Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America
Tectonic processes, flexure due to crustal loading, and dynamic mantle flow each impart a unique imprint on topography and geomorphic responses over time scales of 104 to 106 yr. This paper explores the mobility of regional drainage divides as a key geomorphic metric that can distinguish between the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.) Colo.), 2007-08, Vol.3 (4), p.272-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 272 |
container_title | Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.) |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Wegmann, Karl W Zurek, Brian D Regalla, Christine A Bilardello, Dario Wollenberg, Jennifer L Kopczynski, Sarah E Ziemann, Joseph M Haight, Shannon L Apgar, Jeremy D Zhao, Cheng Pazzaglia, Frank J |
description | Tectonic processes, flexure due to crustal loading, and dynamic mantle flow each impart a unique imprint on topography and geomorphic responses over time scales of 104 to 106 yr. This paper explores the mobility of regional drainage divides as a key geomorphic metric that can distinguish between the various processes driving crustal deformation in the greater Yellowstone region of the northwestern United States. We propose a new analysis that quantifies the differences between the location of the present-day drainage divide from divides synthetically generated from filtered topography to determine the relative impact of tectonic and dynamic mantle influences on landscape development. The greater Yellowstone region is an opportune location for this investigation because contrasting models have been proposed to explain the parabolic shape of elevated topography and active seismicity that outline the imprint of hypothesized hotspot activity. Drainage divides synthesized from topography filtered at 50, 100, and 150 km wavelengths within the greater Yellowstone region show that the locations of the actual and synthetic Snake River drainage divides are controlled by both dynamic and flexural mechanisms in the eastern greater Yellowstone region, but by flexural mechanisms only in the western greater Yellowstone region. The location of the actual divide deviates from its predicted position in the filtered topography where tectonic controls, such as active faults (e.g., Centennial and Teton faults), have uplifted large footwall blocks. Our results are consistent with the notion of a northeastward-propagating greater Yellowstone region topographic and seismic parabola, and suggest that Basin and Range extension follows from, rather than precedes, greater Yellowstone region dynamic topography. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that eastward migration of the Snake River drainage divide lags behind the continued northeastward propagation of high-standing topography associated with the Yellowstone geophysical anomaly by 1-2 m.y. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1130/GES00083.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21020432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19551285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e7ea94b503179f2043440c221be1d749403183bb9e95f98a9408458364e7ce1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PAyEQhjdGEz8v_gJOHtTqsIALR2NqNTFq_Ej0RCg721JbUNja9Ef4n6VWE2-9AMk8PPNmpij2KZxQyuC0130EAMlO6FqxRYVgHeDwsv7vvVlspzQCYEqwcqv4ug_JtS54EhrSDpE8evOG5MF9YiQz02JMQ6xJ7T5djcQkYjxxvnbWtCEu_gww1HNvJs6S9xgspoQpEz-uQcSFgbzieBxmqQ0eScRB7nZMZphyyZPbENshOZ9gzM7dYqMx44R7v_dO8XzZfbq46tzc9a4vzm86hlPVdrBCo3hfAKOVakrgjHOwZUn7SOuKK54LkvX7CpVolMwsSC4kO-NYWaTIdoqDpTdH_pjmJHriks0pjccwTbqksLCWq0FgQGU-V4FUCUFLKTJ4uARtDClFbPR7dBMT55qCXuxQ_-1Q0wwfLeE85WQdeouzEMe1HoVp9HlCOQBUGmQlK8W-AS4Znjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19551285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wegmann, Karl W ; Zurek, Brian D ; Regalla, Christine A ; Bilardello, Dario ; Wollenberg, Jennifer L ; Kopczynski, Sarah E ; Ziemann, Joseph M ; Haight, Shannon L ; Apgar, Jeremy D ; Zhao, Cheng ; Pazzaglia, Frank J</creator><creatorcontrib>Wegmann, Karl W ; Zurek, Brian D ; Regalla, Christine A ; Bilardello, Dario ; Wollenberg, Jennifer L ; Kopczynski, Sarah E ; Ziemann, Joseph M ; Haight, Shannon L ; Apgar, Jeremy D ; Zhao, Cheng ; Pazzaglia, Frank J</creatorcontrib><description>Tectonic processes, flexure due to crustal loading, and dynamic mantle flow each impart a unique imprint on topography and geomorphic responses over time scales of 104 to 106 yr. This paper explores the mobility of regional drainage divides as a key geomorphic metric that can distinguish between the various processes driving crustal deformation in the greater Yellowstone region of the northwestern United States. We propose a new analysis that quantifies the differences between the location of the present-day drainage divide from divides synthetically generated from filtered topography to determine the relative impact of tectonic and dynamic mantle influences on