Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action
A pragmatic possible approach to the prioritization of chemical carcinogens occurring as food contaminants is described, based on the carcinogenic risk to the popula tion. This should be of value in ensuring that resources for assessment and management of carcinogens in food are directed to the most...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human & experimental toxicology 1996-09, Vol.15 (9), p.739-746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 739 |
container_title | Human & experimental toxicology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | McDonald, AL Fielder, RJ Diggle, GE Tennant, DR Fisher, CE |
description | A pragmatic possible approach to the prioritization of chemical carcinogens occurring as food contaminants is described, based on the carcinogenic risk to the popula tion. This should be of value in ensuring that resources for assessment and management of carcinogens in food are directed to the most important areas with regard to carcinogenic risk to the population. Key components of this approach are an assessment of the carcinogenic hazard to humans combined with estimations of intakes per person and of the proportion of the population exposed. These are used to derive an index referred to as the Population Carcinogenic Index. Concerning the hazard assessment expert judgement is used to place the chemical in one of five categories. The highest category is for chemical carcinogens that are believed to act by a genotoxic mechanism. It is recognised that such com pounds may vary enormously with respect to their potency and various approaches to ranking carcinogens on the basis of potency are reviewed. The approach adopted is to subdivide the genotoxic carcinogens category into high, medium and low potency based on the TD 50 value. Methods of estimating intakes and exposed populations are considered and an approach which groups these into broad categories is developed. The hazard and exposure assessments are then combined to derive the Population Carcinogenicity Index. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/096032719601500904 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21076885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_096032719601500904</sage_id><sourcerecordid>15823286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-7cf4e058d384ec10cea0692c7a74e7fa814fcb5707e2c72964f073e5a7d8cd133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDsQbytnSSbTdabFL-g4EXPS5qdlJTtpia7B_-9KV16EfQ0w7zPfL2EXFO4p1TKOVQlcCZpClQAVFCckCktpMxTzk_JdA_ke-KcXMS4AYCyEnRCJkopYFBNiVjoYFzn19jFzHWZ9b55yHbB-eB6hzEVQhZwPbS69-E706Z3vrskZ1a3Ea_GOCOfz08fi9d8-f7ytnhc5qZgVZ9LYwsEoRquCjQUDOp0ADNSywKl1YoW1qyEBImpyKqysCA5Ci0bZRrK-YzcHebugv8aMPb11kWDbas79EOsGQVZKiX-BalQjDNVJpAdQBN8jAFtnX7d6vBdU6j3pta_TU1NN-P0YbXF5tgyupj021HX0ejWBt0ZF48YZ4JxpRI2P2BRr7He-CF0yby_Fv8A33eKkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15823286</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>McDonald, AL ; Fielder, RJ ; Diggle, GE ; Tennant, DR ; Fisher, CE</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, AL ; Fielder, RJ ; Diggle, GE ; Tennant, DR ; Fisher, CE</creatorcontrib><description>A pragmatic possible approach to the prioritization of chemical carcinogens occurring as food contaminants is described, based on the carcinogenic risk to the popula tion. This should be of value in ensuring that resources for assessment and management of carcinogens in food are directed to the most important areas with regard to carcinogenic risk to the population. Key components of this approach are an assessment of the carcinogenic hazard to humans combined with estimations of intakes per person and of the proportion of the population exposed. These are used to derive an index referred to as the Population Carcinogenic Index. Concerning the hazard assessment expert judgement is used to place the chemical in one of five categories. The highest category is for chemical carcinogens that are believed to act by a genotoxic mechanism. It is recognised that such com pounds may vary enormously with respect to their potency and various approaches to ranking carcinogens on the basis of potency are reviewed. The approach adopted is to subdivide the genotoxic carcinogens category into high, medium and low potency based on the TD 50 value. Methods of estimating intakes and exposed populations are considered and an approach which groups these into broad categories is developed. The hazard and exposure assessments are then combined to derive the Population Carcinogenicity Index.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3271</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0144-5952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0903</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/096032719601500904</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8880209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens ; Carcinogens - analysis ; Chemical agents ; Food Analysis ; Food Contamination ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Mutagens - analysis ; Risk Assessment ; Selection Bias ; Tumors ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Human & experimental toxicology, 1996-09, Vol.15 (9), p.739-746</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-7cf4e058d384ec10cea0692c7a74e7fa814fcb5707e2c72964f073e5a7d8cd133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-7cf4e058d384ec10cea0692c7a74e7fa814fcb5707e2c72964f073e5a7d8cd133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/096032719601500904$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/096032719601500904$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3252388$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8880209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, AL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielder, RJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diggle, GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, DR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, CE</creatorcontrib><title>Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action</title><title>Human & experimental toxicology</title><addtitle>Hum Exp Toxicol</addtitle><description>A pragmatic possible approach to the prioritization of chemical carcinogens occurring as food contaminants is described, based on the carcinogenic risk to the popula tion. This should be of value in ensuring that resources for assessment and management of carcinogens in