Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit

OBJECTIVES:Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otology & neurotology 2018-10, Vol.39 (9), p.e803-e809
Hauptverfasser: Prejban, David A, Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan, Arnoldner, Christoph, Liepins, Rudolfs, Honeder, Clemens, Kaider, Alexandra, Gstöttner, Wolfgang, Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter, Riss, Dominik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e809
container_issue 9
container_start_page e803
container_title Otology & neurotology
container_volume 39
creator Prejban, David A
Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan
Arnoldner, Christoph
Liepins, Rudolfs
Honeder, Clemens
Kaider, Alexandra
Gstöttner, Wolfgang
Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
Riss, Dominik
description OBJECTIVES:Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. METHODS:Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. RESULTS:An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. CONCLUSION:Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2102321717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2102321717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-2165a4ea0193ae341b493cba82cfea41863c695a8480dedc564e70abbabf5bbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkVtPGzEQha2qqIHAP6gqP_Zlwde99C0N5SIFgRR4XtnObNeps7u1vY349zgQoMIvY1nnnPF8g9BXSk4pqYqzm9ntKfnv0Crnn9AhlbzIhCTy8_OdZgVl1QQdhbBOmoLL4gua8KSuRFUeou3Sdr8d4KVdwQqfg2rwvDetA-Xx9WZwqov4IYAP2HY4toDPbdNYM7qIFzZE6JI9meOoou27H3g5AJgW34E3MOyesOpWeDnqNZho_wH-CR00Nh6jg0a5ACf7OkUPF7_u51fZ4vbyej5bZIZLlmeM5lIJUOm_XAEXVIuKG61KZhpQgpY5N3klVSlKkgYwMhdQEKW10o3UGvgUfX_JHXz_d4QQ640NBlwaDPox1IwSxhktEpkpEi9S4_sQPDT14O1G-ceaknqHvE7I64_Ik-3bvsOoN7B6M70yfs_d9i4mkn_cuAVft6BcbFNe2o-oWMYILekuNdsl5_wJXYmMvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2102321717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Prejban, David A ; Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan ; Arnoldner, Christoph ; Liepins, Rudolfs ; Honeder, Clemens ; Kaider, Alexandra ; Gstöttner, Wolfgang ; Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter ; Riss, Dominik</creator><creatorcontrib>Prejban, David A ; Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan ; Arnoldner, Christoph ; Liepins, Rudolfs ; Honeder, Clemens ; Kaider, Alexandra ; Gstöttner, Wolfgang ; Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter ; Riss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES:Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. METHODS:Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. RESULTS:An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. CONCLUSION:Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-7129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30199498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by Otology &amp; Neurotology, Inc. Image copyright Wolters Kluwer Health/Anatomical Chart Company</publisher><ispartof>Otology &amp; neurotology, 2018-10, Vol.39 (9), p.e803-e809</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by Otology &amp; Neurotology, Inc. Image copyright © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health/Anatomical Chart Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-2165a4ea0193ae341b493cba82cfea41863c695a8480dedc564e70abbabf5bbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-2165a4ea0193ae341b493cba82cfea41863c695a8480dedc564e70abbabf5bbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30199498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prejban, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoldner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liepins, Rudolfs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeder, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaider, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gstöttner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><title>Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit</title><title>Otology &amp; neurotology</title><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES:Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. METHODS:Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. RESULTS:An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. CONCLUSION:Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.