Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography

The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective dose delivered to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) from low-dose (LD) CT compared with that from radiography. Secondary objectives included evaluation of diagnostic quality of LD CT of the SIJ and development of a clinical protocol for LD C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2018-11, Vol.211 (5), p.1058-1062
Hauptverfasser: Chahal, Baljot S, Kwan, Alexander L C, Dhillon, Sukhvinder S, Olubaniyi, Babajide O, Jhiangri, Gian S, Neilson, Matthew M, Lambert, Robert G W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1062
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1058
container_title American journal of roentgenology (1976)
container_volume 211
creator Chahal, Baljot S
Kwan, Alexander L C
Dhillon, Sukhvinder S
Olubaniyi, Babajide O
Jhiangri, Gian S
Neilson, Matthew M
Lambert, Robert G W
description The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective dose delivered to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) from low-dose (LD) CT compared with that from radiography. Secondary objectives included evaluation of diagnostic quality of LD CT of the SIJ and development of a clinical protocol for LD CT of the SIJ. Data from 36 patients (19 women, 17 men) undergoing LD CT for suspected renal colic were analyzed. Two effective dose estimates were calculated: one for the SIJ and another for an extended region from the iliac crest to 1 cm below the SIJ. Thirty-six anteroposterior pelvic and 36 SIJ view radiographs were age-, sex-, and body width-matched to CT scans. Effective dose from radiography was estimated using the method described in International Commission on Radiologic Protection Publication 60. Maximum effective dose to the SIJ from LD CT was less than 1 mSv in all cases, with a mean ± SD of 0.42 ± 0.18 mSv (range, 0.14-0.83 mSv), whereas mean dose to the extended region was 0.57 ± 0.24 mSv (range, 0.19-1.11 mSv). Mean dose from SIJ radiographs was 0.15 ± 0.10 mSv (range, 0.07-1.38 mSv), and mean dose from a single pelvic radiograph was 0.09 ± 0.06 mSv (range, 0.04-0.37 mSv). All CT studies were of diagnostic quality for assessment of the SIJ. LD CT of the SIJ can be consistently performed with an effective radiation dose of less than 1 mSv. Because reliability and sensitivity of radiography for sacroiliitis is poor, we recommend that LD CT replace radiography for dedicated evaluation of the SIJ.
doi_str_mv 10.2214/AJR.18.19678
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2103672498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2103672498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e4db8b93fc7bf528a6d3c9e8054019f5cc5f3c22e3516c1f75063a97da92586f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9PwjAARhujEURvnk2PHhz2x7q2RzNBJSQmCNHb0nWtzGx0tluU_94h6Om7vLzkewBcYjQmBMe3d7PFGIsxlgkXR2CIWZxEFMf4GAwRTXAkEH0bgLMQPhBCXEh-CgYUEcS5xEOwWqiiVG3pNnDy3bjQeQNbB9u1gS9Ke1dWpdJw5spNC6fe1XDuvqJ7FwxMlzB1daO8KeBr2a7hzuTevWrW23NwYlUVzMVhR2A1nSzTx2j-_PCU3s0jTSRuIxMXucgltZrnlhGhkoJqaQRiMcLSMq2ZpZoQQxlONLacoYQqyQslCROJpSNwvfc23n12JrRZXQZtqkptjOtCRnCfgJNYih692aP9qRC8sVnjy1r5bYZRtguZ9SEzLLLfkD1-dTB3eW2Kf_ivHP0BeYxtMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2103672498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography</title><source>American Roentgen Ray Society</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chahal, Baljot S ; Kwan, Alexander L C ; Dhillon, Sukhvinder S ; Olubaniyi, Babajide O ; Jhiangri, Gian S ; Neilson, Matthew M ; Lambert, Robert G W</creator><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Baljot S ; Kwan, Alexander L C ; Dhillon, Sukhvinder S ; Olubaniyi, Babajide O ; Jhiangri, Gian S ; Neilson, Matthew M ; Lambert, Robert G W</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective dose delivered to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) from low-dose (LD) CT compared with that from radiography. Secondary objectives included evaluation of diagnostic quality of LD CT of the SIJ and development of a clinical protocol for LD CT of the SIJ. Data from 36 patients (19 women, 17 men) undergoing LD CT for suspected renal colic were analyzed. Two effective dose estimates were calculated: one for the SIJ and another for an extended region from the iliac crest to 1 cm