food are directed to the most important areas with regard to carcinogenic risk to the population. Key components of this approach are an assessment of the carcinogenic hazard to humans combined with estimations of intakes per person and of the proportion of the population exposed. These are used to derive an index referred to as the Population Carcinogenic Index. Concerning the hazard assessment expert judgement is used to place the chemical in one of five categories. The highest category is for chemical carcinogens that are believed to act by a genotoxic mechanism. It is recognised that such com pounds may vary enormously with respect to their potency and various approaches to ranking carcinogens on the basis of potency are reviewed. The approach adopted is to subdivide the genotoxic carcinogens category into high, medium and low potency based on the TD 50 value. Methods of estimating intakes and exposed populations are considered and an approach which groups these into broad categories is developed. The hazard and exposure assessments are then combined to derive the Population Carcinogenicity Index.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</subject><subject>Carcinogens - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical agents</subject><subject>Food Analysis</subject><subject>Food Contamination</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mutagens - analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0960-3271</issn><issn>0144-5952</issn><issn>1477-0903</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDsQbytnSSbTdabFL-g4EXPS5qdlJTtpia7B_-9KV16EfQ0w7zPfL2EXFO4p1TKOVQlcCZpClQAVFCckCktpMxTzk_JdA_ke-KcXMS4AYCyEnRCJkopYFBNiVjoYFzn19jFzHWZ9b55yHbB-eB6hzEVQhZwPbS69-E706Z3vrskZ1a3Ea_GOCOfz08fi9d8-f7ytnhc5qZgVZ9LYwsEoRquCjQUDOp0ADNSywKl1YoW1qyEBImpyKqysCA5Ci0bZRrK-YzcHebugv8aMPb11kWDbas79EOsGQVZKiX-BalQjDNVJpAdQBN8jAFtnX7d6vBdU6j3pta_TU1NN-P0YbXF5tgyupj021HX0ejWBt0ZF48YZ4JxpRI2P2BRr7He-CF0yby_Fv8A33eKkw</recordid><startdate>19960901</startdate><enddate>19960901</enddate><creator>McDonald, AL</creator><creator>Fielder, RJ</creator><creator>Diggle, GE</creator><creator>Tennant, DR</creator><creator>Fisher, CE</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Arnold</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960901</creationdate><title>Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action</title><author>McDonald, AL ; Fielder, RJ ; Diggle, GE ; Tennant, DR ; Fisher, CE</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-7cf4e058d384ec10cea0692c7a74e7fa814fcb5707e2c72964f073e5a7d8cd133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens</topic><topic>Carcinogens - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical agents</topic><topic>Food Analysis</topic><topic>Food Contamination</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mutagens - analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, AL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielder, RJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diggle, GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tennant, DR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, CE</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Human & experimental toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, AL</au><au>Fielder, RJ</au><au>Diggle, GE</au><au>Tennant, DR</au><au>Fisher, CE</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action</atitle><jtitle>Human & experimental toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Exp Toxicol</addtitle><date>1996-09-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>739</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>739-746</pages><issn>0960-3271</issn><issn>0144-5952</issn><eissn>1477-0903</eissn><abstract>A pragmatic possible approach to the prioritization of chemical carcinogens occurring as food contaminants is described, based on the carcinogenic risk to the popula tion. This should be of value in ensuring that resources for assessment and management of carcinogens in food are directed to the most important areas with regard to carcinogenic risk to the population. Key components of this approach are an assessment of the carcinogenic hazard to humans combined with estimations of intakes per person and of the proportion of the population exposed. These are used to derive an index referred to as the Population Carcinogenic Index. Concerning the hazard assessment expert judgement is used to place the chemical in one of five categories. The highest category is for chemical carcinogens that are believed to act by a genotoxic mechanism. It is recognised that such com pounds may vary enormously with respect to their potency and various approaches to ranking carcinogens on the basis of potency are reviewed. The approach adopted is to subdivide the genotoxic carcinogens category into high, medium and low potency based on the TD 50 value. Methods of estimating intakes and exposed populations are considered and an approach which groups these into broad categories is developed. The hazard and exposure assessments are then combined to derive the Population Carcinogenicity Index.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>8880209</pmid><doi>10.1177/096032719601500904</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3271 |
ispartof | Human & experimental toxicology, 1996-09, Vol.15 (9), p.739-746 |
issn | 0960-3271 0144-5952 1477-0903 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21076885 |
source | SAGE Publications; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Carcinogenesis, carcinogens and anticarcinogens Carcinogens - analysis Chemical agents Food Analysis Food Contamination Guidelines as Topic Humans Medical sciences Mutagens - analysis Risk Assessment Selection Bias Tumors United Kingdom |
title | Carcinogens in food: priorities for regulatory action |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A33%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carcinogens%20in%20food:%20priorities%20for%20regulatory%20action&rft.jtitle=Human%20&%20experimental%20toxicology&rft.au=McDonald,%20AL&rft.date=1996-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=739&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=739-746&rft.issn=0960-3271&rft.eissn=1477-0903&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/096032719601500904&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15823286%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15823286&rft_id=info:pmid/8880209&rft_sage_id=10.1177_096032719601500904&rfr_iscdi=true |