Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats

Objective To document the distribution of ureteral stones in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Seventy‐eight cats. Methods Abdominal radiographs with ureteral stones were reviewed. The location of stones was categorized as proximal ureter (PU), midureter (MU), or ureterovesicular...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary surgery 2018-10, Vol.47 (7), p.895-901
Hauptverfasser: Nesser, Valerie E., Reetz, Jennifer A., Clarke, Dana L., Aronson, Lillian R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 901
container_issue 7
container_start_page 895
container_title Veterinary surgery
container_volume 47
creator Nesser, Valerie E.
Reetz, Jennifer A.
Clarke, Dana L.
Aronson, Lillian R.
description Objective To document the distribution of ureteral stones in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Seventy‐eight cats. Methods Abdominal radiographs with ureteral stones were reviewed. The location of stones was categorized as proximal ureter (PU), midureter (MU), or ureterovesicular junction (UVJ). The number, size, and location of stones were recorded by using the kidneys and vertebral bodies as landmarks. Stone location in cats with 1 versus multiple stones was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the incidence of ureteral stone location. Results Among cats with a single stone (44%, 34/78), 44% (15/34) had a stone in the PU, 41% (14/34) had a stone in the MU, and 15% (5/34) had a stone at the UVJ. When multiple stones were present, 61% (27/44) of cats had at least 1 stone located in the PU, 70% (31/44) had at least 1 stone located in the MU, and 34% (15/44) had at least 1 stone located at the UVJ. The L4 vertebral body most commonly marked stone location in cats with 1 stone and the most distal stone in cats with multiple stones. Stones located at the UVJ site were more common in male (37%) than in female (12%) cats (P = 0.004). Larger stone size was associated with a more proximal location (P = 0.04). Conclusion Ureteral stones were more commonly located in the PU and the MU than in the UVJ. UVJ stones were more common in male than in female cats, and larger stones had a more proximal location. Clinical significance This study enhances our understanding of feline ureteral stone location and identifies a correlation between stone location and stone size.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vsu.12934
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2099887475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116800345</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-1ccc6340ae43291189d070cc63863753abeb47cabc265bf0c56071847ec9eb3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUgIMobk4P_gNS8KKHbi9N2iRHGfMHDAR14i2kaaoZXTOTVtl_b2enB8F3efD4-Hh8CJ1iGONuJh-hHeNEELqHhjglSSxSeNlHQ8AZjgkVYoCOQlgCgKCUHKIBAcwhyfgQsQdVWPfq1frN6qiwofE2bxvr6siVUetNY7yqotC42oTI1hHjkVZNOEYHpaqCOdntEVpcz56mt_H8_uZuejWPNcWCxlhrnREKylCSCIy5KIDB9sYzwlKicpNTplWukyzNS9BpBgxzyowWJieajNBF7117996a0MiVDdpUlaqNa4NMQAjOGe1cI3T-B1261tfddzLBOOMAhG6py57S3oXgTSnX3q6U30gMcltTdjXld82OPdsZ23xlil_yJ18HTHrg01Zm879JPj8ueuUXnCl8mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116800345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Nesser, Valerie E. ; Reetz, Jennifer A. ; Clarke, Dana L. ; Aronson, Lillian R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nesser, Valerie E. ; Reetz, Jennifer A. ; Clarke, Dana L. ; Aronson, Lillian R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To document the distribution of ureteral stones in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Seventy‐eight cats. Methods Abdominal radiographs with ureteral stones were reviewed. The location of stones was categorized as proximal ureter (PU), midureter (MU), or ureterovesicular junction (UVJ). The number, size, and location of stones were recorded by using the kidneys and vertebral bodies as landmarks. Stone location in cats with 1 versus multiple stones was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the incidence of ureteral stone location. Results Among cats with a single stone (44%, 34/78), 44% (15/34) had a stone in the PU, 41% (14/34) had a stone in the MU, and 15% (5/34) had a stone at the UVJ. When multiple stones were present, 61% (27/44) of cats had at least 1 stone located in the PU, 70% (31/44) had at least 1 stone located in the MU, and 34% (15/44) had at least 1 stone located at the UVJ. The L4 vertebral body most commonly marked stone location in cats with 1 stone and the most distal stone in cats with multiple stones. Stones located at the UVJ site were more common in male (37%) than in female (12%) cats (P = 0.004). Larger stone size was associated with a more proximal location (P = 0.04). Conclusion Ureteral stones were more commonly located in the PU and the MU than in the UVJ. UVJ stones were more common in male than in female cats, and larger stones had a more proximal location. Clinical significance This study enhances our understanding of feline ureteral stone location and identifies a correlation between stone location and stone size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30180268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cat Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Cat Diseases - pathology ; Cats ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney ; Kidneys ; Lithotripsy ; Male ; Radiographs ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Stone ; Ureter ; Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Ureteral Calculi - veterinary ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2018-10, Vol.47 (7), p.895-901</ispartof><rights>2018 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><rights>2018 The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-1ccc6340ae43291189d070cc63863753abeb47cabc265bf0c56071847ec9eb3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-1ccc6340ae43291189d070cc63863753abeb47cabc265bf0c56071847ec9eb3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvsu.12934$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvsu.12934$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30180268$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nesser, Valerie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reetz, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, Lillian R.