below the SIJ. Thirty-six anteroposterior pelvic and 36 SIJ view radiographs were age-, sex-, and body width-matched to CT scans. Effective dose from radiography was estimated using the method described in International Commission on Radiologic Protection Publication 60. Maximum effective dose to the SIJ from LD CT was less than 1 mSv in all cases, with a mean ± SD of 0.42 ± 0.18 mSv (range, 0.14-0.83 mSv), whereas mean dose to the extended region was 0.57 ± 0.24 mSv (range, 0.19-1.11 mSv). Mean dose from SIJ radiographs was 0.15 ± 0.10 mSv (range, 0.07-1.38 mSv), and mean dose from a single pelvic radiograph was 0.09 ± 0.06 mSv (range, 0.04-0.37 mSv). All CT studies were of diagnostic quality for assessment of the SIJ. LD CT of the SIJ can be consistently performed with an effective radiation dose of less than 1 mSv. Because reliability and sensitivity of radiography for sacroiliitis is poor, we recommend that LD CT replace radiography for dedicated evaluation of the SIJ.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-803X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1546-3141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.19678</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30207791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2018-11, Vol.211 (5), p.1058-1062</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e4db8b93fc7bf528a6d3c9e8054019f5cc5f3c22e3516c1f75063a97da92586f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e4db8b93fc7bf528a6d3c9e8054019f5cc5f3c22e3516c1f75063a97da92586f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4121,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30207791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Baljot S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Alexander L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Sukhvinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olubaniyi, Babajide O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhiangri, Gian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Robert G W</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography</title><title>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</title><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><description>The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective dose delivered to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) from low-dose (LD) CT compared with that from radiography. Secondary objectives included evaluation of diagnostic quality of LD CT of the SIJ and development of a clinical protocol for LD CT of the SIJ. Data from 36 patients (19 women, 17 men) undergoing LD CT for suspected renal colic were analyzed. Two effective dose estimates were calculated: one for the SIJ and another for an extended region from the iliac crest to 1 cm below the SIJ. Thirty-six anteroposterior pelvic and 36 SIJ view radiographs were age-, sex-, and body width-matched to CT scans. Effective dose from radiography was estimated using the method described in International Commission on Radiologic Protection Publication 60. Maximum effective dose to the SIJ from LD CT was less than 1 mSv in all cases, with a mean ± SD of 0.42 ± 0.18 mSv (range, 0.14-0.83 mSv), whereas mean dose to the extended region was 0.57 ± 0.24 mSv (range, 0.19-1.11 mSv). Mean dose from SIJ radiographs was 0.15 ± 0.10 mSv (range, 0.07-1.38 mSv), and mean dose from a single pelvic radiograph was 0.09 ± 0.06 mSv (range, 0.04-0.37 mSv). All CT studies were of diagnostic quality for assessment of the SIJ. LD CT of the SIJ can be consistently performed with an effective radiation dose of less than 1 mSv. Because reliability and sensitivity of radiography for sacroiliitis is poor, we recommend that LD CT replace radiography for dedicated evaluation of the SIJ.