Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry
Highly immersive virtual reality (VR) systems have been introduced into the consumer market in recent years. The improved technological capabilities of these systems as well as the combination with biometric sensors, for example electroencephalography (EEG), in a closed-loop hybrid VR-EEG, opens up...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 2018-10, Vol.27 (4), p.610-627 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 627 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 610 |
| container_title | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | KELLMEYER, PHILIPP |
| description | Highly immersive virtual reality (VR) systems have been introduced into the consumer market in recent years. The improved technological capabilities of these systems as well as the combination with biometric sensors, for example electroencephalography (EEG), in a closed-loop hybrid VR-EEG, opens up a range of new potential medical applications. This article first provides an overview of the past and current clinical applications of VR systems in neurology and psychiatry and introduces core concepts in neurophilosophy and VR research (such as agency, trust, presence, and others). Then, important adverse effects of highly immersive VR simulations and the ethical implications of standalone and hybrid VR systems for therapy in neurology and psychiatry are highlighted. These new forms of VR-based therapy may strengthen patients in exercising their autonomy. At the same time, however, these emerging systems present ethical challenges, for example in terms of moral and legal accountability in interactions involving “intelligent” hybrid VR systems. A user-centered approach that is informed by the target patients’ needs and capabilities could help to build beneficial systems for VR therapy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0963180118000129 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101913496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0963180118000129</cupid><sourcerecordid>2101913496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3de792c0588e8c457bac779aa17b8b1c8f7647f98f548054f52d0f612f298c1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlmpemTXIcMn_AUNHpTUqaJltHt9akPfS_N92mguIhvJD3ed8XPgidAr4EDOzqBYskAo7BH4yBiD00BJqIkABl-2jYt8O-P0BHzi09QwiGQzSIMAhOk3iI3h90a6t6UZSV64uSZSDXeTBptvexq7VqXFCZ4K2wTeufnrUsi6YLZgttZd0FxTrYhJTVvNvMPrlOLQrZ2O4YHRhZOn2yqyP0ejOZXd-F08fb--vxNFSUQBNGuWaCKBxzrrmiMcukYkxICSzjGShuWEKZEdzElOOYmpjk2CRADBFcQRaN0MU2t7bVR6tdk64Kp3RZyrWuWpcSr0tARL2PETr_hS6r1q797zYUgdjb9BRsKWUr56w2aW2LlbRdCjjt3ad_3PuZs11ym610_j3xJdsD0S5UrjJb5HP9s_v_2E85qY0f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101215118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</creator><creatorcontrib>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><description>Highly immersive virtual reality (VR) systems have been introduced into the consumer market in recent years. The improved technological capabilities of these systems as well as the combination with biometric sensors, for example electroencephalography (EEG), in a closed-loop hybrid VR-EEG, opens up a range of new potential medical applications. This article first provides an overview of the past and current clinical applications of VR systems in neurology and psychiatry and introduces core concepts in neurophilosophy and VR research (such as agency, trust, presence, and others). Then, important adverse effects of highly immersive VR simulations and the ethical implications of standalone and hybrid VR systems for therapy in neurology and psychiatry are highlighted. These new forms of VR-based therapy may strengthen patients in exercising their autonomy. At the same time, however, these emerging systems present ethical challenges, for example in terms of moral and legal accountability in interactions involving “intelligent” hybrid VR systems. A user-centered approach that is informed by the target patients’ needs and capabilities could help to build beneficial systems for VR therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-1801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0963180118000129</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30198465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Autonomy ; Brain research ; Cognition & reasoning ; Electroencephalography ; Ethical dilemmas ; Ethics ; Intelligence ; Medical research ; Medical technology ; Medical treatment ; Memory ; Morality ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Patients ; Philosophy ; Physiology ; Psychiatry ; Psychotherapy ; Robotics ; Science ; Side effects ; User experience ; Virtual reality</subject><ispartof>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2018-10, Vol.27 (4), p.610-627</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3de792c0588e8c457bac779aa17b8b1c8f7647f98f548054f52d0f612f298c1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3de792c0588e8c457bac779aa17b8b1c8f7647f98f548054f52d0f612f298c1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0963180118000129/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,12827,27847,27905,27906,30980,55609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30198465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><title>Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry</title><title>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</title><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><description>Highly