Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration

Silicone is an important material family used for various medical implants. It is biocompatible, but its bioinertness prevents cell attachment, and thus tissue biointegration of silicone implants. This often results in constrictive fibrosis and implant failure. Bioglass 45S5® (BG) could be a suitabl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2019-05, Vol.107 (4), p.1180-1188
Hauptverfasser: Cohrs, Nicholas H, Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin, Mohn, Dirk, Wolint, Petra, Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella, Stark, Wendelin J, Buschmann, Johanna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1188
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1180
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
container_volume 107
creator Cohrs, Nicholas H
Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin
Mohn, Dirk
Wolint, Petra
Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella
Stark, Wendelin J
Buschmann, Johanna
description Silicone is an important material family used for various medical implants. It is biocompatible, but its bioinertness prevents cell attachment, and thus tissue biointegration of silicone implants. This often results in constrictive fibrosis and implant failure. Bioglass 45S5® (BG) could be a suitable material to alter the properties of silicone, render it bioactive and improve tissue integration. Therefore, BG micro- or nanoparticles were blended into medical-grade silicone and 2D as well as 3D structures of the resulting composites were analyzed in ovo by a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The biomechanical properties of the composites were measured and the bioactivity of the composites was verified in simulated body fluid. The bioactivity of BG-containing composites was confirmed visually by the formation of hydroxyapatite through scanning electron microscopy as well as by infrared spectroscopy. BG stiffens as prepared non-porous composites by 13% and 36% for micro- and nanocomposites respectively. In particular, after implantation for 7 days, the Young's modulus had increased significantly from 1.20 ± 0.01 to 1.57 ± 0.03 MPa for microcomposites and 1.44 ± 0.03 to 1.69 ± 0.29 MPa to for nanocpmosites. Still, the materials remain highly elastic and are comparably soft. The incorporation of BG into silicone overcame the bioinertness of the pure polymer. Although the overall tissue integration was weak, it was significantly improved for BG-containing porous silicones (+72% for microcomposites) and even further enhanced for composites containing nanoparticles (+94%). These findings make BG a suitable material to improve silicone implant properties. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1180-1188, 2019.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.b.34211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101271063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2201508913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5d1d854154a4e06bb3740c650e5d61a80d61b91eca8cc5490fcf50e2e6532a503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoVqsn7xLwIkhrJh_b7VGLX6B4UM8hm53VlN1NTXYV_5Q_wl9mWrUHLzPDzMPL8BByAGwMjPHTedGMi7GQHGCD7IBSfCSnOWyu54kYkN0Y5wnOmBLbZCAY5FMAvkP0nS9d5azpnG-pr2h0tbO-RYq1iZ1vMET67roXeu78c1pFKtWD-vqkrrUBTcSYJurfPO1cjD3SwnnXdvgcVpF7ZKsydcT93z4kT5cXj7Pr0e391c3s7HZkhZLdSJVQ5kqCkkYiy4pCTCSzmWKoygxMzlItpoDW5NYqOWWVrdKRY6YEN4qJITn-yV0E_9pj7HTjosW6Ni36PmoODPgEWCYSevQPnfs-tOk7zTkDxZKaJXXyQ9ngYwxY6UVwjQkfGpheetfJuy70ynuiD38z-6LBcs3-iRbf3ox-Rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2201508913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Cohrs, Nicholas H ; Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin ; Mohn, Dirk ; Wolint, Petra ; Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella ; Stark, Wendelin J ; Buschmann, Johanna</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohrs, Nicholas H ; Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin ; Mohn, Dirk ; Wolint, Petra ; Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella ; Stark, Wendelin J ; Buschmann, Johanna</creatorcontrib><description>Silicone is an important material family used for various medical implants. It is biocompatible, but its bioinertness prevents cell attachment, and thus tissue biointegration of silicone implants. This often results in constrictive fibrosis and implant failure. Bioglass 45S5® (BG) could be a suitable material to alter the properties of silicone, render it bioactive and improve tissue integration. Therefore, BG micro- or nanoparticles were blended into medical-grade silicone and 2D as well as 3D structures of the resulting composites were analyzed in ovo by a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The biomechanical properties of the composites were measured and the bioactivity of the composites was verified in simulated body fluid. The bioactivity of BG-containing composites was confirmed visually by the formation of hydroxyapatite through scanning electron microscopy as well as by infrared