Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients

Objective Perineural injection with 5% dextrose (D5W) is a novel strategy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In contrast, perineural injection with corticosteroid has been used for decades for treating CTS, but possible neurotoxicity has been a major concern. No studies investigating...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of neurology 2018-10, Vol.84 (4), p.601-610
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Yung‐Tsan, Ke, Ming‐Jen, Ho, Tsung‐Yen, Li, Tsung‐Ying, Shen, Yu‐Ping, Chen, Liang‐Cheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 610
container_issue 4
container_start_page 601
container_title Annals of neurology
container_volume 84
creator Wu, Yung‐Tsan
Ke, Ming‐Jen
Ho, Tsung‐Yen
Li, Tsung‐Ying
Shen, Yu‐Ping
Chen, Liang‐Cheng
description Objective Perineural injection with 5% dextrose (D5W) is a novel strategy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In contrast, perineural injection with corticosteroid has been used for decades for treating CTS, but possible neurotoxicity has been a major concern. No studies investigating the comparative effects have been published so far. The authors performed a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, head‐to‐head comparative trial to compare these two approaches for patients having mild‐to‐moderate CTS. Methods Fifty‐four participants with mild‐to‐moderate CTS were randomly divided into dextrose and steroid groups. The patients were administered 1 session of perineural injection with 5ml D5W (dextrose group) or 3ml triamcinolone acetonide mixed with 2ml normal saline (steroid group), under ultrasound guidance. A visual analog scale was assigned to assess the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, cross‐sectional area of the median nerve, and electrophysiological studies. The assessment was performed prior to injection and 1, 3, 4, and 6 months postinjection. Results All patients (27 wrists per group) completed the study. Compared with the steroid group, the dextrose group exhibited a significant reduction in pain and disability through the 4th to the 6th month (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ana.25332
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2100330465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2100330465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-1365b787df007f6c8a656896d67ce5026c150304220f0e8b6f4ee11ca3c6b45f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFqFTEUQINU7LO68Ackm0JdTHuTTDLzlo-iVigKoushk9xASiZ5JjOtT7roJ_iNfolpX3XXTS4kJwfuIeQNg1MGwM901KdcCsGfkRWTgjU9b9cHZAVCtY1koj0kL0u5AoC1YvCCHApgfSd5uyK3X3W0afK_0FKbljHgn7vfY_DR1gtTpzc60Dn7eiZH5TG1-HPOqSC9xlyW8vA2GR9TSBGpj1doZp8idSlTo_P2_vsSIwZadtHmNCHd6tljnMsr8tzpUPD14zwi3z-8_3Z-0Vx--fjpfHPZGMElb5hQcuz6zjqAzinTayVVv1ZWdQYlcGWYBAEt5-AA-1G5FpExo4VRYyudOCIne-82px8LlnmYfDEYgo6YljLwWlFUgZIVfbdHTd2xZHTDNvtJ593AYLiPPdTYw0Psyr591C7jhPY_-a9uBc72wI0PuHvaNGw-b_bKv1tYixc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2100330465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wu, Yung‐Tsan ; Ke, Ming‐Jen ; Ho, Tsung‐Yen ; Li, Tsung‐Ying ; Shen, Yu‐Ping ; Chen, Liang‐Cheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yung‐Tsan ; Ke, Ming‐Jen ; Ho, Tsung‐Yen ; Li, Tsung‐Ying ; Shen, Yu‐Ping ; Chen, Liang‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Perineural injection with 5% dextrose (D5W) is a novel strategy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In contrast, perineural injection with corticosteroid has been used for decades for treating CTS, but possible neurotoxicity has been a major concern. No studies investigating the comparative effects have been published so far. The authors performed a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, head‐to‐head comparative trial to compare these two approaches for patients having mild‐to‐moderate CTS. Methods Fifty‐four participants with mild‐to‐moderate CTS were randomly divided into dextrose and steroid groups. The patients were administered 1 session of perineural injection with 5ml D5W (dextrose group) or 3ml triamcinolone acetonide mixed with 2ml normal saline (steroid group), under ultrasound guidance. A visual analog scale was assigned to assess the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, cross‐sectional area of the median nerve, and electrophysiological studies. The assessment was performed prior to injection and 1, 3, 4, and 6 months postinjection. Results All patients (27 wrists per group) completed the study. Compared with the steroid group, the dextrose group exhibited a significant reduction in pain and disability through the 4th to the 6th month (p &lt; 0.01). Interpretation Our study demonstrates that perineural injection of D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild‐to‐moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. Ann Neurol 2018;84:601–610</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-5134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ana.25332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30187524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Annals of neurology, 2018-10, Vol.84 (4), p.601-610</ispartof><rights>2018 American Neurological Association</rights><rights>2018 American Neurological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-1365b787df007f6c8a656896d67ce5026c150304220f0e8b6f4ee11ca3c6b45f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-1365b787df007f6c8a656896d67ce5026c150304220f0e8b6f4ee11ca3c6b45f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fana.25332$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fana.25332$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30187524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yung‐Tsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Ming‐Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Tsung‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tsung‐Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yu‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liang‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><title>Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients</title><title>Annals of neurology</title><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><description>Objective Perineural injection with 5% dextrose (D5W) is a novel strategy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In contrast, perineural injection with corticosteroid has been used for decades for treating CTS, but possible neurotoxicity has been a major concern. No studies investigating the comparative effects have been published so far. The authors performed a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, head‐to‐head comparative trial to compare these two approaches for patients having mild‐to‐moderate CTS. Methods Fifty‐four participants with mild‐to‐moderate CTS were randomly divided into dextrose and steroid groups. The patients were administered 1 session of perineural injection with 5ml D5W (dextrose group) or 3ml triamcinolone acetonide mixed with 2ml normal saline (steroid group), under ultrasound guidance. A visual analog scale was assigned to assess the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, cross‐sectional area of the median nerve, and electrophysiological studies. The assessment was performed prior to injection and 1, 3, 4, and 6 months postinjection. Results All patients (27 wrists per group) completed the study. Compared with the steroid group, the dextrose group exhibited a significant reduction in pain and disability through the 4th to the 6th month (p &lt; 0.01). Interpretation Our study demonstrates that perineural injection of D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild‐to‐moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. Ann Neurol 2018;84:601–610</description><issn>0364-5134</issn><issn>1531-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFqFTEUQINU7LO68Ackm0JdTHuTTDLzlo-iVigKoushk9xASiZ5JjOtT7roJ_iNfolpX3XXTS4kJwfuIeQNg1MGwM901KdcCsGfkRWTgjU9b9cHZAVCtY1koj0kL0u5AoC1YvCCHApgfSd5uyK3X3W0afK_0FKbljHgn7vfY_DR1gtTpzc60Dn7eiZH5TG1-HPOqSC9xlyW8vA2GR9TSBGpj1doZp8idSlTo_P2_vsSIwZadtHmNCHd6tljnMsr8tzpUPD14zwi3z-8_3Z-0Vx--fjpfHPZGMElb5hQcuz6zjqAzinTayVVv1ZWdQYlcGWYBAEt5-AA-1G5FpExo4VRYyudOCIne-82px8LlnmYfDEYgo6YljLwWlFUgZIVfbdHTd2xZHTDNvtJ593AYLiPPdTYw0Psyr591C7jhPY_-a9uBc72wI0PuHvaNGw-b_bKv1tYixc</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Wu, Yung‐Tsan</creator><creator>Ke, Ming‐Jen</creator><creator>Ho, Tsung‐Yen</creator><creator>Li, Tsung‐Ying</creator><creator>Shen, Yu‐Ping</creator><creator>Chen, Liang‐Cheng</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients</title><author>Wu, Yung‐Tsan ; Ke, Ming‐Jen ; Ho, Tsung‐Yen ; Li, Tsung‐Ying ; Shen, Yu‐Ping ; Chen, Liang‐Cheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3252-1365b787df007f6c8a656896d67ce5026c150304220f0e8b6f4ee11ca3c6b45f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yung‐Tsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Ming‐Jen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Tsung‐Yen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Tsung‐Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yu‐Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Liang‐Cheng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Yung‐Tsan</au><au>Ke, Ming‐Jen</au><au>Ho, Tsung‐Yen</au><au>Li, Tsung‐Ying</au><au>Shen, Yu‐Ping</au><au>Chen, Liang‐Cheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Neurol</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>610</epage><pages>601-610</pages><issn>0364-5134</issn><eissn>1531-8249</eissn><abstract>Objective Perineural injection with 5% dextrose (D5W) is a novel strategy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In contrast, perineural injection with corticosteroid has been used for decades for treating CTS, but possible neurotoxicity has been a major concern. No studies investigating the comparative effects have been published so far. The authors performed a prospective, randomized, double‐blinded, head‐to‐head comparative trial to compare these two approaches for patients having mild‐to‐moderate CTS. Methods Fifty‐four participants with mild‐to‐moderate CTS were randomly divided into dextrose and steroid groups. The patients were administered 1 session of perineural injection with 5ml D5W (dextrose group) or 3ml triamcinolone acetonide mixed with 2ml normal saline (steroid group), under ultrasound guidance. A visual analog scale was assigned to assess the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, cross‐sectional area of the median nerve, and electrophysiological studies. The assessment was performed prior to injection and 1, 3, 4, and 6 months postinjection. Results All patients (27 wrists per group) completed the study. Compared with the steroid group, the dextrose group exhibited a significant reduction in pain and disability through the 4th to the 6th month (p &lt; 0.01). Interpretation Our study demonstrates that perineural injection of D5W is more beneficial than that of corticosteroid in patients with mild‐to‐moderate CTS at 4 to 6 months postinjection. Ann Neurol 2018;84:601–610</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>30187524</pmid><doi>10.1002/ana.25332</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-5134
ispartof Annals of neurology, 2018-10, Vol.84 (4), p.601-610
issn 0364-5134
1531-8249
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2100330465
source Wiley Journals
title Randomized double‐blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Randomized%20double%E2%80%90blinded%20clinical%20trial%20of%205%25%20dextrose%20versus%20triamcinolone%20injection%20for%20carpal%20tunnel%20syndrome%20patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Wu,%20Yung%E2%80%90Tsan&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=610&rft.pages=601-610&rft.issn=0364-5134&rft.eissn=1531-8249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ana.25332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2100330465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2100330465&rft_id=info:pmid/30187524&rfr_iscdi=true