Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications
In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | S31 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Gao, Yuan Kennish, Michael J. Flynn, Amanda McGuirk |
description | In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/05-1124.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21006178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40061815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40061815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwBwg5CR6qmaTpx3FZV11Z1gUVj2GaTrXS3dQki-y_t6XizbnMMDzP8DJRdA78GvKC33AVA4jkGvaiIyhkESuVi_1-5gpinqVwGB17_8n7EkIcRa-TsLa--yDXGLZsgrPvtGG31FnfhMZuWLAsfBBb0jd7JOdpx6YWfcCWvWHoFww3FZsHz-brrm0MDpI_jQ5qbD2d_faT6PVu9jJ9iBdP9_PpZBEbmSYQi7RIS1HIREFRViLFukCgROYSUZWmQkoRuUlkVhtUmJfc8JwqlVU19fGlPIkux7uds19b8kGvG2-obXFDduu1AM5TyPIevBpB46z3jmrduWaNbqeB6-Fxmis9PE5Dz6Yj-920tPsf1LPJSnCeQfa8Us9yEC9G8dMH6_7EZMiQg5I_Bnt5vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21006178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><description>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were <4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/05-1124.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; ammonium ; Atmospheric deposition ; Atmospherics ; Brackish ; Coastal water ; Estuaries ; New Jersey coast ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen loading ; Precipitation ; Sea water ; wet and dry atmospheric deposition ; Wet atmospheric deposition</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40061815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennish, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were <4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>ammonium</subject><subject>Atmospheric deposition</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Coastal water</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>New Jersey coast</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen loading</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Sea water</subject><subject>wet and dry atmospheric deposition</subject><subject>Wet atmospheric deposition</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwBwg5CR6qmaTpx3FZV11Z1gUVj2GaTrXS3dQki-y_t6XizbnMMDzP8DJRdA78GvKC33AVA4jkGvaiIyhkESuVi_1-5gpinqVwGB17_8n7EkIcRa-TsLa--yDXGLZsgrPvtGG31FnfhMZuWLAsfBBb0jd7JOdpx6YWfcCWvWHoFww3FZsHz-brrm0MDpI_jQ5qbD2d_faT6PVu9jJ9iBdP9_PpZBEbmSYQi7RIS1HIREFRViLFukCgROYSUZWmQkoRuUlkVhtUmJfc8JwqlVU19fGlPIkux7uds19b8kGvG2-obXFDduu1AM5TyPIevBpB46z3jmrduWaNbqeB6-Fxmis9PE5Dz6Yj-920tPsf1LPJSnCeQfa8Us9yEC9G8dMH6_7EZMiQg5I_Bnt5vw</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Gao, Yuan</creator><creator>Kennish, Michael J.</creator><creator>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><author>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>ammonium</topic><topic>Atmospheric deposition</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Coastal water</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>New Jersey coast</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen loading</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Sea water</topic><topic>wet and dry atmospheric deposition</topic><topic>Wet atmospheric deposition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennish, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yuan</au><au>Kennish, Michael J.</au><au>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>S31</spage><epage>S41</epage><pages>S31-S41</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were <4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/05-1124.1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21006178 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Aerosols ammonium Atmospheric deposition Atmospherics Brackish Coastal water Estuaries New Jersey coast nitrate Nitrates Nitrogen nitrogen loading Precipitation Sea water wet and dry atmospheric deposition Wet atmospheric deposition |
title | Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20Nitrogen%20Deposition%20to%20the%20New%20Jersey%20Coastal%20Waters%20and%20Its%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Gao,%20Yuan&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=S31&rft.epage=S41&rft.pages=S31-S41&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/05-1124.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40061815%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21006178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40061815&rfr_iscdi=true |