</creator><creator>Fraser, Jason D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus</title><author>Sujka, Joseph ; Alemayehu, Hanna ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sobrino, Justin A ; St Peter, Shawn D ; Fraser, Jason D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-38d9dee3de77f5b547101241aa9d2126c47fdeb2ed49166fb2232d32894695b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Enteral Nutrition</topic><topic>Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ostomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prolapse</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Stomas - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgical Stomas - physiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Umbilicus - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sujka, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alemayehu, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, Justin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St Peter, Shawn D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, Jason D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sujka, Joseph</au><au>Alemayehu, Hanna</au><au>Benedict, Leo Andrew</au><au>Sobrino, Justin A</au><au>St Peter, Shawn D</au><au>Fraser, Jason D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic &amp; advanced surgical techniques. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>247</epage><pages>243-247</pages><issn>1092-6429</issn><eissn>1557-9034</eissn><abstract>Neonatal exploratory laparotomies are often performed with a transumbilical incision in our institution, so umbilical ostomy placement has become more common. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the outcomes of neonates with ostomy placement at the umbilicus in comparison to more traditional stoma locations. Retrospective study of neonates that underwent an exploratory laparotomy with ostomy creation between January 2010 and September 2015. Demographics, presentation, feedings, ostomy position, postoperative complications, and outcomes were collected. Comparative analysis was performed in STATA with P-value &lt;.05 determined as significant. Results reported as means ± standard deviation and medians with interquartile ranges. Fifty-four children were included, 37% (n = 20) had stomas at the umbilicus. Most common other stoma location was the right lower quadrant (63%, n = 34). Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was the most common indication for surgery in both groups. Days to stoma output were similar between the two groups, [3 (1, 6) versus 2 (1, 5), P = .96]. Days to initiation of feeds were delayed in the umbilical ostomy group [15 (9.5, 23.5) versus 6 (4, 10), P = .02]. Comparing only NEC patients, initiation of feeds was similar [22 (14, 56) versus 15.5 (8, 43), P = .73]. Umbilical ostomies had an increase in prolapse/peristomal hernias (7 versus 3, P = .01), but no patients required operative revision. Umbilical ostomies had similar time to stoma function compared to other sites, but a delay in initiation of oral feeds likely secondary to a higher percentage of patients with NEC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30222517</pmid><doi>10.1089/lap.2018.0185</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-6429
ispartof Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 2019-02, Vol.29 (2), p.243-247
issn 1092-6429
1557-9034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2109336019
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Enteral Nutrition
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing - surgery
Female
Hernia - etiology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Ostomy - adverse effects
Ostomy - methods
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prolapse
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Stomas - adverse effects
Surgical Stomas - physiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Umbilicus - surgery
title Outcomes of Ostomy Location in Children: Placement of the Ostomy at the Umbilicus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T23%3A54%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20Ostomy%20Location%20in%20Children:%20Placement%20of%20the%20Ostomy%20at%20the%20Umbilicus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laparoendoscopic%20&%20advanced%20surgical%20techniques.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Sujka,%20Joseph&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=247&rft.pages=243-247&rft.issn=1092-6429&rft.eissn=1557-9034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/lap.2018.0185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2109336019%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2109336019&rft_id=info:pmid/30222517&rfr_iscdi=true