</description><issn>1531-7129</issn><issn>1537-4505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkVtPGzEQha2qqIHAP6gqP_Zlwde99C0N5SIFgRR4XtnObNeps7u1vY349zgQoMIvY1nnnPF8g9BXSk4pqYqzm9ntKfnv0Crnn9AhlbzIhCTy8_OdZgVl1QQdhbBOmoLL4gua8KSuRFUeou3Sdr8d4KVdwQqfg2rwvDetA-Xx9WZwqov4IYAP2HY4toDPbdNYM7qIFzZE6JI9meOoou27H3g5AJgW34E3MOyesOpWeDnqNZho_wH-CR00Nh6jg0a5ACf7OkUPF7_u51fZ4vbyej5bZIZLlmeM5lIJUOm_XAEXVIuKG61KZhpQgpY5N3klVSlKkgYwMhdQEKW10o3UGvgUfX_JHXz_d4QQ640NBlwaDPox1IwSxhktEpkpEi9S4_sQPDT14O1G-ceaknqHvE7I64_Ik-3bvsOoN7B6M70yfs_d9i4mkn_cuAVft6BcbFNe2o-oWMYILekuNdsl5_wJXYmMvQ</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Prejban, David A</creator><creator>Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan</creator><creator>Arnoldner, Christoph</creator><creator>Liepins, Rudolfs</creator><creator>Honeder, Clemens</creator><creator>Kaider, Alexandra</creator><creator>Gstöttner, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter</creator><creator>Riss, Dominik</creator><general>Copyright by Otology &amp; Neurotology, Inc. Image copyright Wolters Kluwer Health/Anatomical Chart Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit</title><author>Prejban, David A ; Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan ; Arnoldner, Christoph ; Liepins, Rudolfs ; Honeder, Clemens ; Kaider, Alexandra ; Gstöttner, Wolfgang ; Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter ; Riss, Dominik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3526-2165a4ea0193ae341b493cba82cfea41863c695a8480dedc564e70abbabf5bbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prejban, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoldner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liepins, Rudolfs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honeder, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaider, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gstöttner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riss, Dominik</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prejban, David A</au><au>Hamzavi, Jafar-Sasan</au><au>Arnoldner, Christoph</au><au>Liepins, Rudolfs</au><au>Honeder, Clemens</au><au>Kaider, Alexandra</au><au>Gstöttner, Wolfgang</au><au>Baumgartner, Wolf-Dieter</au><au>Riss, Dominik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit</atitle><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e803</spage><epage>e809</epage><pages>e803-e809</pages><issn>1531-7129</issn><eissn>1537-4505</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES:Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have great difficulties in listening situations which rely on binaural auditory processing. The purpose of this study was to examine to which extent a cochlear implant (CI) can improve speech perception outcomes in various noisy listening environments. Additionally, the ability to use interaural level differences for sound localization and subjective benefit with the CI were assessed. METHODS:Ten single-sided deaf patients with CI were tested in different loudspeaker configurations with and without the CI. A multi-source noise field (MSNF) with uncorrelated noise from four different directions was used in addition to a setup with the signal from the CI side and noise from the normal-hearing side (SCINNH, azimuth of ±45 degrees). Ten normal-hearing subjects were used as a control for the setup. Speech understanding was measured by an adaptive sentence test (Oldenburg Sentence Test, OLSA) in stationary speech shaped noise and temporally modulated noise to assess the benefit in each listening situation. Sensitivity to interaural level differences was measured in a lateralization experiment. Furthermore, patients completed the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSS) questionnaire to assess subjective benefit with the CI. RESULTS:An overall average benefit in speech reception threshold (SRT) of 1.6 dB (±0.6 dB standard error of the mean [SEM]) was observed in the binaural listening condition (with CI) in all conditions. In the MSNF setup thresholds improved by 0.4 dB (±0.5 dB SEM) and in the SCINNH configuration by 2.7 dB (±0.7 dB SEM). The choice of masking noise effect also had a significant effect on the SRT outcome. The lateralization performance of the SSD users was on a par with the normal hearing group. BBSS scores reflect the overall benefit with the CI apparent in the speech test results. CONCLUSION:Patients with single-sided deafness do benefit from a CI in difficult listening environments and are able to localize sound based on interaural level differences. Considering these outcomes, cochlear implantation represents a promising treatment option for patients with single-sided deafness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by Otology &amp; Neurotology, Inc. Image copyright Wolters Kluwer Health/Anatomical Chart Company</pub><pmid>30199498</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-7129
ispartof Otology & neurotology, 2018-10, Vol.39 (9), p.e803-e809
issn 1531-7129
1537-4505
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2102321717
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A59%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single%20Sided%20Deaf%20Cochlear%20Implant%20Users%20in%20the%20Difficult%20Listening%20Situation:%20Speech%20Perception%20and%20Subjective%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=Otology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Prejban,%20David%20A&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e803&rft.epage=e809&rft.pages=e803-e809&rft.issn=1531-7129&rft.eissn=1537-4505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001963&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2102321717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2102321717&rft_id=info:pmid/30199498&rfr_iscdi=true