The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review

Participatory research carried out by or with children, has become a well-established and valuable part of the research landscape investigating children's lives, views and needs. So too has a critical agenda about its ethical implications and methodological complexities. One criticism is that t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2018-10, Vol.215, p.80-91
Hauptverfasser: Bradbury-Jones, Caroline, Isham, Louise, Taylor, Julie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue
container_start_page 80
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 215
creator Bradbury-Jones, Caroline
Isham, Louise
Taylor, Julie
description Participatory research carried out by or with children, has become a well-established and valuable part of the research landscape investigating children's lives, views and needs. So too has a critical agenda about its ethical implications and methodological complexities. One criticism is that the involvement of children who may be considered ‘vulnerable’ or ‘marginalised’ has been slower to take root within mainstream participatory practice. This means that there has been less focus on how groups such as disabled children or children affected by abuse or neglect can shape and challenge adult-dominated types of knowledge and decision-making that are likely to affect them. This article reports on the findings of a qualitative systematic literature review of thirteen contemporary papers. The review was undertaken by a UK team in 2017. The included articles explored some core ethical and methodological issues involved in carrying out participatory research with vulnerable children and young people. It reports on three themes: 1) The extent to which participatory spaces could recalibrate opportunities and attention given to marginalised and silenced groups; 2) The ways in which these children and young people could develop skills and exercise political and moral agency through participatory activity, and, 3) How to facilitate meaningful engagement with individuals and groups and reconcile this with a critical appreciation of the important but limited nature of research as means of political and social change. The review provides a unique, contemporary analysis of participatory research with vulnerable children, illuminating in particular its conceptual complexities and contradictions, particularly regarding power, empowerment and voice. Its overall utility and interest is augmented by the disciplinary and geographical breadth of the included articles, rendering it relevant to many contexts and countries. •Complexity is an inherent feature of participatory research with children and young people.•Power, empowerment and voice are useful concepts in critiquing participatory approaches.•Participatory spaces can recalibrate attention given to marginalised and silenced groups.•Vulnerable children and young people can exercise agency through participatory activity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2105041857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953618304702</els_id><sourcerecordid>2105041857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f3858dedbf84a906698e3591905240ece4e08306b7cc3564b7c2941de43e17053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQQC0EoqHwC2CJC5cN47V318stqiggVeJSzpbjnRBHG3tre1PyB3w2k6blwAVppLHsN8_2DGPvBCwFiPbjbpmjy87vcVjWIPQSKKR-xhZCd7JqpOqeswXUXVf1jWwv2KucdwAgQMuX7EJCLbSGdsF-326Ru7ifRvzli8fMbRhoI5RkB--KjyFzH_hkU_HOT7bEdOQJM9rktvzely0_zGPAZNcjmbZ-HBKGB8sxzuEnnzCS_BNf8bvZjr7Y4g_I8zEX3NPakezg8f41e7GxY8Y3j_mS_bj-fHv1tbr5_uXb1eqmckrpUm2kbvSAw3qjle2hbXuNsulFD02tAB0qpC9Cu-6ck02rKNe9EgMqiaKDRl6yD2fvlOLdjLmYvc8Ox9EGjHM2tYAGlNBNR-j7f9BdnFOg1xFFclAaBFHdmXIp5pxwY6bk9zYdjQBzGpbZmb_DMqdhGaCQmirfPvrn9ensqe5pOgSszgBSQ6hJyZAFg8PBJ3TFDNH_95I_gYesTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135604801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline ; Isham, Louise ; Taylor, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline ; Isham, Louise ; Taylor, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Participatory research carried out by or with children, has become a well-established and valuable part of the research landscape investigating children's lives, views and needs. So too has a critical agenda about its ethical implications and methodological complexities. One criticism is that the involvement of children who may be considered ‘vulnerable’ or ‘marginalised’ has been slower to take root within mainstream participatory practice. This means that there has been less focus on how groups such as disabled children or children affected by abuse or neglect can shape and challenge adult-dominated types of knowledge and decision-making that are likely to affect them. This article reports on the findings of a qualitative systematic literature review of thirteen contemporary papers. The review was undertaken by a UK team in 2017. The included articles explored some core ethical and methodological issues involved in carrying out participatory research with vulnerable children and young people. It reports on three themes: 1) The extent to which participatory spaces could recalibrate opportunities and attention given to marginalised and silenced groups; 2) The ways in which these children and young people could develop skills and exercise political and moral agency through participatory activity, and, 3) How to facilitate meaningful engagement with individuals and groups and reconcile this with a critical appreciation of the important but limited nature of research as means of political and social change. The review provides a unique, contemporary analysis of participatory research with vulnerable children, illuminating in particular its conceptual complexities and contradictions, particularly regarding power, empowerment and voice. Its overall utility and interest is augmented by the disciplinary and geographical breadth of the included articles, rendering it relevant to many contexts and countries. •Complexity is an inherent feature of participatory research with children and young people.