From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department

Most patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department (ED) do so with a peripheral intravenous catheter/cannula (PIVC). Many PIVCs develop postinsertion failure (PIF). To determine the independent factors predicting PIF after PIVC insertion in the ED. We analyzed data from a prospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2018-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1216-1221
Hauptverfasser: Carr, Peter J, Rippey, James C R, Cooke, Marie L, Higgins, Niall S, Trevenen, Michelle, Foale, Aileen, Rickard, Claire M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1221
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1216
container_title Infection control and hospital epidemiology
container_volume 39
creator Carr, Peter J
Rippey, James C R
Cooke, Marie L
Higgins, Niall S
Trevenen, Michelle
Foale, Aileen
Rickard, Claire M
description Most patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department (ED) do so with a peripheral intravenous catheter/cannula (PIVC). Many PIVCs develop postinsertion failure (PIF). To determine the independent factors predicting PIF after PIVC insertion in the ED. We analyzed data from a prospective clinical cohort study of ED-inserted PIVCs admitted to the hospital wards. Independent predictors of PIF were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. In 391 patients admitted from 2 EDs, the rate of PIF was 31% (n=118). The types of PIF identified were infiltration, occlusion, pain and/or peripheral intravenous assessment score >2 (ie, the hospital's assessment of PIVC phlebitis), and dislodgement (ie, accidental securement device failure or purposeful removal). Of the PIVCs that failed, infiltration and occlusion combined were the most common causes of PIF (n=55, 47%). The median PIVC dwell time was 28.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 17.4-50.8 hours). The following variables were associated with increased risk of PIF: being an older patient (for a 1-year increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03; P=.0001); having an Australian Triage Scale score of 1 or 2 compared to a score of 3, 4, or 5 (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-3.01; P=.0003); having an ultrasound-guided PIVC (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 2.11-20.1; P=.0011); having the PIVC inserted by a medical student (P=.0095); infection prevention breaches at insertion (P=.0326); and PIVC inserted in the ante cubital fossa or the back of hand compared to the upper arm (P=.0337). PIF remains at an unacceptable level in both traditionally inserted and ultrasound-inserted PIVCs.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ANZCTRN12615000588594).
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ice.2018.190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101919212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2787869088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c1082f39a2189cff968cf65d5ccccb3a0364e73c7dd8fc858456f9c763dd0a363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFvFSEUhYmxsa_VnWtD4saF84ThDQPumsa2Jk260cTdhMLFoRmGEZhn3m_xz3qbPruQzSXku-eQcwh5y9mWM95_Cha2LeNqyzV7QTa863Qjldi9JBumtG5UK36ckrNSHhhjvdb8FTkVjGvZa7Uhf65yijTMBXINaaY10Qwx7c30mV7QuE4V9ecKmZY17wO-UzOb6VBCocnjnRoXQ63gqE1jypX-DnWkC-SwjJARD3PNZg9zWgu1po6AYuXoiFsBPUegECH_hNkeqIPF5BrR9DU58WYq8OY4z8n3qy_fLm-a27vrr5cXt40VXNfGcqZaL7RpudLWey2V9bJzncVzLwwTcge9sL1zylvVqV0nvba9FM4xI6Q4Jx-edJecfq1Q6hBDsTBNZgb89dBizprrlreIvv8PfUhrxkCQ6lWvpGZKIfXxibI5lZLBD0sO0eTDwNnwWNqAoQ6PpQ1YGuLvjqLrfQT3DP9rSfwFvL2Wpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2787869088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Carr, Peter J ; Rippey, James C R ; Cooke, Marie L ; Higgins, Niall S ; Trevenen, Michelle ; Foale, Aileen ; Rickard, Claire M</creator><creatorcontrib>Carr, Peter J ; Rippey, James C R ; Cooke, Marie L ; Higgins, Niall S ; Trevenen, Michelle ; Foale, Aileen ; Rickard, Claire M</creatorcontrib><description>Most patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department (ED) do so with a peripheral intravenous catheter/cannula (PIVC). Many PIVCs develop postinsertion failure (PIF). To determine the independent factors predicting PIF after PIVC insertion in the ED. We analyzed data from a prospective clinical cohort study of ED-inserted PIVCs admitted to the hospital wards. Independent predictors of PIF were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. In 391 patients admitted from 2 EDs, the rate of PIF was 31% (n=118). The types of PIF identified were infiltration, occlusion, pain and/or peripheral intravenous assessment score &gt;2 (ie, the hospital's assessment of PIVC phlebitis), and dislodgement (ie, accidental securement device failure or purposeful removal). Of the PIVCs that failed, infiltration and occlusion combined were the most common causes of PIF (n=55, 47%). The median PIVC dwell time was 28.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 17.4-50.8 hours). The following variables were associated with increased risk of PIF: being an older patient (for a 1-year increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03; P=.0001); having an Australian Triage Scale score of 1 or 2 compared to a score of 3, 4, or 5 (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-3.01; P=.0003); having an ultrasound-guided PIVC (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 2.11-20.1; P=.0011); having the PIVC inserted by a medical student (P=.0095); infection prevention breaches at insertion (P=.0326); and PIVC inserted in the ante cubital fossa or the back of hand compared to the upper arm (P=.0337). PIF remains at an unacceptable level in both traditionally inserted and ultrasound-inserted PIVCs.