landscape development. The greater Yellowstone region is an opportune location for this investigation because contrasting models have been proposed to explain the parabolic shape of elevated topography and active seismicity that outline the imprint of hypothesized hotspot activity. Drainage divides synthesized from topography filtered at 50, 100, and 150 km wavelengths within the greater Yellowstone region show that the locations of the actual and synthetic Snake River drainage divides are controlled by both dynamic and flexural mechanisms in the eastern greater Yellowstone region, but by flexural mechanisms only in the western greater Yellowstone region. The location of the actual divide deviates from its predicted position in the filtered topography where tectonic controls, such as active faults (e.g., Centennial and Teton faults), have uplifted large footwall blocks. Our results are consistent with the notion of a northeastward-propagating greater Yellowstone region topographic and seismic parabola, and suggest that Basin and Range extension follows from, rather than precedes, greater Yellowstone region dynamic topography. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that eastward migration of the Snake River drainage divide lags behind the continued northeastward propagation of high-standing topography associated with the Yellowstone geophysical anomaly by 1-2 m.y.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-040X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-040X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1130/GES00083.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Geological Society of America</publisher><subject>applied (geophysical surveys & methods) ; body waves ; Bouguer anomalies ; continental crust ; crust ; deformation ; digital terrain models ; drainage basins ; effects ; elastic waves ; elevation ; Freshwater ; geodynamics ; geographic information systems ; geomorphology ; Geophysics ; gravity anomalies ; Idaho ; information systems ; magmatism ; mantle ; observations ; P-waves ; prediction ; radar methods ; remote sensing ; satellite methods ; seismic waves ; sensitivity analysis ; Snake River ; Snake River plain ; tectonics ; temporal distribution ; thickness ; topography ; United States ; variations ; velocity ; Western U.S ; Wyoming ; Yellowstone Hot Spot</subject><ispartof>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.), 2007-08, Vol.3 (4), p.272-281</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Reference includes data supplied by the Geological Society of America @Boulder, CO @USA @United States</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e7ea94b503179f2043440c221be1d749403183bb9e95f98a9408458364e7ce1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e7ea94b503179f2043440c221be1d749403183bb9e95f98a9408458364e7ce1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wegmann, Karl W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurek, Brian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regalla, Christine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilardello, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenberg, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopczynski, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemann, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apgar, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazzaglia, Frank J</creatorcontrib><title>Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America</title><title>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</title><description>Tectonic processes, flexure due to crustal loading, and dynamic mantle flow each impart a unique imprint on topography and geomorphic responses over time scales of 104 to 106 yr. This paper explores the mobility of regional drainage divides as a key geomorphic metric that can distinguish between the various processes driving crustal deformation in the greater Yellowstone region of the northwestern United States. We propose a new analysis that quantifies the differences between the location of the present-day drainage divide from divides synthetically generated from filtered topography to determine the relative impact of tectonic and dynamic mantle influences on landscape development. The greater Yellowstone region is an opportune location for this investigation because contrasting models have been proposed to explain the parabolic shape of elevated topography and active seismicity that outline the imprint of hypothesized hotspot activity. Drainage divides synthesized from topography filtered at 50, 100, and 150 km wavelengths within the greater Yellowstone region show that the locations of the actual and synthetic Snake River drainage divides are controlled by both dynamic and flexural mechanisms in the eastern greater Yellowstone region, but by flexural mechanisms only in the western greater Yellowstone region. The location of the actual divide deviates from its predicted position in the filtered topography where tectonic controls, such as active faults (e.g., Centennial and Teton faults), have uplifted large footwall blocks. Our results are consistent with the notion of a northeastward-propagating greater Yellowstone region topographic and seismic parabola, and suggest that Basin and Range extension follows from, rather than precedes, greater Yellowstone region dynamic topography. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that eastward migration of the Snake River drainage divide lags behind the continued northeastward propagation of high-standing topography associated with the Yellowstone geophysical anomaly by 1-2 m.y.</description><subject>applied (geophysical surveys & methods)</subject><subject>body waves</subject><subject>Bouguer anomalies</subject><subject>continental crust</subject><subject>crust</subject><subject>deformation</subject><subject>digital terrain models</subject><subject>drainage basins</subject><subject>effects</subject><subject>elastic waves</subject><subject>elevation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>geodynamics</subject><subject>geographic information systems</subject><subject>geomorphology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>gravity anomalies</subject><subject>Idaho</subject><subject>information systems</subject><subject>magmatism</subject><subject>mantle</subject><subject>observations</subject><subject>P-waves</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>radar methods</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>satellite methods</subject><subject>seismic waves</subject><subject>sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Snake River</subject><subject>Snake River plain</subject><subject>tectonics</subject><subject>temporal distribution</subject><subject>thickness</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>variations</subject><subject>velocity</subject><subject>Western U.S</subject><subject>Wyoming</subject><subject>Yellowstone Hot Spot</subject><issn>1553-040X</issn><issn>1553-040X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1PAyEQhjdGEz8v_gJOHtTqsIALR2NqNTFq_Ej0RCg721JbUNja9Ef4n6VWE2-9AMk8PPNmpij2KZxQyuC0130EAMlO6FqxRYVgHeDwsv7vvVlspzQCYEqwcqv4ug_JtS54EhrSDpE8evOG5MF9YiQz02JMQ6xJ7T5djcQkYjxxvnbWtCEu_gww1HNvJs6S9xgspoQpEz-uQcSFgbzieBxmqQ0eScRB7nZMZphyyZPbENshOZ9gzM7dYqMx44R7v_dO8XzZfbq46tzc9a4vzm86hlPVdrBCo3hfAKOVakrgjHOwZUn7SOuKK54LkvX7CpVolMwsSC4kO-NYWaTIdoqDpTdH_pjmJHriks0pjccwTbqksLCWq0FgQGU-V4FUCUFLKTJ4uARtDClFbPR7dBMT55qCXuxQ_-1Q0wwfLeE85WQdeouzEMe1HoVp9HlCOQBUGmQlK8W-AS4Znjg</recordid><startdate>20070801</startdate><enddate>20070801</enddate><creator>Wegmann, Karl W</creator><creator>Zurek, Brian D</creator><creator>Regalla, Christine A</creator><creator>Bilardello, Dario</creator><creator>Wollenberg, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Kopczynski, Sarah E</creator><creator>Ziemann, Joseph M</creator><creator>Haight, Shannon L</creator><creator>Apgar, Jeremy D</creator><creator>Zhao, Cheng</creator><creator>Pazzaglia, Frank J</creator><general>Geological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070801</creationdate><title>Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America</title><author>Wegmann, Karl W ; Zurek, Brian D ; Regalla, Christine A ; Bilardello, Dario ; Wollenberg, Jennifer L ; Kopczynski, Sarah E ; Ziemann, Joseph M ; Haight, Shannon L ; Apgar, Jeremy D ; Zhao, Cheng ; Pazzaglia, Frank J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e7ea94b503179f2043440c221be1d749403183bb9e95f98a9408458364e7ce1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>applied (geophysical surveys & methods)</topic><topic>body waves</topic><topic>Bouguer anomalies</topic><topic>continental crust</topic><topic>crust</topic><topic>deformation</topic><topic>digital terrain models</topic><topic>drainage basins</topic><topic>effects</topic><topic>elastic waves</topic><topic>elevation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>geodynamics</topic><topic>geographic information systems</topic><topic>geomorphology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>gravity anomalies</topic><topic>Idaho</topic><topic>information systems</topic><topic>magmatism</topic><topic>mantle</topic><topic>observations</topic><topic>P-waves</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>radar methods</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>satellite methods</topic><topic>seismic waves</topic><topic>sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Snake River</topic><topic>Snake River plain</topic><topic>tectonics</topic><topic>temporal distribution</topic><topic>thickness</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>variations</topic><topic>velocity</topic><topic>Western U.S</topic><topic>Wyoming</topic><topic>Yellowstone Hot Spot</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wegmann, Karl W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurek, Brian D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Regalla, Christine