</creatorcontrib><title>Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><description>Objective To document the distribution of ureteral stones in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Seventy‐eight cats. Methods Abdominal radiographs with ureteral stones were reviewed. The location of stones was categorized as proximal ureter (PU), midureter (MU), or ureterovesicular junction (UVJ). The number, size, and location of stones were recorded by using the kidneys and vertebral bodies as landmarks. Stone location in cats with 1 versus multiple stones was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the incidence of ureteral stone location. Results Among cats with a single stone (44%, 34/78), 44% (15/34) had a stone in the PU, 41% (14/34) had a stone in the MU, and 15% (5/34) had a stone at the UVJ. When multiple stones were present, 61% (27/44) of cats had at least 1 stone located in the PU, 70% (31/44) had at least 1 stone located in the MU, and 34% (15/44) had at least 1 stone located at the UVJ. The L4 vertebral body most commonly marked stone location in cats with 1 stone and the most distal stone in cats with multiple stones. Stones located at the UVJ site were more common in male (37%) than in female (12%) cats (P = 0.004). Larger stone size was associated with a more proximal location (P = 0.04). Conclusion Ureteral stones were more commonly located in the PU and the MU than in the UVJ. UVJ stones were more common in male than in female cats, and larger stones had a more proximal location. Clinical significance This study enhances our understanding of feline ureteral stone location and identifies a correlation between stone location and stone size.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Radiographs</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Ureter</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ureteral Calculi - veterinary</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUgIMobk4P_gNS8KKHbi9N2iRHGfMHDAR14i2kaaoZXTOTVtl_b2enB8F3efD4-Hh8CJ1iGONuJh-hHeNEELqHhjglSSxSeNlHQ8AZjgkVYoCOQlgCgKCUHKIBAcwhyfgQsQdVWPfq1frN6qiwofE2bxvr6siVUetNY7yqotC42oTI1hHjkVZNOEYHpaqCOdntEVpcz56mt_H8_uZuejWPNcWCxlhrnREKylCSCIy5KIDB9sYzwlKicpNTplWukyzNS9BpBgxzyowWJieajNBF7117996a0MiVDdpUlaqNa4NMQAjOGe1cI3T-B1261tfddzLBOOMAhG6py57S3oXgTSnX3q6U30gMcltTdjXld82OPdsZ23xlil_yJ18HTHrg01Zm879JPj8ueuUXnCl8mw</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Nesser, Valerie E.</creator><creator>Reetz, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Clarke, Dana L.</creator><creator>Aronson, Lillian R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats</title><author>Nesser, Valerie E. ; Reetz, Jennifer A. ; Clarke, Dana L. ; Aronson, Lillian R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-1ccc6340ae43291189d070cc63863753abeb47cabc265bf0c56071847ec9eb3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Radiographs</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Ureter</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ureteral Calculi - veterinary</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nesser, Valerie E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reetz, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aronson, Lillian R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nesser, Valerie E.</au><au>Reetz, Jennifer A.</au><au>Clarke, Dana L.</au><au>Aronson, Lillian R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>901</epage><pages>895-901</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective To document the distribution of ureteral stones in cats. Study design Retrospective case series. Animals Seventy‐eight cats. Methods Abdominal radiographs with ureteral stones were reviewed. The location of stones was categorized as proximal ureter (PU), midureter (MU), or ureterovesicular junction (UVJ). The number, size, and location of stones were recorded by using the kidneys and vertebral bodies as landmarks. Stone location in cats with 1 versus multiple stones was assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the incidence of ureteral stone location. Results Among cats with a single stone (44%, 34/78), 44% (15/34) had a stone in the PU, 41% (14/34) had a stone in the MU, and 15% (5/34) had a stone at the UVJ. When multiple stones were present, 61% (27/44) of cats had at least 1 stone located in the PU, 70% (31/44) had at least 1 stone located in the MU, and 34% (15/44) had at least 1 stone located at the UVJ. The L4 vertebral body most commonly marked stone location in cats with 1 stone and the most distal stone in cats with multiple stones. Stones located at the UVJ site were more common in male (37%) than in female (12%) cats (P = 0.004). Larger stone size was associated with a more proximal location (P = 0.04). Conclusion Ureteral stones were more commonly located in the PU and the MU than in the UVJ. UVJ stones were more common in male than in female cats, and larger stones had a more proximal location. Clinical significance This study enhances our understanding of feline ureteral stone location and identifies a correlation between stone location and stone size.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30180268</pmid><doi>10.1111/vsu.12934</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-3499
ispartof Veterinary surgery, 2018-10, Vol.47 (7), p.895-901
issn 0161-3499
1532-950X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2099887475
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
Cat Diseases - diagnostic imaging
Cat Diseases - pathology
Cats
Female
Humans
Kidney
Kidneys
Lithotripsy
Male
Radiographs
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Stone
Ureter
Ureteral Calculi - diagnostic imaging
Ureteral Calculi - veterinary
Vertebrae
title Radiographic distribution of ureteral stones in 78 cats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A17%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiographic%20distribution%20of%20ureteral%20stones%20in%2078%20cats&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Nesser,%20Valerie%20E.&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=901&rft.pages=895-901&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vsu.12934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2116800345%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116800345&rft_id=info:pmid/30180268&rfr_iscdi=true