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ANZCTRN12615000588594).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-823X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-6834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30196798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Australia ; Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation ; Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Catheters ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Data collection ; Device Removal ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Female ; Forearm ; Gender ; Hand ; Humans ; Infections ; Infiltration ; Intravenous therapy ; Male ; Medical instruments ; Medical students ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Phlebitis ; Phlebitis - etiology ; Phlebotomy ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Survival analysis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1216-1221</ispartof><rights>2018 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c1082f39a2189cff968cf65d5ccccb3a0364e73c7dd8fc858456f9c763dd0a363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c1082f39a2189cff968cf65d5ccccb3a0364e73c7dd8fc858456f9c763dd0a363</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4935-3256</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2787869088/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2787869088?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781,74045</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30196798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carr, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippey, James C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Marie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Niall S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trevenen, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foale, Aileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickard, Claire M</creatorcontrib><title>From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department</title><title>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</title><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Most patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department (ED) do so with a peripheral intravenous catheter/cannula (PIVC). Many PIVCs develop postinsertion failure (PIF). To determine the independent factors predicting PIF after PIVC insertion in the ED. We analyzed data from a prospective clinical cohort study of ED-inserted PIVCs admitted to the hospital wards. Independent predictors of PIF were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. In 391 patients admitted from 2 EDs, the rate of PIF was 31% (n=118). The types of PIF identified were infiltration, occlusion, pain and/or peripheral intravenous assessment score &gt;2 (ie, the hospital's assessment of PIVC phlebitis), and dislodgement (ie, accidental securement device failure or purposeful removal). Of the PIVCs that failed, infiltration and occlusion combined were the most common causes of PIF (n=55, 47%). The median PIVC dwell time was 28.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 17.4-50.8 hours). The following variables were associated with increased risk of PIF: being an older patient (for a 1-year increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03; P=.0001); having an Australian Triage Scale score of 1 or 2 compared to a score of 3, 4, or 5 (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-3.01; P=.0003); having an ultrasound-guided PIVC (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 2.11-20.1; P=.0011); having the PIVC inserted by a medical student (P=.0095); infection prevention breaches at insertion (P=.0326); and PIVC inserted in the ante cubital fossa or the back of hand compared to the upper arm (P=.0337). PIF remains at an unacceptable level in both traditionally inserted and ultrasound-inserted PIVCs.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ANZCTRN12615000588594).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Device Removal</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hand</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infiltration</subject><subject>Intravenous therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical instruments</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phlebitis</subject><subject>Phlebitis - etiology</subject><subject>Phlebotomy</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0899-823X</issn><issn>1559-6834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFvFSEUhYmxsa_VnWtD4saF84ThDQPumsa2Jk260cTdhMLFoRmGEZhn3m_xz3qbPruQzSXku-eQcwh5y9mWM95_Cha2LeNqyzV7QTa863Qjldi9JBumtG5UK36ckrNSHhhjvdb8FTkVjGvZa7Uhf65yijTMBXINaaY10Qwx7c30mV7QuE4V9ecKmZY17wO-UzOb6VBCocnjnRoXQ63gqE1jypX-DnWkC-SwjJARD3PNZg9zWgu1po6AYuXoiFsBPUegECH_hNkeqIPF5BrR9DU58WYq8OY4z8n3qy_fLm-a27vrr5cXt40VXNfGcqZaL7RpudLWey2V9bJzncVzLwwTcge9sL1zylvVqV0nvba9FM4xI6Q4Jx-edJecfq1Q6hBDsTBNZgb89dBizprrlreIvv8PfUhrxkCQ6lWvpGZKIfXxibI5lZLBD0sO0eTDwNnwWNqAoQ6PpQ1YGuLvjqLrfQT3DP9rSfwFvL2Wpg</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Carr, Peter J</creator><creator>Rippey, James