spectroscopy. BG stiffens as prepared non-porous composites by 13% and 36% for micro- and nanocomposites respectively. In particular, after implantation for 7 days, the Young's modulus had increased significantly from 1.20 ± 0.01 to 1.57 ± 0.03 MPa for microcomposites and 1.44 ± 0.03 to 1.69 ± 0.29 MPa to for nanocpmosites. Still, the materials remain highly elastic and are comparably soft. The incorporation of BG into silicone overcame the bioinertness of the pure polymer. Although the overall tissue integration was weak, it was significantly improved for BG-containing porous silicones (+72% for microcomposites) and even further enhanced for composites containing nanoparticles (+94%). These findings make BG a suitable material to improve silicone implant properties. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1180-1188, 2019.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34211</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30189112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Bioglass ; Biological activity ; Biomechanics ; Biomedical materials ; Body fluids ; Cell adhesion ; Chorioallantoic membrane ; Elastomers ; Fibrosis ; Hydroxyapatite ; Implantation ; In vitro methods and tests ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Materials research ; Materials science ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; Nanocomposites ; Nanoparticles ; Properties (attributes) ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Silicones ; Surgical implants ; Tissues ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2019-05, Vol.107 (4), p.1180-1188</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5d1d854154a4e06bb3740c650e5d61a80d61b91eca8cc5490fcf50e2e6532a503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5d1d854154a4e06bb3740c650e5d61a80d61b91eca8cc5490fcf50e2e6532a503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30189112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohrs, Nicholas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolint, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Wendelin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Johanna</creatorcontrib><title>Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><description>Silicone is an important material family used for various medical implants. It is biocompatible, but its bioinertness prevents cell attachment, and thus tissue biointegration of silicone implants. This often results in constrictive fibrosis and implant failure. Bioglass 45S5® (BG) could be a suitable material to alter the properties of silicone, render it bioactive and improve tissue integration. Therefore, BG micro- or nanoparticles were blended into medical-grade silicone and 2D as well as 3D structures of the resulting composites were analyzed in ovo by a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The biomechanical properties of the composites were measured and the bioactivity of the composites was verified in simulated body fluid. The bioactivity of BG-containing composites was confirmed visually by the formation of hydroxyapatite through scanning electron microscopy as well as by infrared spectroscopy. BG stiffens as prepared non-porous composites by 13% and 36% for micro- and nanocomposites respectively. In particular, after implantation for 7 days, the Young's modulus had increased significantly from 1.20 ± 0.01 to 1.57 ± 0.03 MPa for microcomposites and 1.44 ± 0.03 to 1.69 ± 0.29 MPa to for nanocpmosites. Still, the materials remain highly elastic and are comparably soft. The incorporation of BG into silicone overcame the bioinertness of the pure polymer. Although the overall tissue integration was weak, it was significantly improved for BG-containing porous silicones (+72% for microcomposites) and even further enhanced for composites containing nanoparticles (+94%). These findings make BG a suitable material to improve silicone implant properties. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1180-1188, 2019.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Bioglass</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Body fluids</subject><subject>Cell adhesion</subject><subject>Chorioallantoic membrane</subject><subject>Elastomers</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>In vitro methods and tests</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Materials research</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Silicones</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoVqsn7xLwIkhrJh_b7VGLX6B4UM8hm53VlN1NTXYV_5Q_wl9mWrUHLzPDzMPL8BByAGwMjPHTedGMi7GQHGCD7IBSfCSnOWyu54kYkN0Y5wnOmBLbZCAY5FMAvkP0nS9d5azpnG-pr2h0tbO-RYq1iZ1vMET67roXeu78c1pFKtWD-vqkrrUBTcSYJurfPO1cjD3SwnnXdvgcVpF7ZKsydcT93z4kT5cXj7Pr0e391c3s7HZkhZLdSJVQ5kqCkkYiy4pCTCSzmWKoygxMzlItpoDW5NYqOWWVrdKRY6YEN4qJITn-yV0E_9pj7HTjosW6Ni36PmoODPgEWCYSevQPnfs-tOk7zTkDxZKaJXXyQ9ngYwxY6UVwjQkfGpheetfJuy70ynuiD38z-6LBcs3-iRbf3ox-Rw</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Cohrs, Nicholas