Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?

The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental monitoring 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781
Hauptverfasser: Baun, Anders, Hartmann, Nanna B, Grieger, Khara D, Hansen, Steffen Foss
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1781
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1774
container_title Journal of environmental monitoring
container_volume 11
creator Baun, Anders
Hartmann, Nanna B
Grieger, Khara D
Hansen, Steffen Foss
description The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/b909730a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21032694</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21032694</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoVqvgJ5CcxMtqskm63ZNIqX-g4EE9Ly_pSxvZZtcki_jtjbbq6c3hN_OGIeSMsyvORH2ta1ZXgsEeOeJyIgsmhNj_06UakeMY3xhjomLlIRnxepoNjB2R_hlTcn5F0xpp6zYuRWq7QNGvnEcMuKQefNdDSM60GKnzdD6ErkfwNA7BgkH6AQlDpAWFgNQMIaBPFPo-dGDW2fMj--AydnNCDiy0EU93d0xe7-Yvs4di8XT_OLtdFCZ3T4XQXDHkU1SyZFYu5VRLhVoZVpWcA7fGKtDC1MBNprQGgNqKSivJVCWsGJOLbW5-_T5gTM3GRYNtCx67ITZlHq6c1DKDl1vQhC7GgLbJTTcQPhvOmu91m991M3q-yxz0Bpf_4G5O8QU10Xa7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21032694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</creator><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><description>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-0325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-0333</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/b909730a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19809700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; Environmental Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Environmental Health - methods ; Environmental Health - standards ; Environmental Monitoring - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental Monitoring - standards ; Europe ; Humans ; Nanoparticles - adverse effects ; Nanoparticles - analysis ; Risk Assessment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Assessment - standards ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water Supply - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental monitoring, 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19809700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Nanna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieger, Khara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><title>Journal of environmental monitoring</title><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><description>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Environmental Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Environmental Health - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Health - standards</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - standards</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nanoparticles - analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - standards</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>1464-0325</issn><issn>1464-0333</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEUxIMoVqvgJ5CcxMtqskm63ZNIqX-g4EE9Ly_pSxvZZtcki_jtjbbq6c3hN_OGIeSMsyvORH2ta1ZXgsEeOeJyIgsmhNj_06UakeMY3xhjomLlIRnxepoNjB2R_hlTcn5F0xpp6zYuRWq7QNGvnEcMuKQefNdDSM60GKnzdD6ErkfwNA7BgkH6AQlDpAWFgNQMIaBPFPo-dGDW2fMj--AydnNCDiy0EU93d0xe7-Yvs4di8XT_OLtdFCZ3T4XQXDHkU1SyZFYu5VRLhVoZVpWcA7fGKtDC1MBNprQGgNqKSivJVCWsGJOLbW5-_T5gTM3GRYNtCx67ITZlHq6c1DKDl1vQhC7GgLbJTTcQPhvOmu91m991M3q-yxz0Bpf_4G5O8QU10Xa7</recordid><startdate>20091001</startdate><enddate>20091001</enddate><creator>Baun, Anders</creator><creator>Hartmann, Nanna B</creator><creator>Grieger, Khara D</creator><creator>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091001</creationdate><title>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</title><author>Baun, Anders ; Hartmann, Nanna B ; Grieger, Khara D ; Hansen, Steffen Foss</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3b150e18e5420f4d48b45eb5c07211a1fcf5ab3c9a1c18ebbaaa9f37b540573f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Environmental Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Environmental Health - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Health - standards</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - standards</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nanoparticles - analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - standards</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baun, Anders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartmann, Nanna B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieger, Khara D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Steffen Foss</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baun, Anders</au><au>Hartmann, Nanna B</au><au>Grieger, Khara D</au><au>Hansen, Steffen Foss</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Monit</addtitle><date>2009-10-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1774</spage><epage>1781</epage><pages>1774-1781</pages><issn>1464-0325</issn><eissn>1464-0333</eissn><abstract>The current widespread and diverse use of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in consumer products is expected to result in direct and indirect emissions to the aquatic environment. In Europe, the Water Framework Directive (WFD) is responsible for maintaining a good chemical and ecological status of surface waters. This review provides an insight to the likely scenarios if an engineered nanoparticle should be considered a "priority substance" in the WFD. Through a brief literature review of the aquatic toxicity of carbon- and metal-containing ENPs and in light of principles to establish environmental quality standards, we conclude that it is impossible to set limit values for ENPs in surface waters now and in the foreseeable future. This is due to the extensive lack of knowledge not only in relation to unknown toxic effects, degradability, and bioaccumulation of ENPs in the aquatic environment, but also due to the questionable validity of test systems and methods to establish environmental quality standards (EQS). From this, we also suggest some paths to follow to compensate for these knowledge gaps which include environmental monitoring and a closer look at the use of ENPs in consumer products.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>19809700</pmid><doi>10.1039/b909730a</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-0325
ispartof Journal of environmental monitoring, 2009-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1774-1781
issn 1464-0325
1464-0333
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21032694
source MEDLINE; Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Environmental Health - legislation & jurisprudence
Environmental Health - methods
Environmental Health - standards
Environmental Monitoring - legislation & jurisprudence
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental Monitoring - standards
Europe
Humans
Nanoparticles - adverse effects
Nanoparticles - analysis
Risk Assessment - legislation & jurisprudence
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Assessment - standards
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - standards
Water Supply - analysis
Water Supply - legislation & jurisprudence
Water Supply - standards
title Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters - are current approaches appropriate?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A52%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20the%20limits%20for%20engineered%20nanoparticles%20in%20European%20surface%20waters%20-%20are%20current%20approaches%20appropriate?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20monitoring&rft.au=Baun,%20Anders&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1774&rft.epage=1781&rft.pages=1774-1781&rft.issn=1464-0325&rft.eissn=1464-0333&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/b909730a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21032694%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21032694&rft_id=info:pmid/19809700&rfr_iscdi=true