</description><issn>0361-803X</issn><issn>1546-3141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kM9PwjAARhujEURvnk2PHhz2x7q2RzNBJSQmCNHb0nWtzGx0tluU_94h6Om7vLzkewBcYjQmBMe3d7PFGIsxlgkXR2CIWZxEFMf4GAwRTXAkEH0bgLMQPhBCXEh-CgYUEcS5xEOwWqiiVG3pNnDy3bjQeQNbB9u1gS9Ke1dWpdJw5spNC6fe1XDuvqJ7FwxMlzB1daO8KeBr2a7hzuTevWrW23NwYlUVzMVhR2A1nSzTx2j-_PCU3s0jTSRuIxMXucgltZrnlhGhkoJqaQRiMcLSMq2ZpZoQQxlONLacoYQqyQslCROJpSNwvfc23n12JrRZXQZtqkptjOtCRnCfgJNYih692aP9qRC8sVnjy1r5bYZRtguZ9SEzLLLfkD1-dTB3eW2Kf_ivHP0BeYxtMg</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Chahal, Baljot S</creator><creator>Kwan, Alexander L C</creator><creator>Dhillon, Sukhvinder S</creator><creator>Olubaniyi, Babajide O</creator><creator>Jhiangri, Gian S</creator><creator>Neilson, Matthew M</creator><creator>Lambert, Robert G W</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography</title><author>Chahal, Baljot S ; Kwan, Alexander L C ; Dhillon, Sukhvinder S ; Olubaniyi, Babajide O ; Jhiangri, Gian S ; Neilson, Matthew M ; Lambert, Robert G W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-e4db8b93fc7bf528a6d3c9e8054019f5cc5f3c22e3516c1f75063a97da92586f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Baljot S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Alexander L C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Sukhvinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olubaniyi, Babajide O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhiangri, Gian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neilson, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambert, Robert G W</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chahal, Baljot S</au><au>Kwan, Alexander L C</au><au>Dhillon, Sukhvinder S</au><au>Olubaniyi, Babajide O</au><au>Jhiangri, Gian S</au><au>Neilson, Matthew M</au><au>Lambert, Robert G W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography</atitle><jtitle>American journal of roentgenology (1976)</jtitle><addtitle>AJR Am J Roentgenol</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>211</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1058</spage><epage>1062</epage><pages>1058-1062</pages><issn>0361-803X</issn><eissn>1546-3141</eissn><abstract>The primary objective of this study was to estimate the effective dose delivered to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) from low-dose (LD) CT compared with that from radiography. Secondary objectives included evaluation of diagnostic quality of LD CT of the SIJ and development of a clinical protocol for LD CT of the SIJ. Data from 36 patients (19 women, 17 men) undergoing LD CT for suspected renal colic were analyzed. Two effective dose estimates were calculated: one for the SIJ and another for an extended region from the iliac crest to 1 cm below the SIJ. Thirty-six anteroposterior pelvic and 36 SIJ view radiographs were age-, sex-, and body width-matched to CT scans. Effective dose from radiography was estimated using the method described in International Commission on Radiologic Protection Publication 60. Maximum effective dose to the SIJ from LD CT was less than 1 mSv in all cases, with a mean ± SD of 0.42 ± 0.18 mSv (range, 0.14-0.83 mSv), whereas mean dose to the extended region was 0.57 ± 0.24 mSv (range, 0.19-1.11 mSv). Mean dose from SIJ radiographs was 0.15 ± 0.10 mSv (range, 0.07-1.38 mSv), and mean dose from a single pelvic radiograph was 0.09 ± 0.06 mSv (range, 0.04-0.37 mSv). All CT studies were of diagnostic quality for assessment of the SIJ. LD CT of the SIJ can be consistently performed with an effective radiation dose of less than 1 mSv. Because reliability and sensitivity of radiography for sacroiliitis is poor, we recommend that LD CT replace radiography for dedicated evaluation of the SIJ.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30207791</pmid><doi>10.2214/AJR.18.19678</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-803X
ispartof American journal of roentgenology (1976), 2018-11, Vol.211 (5), p.1058-1062
issn 0361-803X
1546-3141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2103672498
source American Roentgen Ray Society; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Radiation Exposure to the Sacroiliac Joint From Low-Dose CT Compared With Radiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T12%3A35%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20Exposure%20to%20the%20Sacroiliac%20Joint%20From%20Low-Dose%20CT%20Compared%20With%20Radiography&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20roentgenology%20(1976)&rft.au=Chahal,%20Baljot%20S&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=211&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1058&rft.epage=1062&rft.pages=1058-1062&rft.issn=0361-803X&rft.eissn=1546-3141&rft_id=info:doi/10.2214/AJR.18.19678&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2103672498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2103672498&rft_id=info:pmid/30207791&rfr_iscdi=true