H</creator><creator>Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin</creator><creator>Mohn, Dirk</creator><creator>Wolint, Petra</creator><creator>Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella</creator><creator>Stark, Wendelin J</creator><creator>Buschmann, Johanna</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration</title><author>Cohrs, Nicholas H ; Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin ; Mohn, Dirk ; Wolint, Petra ; Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella ; Stark, Wendelin J ; Buschmann, Johanna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5d1d854154a4e06bb3740c650e5d61a80d61b91eca8cc5490fcf50e2e6532a503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Bioglass</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Body fluids</topic><topic>Cell adhesion</topic><topic>Chorioallantoic membrane</topic><topic>Elastomers</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>In vitro methods and tests</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Materials research</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Silicones</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohrs, Nicholas H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohn, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolint, Petra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Wendelin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buschmann, Johanna</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohrs, Nicholas H</au><au>Schulz-Schönhagen, Konstantin</au><au>Mohn, Dirk</au><au>Wolint, Petra</au><au>Meier Bürgisser, Gabriella</au><au>Stark, Wendelin J</au><au>Buschmann, Johanna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater</addtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1180</spage><epage>1188</epage><pages>1180-1188</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Silicone is an important material family used for various medical implants. It is biocompatible, but its bioinertness prevents cell attachment, and thus tissue biointegration of silicone implants. This often results in constrictive fibrosis and implant failure. Bioglass 45S5® (BG) could be a suitable material to alter the properties of silicone, render it bioactive and improve tissue integration. Therefore, BG micro- or nanoparticles were blended into medical-grade silicone and 2D as well as 3D structures of the resulting composites were analyzed in ovo by a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The biomechanical properties of the composites were measured and the bioactivity of the composites was verified in simulated body fluid. The bioactivity of BG-containing composites was confirmed visually by the formation of hydroxyapatite through scanning electron microscopy as well as by infrared spectroscopy. BG stiffens as prepared non-porous composites by 13% and 36% for micro- and nanocomposites respectively. In particular, after implantation for 7 days, the Young's modulus had increased significantly from 1.20 ± 0.01 to 1.57 ± 0.03 MPa for microcomposites and 1.44 ± 0.03 to 1.69 ± 0.29 MPa to for nanocpmosites. Still, the materials remain highly elastic and are comparably soft. The incorporation of BG into silicone overcame the bioinertness of the pure polymer. Although the overall tissue integration was weak, it was significantly improved for BG-containing porous silicones (+72% for microcomposites) and even further enhanced for composites containing nanoparticles (+94%). These findings make BG a suitable material to improve silicone implant properties. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 1180-1188, 2019.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30189112</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.34211</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4973
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2019-05, Vol.107 (4), p.1180-1188
issn 1552-4973
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2101271063
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Biocompatibility
Bioglass
Biological activity
Biomechanics
Biomedical materials
Body fluids
Cell adhesion
Chorioallantoic membrane
Elastomers
Fibrosis
Hydroxyapatite
Implantation
In vitro methods and tests
Infrared spectroscopy
Materials research
Materials science
Mechanical properties
Modulus of elasticity
Nanocomposites
Nanoparticles
Properties (attributes)
Scanning electron microscopy
Silicones
Surgical implants
Tissues
Transplants & implants
title Modification of silicone elastomers with Bioglass 45S5® increases in ovo tissue biointegration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A44%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modification%20of%20silicone%20elastomers%20with%20Bioglass%2045S5%C2%AE%20increases%20in%20ovo%20tissue%20biointegration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Cohrs,%20Nicholas%20H&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1180&rft.epage=1188&rft.pages=1180-1188&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.34211&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2201508913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2201508913&rft_id=info:pmid/30189112&rfr_iscdi=true