Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications

In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Yuan, Kennish, Michael J., Flynn, Amanda McGuirk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S41
container_issue 5
container_start_page S31
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 17
creator Gao, Yuan
Kennish, Michael J.
Flynn, Amanda McGuirk
description In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were
doi_str_mv 10.1890/05-1124.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21006178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40061815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40061815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwBwg5CR6qmaTpx3FZV11Z1gUVj2GaTrXS3dQki-y_t6XizbnMMDzP8DJRdA78GvKC33AVA4jkGvaiIyhkESuVi_1-5gpinqVwGB17_8n7EkIcRa-TsLa--yDXGLZsgrPvtGG31FnfhMZuWLAsfBBb0jd7JOdpx6YWfcCWvWHoFww3FZsHz-brrm0MDpI_jQ5qbD2d_faT6PVu9jJ9iBdP9_PpZBEbmSYQi7RIS1HIREFRViLFukCgROYSUZWmQkoRuUlkVhtUmJfc8JwqlVU19fGlPIkux7uds19b8kGvG2-obXFDduu1AM5TyPIevBpB46z3jmrduWaNbqeB6-Fxmis9PE5Dz6Yj-920tPsf1LPJSnCeQfa8Us9yEC9G8dMH6_7EZMiQg5I_Bnt5vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21006178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><description>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were &lt;4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/05-1124.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; ammonium ; Atmospheric deposition ; Atmospherics ; Brackish ; Coastal water ; Estuaries ; New Jersey coast ; nitrate ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen loading ; Precipitation ; Sea water ; wet and dry atmospheric deposition ; Wet atmospheric deposition</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40061815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40061815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennish, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><title>Ecological applications</title><description>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were &lt;4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>ammonium</subject><subject>Atmospheric deposition</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Coastal water</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>New Jersey coast</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen loading</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Sea water</subject><subject>wet and dry atmospheric deposition</subject><subject>Wet atmospheric deposition</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoso-HnwBwg5CR6qmaTpx3FZV11Z1gUVj2GaTrXS3dQki-y_t6XizbnMMDzP8DJRdA78GvKC33AVA4jkGvaiIyhkESuVi_1-5gpinqVwGB17_8n7EkIcRa-TsLa--yDXGLZsgrPvtGG31FnfhMZuWLAsfBBb0jd7JOdpx6YWfcCWvWHoFww3FZsHz-brrm0MDpI_jQ5qbD2d_faT6PVu9jJ9iBdP9_PpZBEbmSYQi7RIS1HIREFRViLFukCgROYSUZWmQkoRuUlkVhtUmJfc8JwqlVU19fGlPIkux7uds19b8kGvG2-obXFDduu1AM5TyPIevBpB46z3jmrduWaNbqeB6-Fxmis9PE5Dz6Yj-920tPsf1LPJSnCeQfa8Us9yEC9G8dMH6_7EZMiQg5I_Bnt5vw</recordid><startdate>200707</startdate><enddate>200707</enddate><creator>Gao, Yuan</creator><creator>Kennish, Michael J.</creator><creator>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200707</creationdate><title>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</title><author>Gao, Yuan ; Kennish, Michael J. ; Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3641-2696b2934519bd26af9a1e4383aa5bcdae6aa0c437fca5a8b0c08ed57dfe02233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>ammonium</topic><topic>Atmospheric deposition</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Coastal water</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>New Jersey coast</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen loading</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Sea water</topic><topic>wet and dry atmospheric deposition</topic><topic>Wet atmospheric deposition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennish, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yuan</au><au>Kennish, Michael J.</au><au>Flynn, Amanda McGuirk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><date>2007-07</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>S31</spage><epage>S41</epage><pages>S31-S41</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>In situ measurements of atmospheric${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $at Sandy Hook on the northern New Jersey (USA) coast and at Tuckerton on the southern New Jersey coast reveal significant temporal and spatial variations of these inorganic N constituents. The mean concentration of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $in precipitation was higher at Sandy Hook (44.6 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (29.1 micromo1/L). The mean concentration of${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $in precipitation exhibited a similar pattern, being higher at Sandy Hook (26.3 micromo1/L) than at Tuckerton (18.3 micromo1/L). Aerosol${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations at Sandy Hook were also higher than those at Tuckerton. On an annual basis, the total atmospheric deposition of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $was estimated to be 51.1 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 32.9 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. For${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $, the total atmospheric deposition was 32.8 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Sandy Hook and 20.3 mmol.m⁻².yr⁻¹ at Tuckerton. Wet deposition accounted for up to 89% of the total${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $deposition and 76-91% of the total${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $deposition on the New Jersey coast. By comparison,${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $and${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations are relatively low in estuarine waters of New Jersey. The annual mean${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $concentrations recorded in surface waters of the Mullica River-Great Bay Estuary near the Tuckerton atmospheric site during the 2002-2004 period were as follows: 12.1 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 4.5 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 2.5 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 1.2 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. The annual mean${\rm{NH}}_4^ + $concentrations in these waters were as follows: 1.5 micromo1/L for the upper estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the mid-estuary, 3.8 micromo1/L for the lower estuary, and 2.4 micromo1/L for the bay inlet area. In the Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary, the mean concentrations of${\rm{NO}}_3^ - $plus${\rm{NO}}_2^ - $were &lt;4 micromo1/L. In this system, atmospheric deposition accounts for ~39% of the total N load. These results suggest that atmospheric deposition appears to be an important pathway of new N inputs to New Jersey coastal waters and a potentially significant N enrichment source for biotic production.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/05-1124.1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2007-07, Vol.17 (5), p.S31-S41
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21006178
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Aerosols
ammonium
Atmospheric deposition
Atmospherics
Brackish
Coastal water
Estuaries
New Jersey coast
nitrate
Nitrates
Nitrogen
nitrogen loading
Precipitation
Sea water
wet and dry atmospheric deposition
Wet atmospheric deposition
title Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the New Jersey Coastal Waters and Its Implications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A01%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20Nitrogen%20Deposition%20to%20the%20New%20Jersey%20Coastal%20Waters%20and%20Its%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Gao,%20Yuan&rft.date=2007-07&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=S31&rft.epage=S41&rft.pages=S31-S41&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/05-1124.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40061815%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21006178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40061815&rfr_iscdi=true