•Power, empowerment and voice are useful concepts in critiquing participatory approaches.•Participatory spaces can recalibrate attention given to marginalised and silenced groups.•Vulnerable children and young people can exercise agency through participatory activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30218806</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Action research ; Adolescent ; Appreciation ; Child ; Child abuse &amp; neglect ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children &amp; youth ; Children with disabilities ; Co-research ; Collaboration ; Community-Based Participatory Research - methods ; Community-Based Participatory Research - standards ; Community-Based Participatory Research - trends ; Complexity ; Complexity theory ; Criticism ; Decision making ; Disabled Children - psychology ; Empowerment ; Engagement ; Ethics ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Methodological problems ; Moral agency ; Participatory ; Participatory research ; Peer-research ; People with disabilities ; Political change ; Power ; Qualitative Research ; Social change ; Social exclusion ; Social research ; Systematic review ; Teams ; Vulnerability ; Vulnerable ; Vulnerable Populations - psychology ; Young people ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2018-10, Vol.215, p.80-91</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Oct 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f3858dedbf84a906698e3591905240ece4e08306b7cc3564b7c2941de43e17053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f3858dedbf84a906698e3591905240ece4e08306b7cc3564b7c2941de43e17053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5237-6777</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,33776,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30218806$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isham, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Participatory research carried out by or with children, has become a well-established and valuable part of the research landscape investigating children's lives, views and needs. So too has a critical agenda about its ethical implications and methodological complexities. One criticism is that the involvement of children who may be considered ‘vulnerable’ or ‘marginalised’ has been slower to take root within mainstream participatory practice. This means that there has been less focus on how groups such as disabled children or children affected by abuse or neglect can shape and challenge adult-dominated types of knowledge and decision-making that are likely to affect them. This article reports on the findings of a qualitative systematic literature review of thirteen contemporary papers. The review was undertaken by a UK team in 2017. The included articles explored some core ethical and methodological issues involved in carrying out participatory research with vulnerable children and young people. It reports on three themes: 1) The extent to which participatory spaces could recalibrate opportunities and attention given to marginalised and silenced groups; 2) The ways in which these children and young people could develop skills and exercise political and moral agency through participatory activity, and, 3) How to facilitate meaningful engagement with individuals and groups and reconcile this with a critical appreciation of the important but limited nature of research as means of political and social change. The review provides a unique, contemporary analysis of participatory research with vulnerable children, illuminating in particular its conceptual complexities and contradictions, particularly regarding power, empowerment and voice. Its overall utility and interest is augmented by the disciplinary and geographical breadth of the included articles, rendering it relevant to many contexts and countries. •Complexity is an inherent feature of participatory research with children and young people.•Power, empowerment and voice are useful concepts in critiquing participatory approaches.•Participatory spaces can recalibrate attention given to marginalised and silenced groups.•Vulnerable children and young people can exercise agency through participatory activity.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child abuse &amp; neglect</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Children with disabilities</subject><subject>Co-research</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Community-Based Participatory Research - methods</subject><subject>Community-Based Participatory Research - standards</subject><subject>Community-Based Participatory Research - trends</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complexity theory</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disabled Children - psychology</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methodological problems</subject><subject>Moral agency</subject><subject>Participatory</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Peer-research</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Political change</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social exclusion</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Vulnerable</subject><subject>Vulnerable Populations - psychology</subject><subject>Young people</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFuEzEQQC0EoqHwC2CJC5cN47V318stqiggVeJSzpbjnRBHG3tre1PyB3w2k6blwAVppLHsN8_2DGPvBCwFiPbjbpmjy87vcVjWIPQSKKR-xhZCd7JqpOqeswXUXVf1jWwv2KucdwAgQMuX7EJCLbSGdsF-326Ru7ifRvzli8fMbRhoI5RkB--KjyFzH_hkU_HOT7bEdOQJM9rktvzely0_zGPAZNcjmbZ-HBKGB8sxzuEnnzCS_BNf8bvZjr7Y4g_I8zEX3NPakezg8f41e7GxY8Y3j_mS_bj-fHv1tbr5_uXb1eqmckrpUm2kbvSAw3qjle2hbXuNsulFD02tAB0qpC9Cu-6ck02rKNe9EgMqiaKDRl6yD2fvlOLdjLmYvc8Ox9EGjHM2tYAGlNBNR-j7f9BdnFOg1xFFclAaBFHdmXIp5pxwY6bk9zYdjQBzGpbZmb_DMqdhGaCQmirfPvrn9ensqe5pOgSszgBSQ6hJyZAFg8PBJ3TFDNH_95I_gYesTw</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline</creator><creator>Isham, Louise</creator><creator>Taylor, Julie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-6777</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review</title><author>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline ; Isham, Louise ; Taylor, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-f3858dedbf84a906698e3591905240ece4e08306b7cc3564b7c2941de43e17053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child abuse &amp; neglect</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Children with disabilities</topic><topic>Co-research</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Community-Based Participatory Research - methods</topic><topic>Community-Based Participatory Research - standards</topic><topic>Community-Based Participatory Research - trends</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complexity theory</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disabled Children - psychology</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methodological problems</topic><topic>Moral agency</topic><topic>Participatory</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Peer-research</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Political change</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social exclusion</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Vulnerable</topic><topic>Vulnerable Populations - psychology</topic><topic>Young people</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isham, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradbury-Jones, Caroline</au><au>Isham, Louise</au><au>Taylor, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>215</volume><spage>80</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>80-91</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Participatory research carried out by or with children, has become a well-established and valuable part of the research landscape investigating children's lives, views and needs. So too has a critical agenda about its ethical implications and methodological complexities. One criticism is that the involvement of children who may be considered ‘vulnerable’ or ‘marginalised’ has been slower to take root within mainstream participatory practice. This means that there has been less focus on how groups such as disabled children or children affected by abuse or neglect can shape and challenge adult-dominated types of knowledge and decision-making that are likely to affect them. This article reports on the findings of a qualitative systematic literature review of thirteen contemporary papers. The review was undertaken by a UK team in 2017. The included articles explored some core ethical and methodological issues involved in carrying out participatory research with vulnerable children and young people. It reports on three themes: 1) The extent to which participatory spaces could recalibrate opportunities and attention given to marginalised and silenced groups; 2) The ways in which these children and young people could develop skills and exercise political and moral agency through participatory activity, and, 3) How to facilitate meaningful engagement with individuals and groups and reconcile this with a critical appreciation of the important but limited nature of research as means of political and social change. The review provides a unique, contemporary analysis of participatory research with vulnerable children, illuminating in particular its conceptual complexities and contradictions, particularly regarding power, empowerment and voice. Its overall utility and interest is augmented by the disciplinary and geographical breadth of the included articles, rendering it relevant to many contexts and countries. •Complexity is an inherent feature of participatory research with children and young people.•Power, empowerment and voice are useful concepts in critiquing participatory approaches.•Participatory spaces can recalibrate attention given to marginalised and silenced groups.•Vulnerable children and young people can exercise agency through participatory activity.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30218806</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-6777</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2018-10, Vol.215, p.80-91
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2105041857
source MEDLINE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Action research
Adolescent
Appreciation
Child
Child abuse & neglect
Child, Preschool
Children
Children & youth
Children with disabilities
Co-research
Collaboration
Community-Based Participatory Research - methods
Community-Based Participatory Research - standards
Community-Based Participatory Research - trends
Complexity
Complexity theory
Criticism
Decision making
Disabled Children - psychology
Empowerment
Engagement
Ethics
Humans
Literature reviews
Methodological problems
Moral agency
Participatory
Participatory research
Peer-research
People with disabilities
Political change
Power
Qualitative Research
Social change
Social exclusion
Social research
Systematic review
Teams
Vulnerability
Vulnerable
Vulnerable Populations - psychology
Young people
Youth
title The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T09%3A54%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20complexities%20and%20contradictions%20in%20participatory%20research%20with%20vulnerable%20children%20and%20young%20people:%20A%20qualitative%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Bradbury-Jones,%20Caroline&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=215&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=80-91&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2105041857%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135604801&rft_id=info:pmid/30218806&rft_els_id=S0277953618304702&rfr_iscdi=true