Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters

ABSTRACTGadomski, SJ, Ratamess, NA, and Cutrufello, PT. Range of motion adaptations in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The aim of this study was to investigate range of motion (ROM) and training patterns in powerlifters. Upper- and lower-extremity passive ROMs were assessed thro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2018-11, Vol.32 (11), p.3020-3028
Hauptverfasser: Gadomski, Stephen J, Ratamess, Nicholas A, Cutrufello, Paul T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3028
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3020
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 32
creator Gadomski, Stephen J
Ratamess, Nicholas A
Cutrufello, Paul T
description ABSTRACTGadomski, SJ, Ratamess, NA, and Cutrufello, PT. Range of motion adaptations in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The aim of this study was to investigate range of motion (ROM) and training patterns in powerlifters. Upper- and lower-extremity passive ROMs were assessed through goniometry in 15 male powerlifters (35.3 ± 13.7 years) and 15 age-matched controls (34.9 ± 14.6 years). The Apley scratch test and modified Thomas test were used to assess ROM across multiple joints. Training frequency, stretching frequency, and exercise selection were recorded using questionnaires. Passive glenohumeral (GH) extension, internal rotation, and external rotation ROM were significantly decreased in powerlifters (p < 0.050). Powerlifters displayed decreased ROM in the Apley scratch test in both dominant (p = 0.015) and nondominant (p = 0.025) arms. However, knee extension angle was markedly improved in powerlifters (20.3 ± 7.3°) compared with controls (29.9 ± 6.2°; p < 0.001). Bench press and bench press variations accounted for 74.8% of all upper-body exercises, whereas back squat and deadlift accounted for 79.7% of all lower-body exercises in powerliftersʼ training programs. To determine whether existing ROM adaptations were seen in elite powerlifters, the powerlifting cohort was split into 3 groups based on Wilks score500 (high). GH ROM limitations were more pronounced in elite powerlifters (Wilks >500), who had more powerlifting experience (p = 0.048) and greater lean body mass (p = 0.040). Overall, powerlifters displayed decreased GH ROM, but increased hamstring ROM, after training programs that were heavily focused on the bench press, back squat, and deadlift.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002824
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2102921167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2162745850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-6927758f8f73df5f3753f79179622908274cc26a17f3cfb5f17086a3f2618c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gciCF0G25jvZYyl-UlH8OIc0TezW7aZNdin-e1NaRXpwLjOHZ94ZHgBOEewjhoqrh9dhH_4pLDHdA13ECMkplmI_zZDTXEKEOuAoxlliGGPkEHQIxJByJrrg8kXXHzbzLnv0TenrbDDRi0avx5iVdfbsVzZUpWtsiMfgwOkq2pNt74H3m-u34V0-erq9Hw5GuSGS0pwXWAgmnXSCTBxzRDDiRIFEwTEuoMSCGoO5RsIR48bMIQEl18RhjqTBlvTAxSZ3EfyytbFR8zIaW1W6tr6NCiOIC4wQFwk930Fnvg11-i5RPF1iksFE0Q1lgo8xWKcWoZzr8KUQVGuZKslUuzLT2tk2vB3P7eR36cdeAuQGWPlqLeizapMtNbW6aqb_Z38DX_98hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2162745850</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Gadomski, Stephen J ; Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Cutrufello, Paul T</creator><creatorcontrib>Gadomski, Stephen J ; Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Cutrufello, Paul T</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTGadomski, SJ, Ratamess, NA, and Cutrufello, PT. Range of motion adaptations in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The aim of this study was to investigate range of motion (ROM) and training patterns in powerlifters. Upper- and lower-extremity passive ROMs were assessed through goniometry in 15 male powerlifters (35.3 ± 13.7 years) and 15 age-matched controls (34.9 ± 14.6 years). The Apley scratch test and modified Thomas test were used to assess ROM across multiple joints. Training frequency, stretching frequency, and exercise selection were recorded using questionnaires. Passive glenohumeral (GH) extension, internal rotation, and external rotation ROM were significantly decreased in powerlifters (p &lt; 0.050). Powerlifters displayed decreased ROM in the Apley scratch test in both dominant (p = 0.015) and nondominant (p = 0.025) arms. However, knee extension angle was markedly improved in powerlifters (20.3 ± 7.3°) compared with controls (29.9 ± 6.2°; p &lt; 0.001). Bench press and bench press variations accounted for 74.8% of all upper-body exercises, whereas back squat and deadlift accounted for 79.7% of all lower-body exercises in powerliftersʼ training programs. To determine whether existing ROM adaptations were seen in elite powerlifters, the powerlifting cohort was split into 3 groups based on Wilks score&lt;400 (low), 400–500 (intermediate), and &gt;500 (high). GH ROM limitations were more pronounced in elite powerlifters (Wilks &gt;500), who had more powerlifting experience (p = 0.048) and greater lean body mass (p = 0.040). Overall, powerlifters displayed decreased GH ROM, but increased hamstring ROM, after training programs that were heavily focused on the bench press, back squat, and deadlift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002824</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30204657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Body Composition ; Body mass ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Exercise Therapy ; Humans ; Knee ; Lean body mass ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Posture ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Rotation ; Strength training ; Weight Lifting - physiology ; Weightlifting ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2018-11, Vol.32 (11), p.3020-3028</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-6927758f8f73df5f3753f79179622908274cc26a17f3cfb5f17086a3f2618c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-6927758f8f73df5f3753f79179622908274cc26a17f3cfb5f17086a3f2618c2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30204657$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gadomski, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrufello, Paul T</creatorcontrib><title>Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTGadomski, SJ, Ratamess, NA, and