Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?
The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of sur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental monitoring 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1781 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1774 |
container_title | Journal of environmental monitoring |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Baun, Anders Hartmann, Nanna B Grieger, Khara D Hansen, Steffen Foss |
description | The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/b909730a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21032694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21032694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoVqvgJ5CcxMtqskm63ZNIqX-g4EE9Ly_pSxvZZtcki_jtjbbq6c3hN_OGIeSMsyvORH2ta1ZXgsEeOeJyIgsmhNj_06UakeMY3xhjomLlIRnxepoNjB2R_hlTcn5F0xpp6zYuRWq7QNGvnEcMuKQefNdDSM60GKnzdD6ErkfwNA7BgkH6AQlDpAWFgNQMIaBPFPo-dGDW2fMj--AydnNCDiy0EU93d0xe7-Yvs4di8XT_OLtdFCZ3T4XQXDHkU1SyZFYu5VRLhVoZVpWcA7fGKtDC1MBNprQGgNqKSivJVCWsGJOLbW5-_T5gTM3GRYNtCx67ITZlHq6c1DKDl1vQhC7GgLbJTTcQPhvOmu91m991M3q-yxz0Bpf_4G5O8QU10Xa7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21032694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</creator><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><description>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-0325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/b909730a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19809700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Environmental Health - legislation & jurisprudence ; Environmental Health - methods ; Environmental Health - standards ; Environmental Monitoring - legislation & jurisprudence ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Monitoring - standards ; Europe ; Humans ; Nanoparticles - adverse effects ; Nanoparticles - analysis ; Risk Assessment - legislation & jurisprudence ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water Supply - legislation & jurisprudence ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental monitoring, 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Nanna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieger, Khara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><title>Journal of environmental monitoring</title><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><description>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Environmental Health - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Environmental Health - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Health - standards</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - standards</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>1464-0325</issn><issn>1464-0333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoVqvgJ5CcxMtqskm63ZNIqX-g4EE9Ly_pSxvZZtcki_jtjbbq6c3hN_OGIeSMsyvORH2ta1ZXgsEeOeJyIgsmhNj_06UakeMY3xhjomLlIRnxepoNjB2R_hlTcn5F0xpp6zYuRWq7QNGvnEcMuKQefNdDSM60GKnzdD6ErkfwNA7BgkH6AQlDpAWFgNQMIaBPFPo-dGDW2fMj--AydnNCDiy0EU93d0xe7-Yvs4di8XT_OLtdFCZ3T4XQXDHkU1SyZFYu5VRLhVoZVpWcA7fGKtDC1MBNprQGgNqKSivJVCWsGJOLbW5-_T5gTM3GRYNtCx67ITZlHq6c1DKDl1vQhC7GgLbJTTcQPhvOmu91m991M3q-yxz0Bpf_4G5O8QU10Xa7</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Baun, Anders</creator><creator>Hartmann, Nanna B</creator><creator>Grieger, Khara D</creator><creator>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><author>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Environmental Health - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Environmental Health - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Health - standards</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - standards</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Nanna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieger, Khara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baun, Anders</au><au>Hartmann, Nanna B</au><au>Grieger, Khara D</au><au>Hansen, Steffen Foss</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1774-1781</pages><issn>1464-0325</issn><eissn>1464-0333</eissn><abstract>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>19809700</pmid><doi>10.1039/b909730a</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-0325 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental monitoring, 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781 |
issn | 1464-0325 1464-0333 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21032694 |
source | MEDLINE; Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Environmental Health - legislation & jurisprudence Environmental Health - methods Environmental Health - standards Environmental Monitoring - legislation & jurisprudence Environmental Monitoring - methods Environmental Monitoring - standards Europe Humans Nanoparticles - adverse effects Nanoparticles - analysis Risk Assessment - legislation & jurisprudence Risk Assessment - methods Risk Assessment - standards Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards Water Supply - analysis Water Supply - legislation & jurisprudence Water Supply - standards |
title | Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20the%20limits%20for%20engineered%20nanoparticles%20in%20European%20surface%20waters%20-%20are%20current%20approaches%20appropriate?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20monitoring&rft.au=Baun,%20Anders&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1774-1781&rft.issn=1464-0325&rft.eissn=1464-0333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/b909730a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21032694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21032694&rft_id=info:pmid/19809700&rfr_iscdi=true |