immersive virtual reality (VR) systems have been introduced into the consumer market in recent years. The improved technological capabilities of these systems as well as the combination with biometric sensors, for example electroencephalography (EEG), in a closed-loop hybrid VR-EEG, opens up a range of new potential medical applications. This article first provides an overview of the past and current clinical applications of VR systems in neurology and psychiatry and introduces core concepts in neurophilosophy and VR research (such as agency, trust, presence, and others). Then, important adverse effects of highly immersive VR simulations and the ethical implications of standalone and hybrid VR systems for therapy in neurology and psychiatry are highlighted. These new forms of VR-based therapy may strengthen patients in exercising their autonomy. At the same time, however, these emerging systems present ethical challenges, for example in terms of moral and legal accountability in interactions involving “intelligent” hybrid VR systems. A user-centered approach that is informed by the target patients’ needs and capabilities could help to build beneficial systems for VR therapy.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Ethical dilemmas</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>User experience</subject><subject>Virtual reality</subject><issn>0963-1801</issn><issn>1469-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlmpemTXIcMn_AUNHpTUqaJltHt9akPfS_N92mguIhvJD3ed8XPgidAr4EDOzqBYskAo7BH4yBiD00BJqIkABl-2jYt8O-P0BHzi09QwiGQzSIMAhOk3iI3h90a6t6UZSV64uSZSDXeTBptvexq7VqXFCZ4K2wTeufnrUsi6YLZgttZd0FxTrYhJTVvNvMPrlOLQrZ2O4YHRhZOn2yqyP0ejOZXd-F08fb--vxNFSUQBNGuWaCKBxzrrmiMcukYkxICSzjGShuWEKZEdzElOOYmpjk2CRADBFcQRaN0MU2t7bVR6tdk64Kp3RZyrWuWpcSr0tARL2PETr_hS6r1q797zYUgdjb9BRsKWUr56w2aW2LlbRdCjjt3ad_3PuZs11ym610_j3xJdsD0S5UrjJb5HP9s_v_2E85qY0f</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry</title><author>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-3de792c0588e8c457bac779aa17b8b1c8f7647f98f548054f52d0f612f298c1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Ethical dilemmas</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>User experience</topic><topic>Virtual reality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KELLMEYER, PHILIPP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics</jtitle><addtitle>Camb Q Healthc Ethics</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>610</spage><epage>627</epage><pages>610-627</pages><issn>0963-1801</issn><eissn>1469-2147</eissn><abstract>Highly immersive virtual reality (VR) systems have been introduced into the consumer market in recent years. The improved technological capabilities of these systems as well as the combination with biometric sensors, for example electroencephalography (EEG), in a closed-loop hybrid VR-EEG, opens up a range of new potential medical applications. This article first provides an overview of the past and current clinical applications of VR systems in neurology and psychiatry and introduces core concepts in neurophilosophy and VR research (such as agency, trust, presence, and others). Then, important adverse effects of highly immersive VR simulations and the ethical implications of standalone and hybrid VR systems for therapy in neurology and psychiatry are highlighted. These new forms of VR-based therapy may strengthen patients in exercising their autonomy. At the same time, however, these emerging systems present ethical challenges, for example in terms of moral and legal accountability in interactions involving “intelligent” hybrid VR systems. A user-centered approach that is informed by the target patients’ needs and capabilities could help to build beneficial systems for VR therapy.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30198465</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0963180118000129</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0963-1801 |
| ispartof | Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 2018-10, Vol.27 (4), p.610-627 |
| issn | 0963-1801 1469-2147 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101913496 |
| source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Accountability Autonomy Brain research Cognition & reasoning Electroencephalography Ethical dilemmas Ethics Intelligence Medical research Medical technology Medical treatment Memory Morality Neurology Neurosciences Patients Philosophy Physiology Psychiatry Psychotherapy Robotics Science Side effects User experience Virtual reality |
| title | Neurophilosophical and Ethical Aspects of Virtual Reality Therapy in Neurology and Psychiatry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A41%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neurophilosophical%20and%20Ethical%20Aspects%20of%20Virtual%20Reality%20Therapy%20in%20Neurology%20and%20Psychiatry&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20quarterly%20of%20healthcare%20ethics&rft.au=KELLMEYER,%20PHILIPP&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=610&rft.epage=627&rft.pages=610-627&rft.issn=0963-1801&rft.eissn=1469-2147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0963180118000129&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2101913496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101215118&rft_id=info:pmid/30198465&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0963180118000129&rfr_iscdi=true |