C R</creator><creator>Cooke, Marie L</creator><creator>Higgins, Niall S</creator><creator>Trevenen, Michelle</creator><creator>Foale, Aileen</creator><creator>Rickard, Claire M</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4935-3256</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department</title><author>Carr, Peter J ; Rippey, James C R ; Cooke, Marie L ; Higgins, Niall S ; Trevenen, Michelle ; Foale, Aileen ; Rickard, Claire M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c1082f39a2189cff968cf65d5ccccb3a0364e73c7dd8fc858456f9c763dd0a363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Device Removal</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hand</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infiltration</topic><topic>Intravenous therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical instruments</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phlebitis</topic><topic>Phlebitis - etiology</topic><topic>Phlebotomy</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carr, Peter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippey, James C R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Marie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Niall S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trevenen, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foale, Aileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickard, Claire M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carr, Peter J</au><au>Rippey, James C R</au><au>Cooke, Marie L</au><au>Higgins, Niall S</au><au>Trevenen, Michelle</au><au>Foale, Aileen</au><au>Rickard, Claire M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Infection control and hospital epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1216</spage><epage>1221</epage><pages>1216-1221</pages><issn>0899-823X</issn><eissn>1559-6834</eissn><abstract>Most patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department (ED) do so with a peripheral intravenous catheter/cannula (PIVC). Many PIVCs develop postinsertion failure (PIF). To determine the independent factors predicting PIF after PIVC insertion in the ED. We analyzed data from a prospective clinical cohort study of ED-inserted PIVCs admitted to the hospital wards. Independent predictors of PIF were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. In 391 patients admitted from 2 EDs, the rate of PIF was 31% (n=118). The types of PIF identified were infiltration, occlusion, pain and/or peripheral intravenous assessment score &gt;2 (ie, the hospital's assessment of PIVC phlebitis), and dislodgement (ie, accidental securement device failure or purposeful removal). Of the PIVCs that failed, infiltration and occlusion combined were the most common causes of PIF (n=55, 47%). The median PIVC dwell time was 28.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 17.4-50.8 hours). The following variables were associated with increased risk of PIF: being an older patient (for a 1-year increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.03; P=.0001); having an Australian Triage Scale score of 1 or 2 compared to a score of 3, 4, or 5 (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.39-3.01; P=.0003); having an ultrasound-guided PIVC (HR, 6.52; 95% CI, 2.11-20.1; P=.0011); having the PIVC inserted by a medical student (P=.0095); infection prevention breaches at insertion (P=.0326); and PIVC inserted in the ante cubital fossa or the back of hand compared to the upper arm (P=.0337). PIF remains at an unacceptable level in both traditionally inserted and ultrasound-inserted PIVCs.Clinical trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Trials Registry (ANZCTRN12615000588594).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30196798</pmid><doi>10.1017/ice.2018.190</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4935-3256</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-823X
ispartof Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2018-10, Vol.39 (10), p.1216-1221
issn 0899-823X
1559-6834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101919212
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Catheterization, Peripheral - instrumentation
Catheterization, Peripheral - methods
Catheters
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Data collection
Device Removal
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency Service, Hospital
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
Forearm
Gender
Hand
Humans
Infections
Infiltration
Intravenous therapy
Male
Medical instruments
Medical students
Middle Aged
Patients
Phlebitis
Phlebitis - etiology
Phlebotomy
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Survival analysis
Ultrasonic imaging
Variables
title From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20insertion%20to%20removal:%20A%20multicenter%20survival%20analysis%20of%20an%20admitted%20cohort%20with%20peripheral%20intravenous%20catheters%20inserted%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Infection%20control%20and%20hospital%20epidemiology&rft.au=Carr,%20Peter%20J&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1216&rft.epage=1221&rft.pages=1216-1221&rft.issn=0899-823X&rft.eissn=1559-6834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ice.2018.190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2787869088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2787869088&rft_id=info:pmid/30196798&rfr_iscdi=true