Cutrufello, PT. Range of motion adaptations in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The aim of this study was to investigate range of motion (ROM) and training patterns in powerlifters. Upper- and lower-extremity passive ROMs were assessed through goniometry in 15 male powerlifters (35.3 ± 13.7 years) and 15 age-matched controls (34.9 ± 14.6 years). The Apley scratch test and modified Thomas test were used to assess ROM across multiple joints. Training frequency, stretching frequency, and exercise selection were recorded using questionnaires. Passive glenohumeral (GH) extension, internal rotation, and external rotation ROM were significantly decreased in powerlifters (p &lt; 0.050). Powerlifters displayed decreased ROM in the Apley scratch test in both dominant (p = 0.015) and nondominant (p = 0.025) arms. However, knee extension angle was markedly improved in powerlifters (20.3 ± 7.3°) compared with controls (29.9 ± 6.2°; p &lt; 0.001). Bench press and bench press variations accounted for 74.8% of all upper-body exercises, whereas back squat and deadlift accounted for 79.7% of all lower-body exercises in powerliftersʼ training programs. To determine whether existing ROM adaptations were seen in elite powerlifters, the powerlifting cohort was split into 3 groups based on Wilks score&lt;400 (low), 400–500 (intermediate), and &gt;500 (high). GH ROM limitations were more pronounced in elite powerlifters (Wilks &gt;500), who had more powerlifting experience (p = 0.048) and greater lean body mass (p = 0.040). Overall, powerlifters displayed decreased GH ROM, but increased hamstring ROM, after training programs that were heavily focused on the bench press, back squat, and deadlift.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Lean body mass</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Weight Lifting - physiology</subject><subject>Weightlifting</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlb_gciCF0G25jvZYyl-UlH8OIc0TezW7aZNdin-e1NaRXpwLjOHZ94ZHgBOEewjhoqrh9dhH_4pLDHdA13ECMkplmI_zZDTXEKEOuAoxlliGGPkEHQIxJByJrrg8kXXHzbzLnv0TenrbDDRi0avx5iVdfbsVzZUpWtsiMfgwOkq2pNt74H3m-u34V0-erq9Hw5GuSGS0pwXWAgmnXSCTBxzRDDiRIFEwTEuoMSCGoO5RsIR48bMIQEl18RhjqTBlvTAxSZ3EfyytbFR8zIaW1W6tr6NCiOIC4wQFwk930Fnvg11-i5RPF1iksFE0Q1lgo8xWKcWoZzr8KUQVGuZKslUuzLT2tk2vB3P7eR36cdeAuQGWPlqLeizapMtNbW6aqb_Z38DX_98hw</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Gadomski, Stephen J</creator><creator>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creator><creator>Cutrufello, Paul T</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters</title><author>Gadomski, Stephen J ; Ratamess, Nicholas A ; Cutrufello, Paul T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3844-6927758f8f73df5f3753f79179622908274cc26a17f3cfb5f17086a3f2618c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Lean body mass</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Weight Lifting - physiology</topic><topic>Weightlifting</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gadomski, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratamess, Nicholas A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutrufello, Paul T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gadomski, Stephen J</au><au>Ratamess, Nicholas A</au><au>Cutrufello, Paul T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3020</spage><epage>3028</epage><pages>3020-3028</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTGadomski, SJ, Ratamess, NA, and Cutrufello, PT. Range of motion adaptations in powerlifters. J Strength Cond Res XX(X)000–000, 2018—The aim of this study was to investigate range of motion (ROM) and training patterns in powerlifters. Upper- and lower-extremity passive ROMs were assessed through goniometry in 15 male powerlifters (35.3 ± 13.7 years) and 15 age-matched controls (34.9 ± 14.6 years). The Apley scratch test and modified Thomas test were used to assess ROM across multiple joints. Training frequency, stretching frequency, and exercise selection were recorded using questionnaires. Passive glenohumeral (GH) extension, internal rotation, and external rotation ROM were significantly decreased in powerlifters (p &lt; 0.050). Powerlifters displayed decreased ROM in the Apley scratch test in both dominant (p = 0.015) and nondominant (p = 0.025) arms. However, knee extension angle was markedly improved in powerlifters (20.3 ± 7.3°) compared with controls (29.9 ± 6.2°; p &lt; 0.001). Bench press and bench press variations accounted for 74.8% of all upper-body exercises, whereas back squat and deadlift accounted for 79.7% of all lower-body exercises in powerliftersʼ training programs. To determine whether existing ROM adaptations were seen in elite powerlifters, the powerlifting cohort was split into 3 groups based on Wilks score&lt;400 (low), 400–500 (intermediate), and &gt;500 (high). GH ROM limitations were more pronounced in elite powerlifters (Wilks &gt;500), who had more powerlifting experience (p = 0.048) and greater lean body mass (p = 0.040). Overall, powerlifters displayed decreased GH ROM, but increased hamstring ROM, after training programs that were heavily focused on the bench press, back squat, and deadlift.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>30204657</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000002824</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2018-11, Vol.32 (11), p.3020-3028
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2102921167
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adaptation
Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Body Composition
Body mass
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise Therapy
Humans
Knee
Lean body mass
Male
Middle Aged
Posture
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular
Rotation
Strength training
Weight Lifting - physiology
Weightlifting
Young Adult
title Range of Motion Adaptations in Powerlifters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A41%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Range%20of%20Motion%20Adaptations%20in%20Powerlifters&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Gadomski,%20Stephen%20J&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3020&rft.epage=3028&rft.pages=3020-3028&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002824&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2162745850%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2162745850&rft_id=info:pmid/30204657&rfr_iscdi=true