A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilardello, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wollenberg, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopczynski, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziemann, Joseph M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haight, Shannon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apgar, Jeremy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pazzaglia, Frank J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wegmann, Karl W</au><au>Zurek, Brian D</au><au>Regalla, Christine A</au><au>Bilardello, Dario</au><au>Wollenberg, Jennifer L</au><au>Kopczynski, Sarah E</au><au>Ziemann, Joseph M</au><au>Haight, Shannon L</au><au>Apgar, Jeremy D</au><au>Zhao, Cheng</au><au>Pazzaglia, Frank J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America</atitle><jtitle>Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2007-08-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>272-281</pages><issn>1553-040X</issn><eissn>1553-040X</eissn><abstract>Tectonic processes, flexure due to crustal loading, and dynamic mantle flow each impart a unique imprint on topography and geomorphic responses over time scales of 104 to 106 yr. This paper explores the mobility of regional drainage divides as a key geomorphic metric that can distinguish between the various processes driving crustal deformation in the greater Yellowstone region of the northwestern United States. We propose a new analysis that quantifies the differences between the location of the present-day drainage divide from divides synthetically generated from filtered topography to determine the relative impact of tectonic and dynamic mantle influences on landscape development. The greater Yellowstone region is an opportune location for this investigation because contrasting models have been proposed to explain the parabolic shape of elevated topography and active seismicity that outline the imprint of hypothesized hotspot activity. Drainage divides synthesized from topography filtered at 50, 100, and 150 km wavelengths within the greater Yellowstone region show that the locations of the actual and synthetic Snake River drainage divides are controlled by both dynamic and flexural mechanisms in the eastern greater Yellowstone region, but by flexural mechanisms only in the western greater Yellowstone region. The location of the actual divide deviates from its predicted position in the filtered topography where tectonic controls, such as active faults (e.g., Centennial and Teton faults), have uplifted large footwall blocks. Our results are consistent with the notion of a northeastward-propagating greater Yellowstone region topographic and seismic parabola, and suggest that Basin and Range extension follows from, rather than precedes, greater Yellowstone region dynamic topography. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that eastward migration of the Snake River drainage divide lags behind the continued northeastward propagation of high-standing topography associated with the Yellowstone geophysical anomaly by 1-2 m.y.</abstract><pub>Geological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1130/GES00083.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1553-040X |
ispartof | Geosphere (Boulder, Colo.), 2007-08, Vol.3 (4), p.272-281 |
issn | 1553-040X 1553-040X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21020432 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | applied (geophysical surveys & methods) body waves Bouguer anomalies continental crust crust deformation digital terrain models drainage basins effects elastic waves elevation Freshwater geodynamics geographic information systems geomorphology Geophysics gravity anomalies Idaho information systems magmatism mantle observations P-waves prediction radar methods remote sensing satellite methods seismic waves sensitivity analysis Snake River Snake River plain tectonics temporal distribution thickness topography United States variations velocity Western U.S Wyoming Yellowstone Hot Spot |
title | Position of the Snake River watershed divide as an indicator of geodynamic processes in the greater Yellowstone region, western North America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T19%3A12%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Position%20of%20the%20Snake%20River%20watershed%20divide%20as%20an%20indicator%20of%20geodynamic%20processes%20in%20the%20greater%20Yellowstone%20region,%20western%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Geosphere%20(Boulder,%20Colo.)&rft.au=Wegmann,%20Karl%20W&rft.date=2007-08-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=272-281&rft.issn=1553-040X&rft.eissn=1553-040X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1130/GES00083.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19551285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19551285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |